PDA

View Full Version : lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl


Harut82
08-17-2004, 10:45 AM
Who do you think will win? I was surprised by the resultshttp://socalrsxforums.com/forums/images/smilies/eek_color.gif

Save target as (http://www.norcalevo.net/video/motegibattle.wmv)

steelers10
08-17-2004, 11:21 AM
None of the above. Ford GT. :D

winoman
08-17-2004, 02:31 PM
"win" in what race - straight line acceleration? To what distance?

Ferrari Enzo is generally the fastest I think, followed by M3 GTR (did you mean GTR or CSL? CSL is fast but special edition GTR is the screamer), then Lambo (which one BTW?), (new?) NSX and Porsche turbo (unless its the GTR...then it might rank #2 or #3)...need to specify better however...

winoman
08-17-2004, 02:35 PM
Ford GT is not as quick as the Enzo, the M3 GTR, or the (various) GT series Porsches (very close though)...and runs about similar tie to the Lambos...and a bit faster then the current NSX (don't know about the nw one comming out) and faster then the standard Porsche 911s...

Stark Evade
08-17-2004, 02:44 PM
Nothing is as quick as the Enzo unless it's modified (and even then I'm sure it will suffer in other aspects). Its 0-60 is 3.3. It's 0-30 is 1.3. It does 1.05g on a 300ft s.p. It's quarter mile is 11.2. It's top speed is 218. It does 70-0 in 151ft and 60-0 in 109. That car is tough to beat.

Oh, and it's supposed to drive like a dream and is supposed to be quiter in the cabin than would be expected.

Funny thing though: it has no stereo and no power door locks. It's "in the business of driving."

winoman
08-17-2004, 03:53 PM
oops - just noticed the vid - very nice BTW. This video has been discussed quite a bit at many of the performance web sites - some seem to think that the NSX driver was the better driver and this accounts for its placement. I have no clue really. I've driven and raced against NSXs (in my Supercharged MR2) - and they are very fast and have exceptional road holding...still much of racing is driver skill and some is just luck and circumstance. They are all fast cars - the lambos are awesome - and to some degree I think they and the NSX are more "pure" racers then the other cars. All are nice cars...and yeah - Enzo is faster then all of them...

gevo
08-17-2004, 04:03 PM
Nothing is as quick as the Enzo unless it's modified (and even then I'm sure it will suffer in other aspects). Its 0-60 is 3.3. It's 0-30 is 1.3. It does 1.05g on a 300ft s.p. It's quarter mile is 11.2. It's top speed is 218. It does 70-0 in 151ft and 60-0 in 109. That car is tough to beat.

Oh, and it's supposed to drive like a dream and is supposed to be quiter in the cabin than would be expected.

Funny thing though: it has no stereo and no power door locks. It's "in the business of driving."
Ford GT 0-60 sis 3.4,,, DANG CLOSE!!!

winoman
08-17-2004, 04:43 PM
Ford GT 0-60 sis 3.4,,, DANG CLOSE!!!

Enzo is generally showing a full 1 sec faster in the 1/4 and at least a sec quicker to 100....ut yeah its quite fast as well...would love to be able to drive one...

gevo
08-17-2004, 04:57 PM
In its price range, GT is one hell of a performance vehicle.. Motor Trend ran it against the lambo murcielago, porcshe 911 turbo and.. one more i forgot... the GT beat the other three in all aspects, including the slolom.. one of the drivers for that comparison test came to our store with a motor trend t-shirt, and when i found out he was a part of motor trend, we had a 40 minute talk. HAHA.. as other customers were waiting to be helped.. lol.. but yeah.. there are faster cars (stock) than the GT, but its a beautiful machine :)