Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

The Rise And Fall Of Samvel Babayan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Rise And Fall Of Samvel Babayan

    THE RISE AND FALL OF SAMVEL BABAYAN

    Armenian News Network / Groong
    October 6, 2004


    SUMMARY

    On September 18, 2004, former Defense Minister of Nagorno Karabakh
    Samvel Babayan was released from maximum-security prison in Shushi
    after being pardoned by the person whom he had been convicted of
    trying to assassinate in March 2000, Nagorno Karabakh President Arkady
    Ghukasyan. Samvel Babayan had spent a total of 55 months in detention,
    having been sentenced to 14 years during a trial in Stepanakert in
    February 2001. The release of the former military leader and acclaimed
    hero of the Artsakh war Samvel Babayan was not given an official
    explanation. Unofficial sources, however, report that Mr. Babayan
    suffers from a variety of serious illnesses difficult to treat in
    prison conditions. While coming against the backdrop of politically
    sensitive developments in Artsakh, his amnesty does appear to have
    been an act of clemency.

    Despite the deliberately routine manner of the announcement of the
    former general's release, - which came in the form of a regular notice
    of a list of pardoned convicts by the Office of the President of the
    Nagorno Karabakh Republic on September 17, - the enormity of the news
    ensured its rapid delivery through the Armenian media and political
    world, as well as equally rapid appearance of several conspiracy
    theories connecting the timing of the release to either internal or
    external political factors in Armenia and Artsakh. Despite his fall
    from grace and term in prison, Samvel Babayan's past achievements and
    notoriety succeeded in keeping his memory alive all these years. The
    pardon granted to the former general reminded the Armenians of both
    the heroism of the liberation movement in Artsakh and the ignominy of
    abuse of power and corruption in Armenia and Artsakh.


    BACKGROUND ON SAMVEL BABAYAN

    The 38-year old former holder of such titles as Commander of
    Self-Defense Forces of Nagorno Karabakh, Minister of Defense,
    Lieutenant General Samvel Babayan rose to prominence during the
    military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, in 1991-1994. The
    struggle for self-government of Artsakh, which rekindled a national
    revival in Armenia in 1988 totally uprooted the political environment,
    leading to a complete change of regime and elites in Armenia, and by
    extension, Artsakh. Among the former Soviet states, only the Baltic
    States, Armenia and Artsakh, and since 2004, Georgia can boast of
    having completely rid themselves of Communist apparatchiks in
    power. The anti-Communist change of elites has injected new blood and
    a new set of characters into the political systems of these countries,
    some good, some bad, and some worse. Instability of the governments in
    Latvia and Estonia, the recent impeachment of the Lithuanian
    President, the deep-rooted corruption in Armenia and Georgia are all
    at least partial functions of the inexperience and arrogance of the
    new rulers. It is in this context that Babayan's meteoric rise and
    fall should be considered.


    WARTIME LEADERSHIP

    The challenges facing Artsakh in 1991 - 1994, as the Soviet Union
    collapsed and Azerbaijan decided to solve the Nagorno Karabakh
    conflict militarily, were momentous: forging a unified army and chain
    of command out of dozens of military units to repulse the Azeri
    attacks; securing a land link to Armenia which, due to difficulties of
    terrain and lack of air force and transport resources, was vitally
    needed to break the blockade; and establishing a stable administration.
    That Artsakh Armenians accomplished all of the above and captured six
    Azeri regions in the vicinity of Karabakh by the time the cease-fire
    was signed in May 1994 is testimony to their perseverance and the good
    fortunes of having a military opponent that had incompetent commanders,
    unmotivated soldiers, and an inadequate and unprepared political
    leadership.

    Leadership was one area in which Karabakh Armenians did well in the
    time of war. Samvel Babayan, whose civilian occupation before 1988 had
    been as a car mechanic barely out of high school and military service
    in the Soviet Army, did particularly well. Having joined a
    paramilitary unit before the full-scale war broke out in 1991, he
    quickly gained in stature, rising to command his own unit and leading
    it ably and valiantly. Babayan was one of the commanders participating
    in the capture of the fortress town of Shushi in May 1992, which was a
    benchmark in the conflict. As unified military command began to be
    established in Nagorno Karabakh in 1992 - 1993, Babayan rose to the
    top, becoming the Commander of Self-Defense Forces in 1993, after his
    predecessor Serge Sargsian left to become Armenia's Defense Minister.
    In May 1994, Babayan in his capacity as Commander of Self-Defense
    Forces co-signed the Moscow cease-fire agreement between Armenia,
    Azerbaijan, and Nagorno Karabakh. Incidentally, his signature on that
    agreement marks an implicit recognition of Karabakh's independent
    status and came to be regretted and conveniently forgotten by
    Azerbaijan.


    FROM WARLORD TO STRONGMAN

    After the ceasefire, Karabakh moved slowly towards demilitarization.
    In December 1994, Robert Kocharian was elected President of Karabakh,
    while Babayan retained his control of the armed forces as Defense
    Minister and Self-Defense Forces Commander. With Karabakh on war
    footing, the Commander had considerable power and autonomy, with
    little oversight from the civilian authorities. Rather, a tacit system
    of checks and balances was maintained, just like in Armenia. As long
    as Robert Kocharian was in power in Karabakh, Babayan was under
    control, although he appeared to use his position to acquire land,
    enterprises, tax and customs privileges for himself and his cronies.
    Once Kocharian left to become Prime Minister of Armenia at the request
    of then President Levon Ter-Petrossian in March 1997, Samvel Babayan
    began to assert his influence over the civilian government in
    Stepanakert in a more overt fashion, again evidently abusing his
    office for personal aggrandizement.

    For the time being, he was allowed to carry on his activities
    unchecked. Reeling from the fallout from the controversial
    re-election of September 1996, the administration of President
    Ter-Petrossian was too weak domestically to try to intervene in
    Karabakh to curb Babayan's powers. Meanwhile, President Ter-Petrossian
    attempted to regain his international and domestic legitimacy by
    aggressively championing the two proposals put forward by the newly
    reinvigorated Minsk Group in summer 1997. Opposed to the plan, but
    loath to openly display disloyalty to President Ter-Petrossian,
    Armenia's other top leaders - Defense Minister Vazgen Sargsian, Prime
    Minister Robert Kocharian, and National Security and Interior Minister
    Serge Sargsian - urged Samvel Babayan to challenge Ter-Petrossian's
    inner circle. In the famous joint session of National Security
    Councils of Armenia and Artsakh in January 1998, it was Babayan who
    was most vociferous in his opposition to Ter-Petrossian, who
    eventually resigned and was replaced by Robert Kocharian.

    Nevertheless, Babayan's machinations proved too embarrassing and
    irritating for the government in both Karabakh and Armenia to take.
    Even as the new government of Robert Kocharian publicly took on
    corruption and tax and customs privileges enjoyed by Ter-Petrossian
    cronies, it quickly emerged in the Armenian press that companies
    controlled by Samvel Babayan had become leading importers of gasoline
    and tobacco products in Armenia and that he used Karabakh Army
    military trucks to transport the cargo. Babayan continued to meddle in
    the government affairs in Karabakh, forcing then Prime Minister
    Leonard Petrossian to resign in June 1998. Next, he recruited two
    Armenian political parties, lavishly funding their parliamentary
    campaigns in Armenia in May 1999 and securing third place in
    parliament for their alliance, "Law and Unity." Such open display of
    insubordination had to be addressed, and Armenia's new Prime Minister
    Vazgen Sargsian and President Kocharian joined forces to restrain
    Babayan's influence. A series of government reshuffles in Karabakh
    began to diminish his powers, and he lost the Defense Ministry
    portfolio in June 1999.
    Անտարբեր Մի Եղիր Հայ Ազգի Համար, Վերկաց Գերեզմանից ԱՆԴՐԱՆԻԿ ՓԱ ՇԱ

  • #2
    AN END TO A CAREER

    While the tragedy of October 27 and the subsequent chaos in Armenian
    politics intervened, by December 1999 Babayan was forced to relinquish
    his position as the Self-Defense Forces Commander. Kocharian's
    precarious position in post-October 27 political environment did not
    allow him to tackle the Babayan issue directly, leaving it to the
    government in Karabakh under President Arkady Ghukasyan and the new
    Karabakh Army leadership. Apparently, Babayan decided to strike
    first, launching an assassination attempt against Ghukasyan on March
    22, 2000, which left Ghukasyan seriously wounded but alive. The
    shoddily prepared and executed assassination attempt displayed the
    toll the government's efforts had already taken on his organization.
    At any rate, it was nothing more than an act of desperation on his
    part; it is difficult to imagine any benefit Ghukasyan's assassination
    might have given him.

    Having played his final trump card, Babayan gave the pretext for the
    Karabakh authorities to carry out an efficient and ruthless campaign
    to dismantle his organization, by detaining, removing from office, or
    pettily harassing hundreds of his loyalists and family members,
    closing down or nationalizing his enterprises, and confiscating his
    real estate. The government press printed a disturbingly long list of
    cars, houses, and companies amassed by Samvel Babayan and his brother
    Karen, whom he had elected as Mayor of Stepanakert. The official
    investigation, accompanied by torture and beatings, and the subsequent
    trial were conducted in the best of post-Soviet traditions, i.e.
    without regard to credibility of charges, testimonies, or indictment,
    or for the public opinion, which at any rate was mostly glad to see an
    obviously corrupt individual removed from power, even if for the wrong
    pretext. While Babayan's charges were disputed by his cronies in
    Armenia (including the parliamentarians elected on his ticket) as well
    as by his former comrades-in-arms, the trial concluded in March 2001
    with a verdict finding Babayan guilty of directing the assassination
    attempt, and sentencing him and a dozen other loyalists to different
    terms in prison. The verdict also stripped him of his many government
    decorations and ranks, and disenfranchised him. In a separate trial,
    his brother Karen was convicted of abusing powers of office in the
    Stepanakert Municipality, and sent to jail as well (he was released in
    2002). While the verdict was not agreeable to many in Karabakh and
    Armenia, the sadness over the fall from grace of a former Army
    Commander and war hero was more universal.


    LESSONS OF FALL

    Whatever the merits of the case against Babayan, there can be no doubt
    about the positive effect his removal from power has had on the
    political and economic development in Karabakh, and the international
    credibility of its government. Babayan's rule was not the sole cause
    for Karabakh's social-economic ills, nor did his internment put a
    definite end to corruption and government abuse in Artsakh.
    Nevertheless, freed from the hegemony of one person, Karabakh's
    business and investment environment improved dramatically, allowing
    Armenia's economic progress to spill over into Karabakh. Babayan's
    fate provides an important precedent and stark reminder of what
    unchecked usurpation of power can lead to; this lesson is undoubtedly
    on the minds of leaders in Armenia and Karabakh. Another lesson was
    that, unlike its neighbors Georgia and Azerbaijan, the Armenian
    political environment, and by extension, that of Artsakh does not
    tolerate a one-person rule.

    Imprisoning a former leader and war hero for his transgressions may
    not be a revolutionary idea, but it remains a novel one for
    post-Soviet countries and statelets. Babayan's removal from office and
    subsequent imprisonment provided an important test of durability and
    maturity of government in Karabakh, as well as the strength of its
    statehood. Contrast this with the continuing excesses and abuse by
    President Smirnov in Transnistria, or Abkhazia's Ardzinba clan, or
    Ajaria's Abashidze before he was removed by the central government in
    Georgia (and even then allowed to escape rather than put on trial).
    This is a lesson not entirely lost even on foreign observers, as a
    recent article in The Economist shows. Another important contrast was
    provided by Azerbaijan in the summer of 2004. After a group of
    activists of the so-called Karabakh Liberation Organization, a group
    of activists funded and encouraged by hardliners in the government,
    disrupted a NATO PfP conference in a Baku hotel and attempted to
    assault its participants for inviting Armenian officers to Baku, the
    initial response of the government of Azerbaijan was proper. The
    activists were arrested, put on trial, and given lengthy sentences for
    sabotaging an event sponsored by NATO, an organization to which
    Azerbaijan is said to want to adhere. After a public outcry, President
    Ilham Aliyev quickly backtracked, publicly admonished the court for
    the 'tough verdict,' and forced the appellate court to release the KLO
    activists. The entire episode betrayed serious dilettantism of
    Aliyev's government, and certainly did not inspire confidence in
    Azerbaijan among its international partners.


    RELEASE FROM PRISON

    Over the years, many rumors circulated about the pending release of
    Samvel Babayan from his confinement in the maximum-security prison in
    Shushi. Unofficially, it became known that his health greatly
    suffered after duress caused during the investigation, and he never
    recovered. He is said to suffer from hepatitis and other ailments
    which could not be treated in prison. A total deterioration of health
    or death in prison would have unnecessarily made Babayan a martyr, and
    his release for health reasons was an acceptable solution. The
    government is obviously satisfied that he would not become a public
    nuisance, and the terms of release include a probationary period and
    continued disenfranchisement.

    It was only natural that the early release of Samvel Babayan from
    prison led to several conspiracy theories, suggesting a political deal
    cut with the government, or linking it to the current phase of the
    Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement. The Armenian newspaper Iravunk,
    close to Babayan's former political clients in Armenia, reported that
    the former General had not appealed for a pardon (his mother did on
    his behalf) and that no deal had been offered, or accepted. This
    appears to be the case. It is unlikely that a formal deal between
    Babayan and the Karabakh government has been made, or was even
    necessary. Babayan's political and economic resources were entirely
    uprooted four years ago, and he is no longer a serious threat to the
    government or society. Even if he does attempt political activities in
    Armenia after his recuperation, he cannot run for office and as ARF
    leader Vahan Hovhanisian aptly pointed out, "there is no political
    niche in Armenia" left vacant for Babayan. His political options are
    limited too, as any attempt to rock the boat could lead to his repeat
    internment. Nor will he make a difference on the Karabakh settlement
    either way. A peaceful settlement is currently the domain of the
    Presidents and Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and while
    contours of what is being discussed are gradually becoming clear,
    there is nothing negative or positive that Babayan can contribute.

    Nonetheless, Babayan's release comes at a particularly sensitive time
    for domestic politics in Artsakh. Discontent and dissatisfaction with
    the pace of democratic and social-economic progress in Karabakh
    finally bubbled to the surface during the municipal elections in
    August 2004. Significantly, independent candidate Eduard Aghabekian
    was elected Mayor of Stepanakert, defeating the incumbent in the first
    round and the well-funded ruling party candidate in the run-off.
    Election of an opposition candidate to the Mayor's office in a major
    city is no small achievement, unsurpassed even in Armenia. As the new
    Mayor assumed office, his victory appears to have emboldened both the
    population and the legislature of Artsakh. When Major General Movses
    Hakobian, acting Chief of Army Staff, was quoted by a group of
    visiting journalists from Armenia as saying that Karabakh was not
    ready for full democracy as long as war was not over, a special
    session of the legislature was called to which he was summoned and
    assured the parliamentarians that he was misquoted.

    As the experience of the Saakashvili movement in Georgia shows, the
    popular mandate over municipal government and the ability to win
    elections allows building a political base for greater ambitions in
    nationwide office. As Arkady Ghukasyan (like his political mentor
    Robert Kocharian) is serving his second, and in principle, last term
    in office, he has to increasingly take the public opinion into greater
    account. Pardoning Babayan on his own accord, rather than being forced
    to do it by political opponents, is a sound political move, even if
    conditioned by Babayan's health problems.

    In sum, Samvel Babayan's release appears to have been an act of
    clemency by Karabakh's President Ghukasyan. Clemency in this case,
    however, is a poisoned chalice for Samvel Babayan. As long as he was
    in the Shushi jail, both his supporters and ill wishers viewed him
    from a distance, if not with respect, then with certain appreciation.
    They will now behold what is probably a sick and forlorn figure, an
    untenable realization for the macho political culture in Armenia. That
    will prove to be more difficult to recover from than the stigma of a
    prison term or abuse of office.
    Անտարբեր Մի Եղիր Հայ Ազգի Համար, Վերկաց Գերեզմանից ԱՆԴՐԱՆԻԿ ՓԱ ՇԱ

    Comment

    Working...
    X