Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenian Genocide Museum of America

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    The size of the site used for Papazian's design is bigger than that used by Martinez and Johnson. Papazian additionally uses the sites of another three properties that are further up the street behind the bank. Are these additional properties that were bought by Cafesjian to extend the museum site, and which the current "regime" no longer wishes to use?
    Plenipotentiary meow!

    Comment


    • #12
      Thanks for the glimpse of Papazian's module, right off the bat I hate it which would only mean to me , either its xxxx or genius .
      "All truth passes through three stages:
      First, it is ridiculed;
      Second, it is violently opposed; and
      Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

      Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Gavur View Post
        Thanks for the glimpse of Papazian's module, right off the bat I hate it which would only mean to me , either its xxxx or genius .
        The proposal isn't really buildable as it currently stands - and I don't think it is meant to be. What it is, is an example of thinking about what the museum should be about - the proposal comes in an 80-page book, only half of which is devoted to presenting his specific architectural scheme. I can bet the current lot have barely a scribbled-on-the-back-of-an-envelope-worth of thoughts on what the museum should be about.
        Plenipotentiary meow!

        Comment


        • #14
          I noticed a difference in the site size from that used by Papazian.

          Here is the disgraceful reason why it is different in size.



          The Cafesjian Family Foundation, Inc.
          15 South Fifth Street, Suite 900
          Minneapolis, MN 55402
          Contact: John Waters
          Tel. (612) 359-8991
          Fax (612) 359-8994
          Email: [email protected]

          PRESS RELEASE
          November 27, 2007


          New motion filed in lawsuit against Hirair Hovnanian and
          others over Genocide Museum

          CFF seeks to protect AGMM from irreparable harm and lost opportunity


          Minneapolis, MN, Nov. 27, 2007 ` The Cafesjian Family Foundation
          (CFF), on behalf of the Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial,
          Inc. (AGMM), filed a motion today in an ongoing lawsuit in the United
          States District Court for the District of Columbia. The court is being
          asked to enjoin the Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. (Assembly), and
          AGMM rogue trustees Hirair Hovnanian, Van Krikorian and Anoush
          Mathevosian from attempting to develop the AGMM in contravention of
          the organization's charter documents and the agreements that made the
          undertaking possible in the first place.

          `By this action, CFF seeks to protect AGMM from irreparable harm,'
          said CFF Vice President and CFF-designated AGMM trustee John
          Waters. `On November 3, 2007, the Assembly announced plans to develop
          a museum on part of a site owned by the AGMM. It was a baffling
          announcement, since the Assembly neither owns nor controls AGMM. The
          Assembly-announced plan would diminish the project by confining the
          development to a renovated bank building. According to an attorney
          representing the Assembly, the rogue trustees apparently intended to
          pay for the bank building renovation by selling off the adjoining
          properties in disregard of fiduciary and contractual duties.
          The
          injunction would enforce those obligations.'

          `The AGMM should have a commanding presence,' said CFF Founder and
          President Gerard Cafesjian. `We realized early on that a renovated
          bank building would simply not do justice to the institution that the
          community deserves and that the tragedy suffered by the Armenian
          people warrants. We worked hard to acquire additional property so that
          this project could be done right.'

          Unfortunately the other trustees have blocked nearly every plan that
          has been proposed. Assembly obdurance ultimately brought AGMM
          development to a standstill.

          Realizing that personality clashes were deadlocking AGMM governance,
          Mr. Cafesjian resigned his position as Chair of the Board of Trustees
          in September 2003 in hopes that the project could be
          revived. Mr. Cafesjian removed himself from the board in order that
          AGMM Trustees could move the project forward without the distraction
          of Cafesjian's presence.

          Unfortunately, Mr. Cafesjian's gesture did not produce the desired
          result. Rather than committing to an appropriate project, the
          dissident trustees lashed out at Mr. Cafesjian. At a meeting from
          which the Cafesjian representative was virtually expelled, the
          remaining trustees highjacked the project by delegating all board
          responsibility regarding AGMM development to a committee that is
          answerable to no one. Thereafter, a seven-year-old study, which had
          previously been rejected, was passed off at the L.A. Assembly gala as
          the new vision for AGMM. The rump group apparently intends to proceed
          with this plan while excluding CFF from participation in the
          development.

          `Mr. Cafesjian has proposed a strong vision for AGMM,' said
          Mr. Waters. `And he has contributed property, money and other
          significant resources to move that vision forward. Other trustees,
          apparently led by Mr. Hovnanian, oppose a bold vision. If they get
          their way, the real estate would be dismantled, and over half the site
          that we worked so hard to assemble would be sold, depriving the
          community of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to have the benefit of a
          truly remarkable project.

          `Mr. Cafesjian and the Cafesjian Family Foundation are unwilling to
          stand by and let the AGMM's dream be downsized and the assets
          squandered,' said Mr. Waters. `On behalf of those that have
          sacrificed so much, the Cafesjian Family Foundation will continue to
          fight for a proper development to commemorate the Armenian people and
          their suffering.'
          Plenipotentiary meow!

          Comment


          • #15




            Comment


            • #16


              AGMA and Near East Foundation signed agreement of cooperation
              19.06.2008 19:22 GMT+04:00

              /PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian Genocide Museum of America (AGMA) and the Near East Foundation signed an agreement of cooperation on June 12 at the Foundation’s international headquarters in New York City, the Armenian Assembly of America told PanARMENIAN.Net.

              Signing the agreement on behalf of the two organizations were Van Z. Krikorian, AGMA Trustee and Building and Operations Committee Chairman, and Shant Mardirossian, Near East Foundation Board Chairman. Also present at the signing were Near East Foundation President Alexander Papachristou, Dr. Rouben Adalian, Director of the AGMA, and Dr. Hayk Demoyan, Director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute in Yerevan, Armenia.

              "This agreement opens a treasure trove of historical Armenian Genocide era documents and artifacts for use in the museum’s exhibits," Krikorian said. "We are very pleased to be forging a partnership with the Near East Foundation to educate the public on one of the most significant periods of both Armenian and American history." The Armenian Genocide Museum of America is slated to open in 2010 in Washington, DC.
              "The archives of the Near East Foundation house thousands of documents which exemplify the first international humanitarian undertaking of this sort by the American people," Mardirossian said. "Not only do the archives tell us the stories of countless Armenian orphans, but they deliver them through the journals, diaries, and writings of the Near East Relief workers. This museum, in the heart of Washington, DC, will serve as a tribute to their heroic efforts."

              The Near East Foundation is the successor organization to the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief, which was founded in 1915 and later incorporated as Near East Relief in 1919 by an act of Congress. Near East Relief established and operated orphanages, hospitals, and schools throughout the Balkans, Caucasus, and the Near East to ease the suffering of the Armenian Genocide survivors seeking refuge from the Ottoman Empire.

              "Near East Relief was at the forefront of America’s efforts to respond to the human suffering that occurred in the wake of the Armenian Genocide," Krikorian said. "Armenians in the United States and all over the world benefited directly or indirectly from this monumental undertaking."

              According to Near East Foundation records, from 1915 to 1930 the Near East Relief administered $117 million worth of assistance and is credited with saving a million lives and providing vocational training to 132,000 Armenian orphan children.

              "Millions of dollars were raised through appeals in the media, at public rallies, in churches and synagogues, and in schools," Mardirossian said. "Not only were funds raised, but hundreds of Near East Relief volunteers were on the ground ministering to the suffering survivors of the Genocide, delivering food, clothing, and materials, but most of all comfort and hope. Many risked their lives and several gave their lives for this noble cause. Their stories and memories should be preserved as an example of the American spirit."

              This agreement with the Near East Foundation is the second cooperative agreement AGMA has forged in recent months. In April, the museum entered into a partnership with the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute at the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial Complex in Yerevan, Armenia.

              The resources and expertise from the genocide museum in Armenia and the valuable archival materials from Near East Relief will complement other artifacts and documents to be incorporated in the AGMA exhibits, which are being designed by the preeminent Washington, DC area firm of Gallagher & Associates.

              The museum will be housed in the historic National Bank Building in Washington, DC, at 14th and G Streets, NW, just blocks from the White House. When completed, it will be the first international class museum in the Armenian Diaspora dedicated to preserving and honoring the memory of the victims and survivors of the Armenian Genocide. From 1915-1923 a centrally-planned, government-directed campaign subjected the Armenian population in Turkey to deportation, expropriation, abduction, torture, starvation, and outright killings. An estimated 1.5 million Armenians perished and tens of thousands became widowed, orphaned and homeless.

              Today, the Near East Foundation operates development projects in seven countries in the Middle East and Africa and is planning a project in Armenia. In 1930, the organization re-defined itself. It gave the schools, orphanages, hospitals, and other facilities that it had founded to the countries where it operated, and it became a pioneer in the field of economic development. Current projects include agricultural innovation to combat climate change in Mali and Egypt, reforming primary education to include girls in Morocco, and assisting Iraqi refugees to support themselves in new communities in Syria and Jordan. The 100-member field staff all work in their own countries, so the Near East Foundation supports local professionalism while helping the region's poorest people.

              "We are proud to continue the tradition of American assistance to communities in peril in the Middle East and Africa," said NEF President Papachristou. "We rely fully on the expertise and dedication of our colleagues who know best how to organize these communities to solve their own challenges."

              The agreement between the AGMA and the Near East Foundation also anticipates the promotion of each other’s programs and projects.
              General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

              Comment


              • #17
                Re: Armenian Genocide Museum of America

                Posted to illustrate the background to the post that follows it.

                Museum plans are stymied Armenian dream now under threat
                Worcester Telegram & Gazette
                Dec 23, 2007


                By Colleen Sullivan SPECIAL TO THE TELEGRAM & GAZETTE

                WASHINGTON- Since it opened in 1993, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum
                has attracted more than 25 million visitors, the vast majority of them
                non-xxxs. That number has astonished many observers: Many experts
                thought that such a large museum devoted to so somber and discomforting
                a subject would have difficulty attracting visitors.

                It gave Anoush Matevosian, a member of the Armenian National Institute's
                board of governors, an idea. A museum could open up a new front in the
                struggle to gain wider public recognition and remembrance of the
                Armenian genocide "No one had quite imagined constructing a museum
                dedicated to this sad subject," said Rouben Adalian, director of the
                Armenian National Institute. "The Holocaust Museum set an example which
                can be emulated and learned from, and I think the Armenian-American
                community was very much impressed and inspired by that example." But
                building it would prove more difficult than anticipated.

                The Armenian National Institute is a lobbying group devoted to
                preserving the memory of thousands of Armenians massacred in 1915 by the
                Ottoman Empire, an event Armenians describe as genocide. Turkey, the
                Ottoman state's modern heir, vigorously objects to that description of
                the event.

                The institute and other Armenian groups have waged a worldwide campaign
                to have governments recognize the killings as genocide; dozens of
                governments have passed resolutions to that effect, including Russia,
                Argentina, Sweden, and Canada. France passed a law in 2006 that made
                denial of the genocide a crime.

                A measure recognizing the genocide has languished in Congress since the
                Clinton administration. In October, the nonbinding resolution passed the
                House Foreign Affairs Committee on a 27-21 vote, but Turkish protests
                and pleas from President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
                succeeded in quashing the effort.

                The need to preserve access to crucial bases and airports in Turkey to
                supply the U.S. Army in Iraq was a factor cited by many opponents of the
                resolution, but even before the war in Iraq, the desire of the U.S.
                government to maintain Turkey as a close ally in the Middle East has
                stymied Armenian activists.

                Enter Gerard Cafesjian. A stout, balding man who wears a black eyepatch,
                Mr. Cafesjian, 82, is a former executive and part owner of West
                Publishing, a Minnesota-based legal database firm that was sold to
                Thomson Corp. in 1996 for $3.4 billion. Mr. Cafesjian retired from West
                following the sale, but still manages a wide array of business and
                charitable ventures. He has a stake in a chain of restaurants, is one of
                the producers behind last year's "Prairie Home Companion" film, and paid
                for the restoration of a historic carousel at the Minnesota State Fair,
                now known as the Cafesjian carousel.

                He is better known in Armenia, where he operates a satellite TV station
                - which has come under criticism for a perceived strong bias toward the
                government of President Robert Kocharian. In Armenia, ground has been
                broken on a museum, funded by Mr. Cafesjian and named after him, which
                will house his extensive collection of Armenian art.

                The institute approached Mr. Cafesjian in 1997 for help with the
                genocide museum and in 2000 his family foundation contributed $3.5
                million to help purchase the former national bank building on G Street
                in downtown Washington, D.C., is just a short stroll from the White
                House. Mr. Cafesjian also contributed $500,000 to the project in the
                form of a promissory note.

                Mr. Cafesjian helped to purchase additional lots adjacent to the old
                bank. In 2002, articles appeared in The New York Times, the Los Angeles
                Times and The Washington Post detailing the project and its goals,
                including a $75 million, 115,000-square-foot project to be opened in
                2008.

                And then, silence. Public silence, anyway. Behind closed doors, there
                was much to discuss. Mr. Cafesjian had hired an architect, Edgar
                Papazian, to create a design. The rest of the museum board raised
                questions about the scale and elaborate design of the proposal. While
                the board wrangled, the project remained in limbo.

                Then last year, Mr. Cafesjian sued to get his money back from the board.
                Lawsuits have been filed both in Minnesota - where Mr. Cafesjian's
                charitable foundation is run - and in Washington. He is seeking $15
                million, more than half of the museum's endowment. Were he to win, some
                of the land purchased for the museum would have to be given to Mr.
                Cafesjian to settle the claim.

                "We think the reason he wants the property back is that the value of the
                property has increased significantly since he donated it," said museum
                lawyer Arnold Rosenfeld of K&L Gates. "He wants the property back so he
                can make a big profit."

                Armenian community members in Central Massachusetts expressed
                disappointment over the project delays.

                "It's too bad that political games are being played," said Van Aroian of
                Worcester and a member of Armenian Church of Our Saviour. "That's a
                tragedy that hurts the memory of the people, including my mother's
                family and my father-in-law's family."

                He hopes the parties will resolve their differences. While he would love
                to have a museum dedicated to the Armenian genocide, he said, it would
                be more meaningful if it paid homage to all the other contemporary and
                ongoing genocides.

                "I would incorporate it with all evil acts of humanity in the past," he
                said.

                George Aghjayan, chairman of the Armenian National Committee of Central
                Massachusetts, agreed a museum to educate people about the Armenian
                genocide in particular, as well as genocides in general, is an important
                and worthwhile goal.

                "We're saddened that there are issues that are preventing the museum
                >From moving forward," he said. "We think a genocide museum in the
                capital would be fitting."

                Even if he ultimately loses the court case, all the legal wrangling may
                result in Mr. Cafesjian obtaining his wish. A provision in the original
                grant returns the property he acquired to him if the museum isn't built
                by 2010.

                "By stopping them now, they can't possibly get the museum built by 2010,
                and he'll get his property back that way," Mr. Rosenfeld said.

                The museum board has taken action, hiring its own architectural firm,
                Martinez & Johnson, and exhibit designers, Gallagher & Associates, to
                get to work on the plans.

                The new plans call for a 50,000-square-foot facility, with the bank as
                its centerpiece but including a modern addition, in part to accommodate
                disabled visitors. The museum planners are aiming to attract not only
                Armenian Americans, but the broader public as well.

                "In the case of the Armenian genocide, the United States played a very
                constructive and positive role from the very beginning, and the fact of
                the matter is we know the story of the Armenian genocide primarily
                because of the way American witnesses documented and recorded the
                events," Mr. Adalian said.

                But as long as the case remains in court, even the extent of the
                facilities cannot be fully mapped out, which is a threat to the broader
                public role supporters envision the museum serving.

                "There have been other people who have been subjected to genocide," Mr.
                Adalian said. "And the problem keeps repeating itself into our own
                times."

                Colleen Sullivan reports for the Washington, D.C., bureau of Boston
                University News Service. Lisa D. Welsh of the Telegram & Gazette staff
                contributed to this report.



                AAA ISSUES STATEMENT ON LEGAL BATTLE OVER ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MUSEUM
                PanARMENIAN.Net
                February 9, 2011 - 21:47 AMT 17:47 GMT

                Armenian Assembly of America issued a statement on The Armenian
                Genocide Museum case.

                "Last month the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC issued an
                order and an accompanying 190-page Memorandum of Opinion regarding
                the Armenian Genocide Museum case. Although the case is not over,
                it is important for all members of the Assembly to understand the
                ramifications of the Opinion. It is also important for all members
                of the Assembly to know that we have worked tirelessly to build
                a museum and permanent memorial to the Armenian Genocide in our
                nation's capital. Nothing in the Opinion will stop us from continuing
                these efforts.

                This litigation began in April 2007, when Mr. Cafesjian and his
                foundation sued the Assembly and the Armenian Genocide Museum &
                Memorial (AGMM). In its Opinion, the Court rejected Mr. Cafesjian's
                claims of wrongdoing against the Assembly and AGMM, and reduced Mr.

                Cafesjian's representation on the Board of Trustees. Going forward,
                the Judge decided that Anoush Mathevosian, Hirair Hovnanian, the
                Armenian Assembly of America, and the Cafesjian Family Foundation will
                each have one vote on the AGMM Board. The Judge also decided that Mr.

                Cafesjian is not entitled to the payment of $500,000 that he claimed
                he was owed from the AGMM.

                However, the Court upheld Mr. Cafesjian's right to insist upon
                the return of the real estate acquired to house the museum complex,
                which was estimated at $40 million at trial. This right arose through
                a reversionary clause Mr. Cafesjian included in the documents that
                transferred these properties to AGMM. The clause stated that if the
                museum was "not developed prior to December 31, 2010 in accordance
                with the Plans" or "in substantial compliance with the Plans," then
                at Mr. Cafesjian's "sole discretion" he could insist on the return
                of his funds or the properties. The Judge concluded that the AGMM
                was not developed prior to December 31, 2010, therefore entitling Mr.

                Cafesjian to enforce his right of reversion. The Court also denied
                the allegations of the Assembly and AGMM against Mr. Cafesjian, and
                ruled that Mr. Cafesjian's indemnification for the legal fees will
                be addressed in further court proceedings.

                The Court is now going to balance Mr. Cafesjian's right to a return of
                the properties against the principle enshrined in our bylaws that no
                trustee can profit from a transaction with the Assembly or AGMM. We
                will also ask the Court to consider the applicable IRS rules and
                regulations governing non-profit entities, and the intention of the
                parties at the time he obtained his right of reversion.

                The Judge will begin considering these issues at a hearing on February
                24. The Judge also encouraged the parties to resolve their differences
                to "accomplish the laudable goal of creating an Armenian genocide
                museum and memorial."

                The Assembly is keenly aware that our members and the community have
                many questions. Our attorneys continue to represent and advise us,
                and while many have expressed their surprise and concern regarding the
                reversionary clause and its validity, it is important to note that Mr.

                Cafesjian should not profit from exercising it.

                While this matter is pending, the Assembly must also address another
                lawsuit brought by Mr. Cafesjian filed in January of this year. In
                addition to suing the Assembly, Mr. Cafesjian is also suing Hirair
                Hovnanian and Van Krikorian personally. That suit seeks the return
                of $1,050,000 in trustee dues by Mr. Cafesjian, which he claims a
                right to receive back due to an alleged lack of participation in the
                governance of the Assembly."
                Last edited by bell-the-cat; 03-02-2013, 09:28 AM.
                Plenipotentiary meow!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Re: Armenian Genocide Museum of America

                  "The parties, through the three consolidated actions pending before the
                  court, have spent as much if not more time litigating who is to blame
                  for the museum's failure as they spent attempting to make the museum
                  a reality,"
                  NEW TRIAL ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MUSEUM NIXED
                  Courthouse News
                  Feb 22 2013

                  By MATT REYNOLDS

                  (CN) - The protracted dispute over an Armenian Genocide museum and
                  memorial project that never got off the ground should not face a new
                  trial, a federal judge ruled.

                  The consolidated complaint had pitted the Armenian Assembly of America
                  and the Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial against two former board
                  members, Gerard Cafesjian and John Waters, and the Cafesjian Family
                  Foundation.

                  Their struggle for control of the museum, and allegations over its
                  demise, stemmed from rising tensions between Cafesjian and Hirair
                  Hovnanian, both of whom collaborated on the project in the late 1990s.

                  "The parties, through the three consolidated actions pending before the
                  court, have spent as much if not more time litigating who is to blame
                  for the museum's failure as they spent attempting to make the museum
                  a reality," U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote Wednesday.

                  Cafesjian, a founding member of the museum's board of trustees, helped
                  purchase the museum site, a vacant National Bank building at 14th and G
                  Street in downtown Washington, D.C. He stepped back, however, after the
                  board later failed to reach consensus on how to complete the museum.

                  The Brooklyn-born philanthropist handpicked Waters, his right-hand
                  man, to succeed him, but the board excluded Waters from further
                  participation in the project after Cafesjian sued the assembly for
                  payment of an unpaid promissory note.

                  Kollar-Kotelly largely dismissed the series of claims and counterclaims
                  after a 12-day bench trial in November 2010.

                  In that January 2011 final judgment, Kollar-Kotelly found that
                  neither Cafesijan nor Waters had breached their fiduciary duties to
                  the assembly. She also cleared Cafesijian of bad faith claims and
                  said neither he nor Waters had misappropriated the trade secrets of
                  the assembly.

                  Nearly a year later, the assembly and the museum moved for a new trial
                  based on the alleged perjury of Waters. They said Waters had never
                  mentioned that Cafesjian agreed to award him a bonus and reimburse
                  his expenses if Cafesjian prevailed in the litigation.

                  The motion relied on claims and counterclaims pending before a federal
                  judge in Minnesota where Waters sued Cafesjian for more than $4.3
                  million in deferred compensation, $1.2 million in bonuses and more
                  than $500,000 in legal costs.

                  Cafesjian countered that Waters had embezzled several million dollars
                  from him over a period spanning more than a decade.

                  Refusing to order a new trial in Washington this week, Judge
                  Kollar-Kotelly said the assembly had a "full and fair opportunity to
                  present their case during the bench trial."

                  "The plaintiffs fail to show by clear and convincing evidence that
                  Waters committed perjury or otherwise committed fraud or misconduct
                  by not disclosing the compensation purportedly owed and/or promised
                  by Cafesjian," the 33-page opinion states. "The court did not rely
                  on Waters' credibility in rejecting the plaintiffs' claims at trial,
                  meaning the plaintiffs cannot show actual prejudice from any alleged
                  perjury or other misconduct by Waters," wrote Kollar-Kotelly.

                  "The plaintiffs fail to show by clear and convincing evidence that
                  Cafesjian actually promised Waters the litigation bonus, and in
                  any case the existence of the agreement would not alter the legal
                  conclusion that the defendants did not breach any duty by filing the
                  initial suit in this litigation."

                  In Minnesota, Waters alleged that Cafesijan had destroyed documents
                  from Waters' former office at Cafesijan's GLC Enterprises.

                  Though the assembly claimed "without elaboration" that the allegations
                  directly impacted the trial, it failed "to show by clear and convincing
                  evidence that the defendants destroyed documents relevant to this
                  litigation or otherwise engaged in discovery misconduct sufficient
                  to set aside the final judgment," Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

                  By some estimates 1.5 million minority Armenians were killed by the
                  Ottoman government during and after World War I. Regarded by some as
                  the first genocide of modern times, male Armenians were slaughtered
                  in what is now the Republic of Turkey, while women, children, the
                  elderly and sick were deported or forced on "death marches" through
                  the Syrian Desert.

                  Plenipotentiary meow!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Re: Armenian Genocide Museum of America

                    D.C. buildings linked to Armenian Genocide museum to be razed
                    Washington Business Journal (Washington, DC)
                    Apr 19, 2013


                    By Michael Neibauer, Staff Reporter - Washington Business Journal

                    The owner of three vacant commercial buildings in the heart of
                    downtown D.C., all tied inexorably to the sputtering Armenian Genocide
                    Museum project, has applied to knock them down.

                    What's better, a 5,700-square-foot vacant lot or three vacant
                    buildings? Pick your poison.

                    The Cafesjian Family Foundation of Minneapolis has submitted a request
                    to raze 1338, 1340 and 1342 G St. NW, all of which back up to the
                    historic but vacant National Bank of Washington building at 14th and
                    G, which it also owns.

                    Representatives of the foundation, recorded as the owner of the
                    properties in July 2011, did not return calls for comment. All three
                    buildings were briefly classified by the District in 2012 as blighted,
                    until the foundation successfully appealed.

                    The properties to be razed are worth a combined $8.2 million,
                    according to D.C. assessors, but the value is entirely in the
                    land. I'm not aware of any proposals to build anew.

                    The bank building has long been planned as the future home of the
                    Armenian Genocide Museum, a memorial to 1.5 million Armenians killed
                    in the final days of the Ottoman Empire. The G Street properties, too,
                    were to be part of the project.

                    But the foundation and the nonprofit Armenian Genocide Museum and
                    Memorial are tied up in prolonged litigation (another appeal was filed
                    March 25 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
                    Circuit) over a relationship and donation gone bad, a lawsuit a
                    federal judge once described as `very bitter and very unforunate.'

                    Here's the gist.

                    The bank building was acquired by the Armenian Assembly of America
                    early in 2000 for $7.25 million, using funds provided by multiple
                    donors, most notably $4 million from the Cafesjian Family Foundation,
                    according to court documents.

                    Gerard Cafesjian, a wealthy former publisher and Armenian
                    philanthropist, separately purchased the G Street properties the same
                    year for about $5.5 million, with the idea of turning them into a
                    contemporary art museum to complement the genocide museum. But the art
                    museum was built in the Armenian capital of Yerevan instead, and
                    Cafesjian conditionally agreed to donate the G Street buildings to the
                    Assembly for an expansion of the genocide museum.

                    The grant agreement between Cafesjian and the Armenian Genocide Museum
                    nonprofit, an arm of the Armenian Assembly, set Dec. 31, 2010, as the
                    point at which the properties would be returned if they weren't
                    developed. And that's exactly what happened.

                    Between 2002 and 2007, when the first of many lawsuits was filed, the
                    relationships between the various parties soured, badly. Fundraising
                    efforts for the estimated $100 million museum project stalled, as did
                    attempts to hire an architect or develop a business plan, according to
                    a 190-page federal court ruling issued Jan. 26, 2011.

                    `The Court sincerely hopes that after years of fighting legal battles,
                    the parties can put aside their differences and accomplish the
                    laudable goal of creating an Armenian Genocide museum and memorial,'
                    U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her
                    exhaustive opinion.

                    It's certainly not looking that way.

                    The 50,000-square-foot museum complex is in limbo, and based on a
                    brief conversation I had with a museum representative, I'm less
                    confident than ever that a museum will open in the bank building on
                    14th Street, two blocks from the White House.

                    The raze, as I understand it, has little to do with the museum. More
                    likely, it is related to the District's attempted `blight'
                    classification, which would come with with a property tax rate six
                    times the standard commercial rate. Get rid of the building, get rid
                    of the tax bill.

                    The permit applications are under review by the Department of Consumer
                    and Regulatory Affairs. Workers were inside 1340 G on Friday clearing
                    it of asbestos in preparation for the demolition.
                    Plenipotentiary meow!

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Re: Armenian Genocide Museum of America

                      Debate over Armenian museum will continue at appellate hearing

                      Centre Daily Times
                      April 19 2014


                      By Michael Doyle

                      WASHINGTON -- The legal fight over a proposed Armenian Genocide Museum
                      and Memorial has lasted nearly as long as the horrors the project is
                      supposed to commemorate.

                      Soon, the bitter wrangling will reach a crucial crossroads.

                      On Monday, in a courthouse about 10 blocks from the run-down site of
                      the proposed museum, three appellate judges will sort through the
                      dispute, which has outlasted several of the key parties. The museum's
                      future might hang in the balance.

                      "There is no doubt we are committed to building the museum in
                      Washington, D.C.," Edele Hovnanian, the treasurer of the Armenian
                      Assembly of America's board of trustees, said Friday. "We are
                      absolutely committed."

                      The case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
                      Circuit is still called Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial v.
                      Gerard L. Cafesjian, though this has become a misnomer. Cafesjian, the
                      businessman and philanthropist who won an earlier round, died last
                      year in Naples, Fla., at the age of 88.

                      Another man once at the center of the dispute, former Cafesjian
                      lieutenant John J. Waters Jr., was convicted last month in Minneapolis
                      of 25 felony counts relating to embezzlement from Cafesjian. Waters is
                      awaiting sentencing.

                      Years ago, Cafesjian, Waters and the Armenian Assembly of America
                      leadership were allies. They wanted to build a center marking the
                      period from 1915 to 1923, when by some estimates upward of 1.5 million
                      Armenians died at the hands of the Ottoman Empire.

                      In downtown Washington, project supporters bought a four-story
                      National Bank of Washington building in 2000. Cafesjian provided
                      funding and bought adjacent properties, with a clause that the
                      properties would revert to his control if the project wasn't finished
                      by Dec. 31, 2010.

                      Relations eventually collapsed and the first in a series of suits and
                      countersuits was filed in 2007. In 2011, U.S. District Judge Colleen
                      Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the property belonged to Cafesjian's
                      foundation, of which Waters once served as vice president.

                      "The court sincerely hopes that after years of fighting legal battles,
                      the parties can put aside their differences and accomplish the
                      laudable goal of creating an Armenian genocide museum and memorial,"
                      Kollar-Kotelly wrote in January 2011.

                      That hasn't happened.

                      Instead, the fight that Kollar-Kotelly said "quickly escalated into an
                      unfortunate exchange of accusations and allegations grounded in
                      suspicion and mistrust" has ground ever onward. Though the museum has
                      plans prepared and an online exhibit posted, the litigation has
                      hindered efforts to raise the $100 million or so needed for
                      construction and operations.

                      The Armenian Assembly of America has appealed its trial-court loss,
                      contending in part that Kollar-Kotelly had previously undisclosed
                      "ties" to the Cafesjian side. Kollar-Kotelly had contributed, as had
                      Cafesjian, to the Metropolitan Museum of Art's purchase of expensive
                      modern glass art by an artist whom Cafesjian also sought for the
                      Armenian genocide museum.

                      "If the assembly had known of the shared and beneficial interest
                      between Judge Kollar-Kotelly and Cafesjian as investors in
                      contemporary studio glass art, it would have moved for Judge
                      Kollar-Kotelly's disqualification," attorneys for the Armenian
                      Assembly of America declared in an appellate brief.

                      Attorneys for the Cafesjian Family Foundation didn't address the
                      judicial recusal question in their appellate brief, which focused on
                      other parts of the dispute.

                      "I hope that the (appellate) decision will finally resolve the case,"
                      the foundation's attorney, John B. Williams, said Friday, while noting
                      that "there is always the Supreme Court."

                      The 30-minute oral argument Monday comes three days before the events
                      that traditionally recognize the genocide. In this, Congress has
                      likewise continued to struggle.

                      By a 12-5 vote, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved a
                      resolution April 10 that's intended to "remember and observe the
                      anniversary of the Armenian genocide." That may be the resolution's
                      high-water mark.

                      Vigorously opposed by the Turkish government, and historically viewed
                      skeptically within the State Department and the Pentagon, this
                      genocide resolution has an uncertain future. Senate rules will make it
                      easy for a single lawmaker to block the measure.

                      Turkey questions the casualty count and denies there was a systematic
                      effort to exterminate the Armenian people. Some American diplomats and
                      military professionals fear antagonizing Turkey, a key NATO ally.

                      A like-minded resolution in the House of Representatives, authored by
                      freshman Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., and backed by 50 co-sponsors,
                      hasn't moved since it was introduced last year. Visiting Turkey this
                      month, House Speaker John Boehner effectively called the measure dead.

                      "Don't worry," the Ohio Republican said, according to Turkish news
                      accounts. "Our Congress will not get involved in this issue."

                      In the meantime, lawmakers are participating in Armenian-American
                      community events, with Valadao and Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., expected
                      at a flag-raising ceremony Thursday at Fresno, Calif., City Hall and
                      Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., joining the annual march through the Los
                      Angeles-area Little Armenia.
                      Plenipotentiary meow!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X