Tweet
Hellektor's Humble Prescription:
Regarding the commotion around the protocols in the Armenian community where you don't see the forest for the trees, the countless (mostly too complicated to be feasible) suggestions and given the emotional reaction of our nation which has been the root of all our problems (see how the Turks are playing their role whether it's the charade in Davos or the “Azeris” faking being pissed by Turkey while they have everything under control), I on my part humbly suggest the removal of JUST ONE WORD from the protocols to solve the Artsakh conflict, neutralize the denial of the Armenian Genocide and ensure our right to our occupied homeland.
From the sentence “Confirming the mutual recognition of the existing border between the two countries as defined by relevant treaties of international law”, I suggest the statesmen of the RoA demand the removal of the term “existing”. I assume the audacity to ensure that the solution of the Turk-Armenian problem will be put on the right track and no compromises from the Armenian side will ensue.
The Turk-Armenian conflict/problem is exclusively TERRITORIAL. The Turk destroyed the Armenian nation in their own homeland for thousands of years to prevent the liberation of Armenia and the establishing of an Armenian state.
I. When after Lenin's revolution in 1917, the part of Armenia under Russian rule became free and when they saw the danger of the resurrection of an Armenian state on that territory which would spoil their meticulously and successfully carried out extermination of the Armenian nation all over the Turk occupied Armenian territories and most of Asia Minor, the cunning Turk counterfeited the artificial state of fake “Azerbaijan” on that liberated Armenian territory, stealing the name from the northwest region of Iran for later territorial claims from that country, killing two birds with one stone, which would further their delusional ambitions according to their sick, pan-Turkist delirium.
II. The reason Turkey obstinately denies the Armenian Genocide is because of the fear of an obligation of compensating the Armenian nation and since the crime was perpetrated to steal Armenia, beside the fact that Turks know their country was founded on other peoples’ homeland through annihilation of the landlord, the primitive, nomadic, cattle-herder mentality of the Turk throws them in a hysterical fit when the detachment of any territory from Turkey is discussed.
By removing the word “existing” from the mentioned sentence in the protocols which will render the phrase: “Confirming the mutual recognition of the border between the two countries as defined by relevant treaties of international law” the Turkish preconditions will be neutralized. This will:
I. solve the territorial problem. While under the phrase “relevant treaties of international law” Turks and the international Jewy understand the illegal Kars treaty, we understand the ONLY valid document which is the Wilson arbitration, where the borders were delineated according to all prerequisites of international law. Notice that this is no compensation for the Armenian Genocide and to get the legally specified territory back, we do not have to utter the word genocide. Compensation for all the murdered Armenians, the destruction of our civilization and monuments we will demand after Turkey's recognition thereof, whenever that may be.
I do not pretend from one day to the other Turks will cede the territory, but with the raising of the Wilson arbitration issue, the Turk (and the international Jewry) will lose their weapon of the Armenian Genocide denial (or the infinite wait for hearing the phrase “Armenian Genocide” from the lips of a US president) and will fall into a constant panic of finding ways to counter this legal document. This will:
II. solve the problem of the denial of the Armenian Genocide and defuse the stubborn and costly fight of the Turk, redirecting their efforts to counter the Wilson arbitration. Let them create a thousand and one sub-commissions to infinitely discuss whether “it was genocide or not”!
And most importantly this will
III. solve the Artsakh problem, more precisely, the question of the liberated territories around the Soviet era drawn, genocidal borders of NKAO, the main reason for coming up with this scam of Turk-Armenian “relations”. Every time a Turkish official will be about sniveling like hyenas regarding the “Armenian occupied “Azeri” territories”” or howling like wolves concerning the ““return” of “Azeri” “refugees””, they have to think twice about the Armenian territory they have been illegally occupying since 22nd of November 1920, the day Woodrow Wilson signed and sealed (with the big seal of the Union) his FULL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE UPON THE ARBITRATION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA, where incidentally there is also an interesting phrase: “The government of the United States has never recognized the de facto governments either of Georgia or of Azerbaijan.”, yet another weapon in our hands to solve the issues of Artsakh, Nakhijevan, Utik and Javakhk.
Take ONLY ONE WORD Out of the Protocols and Solve All Armenian-Turkish Problems
Regarding the commotion around the protocols in the Armenian community where you don't see the forest for the trees, the countless (mostly too complicated to be feasible) suggestions and given the emotional reaction of our nation which has been the root of all our problems (see how the Turks are playing their role whether it's the charade in Davos or the “Azeris” faking being pissed by Turkey while they have everything under control), I on my part humbly suggest the removal of JUST ONE WORD from the protocols to solve the Artsakh conflict, neutralize the denial of the Armenian Genocide and ensure our right to our occupied homeland.
From the sentence “Confirming the mutual recognition of the existing border between the two countries as defined by relevant treaties of international law”, I suggest the statesmen of the RoA demand the removal of the term “existing”. I assume the audacity to ensure that the solution of the Turk-Armenian problem will be put on the right track and no compromises from the Armenian side will ensue.
The Turk-Armenian conflict/problem is exclusively TERRITORIAL. The Turk destroyed the Armenian nation in their own homeland for thousands of years to prevent the liberation of Armenia and the establishing of an Armenian state.
I. When after Lenin's revolution in 1917, the part of Armenia under Russian rule became free and when they saw the danger of the resurrection of an Armenian state on that territory which would spoil their meticulously and successfully carried out extermination of the Armenian nation all over the Turk occupied Armenian territories and most of Asia Minor, the cunning Turk counterfeited the artificial state of fake “Azerbaijan” on that liberated Armenian territory, stealing the name from the northwest region of Iran for later territorial claims from that country, killing two birds with one stone, which would further their delusional ambitions according to their sick, pan-Turkist delirium.
II. The reason Turkey obstinately denies the Armenian Genocide is because of the fear of an obligation of compensating the Armenian nation and since the crime was perpetrated to steal Armenia, beside the fact that Turks know their country was founded on other peoples’ homeland through annihilation of the landlord, the primitive, nomadic, cattle-herder mentality of the Turk throws them in a hysterical fit when the detachment of any territory from Turkey is discussed.
By removing the word “existing” from the mentioned sentence in the protocols which will render the phrase: “Confirming the mutual recognition of the border between the two countries as defined by relevant treaties of international law” the Turkish preconditions will be neutralized. This will:
I. solve the territorial problem. While under the phrase “relevant treaties of international law” Turks and the international Jewy understand the illegal Kars treaty, we understand the ONLY valid document which is the Wilson arbitration, where the borders were delineated according to all prerequisites of international law. Notice that this is no compensation for the Armenian Genocide and to get the legally specified territory back, we do not have to utter the word genocide. Compensation for all the murdered Armenians, the destruction of our civilization and monuments we will demand after Turkey's recognition thereof, whenever that may be.
I do not pretend from one day to the other Turks will cede the territory, but with the raising of the Wilson arbitration issue, the Turk (and the international Jewry) will lose their weapon of the Armenian Genocide denial (or the infinite wait for hearing the phrase “Armenian Genocide” from the lips of a US president) and will fall into a constant panic of finding ways to counter this legal document. This will:
II. solve the problem of the denial of the Armenian Genocide and defuse the stubborn and costly fight of the Turk, redirecting their efforts to counter the Wilson arbitration. Let them create a thousand and one sub-commissions to infinitely discuss whether “it was genocide or not”!
And most importantly this will
III. solve the Artsakh problem, more precisely, the question of the liberated territories around the Soviet era drawn, genocidal borders of NKAO, the main reason for coming up with this scam of Turk-Armenian “relations”. Every time a Turkish official will be about sniveling like hyenas regarding the “Armenian occupied “Azeri” territories”” or howling like wolves concerning the ““return” of “Azeri” “refugees””, they have to think twice about the Armenian territory they have been illegally occupying since 22nd of November 1920, the day Woodrow Wilson signed and sealed (with the big seal of the Union) his FULL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE UPON THE ARBITRATION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA, where incidentally there is also an interesting phrase: “The government of the United States has never recognized the de facto governments either of Georgia or of Azerbaijan.”, yet another weapon in our hands to solve the issues of Artsakh, Nakhijevan, Utik and Javakhk.
Comment