Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Education Jobs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Re: Education Jobs

    Oh and a correction - Correlation does not equal causation is misleading. It would be more accurately stated as correlation does not necessarily equal causation.

    There are 3 things required for causal inference: 1) covariation (correlation) 2) temporal precedence and 3) freedom from confounding (e.g. by random assignment).

    It's not about what the statistical analysis was, but rather about methodology. If the methodology warrants a causal inference, then it's appropriate even if the analysis conducted was, for example, computing a Pearson's R or something.
    [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
    -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

    Comment


    • #52
      Re: Education Jobs

      Originally posted by Haykakan View Post
      Violating that principle is bad science and will be called out in peer reviews - the same biases exist in all fields of science so what is your point? Math is not just the basis for physics and chemistry it is the bases for all other fields to including social sciences. Just because you disagree with the facts that are found in lets say psychology or sociology does not make these fields bad science.
      Originally posted by Siggie View Post
      So what I'm reading from that is that you did an undergraduate major in applied mathematics and worked as a research assistant or something on some kind of research. Hardly enough to claim any sort of "expertise" in any scientific field.

      Let me try being less critical and more instructive ... Science is a method. It isn't a subject. Science is what you apply to a field defined by a theme in the type of research questions that are asked. E.g. Political science dealing with research questions having to do with politics and political beliefs and the like. Science is science is science. Whether the question "How do we perceive color?" is asked by a neurologist, psychologist, or physicist is not relevant. If we apply the scientific method in attempting to answer the question and test related hypotheses, we are doing science.
      Your disappointment stems from the SUBJECT of the scientific inquiry. It is more difficult to study people because they vary much more than white rats, which vary much more than samples of a given element. It's harder to do and to control for extraneous, potentially confounding variables, but we do our best and we still apply the exact same methods.
      There are programs in these fields which are a little more on the humanities side than the social science side perhaps and certainly quality varies greatly among programs at different institutions. In some classes the way in which the information that is communicated was learned isn't emphasized and that's too bad in my opinion. When I teach, I don't create that distance between the acquired knowledge and the application of scientific inquiry which led us there. I take a more scientific, methdological emphasis, but not everyone does. Also, fyi, I have friends from these "hard science" fields who have said to me that I (background in Psych) have more research methods and stats training than they do, because they are trained to apply in their narrower, much less variable fields, and they learn only the limited methodologies/analyses that typically use. Whereas, I seem to have expertise with methodology and stats that is more easily applied across disciplines and in "real world application." So, it's really specifically about how much relevant "how to do science" training one receives and not the field in which they receive it. To make a blanket statement that Poli Sci is not a science is...well, ignorant.
      Originally posted by Siggie View Post
      Oh and a correction - Correlation does not equal causation is misleading. It would be more accurately stated as correlation does not necessarily equal causation.

      There are 3 things required for causal inference: 1) covariation (correlation) 2) temporal precedence and 3) freedom from confounding (e.g. by random assignment).

      It's not about what the statistical analysis was, but rather about methodology. If the methodology warrants a causal inference, then it's appropriate even if the analysis conducted was, for example, computing a Pearson's R or something.
      Of course it's about methodology. If you don't have things such as random assignment and random selection, the power of your inference is greatly weakened. Researchers fall victim to all sorts of biases and sometimes fail to ensure such randomness that must be present in the study. To be able to infer something about a general population is a very strong thing. You need a lot supporting you to make such an inference and you need to ensure your readers about randomness and how you've minimized certain biases. That's why studies in sociology/psychology can be so tricky and very hard to accurately assume something about the general pop in these fields and you need a lot of evidence in your data and methodology to prove the power and legitimacy of your inference.
      Մեկ Ազգ, Մեկ Մշակույթ
      ---
      "Western Assimilation is the greatest threat to the Armenian nation since the Armenian Genocide."

      Comment


      • #53
        Re: Education Jobs

        Originally posted by Mos View Post
        Of course it's about methodology. If you don't have things such as random assignment and random selection, the power of your inference is greatly weakened. Researchers fall victim to all sorts of biases and sometimes fail to ensure such randomness that must be present in the study. To be able to infer something about a general population is a very strong thing. You need a lot supporting you to make such an inference and you need to ensure your readers about randomness and how you've minimized certain biases. That's why studies in sociology/psychology can be so tricky and very hard to accurately assume something about the general pop in these fields and you need a lot of evidence in your data and methodology to prove the power and legitimacy of your inference.
        I said causal inference specifically. That may not be the case at all; it depends entirely on the research question(s). And the population to which you wish to generalize the findings depends on the research question as well. We're not always interested in universally true phenomena exclusively. Sometimes we want to know about a smaller population; e.g. alzheimer's patients.
        There are also lots of universal findings that have come from psychology too (I'm speaking about Psych because it is my field). E.g. how we recognize/process faces, that it's faster to relearn than learn first time, cue-dependent learning, inattentional blindness, developmental sequences, perceptual processes, etc. etc. etc.

        Anyway, what's the bottom line? You're saying it can be more difficult to do science in these fields, but that it's doable?
        [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
        -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

        Comment


        • #54
          Re: Education Jobs

          Originally posted by Siggie View Post
          Hit a nerve, eh?
          You do know that science is about more than math right?
          Not really. There is a word for science without math. I think it's called philosophy or religion. Every field of applied science involves math.

          Let me reiterate. If you can't quantify or analyze your research with the use of statistics, your observations are merely subjective and aren't factual.
          Last edited by KanadaHye; 11-13-2012, 07:38 AM.
          "Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a man, you take it." ~Malcolm X

          Comment


          • #55
            Re: Education Jobs

            Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
            Not really. There is a word for science without math. I think it's called philosophy or religion. Every field of applied science involves math.
            Just to be clear, when you say "not really," you're disagreeing with the statement "science is about more than math"?

            If so, then I see that you have limited your reading and comprehension to one sentence again and ignored the rest of my words where I said to do science you must use math, but math isn't the end all be all because the methodology is essential. Won't you ever tire of trying to build strawmen?
            [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
            -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

            Comment


            • #56
              Re: Education Jobs

              Originally posted by Siggie View Post
              Just to be clear, when you say "not really," you're disagreeing with the statement "science is about more than math"?
              No, I'm saying that math is what separates science from science fiction.
              "Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a man, you take it." ~Malcolm X

              Comment


              • #57
                Re: Education Jobs

                Originally posted by Siggie View Post
                If so, then I see that you have limited your reading and comprehension to one sentence again and ignored the rest of my words where I said to do science you must use math, but math isn't the end all be all because the methodology is essential. Won't you ever tire of trying to build strawmen?
                I find this funny because you're the one that attacked Mos and implied he didn't know anything about science when what he said was true.

                Please, please, please don't tell high school students that math isn't integral to a future in the sciences.
                Last edited by KanadaHye; 11-13-2012, 08:26 AM.
                "Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a man, you take it." ~Malcolm X

                Comment


                • #58
                  Re: Education Jobs

                  Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
                  I find this funny because you're the one that attacked Mos and implied he didn't know anything about science when what he said was true.

                  Please, please, please don't tell high school students that math isn't integral to a future in the sciences.
                  There you go with the strawmen STILL. I said nothing of the kind.
                  You know what... you're coming in here mid-discussion and you're completely WRONG about what agreement we came to.

                  I said social sciences do use math because you need math to do science because of the probability/inference testing. But that it isn't just math for the sake of math because it's the methodology that's key. Learning calculus doesn't make one a good scientist if they don't know the first thing about how to apply the scientific method. If it was only about Math then we wouldn't have two fields called maths and sciences because they'd be one and the same. You do need math, yes, but math is but one piece. Don't misrepresent what I said and then disagree with that misrepresentation.
                  [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
                  -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Re: Education Jobs

                    Originally posted by Mos View Post
                    Because PolSci has very little mathematical and concrete theory to it. It's often very subjective and not objective enough as other sciences. A field such as Finance or Chemistry have a much more objective and pure theory to it.
                    Originally posted by Siggie View Post
                    You don't know sh!t about science. I love when someone who's never taken much coursework in a subject states something they're totally ignorant about with such great confidence. It's a dangerous thing to think you know a lot more than you know. Be humbler and actually look into something before speaking on it.

                    PolSci has very little mathematical and concrete theory? Biology is very mathematical then? All sciences use probability theory and statistical theory. If you want to get into the equations for the statistical tests we use to avoid spurious findings and errors, I have a whole book of equations for you. Many from calculus. It will satisfy your "math" requirement.
                    Originally posted by Siggie View Post
                    There you go with the strawmen STILL. I said nothing of the kind.
                    You know what... you're coming in here mid-discussion and you're completely WRONG about what agreement we came to.

                    I said social sciences do use math because you need math to do science because of the probability/inference testing. But that it isn't just math for the sake of math because it's the methodology that's key. Learning calculus doesn't make one a good scientist if they don't know the first thing about how to apply the scientific method. If it was only about Math then we wouldn't have two fields called maths and sciences because they'd be one and the same. You do need math, yes, but math is but one piece. Don't misrepresent what I said and then disagree with that misrepresentation.
                    i GiVe uP
                    "Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a man, you take it." ~Malcolm X

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Re: Education Jobs

                      Exactly. I love that you quote me AND STILL GET IT WRONG.

                      "All sciences use probability theory and statistical theory. If you want to get into the equations for the statistical tests we use to avoid spurious findings and errors, I have a whole book of equations for you. Many from calculus. It will satisfy your "math" requirement."
                      The claim was that polisci is a lesser science because there's not enough math. I said that what defines a science is the utilization of the scientific method as a means to acquire knowledge. Therefore if a field is using that method, which requires application of mathematics (e.g. statistics, probability theory, modeling, etc.) then it's science.

                      Which part of that is confusing? I am saying that if you're doing science then the math comes with it.
                      [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
                      -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X