Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Politics in Hayastan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Politics in Hayastan

    Originally posted by Mher View Post
    so what you are saying is that it has indeed been a decent system, but we should trust you that it is going to get bad?
    I didn't say those are the only two options. I mentioned communism because from your previous comments you seem to have an affection for it.
    I do not want you to trust me. I want you to learn how to gather good information and make good decisions. I will tell you what I tell my students..do not trust me, instead learn how to use your brain so that you cannot be manipulated as much. Niether capitalism nor communism exist anywhere exclusively. USA is about the most capitalistic of countries yet even here you will see plenty of socialism as well. Non of these isms can exist exclusively in any functioning society because they are all deeply flawed on their own. Making decisions is not about affection unless you are talking about a mate or something else emotionally based. Making decisions is about being informed (not to be confused with being misinformed) and using logic(something humans are not too good at). Unfortunately getting good information is increasingly difficult and Americans have been drifting far and away from logic for a long time now and this is done by design and is no accident.
    Hayastan or Bust.

    Comment


    • Re: Politics in Hayastan

      Five ways to stay in power in Central Asia

      Abdujalil Abdurasulov looks at how the presidents of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have stayed in power so long.




      Nursultan Nazarbayev (L) and Islam Karimov (R) have between them been in power for some 50 years

      Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are both expected to re-elect their leaders this spring.
      Few will be surprised if Nursultan Nazarbayev keeps his job in Kazakhstan - though he's yet to announce he is running again - or if Islam Karimov stays president in Uzbekistan.

      Both have been in charge since Soviet times and are two of the longest serving leaders in the world. Here are five tried and tested tactics they have used to keep themselves in power.

      1. Hold a referendum
      People walk in front of a giant poster of Uzbek President Islam Karimov in Tashkent, 24 December 2007. The electorate are not presented with much of a choice

      Often, instead of an election, a referendum is organised to extend the president's term. This was particularly popular in the 1990s when post-Soviet Central Asia was going through a painful transition and growing poverty, high unemployment and a declining economy meant holding an open election could have allowed an opposition to capitalise on public grievances.

      Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan held referenda in 1995, which extended both presidents' terms until 2000. Another referendum in 2002 allowed Islam Karimov to rule Uzbekistan for an extra two years until 2007.

      Since the idea of a referendum draws considerable criticism from the international community, the incumbent now tries to avoid it.

      2. Elastic elections

      If elections do take place in Central Asia, they are not necessarily on schedule.

      This is the second time Uzbekistan has held a presidential election long after its leader's term has expired. This time, it was delayed to avoid a clash with parliamentary elections in December 2014 and will now take place on 29 March.

      Calling elections early, as has been done three times in Kazakhstan, allows the leader to catch his opponents off guard - the main opposition boycotted the early elections in 2011, saying they had had little time to prepare.

      Bringing the schedule forward can also be useful if difficult issues are looming and a leader wants to squeeze in a poll before they hit. Announcing early elections late last month, President Nazarbayev mentioned a "growing economic crisis" and "heightening geopolitical antagonisms" - hinting at the crisis in Ukraine - as some of the reasons for his decision. The vote will take place on 26 April.

      In order to make early elections or referendums look legitimate, in Kazakhstan the initiative is often presented as having come from a group of citizens. The idea to hold early elections in 2015 was proposed by the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakhstan. In 2011, millions of signatures were gathered in support of the bid to extend President Nazarbayev's term until 2020 through a referendum. And then as a "compromise" President Nazarbayev suggested early elections.

      3. No real opposition

      One of the main criticisms of the elections in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan from observers at the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, a regional democracy watchdog, is the lack of competition. Plurality of candidates does not necessarily mean a genuine choice for voters, they claim. Opposing candidates tend to be pro-incumbent and in some cases they even admit that they voted for the incumbent.

      This is arguably understandable given the pressures the candidates can face. The opposition leader who challenged President Karimov in Uzbekistan's 1991 elections, Muhammad Solih from the Erk party, had to flee the country as a result of the persecution he was facing.

      In Kazakhstan, prominent opposition candidates usually fail to get as far as contesting the presidency. In 1999 main opposition candidate Akezhan Kazhageldin was convicted of participating in an unsanctioned rally, which automatically barred him from running for president. In 2011 the main opposition parties boycotted the vote, criticising the decision to hold early elections (see point 2).

      4. Constitutional change

      This spring, President Karimov is effectively running for his fourth term and if or when President Nazarbayev decides to run, it will be his fifth campaign. Even if the constitution stipulates a single person may serve only two terms, presidents of Central Asian states can easily bypass this by amending it, or adopting a new constitution. And previous terms served before the changes are not counted towards the new limit.

      This is how Mr Nazarbayev and Mr Karimov were allowed to run for their third terms. But then Kazakhstan decided to ditch such meticulous legislative fiddling altogether and adopted a law that allows Mr Nazarbayev to serve an unlimited number of terms.

      5. Electoral fraud

      It is common for the incumbent to receive more than 90% of votes and the turnout is always very high. Experts claim that such high figures are achieved through fraud. OSCE observers report ballot staffing, multiple voting and other irregularities during elections. Their reports also regularly mention intimidation and pressure exerted on people to vote in favour of the leader.

      Ironically, both Islam Karimov and Nursultan Nazarbayev would probably win elections without resorting to fraud, because in such a controlled political environment voters see no alternatives. But the fraudulently inflated numbers are viewed as crucial to boost the leaders' legitimacy. Low figures could show them as weak, which could send wrong signals to both allies and opponents.
      Politics is not about the pursuit of morality nor what's right or wrong
      Its about self interest at personal and national level often at odds with the above.
      Great politicians pursue the National interest and small politicians personal interests

      Comment


      • Re: Politics in Hayastan

        Originally posted by londontsi View Post
        Five ways to stay in power in Central Asia

        Abdujalil Abdurasulov looks at how the presidents of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have stayed in power so long.




        Nursultan Nazarbayev (L) and Islam Karimov (R) have between them been in power for some 50 years

        Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are both expected to re-elect their leaders this spring.
        Few will be surprised if Nursultan Nazarbayev keeps his job in Kazakhstan - though he's yet to announce he is running again - or if Islam Karimov stays president in Uzbekistan.

        Both have been in charge since Soviet times and are two of the longest serving leaders in the world. Here are five tried and tested tactics they have used to keep themselves in power.

        1. Hold a referendum
        People walk in front of a giant poster of Uzbek President Islam Karimov in Tashkent, 24 December 2007. The electorate are not presented with much of a choice

        Often, instead of an election, a referendum is organised to extend the president's term. This was particularly popular in the 1990s when post-Soviet Central Asia was going through a painful transition and growing poverty, high unemployment and a declining economy meant holding an open election could have allowed an opposition to capitalise on public grievances.

        Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan held referenda in 1995, which extended both presidents' terms until 2000. Another referendum in 2002 allowed Islam Karimov to rule Uzbekistan for an extra two years until 2007.

        Since the idea of a referendum draws considerable criticism from the international community, the incumbent now tries to avoid it.

        2. Elastic elections

        If elections do take place in Central Asia, they are not necessarily on schedule.

        This is the second time Uzbekistan has held a presidential election long after its leader's term has expired. This time, it was delayed to avoid a clash with parliamentary elections in December 2014 and will now take place on 29 March.

        Calling elections early, as has been done three times in Kazakhstan, allows the leader to catch his opponents off guard - the main opposition boycotted the early elections in 2011, saying they had had little time to prepare.

        Bringing the schedule forward can also be useful if difficult issues are looming and a leader wants to squeeze in a poll before they hit. Announcing early elections late last month, President Nazarbayev mentioned a "growing economic crisis" and "heightening geopolitical antagonisms" - hinting at the crisis in Ukraine - as some of the reasons for his decision. The vote will take place on 26 April.

        In order to make early elections or referendums look legitimate, in Kazakhstan the initiative is often presented as having come from a group of citizens. The idea to hold early elections in 2015 was proposed by the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakhstan. In 2011, millions of signatures were gathered in support of the bid to extend President Nazarbayev's term until 2020 through a referendum. And then as a "compromise" President Nazarbayev suggested early elections.

        3. No real opposition

        One of the main criticisms of the elections in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan from observers at the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, a regional democracy watchdog, is the lack of competition. Plurality of candidates does not necessarily mean a genuine choice for voters, they claim. Opposing candidates tend to be pro-incumbent and in some cases they even admit that they voted for the incumbent.

        This is arguably understandable given the pressures the candidates can face. The opposition leader who challenged President Karimov in Uzbekistan's 1991 elections, Muhammad Solih from the Erk party, had to flee the country as a result of the persecution he was facing.

        In Kazakhstan, prominent opposition candidates usually fail to get as far as contesting the presidency. In 1999 main opposition candidate Akezhan Kazhageldin was convicted of participating in an unsanctioned rally, which automatically barred him from running for president. In 2011 the main opposition parties boycotted the vote, criticising the decision to hold early elections (see point 2).

        4. Constitutional change

        This spring, President Karimov is effectively running for his fourth term and if or when President Nazarbayev decides to run, it will be his fifth campaign. Even if the constitution stipulates a single person may serve only two terms, presidents of Central Asian states can easily bypass this by amending it, or adopting a new constitution. And previous terms served before the changes are not counted towards the new limit.

        This is how Mr Nazarbayev and Mr Karimov were allowed to run for their third terms. But then Kazakhstan decided to ditch such meticulous legislative fiddling altogether and adopted a law that allows Mr Nazarbayev to serve an unlimited number of terms.

        5. Electoral fraud

        It is common for the incumbent to receive more than 90% of votes and the turnout is always very high. Experts claim that such high figures are achieved through fraud. OSCE observers report ballot staffing, multiple voting and other irregularities during elections. Their reports also regularly mention intimidation and pressure exerted on people to vote in favour of the leader.

        Ironically, both Islam Karimov and Nursultan Nazarbayev would probably win elections without resorting to fraud, because in such a controlled political environment voters see no alternatives. But the fraudulently inflated numbers are viewed as crucial to boost the leaders' legitimacy. Low figures could show them as weak, which could send wrong signals to both allies and opponents.
        I an guessing that the implication is that a western style democracy would somehow be better. I like these jokes..tell me more.
        Hayastan or Bust.

        Comment


        • Re: Politics in Hayastan

          Originally posted by Haykakan View Post
          I an guessing that the implication is that a western style democracy would somehow be better. I like these jokes..tell me more.
          I am glad you agree with me that this article presents the best roadmap for Armenia’s future.

          .
          Politics is not about the pursuit of morality nor what's right or wrong
          Its about self interest at personal and national level often at odds with the above.
          Great politicians pursue the National interest and small politicians personal interests

          Comment


          • Re: Politics in Hayastan

            Weren't you the English-wannabe that was making excuses for western aggression against Armenians LOL Listen bro governments are like tailor made suits, one does not fit all. Some are better under socialism some are better under dictatorships some are better as theocracies some are better under democracys. Armenia is a young country and Armenians have to figure out what suit fits them best, but with Armenian bellies the way they are its gonna be difficult finding a good looking suit LOL

            Originally posted by londontsi View Post
            I am glad you agree with me that this article presents the best roadmap for Armenia’s future.

            .

            Comment


            • Re: Politics in Hayastan

              I heard Mher went to the Rise of Russia blog to start a fight with the guys there and got his butt handed to him LOL

              Originally posted by Mher View Post
              so what you are saying is that it has indeed been a decent system, but we should trust you that it is going to get bad?
              I didn't say those are the only two options. I mentioned communism because from your previous comments you seem to have an affection for it.

              Comment


              • Re: Politics in Hayastan

                Originally posted by Serjik View Post
                Weren't you the English-wannabe that was making excuses for western aggression against Armenians ...
                I am not an Englishman


                Originally posted by Serjik
                ... Armenia is a young country and Armenians have to figure out what suit fits them best, .......
                You are chasing your own tail ....

                Who is this "Armenians" who will decide what suits them best... The people maybe ... isn't that democracy ?

                First learn to distinguish your arse from your elbow and then we can have a chat .....
                Politics is not about the pursuit of morality nor what's right or wrong
                Its about self interest at personal and national level often at odds with the above.
                Great politicians pursue the National interest and small politicians personal interests

                Comment


                • Re: Politics in Hayastan

                  Originally posted by Serjik View Post
                  I heard Mher went to the Rise of Russia blog to start a fight with the guys there and got his butt handed to him LOL
                  lol I don't think that's possible b/c haven't checked out that fantasy fiction fan page in a few months/years
                  I'm not sure how that would happen though. Is there a forum there or something
                  or is it just the crazy author talking to himself and he quoted me and responded to it?

                  Comment


                  • Re: Politics in Hayastan

                    I know your are not a brit thats why I called you a wannabe. For me your not even Armenian LOL

                    Originally posted by londontsi View Post
                    I am not an Englishman
                    Governments are put together by intellectuals, militarymen, politicians and businessman, not the people. What gives morons the idea that "the people" know what they want? Did Libyans, Ukrainians and Syrians know what they want? Yeah the destruction of their country. LOL Armenia needs political evolution not a political revolution. Evolution takes time. Got that?

                    Originally posted by londontsi View Post
                    Who is this "Armenians" who will decide what suits them best... The people maybe ... isn't that democracy ?
                    The only "arse" I see here is one that think his "londontsi" LOL

                    Originally posted by londontsi View Post
                    First learn to distinguish your arse from your elbow and then we can have a chat .....

                    Comment


                    • Re: Politics in Hayastan

                      Your not very convincing LOL

                      Originally posted by Mher View Post
                      lol I don't think that's possible b/c haven't checked out that fantasy fiction fan page in a few months/years
                      I'm not sure how that would happen though. Is there a forum there or something
                      or is it just the crazy author talking to himself and he quoted me and responded to it?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X