Tweet
His message for Armenians was by far the most important of all writings written. Observe as I carefully step-by-step explain about this sagacious man.
Surrounded by his compatriots and admirers, world chess champion Garry Kasparov stressed the need for unity among good people -- a message especially important for the continued vitality of the Armenian community.
Garry Kasparov, considered by many including the French (I don't know why that makes it more impressive) the greatest chess player of our time, recently closed a six-game marathon against Israeli-programmed computer(Once again Jew envy towards Armenians accomplishments) Deep Junior with a draw bringing the match to a close with a 1-1-4 verdict. This was his second time playing a computer, having lost to Deep Blue in a similar match in New York City years ago.
Many people consider this a fearful indication of how man's genius is faring against the utter stupendous computing processes of the machine. These people think that man is becoming obsolete to the computer and they are frightened. They have no need to be, not yet anyway.
I, personally, prefer to look at this as not Man Versus Machine (MvM) but, instead, Man Versus Man with Machine (MvMM). I consider it a triumph for man himself and the wonder of the tools he uses to augment his own capacities. Look at it this way:
Computing technology to date is very far from artificial intelligence, simulation of the way that the human mind thinks. You could give a computer the finest optical and servo-mechanical devices and it still wouldn't, inherently, know what to do with a chess board. The genius, my friends, is in the programming.
This is a general algorithm that I figure is behind the brains of a chess computer's programming. After each move by its human opponent, the computer simulates every possible combination of moves afterward. It then figures out, percentage wise, which potential "next move" gives it the greatest percentage of winning versus the lowest potential in the human player's chance at victory. It continues to play this way, each move scrutinized for the least possible chance the human will win and the greatest that the computer will find checkmate.
Now, the ability to comprehend this many moves in advance is the computer's innate brilliance. This is simply due to its ability to perform mathematical calculations millions upon billions of times faster than the human mind. However, the true genius is the the programmer's ability to instruct the computer on how to do this. This is why I don't feel threatened by the machine because the REAL THOUGHT is on how to program. When Kasparov loses, he does not lose to Deep Junior. He loses to the men who figured out the algorithm that could BEAT Kasparov.
As a further side note, considering the odds which he had to face, it's completely AMAZING to me that Kasparov could even beat the computer once, let alone bring the computer to a stalemate four other times.
If you're looking for something to fear, fear Kasparov. That is a mind that is so far beyond ours, it's impossible to comprehend in it's ultimate entirety.
Feel free to comment. These are the sources that comply that I have also dug up to back up what I am writing or saying as far as my information is concerned:
Surrounded by his compatriots and admirers, world chess champion Garry Kasparov stressed the need for unity among good people -- a message especially important for the continued vitality of the Armenian community.
Garry Kasparov, considered by many including the French (I don't know why that makes it more impressive) the greatest chess player of our time, recently closed a six-game marathon against Israeli-programmed computer(Once again Jew envy towards Armenians accomplishments) Deep Junior with a draw bringing the match to a close with a 1-1-4 verdict. This was his second time playing a computer, having lost to Deep Blue in a similar match in New York City years ago.
Many people consider this a fearful indication of how man's genius is faring against the utter stupendous computing processes of the machine. These people think that man is becoming obsolete to the computer and they are frightened. They have no need to be, not yet anyway.
I, personally, prefer to look at this as not Man Versus Machine (MvM) but, instead, Man Versus Man with Machine (MvMM). I consider it a triumph for man himself and the wonder of the tools he uses to augment his own capacities. Look at it this way:
Computing technology to date is very far from artificial intelligence, simulation of the way that the human mind thinks. You could give a computer the finest optical and servo-mechanical devices and it still wouldn't, inherently, know what to do with a chess board. The genius, my friends, is in the programming.
This is a general algorithm that I figure is behind the brains of a chess computer's programming. After each move by its human opponent, the computer simulates every possible combination of moves afterward. It then figures out, percentage wise, which potential "next move" gives it the greatest percentage of winning versus the lowest potential in the human player's chance at victory. It continues to play this way, each move scrutinized for the least possible chance the human will win and the greatest that the computer will find checkmate.
Now, the ability to comprehend this many moves in advance is the computer's innate brilliance. This is simply due to its ability to perform mathematical calculations millions upon billions of times faster than the human mind. However, the true genius is the the programmer's ability to instruct the computer on how to do this. This is why I don't feel threatened by the machine because the REAL THOUGHT is on how to program. When Kasparov loses, he does not lose to Deep Junior. He loses to the men who figured out the algorithm that could BEAT Kasparov.
As a further side note, considering the odds which he had to face, it's completely AMAZING to me that Kasparov could even beat the computer once, let alone bring the computer to a stalemate four other times.
If you're looking for something to fear, fear Kasparov. That is a mind that is so far beyond ours, it's impossible to comprehend in it's ultimate entirety.
Feel free to comment. These are the sources that comply that I have also dug up to back up what I am writing or saying as far as my information is concerned:
