Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenians Demand Justice, Not Recognition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenians Demand Justice, Not Recognition

    ARMENIANS DEMAND JUSTICE, NOT RECOGNITION
    By Harut Sassounian, Publisher, The California Courier

    AZG Armenian Daily #231
    14/12/2007

    Armenian Genocide

    The National Herald, a Greek-American weekly, published a lengthy
    interview with this writer last week on the issue of genocide
    recognition. This column was prompted by the ideas expressed in
    that interview.

    The Armenian Cause is not about genocide recognition, but the pursuit
    of justice which entails that the Armenian victims receive reparations.

    Remembering the Genocide is also about keeping the hope and dream
    alive for succeeding generations of Armenians -- that some day,
    they will regain their historic lands.

    Armenians need to rethink their approach to the pursuit of their
    cause and present their demands in a more effective manner. The
    House of Representatives has already adopted an Armenian Genocide
    resolution twice in 1975 and 1984. Pres. Reagan issued a Presidential
    Proclamation in 1981 that refers to the Armenian Genocide. More than
    20 countries, the European Parliament, a U.N. human rights panel and
    many genocide and Holocaust scholars have acknowledged the Armenian
    Genocide. Therefore, continuing attempts to seek genocide recognition
    from the international community is no longer necessary and distracts
    from the pursuit of more significant Armenian political objectives.

    Armenians have been saying for decades that they have three demands:
    "Recognition" of the genocide, "Reparations" for losses, and "Return"
    of their territories -- in that sequence. They have repeated these
    three R's so often that even Turkey's leaders, who closely monitor
    Armenian statements, have learned them by heart.

    Consequently, Armenians and Turks now have the same distorted view of
    what the Armenian Cause is all about. Both sides mistakenly believe
    that once the Genocide is recognized by Turks and others, Armenians
    will proceed to make demands for reparations and lands. This is the
    main reason why Turks so adamantly refuse to acknowledge the Armenian
    Genocide. They fear that acceptance of the Genocide would obligate
    them to pay reparations and return the usurped Armenian lands.

    And knowing well the sequence of the three R's, Turks cleverly refuse
    to acknowledge the Genocide -- the first demand -- thus preempting
    the remaining two Armenian demands.

    Armenians should not fall in the Turkish trap of getting stuck on
    demand number one. Since genocide recognition has already been
    accomplished, they should immediately proceed to the second and
    third demands.

    There is no prerequisite that the Turks -- or the U.S. or anybody else,
    for that matter -- first acknowledge the Genocide before Armenians
    can take legal action.

    Armenians should present their demands to appropriate national and
    international courts, regardless of whether the Turks recognize
    the Genocide.

    Is justice served when someone murders your family, and the criminal's
    descendants who still live on your property simply admit 100 years
    later that such a crime actually occurred? Would you just thank the
    murderer's descendants for acknowledging the crime or would you press
    to get your family's stolen property back?

    The acknowledgment of the Genocide by Turks or others is not an
    occasion for Armenians to jump for joy.

    Genocide is an undeniable fact. Armenians know it happened. The
    civilized world knows it happened. Many Turks also know it
    happened. The acknowledgment of a historical fact cannot be viewed as
    a demand. Justice requires that the criminal be punished, reparations
    paid, and the ill-gotten fruits gained through genocide returned to
    their rightful owners.

    Obviously, the Turks are not going to voluntarily return the
    Armenian lands even though Armenians have a just claim to those
    territories. Nobody gives an inch of land to anyone unless forced to do
    so. So how does such a claim become reality? It can be done by keeping
    the hope and dream alive and passing them on to the next generation,
    the way the xxxs did by proclaiming "Next year in Jerusalem" for two
    thousand years. The just demand for the recovery of their historic
    lands can disappear once Armenians lose all hope and unilaterally
    give up their dream.

    There is no country in recorded history whose borders have remained
    unchanged. Mighty empires have come and gone. Likewise, the Republic of
    Turkey will not have the same borders forever. No one knows what can
    happen in the next 30 years or 300 years, but if Armenians relinquish
    their claims now, they would have lost the chance of recovering
    anything forever. Armenians must continue to remind their offspring
    for generations to come that those lands which were unjustly stolen
    from them will eventually return to their rightful owners.

    Rather than demanding genocide recognition, Armenians should seek
    justice.


    What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

  • #2
    Re: Armenians Demand Justice, Not Recognition

    Commentary: Those Who Want Versus Those Who Seek Justice

    By Harut Sassounian

    Publisher, The California Courier


    While I anticipated that Turkish denialists would be unhappy with my last
    column, "Armenians Demand Justice, Not Recognition," I did not expect that among
    my vocal critics would be "liberal" Turkish scholars and their Armenian
    cohorts.

    Within minutes of my column's posting on "armworkshop" -- a website based at
    University of Michigan that advocates reconciliation (but without any
    consequences) between Armenians and Turks -- a plethora of reactions started pouring
    in.

    A Turkish scholar, Erol Koroglu, threw the first stone by sarcastically
    calling himself a "stupid" Turk. He was responding to my statement that denialists
    Turks "cleverly" refuse to recognize the Armenian Genocide in order to preempt
    further Armenian demands for restitution and return of land.

    Two "reconciliationist" Armenian members of the "armworkshop" immediately
    chimed in. Sebouh Aslanian of Columbia University said he agreed with Dr. Koroglu
    about "this unfortunate editorial." Aslanian went on to say, "Mr. Sassounian
    does not have the authority to represent all (or even most) Armenians. He is
    certainly not representing me," even though nowhere in my column I had claimed
    to represent Mr. Aslanian or anyone else.

    The next posting on the "armworkshop" came from businessman A. Nurhan
    Becidyan, formerly of Turkey. He said he agreed with "Sebouh that Harut Sassounian is
    not representing all Armenians." Neither Aslanian nor Becidyan gave an
    explanation as to why they disagreed with my column and why they were opposed to
    Armenians receiving compensation for their losses.

    Even more bizarre was the comment posted on "armworkshop" by Prof. Halil
    Berktay, an otherwise respected Turkish scholar and an outspoken critic of the
    Turkish government's denialist policies. Not satisfied that only two Armenians
    had disagreed with my contention that Armenians should demand justice, Prof.
    Berktay tried to provoke more Armenians to say that they disagreed with me:"And
    where are the Armenian voices, groups, organizations, etc., to loudly and
    explicitly oppose him [Sassounian]?" he wrote. "To diassociate themselves
    emphatically from this '3-R' position and to take a public stand against it?"

    Mr. Aslanian, in a second e-mail, said he agreed with Prof. Berktay. "It
    would be reassuring if more Armenians who usually remain SILENT on the sidelines
    and are complacent step up to the plate and at least say 'NOT IN MY NAME,'"he
    wrote.

    Prof. Dennis Papazian refused to bite the bait and instead suggested in his
    "armworkshop" posting that a conference be organized on this topic to see "the
    variation of opinion within the Armenian and Turkish communities."

    Prof. Dalita Roger-Hacyan of France recalled in her posting that "not all
    Turks are afraid of reparations. One Turkish lady on this list was mentioning
    justice and compensation not long ago."

    Prof. Ann Lousin, the chair of the Genocide Research Project Committee of the
    Armenian Bar Association, wrote in her posting that she wanted Ankara to
    reflect the truth about the Armenian Genocide in Turkish textbooks. She wanted
    Armenian churches and monuments identified as such and Armenian churches given
    "some compensation." She said: "Beyond that, there should be room for debate."
    She also wrote that she did not want the house her grandparents owned in Sis in
    which her father and his siblings grew up. "I would like to be certain that
    the Armenian cemetery in that city, where my ancestors (hopefully) lie
    undisturbed, is well-kept-up and free of vandalism, that the seat of the Catholicos
    above the city is recognized as such, etc. There were four Armenian churches in
    Sis in 1910 -- two Apostolic, one Protestant, and one Catholic. I know there
    aren't enough Armenians there to justify renovation and reactivation, but I
    would like the buildings, if still standing, identified as such," she wrote.

    Ragnar Naess, all the way from Norway, came to the defense of this writer's
    column. He posted on the "armworkshop" the following comment: "Of course from a
    standpoint of general ethics, Mr. Sassounian's words cannot be contradicted=80¦.
    I would even say that people murdered and properties stolen more than 100
    years ago might be compensated for. So I envisage that Mr. Sassounian in the name
    of general morality wants a general process of justice regarding all who had
    relatives murdered and properties stolen in the final phase of the Ottoman
    Empire."

    Prof. Ugurhan Berkok asked the following interesting question to the
    "armworkshop" members: "Beyond the politics, ethics and morals, I have somelegal
    questions on this RRR discussion. Forget about R1 [Recognition] for a moment and
    concentrate on law. Can't victims' descendants file claims under current
    Turkish laws? After all, deportation is acknowledged by the Republic of Turkey. Now
    assume R1. No political (legally non-binding) statements to the effect of 'no
    claims will be made' are credible because R1 will legally enable victims'
    descendants to make claims. Thus Sassounian's opinion is in fact reality, whether
    the intention is there or not because no organization can coerce individual
    descendants to sign legally-binding 'no-claim' promises. Thus the three R'sare
    not legally splittable. Am I not right?"

    In addition to the postings on the "armworkshop," many Armenians from around
    the world wrote directly to this writer expressing their agreement with him.
    Here are some examples:

    Dikran Abrahamian (Canada): "What Mr. Sassounian presented in his column isa
    platform -- clear and concise. I wish our political entities would adopt and
    start working on it in earnest, and not waste their energy, money and the
    outpouring of volunteers in other directions."

    Benon Sevan, former United Nations Under-Secretary-General (Cyprus): "Most
    heartfelt congratulations on your column which puts the right emphasis and
    provides the direction towards which we should all strive and not simply demand
    recognition of the Genocide=80¦. I take this opportunity to express mysincere
    appreciation for your excellent and courageous columns."

    Bagrad Nazarian (London): "Sassounian's column is a new and welcome
    departure=80¦. The Armenian state/government must formally and effectively mobilize the
    entire nation (INCLUDING THE DIASPORA into the Armenian state structures) on
    this issue and speak and act on its behalf at international courts and tribunals
    (The Hague, UN, etc.). Why haven't we as a nation -- INCLUDING THE DIASPORA--
    debated this issue at the state level involving the whole nation -- including
    the Diaspora -- and worked out its unshakable and real de jure position, not
    just a token and very inadequate and almost meaningless 'international
    recognition of the Genocide?' Surely the Armenian government/parliament canestablish
    an Armenian Genocide Reparations Commission (along the lines of South
    Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission which successfully buried Apartheid) to
    formally assess and ascertain the extent and nature of our losses, the roleof
    the 'international community'/the Great Powers, their unfulfilled promises,
    and formulate the ways and means of calling Turkey to account? It's high time
    we stopped (both in the Diaspora as well as in Armenia) treating this most
    important national issue as an academic/scholarly issue for various university
    departments or a tactical and token foreign policy issue, a sort of an
    international 'loves me loves me not' game whether this or that parliament will
    recognize the Genocide!"

    Mihran Keheyian (London): "I totally agree with Mr. Sassounian's analysis and
    strategy on the Armenian Genocide. We should pursue it as a state no matter
    how long it takes. We should also make moves in order to activate the Sevres
    Treaty."

    Maurice Kelechian (San Jose, CA): "Sassounian opened Pandora's Box! Not only
    is he shaking the Turkish foundation by its entirety, but also rattling the
    Armenian cage which seems trapped in its own cage or running like a hamsterin a
    never-ending loop of genocide recognition -- instead of dictating the day
    after=80¦. His sharp pen is piercing the fake Turkish shield that is always trying
    to hide or misguide the taboo subject, forgetting how their next-door neighbor,
    the mighty Soviet Union, fell apart without firing a single shot! It fell
    apart because truth was chipping at its foundation, and that is exactly what is
    going to happen to Turkey sooner than later=80¦. Mr. Sassounian is indirectly
    creating a fusion of Turkish and Armenian reality which neither one of themis
    happy with. His single-handed effort is illuminating the darkest demand of
    Justice! But my question remains why is he the only one who has been able to get out
    of this never-ending loop and is able to analyze it realistically from a
    distance and figure out the full picture of Justice?"

    David Boyajian (Newton, MA): "Sassounian's column demonstrates once again
    that he is not only a fine writer -- perhaps the best Armenian American writer
    and investigative journalist today -- but also an opinion leader. I agree with
    him that we must move beyond mere genocide 'acknowledgment.'"

    It is noteworthy that hardly any Armenian, even among armworkshop's
    reconciliationist members, responded positively to Prof. Berktay's attempt to incite a
    large number of Armenians to repudiate this writer's column outlining
    Armenians' just demands for restitution and return of their usurped lands.

    What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

    Comment

    Working...
    X