Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muslims occupy Europe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hipeter924
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Personally I prefer a secular government that does not favour a single belief, in such a system whether it be fundamentalist Christians or Muslims who are the problem they cannot discriminate against other groups through the government and thus discrimination in any form is easier to confront.

    Leave a comment:


  • gegev
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by Muhaha View Post
    According to this logic, China is disappearing.

    The problem in Europe is solely due to their refusal to realize Islam as the infectious disease that it is.

    It's a phenomenon how that entire continent has turned into a liberal rose garden.
    China’s problem is just the opposite. It enforces one child policy, to reduce its population. And China doesn’t suffer demographic crisis, among its indigenous population.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by KarotheGreat View Post
    And now let's put away our fears and hate and look at it logical. Russia exists for I don't know a 1000 years(counting from Kiev) and there have been always living a large portion of Muslim in any different states. And till now they still haven't taken over Russia and why this would happen in the next 50 years?
    And where did you get those numbers from from 19 till 50 in 40 years that's not going to happen.
    And even if it happens(still not going to happen)look at Iran an Islamic country and close friend of Armenia. Look at Syria, Kazakhstan, ...
    Our enemies are not the Muslim people but the Turks.
    but throughout the centuries Muslim powers have tried to conquer us, take our religion away, and wipe our identity of the face of the earth. Arabs, Persians, Turks (obviously) and the list goes on. Don't get to cozy with the muslim world, remember the history they've never been good to us throughout the ages, why should we support them now? We can't be naive. Yes let's be economic partners with Iran, but claiming that they are our brothers along with all these other muslim nations is childish. You know how much Muslim nations supported Azerbaijan during the Nagorno-Karabakh war? Even mercenaries went to fight for Azeri's against us? Pakistan sent weapons and money is one example. And you want to be friends with these Azeri supporters who hate us? I don't understand...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muhaha
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by gegev View Post
    Isn’t the demographic crisis in Europe and other developed/developing countries related to the lack of religious values? Which is #1 (the only) driving force to prevent abortion; that is to solve the problem.

    Whatever religion people believe; the nations that lost their respect to the God’s ban of the abortion; regardless of their economic wealth, as statistics show, will disappear.

    And the true believers, regardless of their economic status (poor/rich), will survive.

    The problem is that Christian believers, as opposed to Muslims, nowadays are the most weak in their devotion to the God; most of them are pretending to be believers when they face Force-Major situations.

    Therefore God “pretends” that he supports them.
    According to this logic, China is disappearing.

    The problem in Europe is solely due to their refusal to realize Islam as the infectious disease that it is.

    It's a phenomenon how that entire continent has turned into a liberal rose garden.
    Last edited by Muhaha; 10-26-2009, 05:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • gegev
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Isn’t the demographic crisis in Europe and other developed/developing countries related to the lack of religious values? Which is #1 (the only) driving force to prevent abortion; that is to solve the problem.

    Whatever religion people believe; the nations that lost their respect to the God’s ban of the abortion; regardless of their economic wealth, as statistics show, will disappear.

    And the true believers, regardless of their economic status (poor/rich), will survive.

    The problem is that Christian believers, as opposed to Muslims, nowadays are the most weak in their devotion to the God; most of them are pretending to be believers when they face Force-Major situations.

    Therefore God “pretends” that he supports them.

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by Army View Post
    Japs see Okinawa as like a foreign island. Also, that island does have a seperate history from Japan.

    But thanks to America, I'd rather to see Uncle Sam ruling instead of fascist japs.
    Out of curiosity, why do you view one form of fascism better than another? If fascism continues at this pace, the entire world will be run like japanese society where everything is fully automated and people are like clock work.
    Last edited by KanadaHye; 09-29-2009, 05:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Army
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Japs see Okinawa as like a foreign island. Also, that island does have a seperate history from Japan.

    But thanks to America, I'd rather to see Uncle Sam ruling instead of fascist japs.

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by Muhaha View Post
    Where are you getting this information? Japan has an array of Armed Forces just like any other country.
    From American soldiers that were stationed there....

    But if you want to read up how the U.S. controls their every move...

    Introduction
    Since 1947, Japan's constitution has forbidden the formation of a traditional military force. The country has maintained only a Self Defense Force (SDF), the mission of which has been to protect the Japanese mainland. Even within these limitations, the SDF has performed a paramilitary, logistical role, supporting U.S. troops based in Japan in exchange for promises of protection. Some experts now see this dynamic shifting. Arguments for "remilitarization"—or military "normalization," as many proponents term it—have gained currency over the last two decades. Since 9/11, SDF forces have been deployed overseas for the first time (to Afghanistan and Iraq). Their roles have been almost exclusively support-based, but their deployment is seen as symbolic of a change in attitudes as well as a challenge to the constitution. Japan is already one of the world's largest spenders on national defense, and the SDF is a robust force, though expenditures are narrowly targeted and essentially protective—they include no long-range bombers or missiles, no aircraft carries or nuclear submarines. Japan has come under increasing pressure to redirect this focus and expand its military operations, both from the United States and also domestically, in response to feared threats from China and North Korea.

    Why does Japan’s constitution forbid a military?
    Japan's current constitution was written in 1947 under the auspices of the American forces deployed to occupy and rebuild Japan after World War II. The new constitution celebrated goals of peace and democracy; as John W. Dower says in his Pulitzer Prize-winning book on postwar Japan, Embracing Defeat, the document was the "crown xxxel of the [American] reformist agenda." Article Nine explicitly forbade Japan from maintaining a military or from using force internationally for any reason. It permitted only a narrow self-defense operation, which was founded in 1954 as the SDF. Dower argues that fatigue and disillusionment with wartime nationalism made the Japanese readily willing to accept this doctrine. Much in agreement with General Douglas MacArthur, the leader of the American forces in Japan, they envisioned a "Switzerland of the Far East"—a nation that would make its way by finance, not force.

    Under the 1954 Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement, the United States pledged to protect Japan under the condition that it could establish permanent military bases on Japanese soil. According to data from 2004, the United States still maintains nearly 50,000 troops at over seventy military bases in Japan, localized overwhelmingly on the southern island of Okinawa.

    http://www.cfr.org/publication/10439/

    I was also told that the Japanese on the island of Okinawa have darker skin and treated like 3rd class citizens.

    We can start a new thread on all the countries that are "occupied" by the American military complex.
    Last edited by KanadaHye; 09-29-2009, 04:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muhaha
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
    Japan had a strong army before they got bombed back to the stone ages. The allies demilitarized the country and the U.S. military took over. There are still 40,000 to 50,000 U.S. soldiers occupying Japan so Japan can't do anything regardless of how strong their economy is unless they go gorilla and start taking out U.S. soldiers one by one ala Afghanistan or Iraq. There is even a statement in their constitution that says they aren't allowed to have a military force... how is that for being sovereign, you can't even defend yourself. But they slave all day to make cool electronics and cars so it's all good. No, this isn't a racist world at all... keep watching TV people, ignorance is bliss. Happiness in slavery

    So, Muslims can populate and occupy Europe all they want, but they can't get powerful or change laws without weapons. I've met Muslims that I found were far more trustworthy than any Canadians, Americans or Armenians for that matter. Muslims from say Indonesia are different that Pakistan... a person's religion doesn't make him/her who he/she is, it has to do a lot with personal experience, their parents, their surroundings, circumstances, etc. I wouldn't call many Europeans practicing Christians either, being fearful of another person's faith just means you're not secure about your own. It's not a Muslims fault if the rest of the population would rather waste money on their lifestyles, bmw's, etc. instead of raising children.
    Where are you getting this information? Japan has an array of Armed Forces just like any other country.

    Leave a comment:


  • Haykakan
    replied
    Re: Muslims occupy Europe

    Originally posted by hipeter924 View Post
    No the people don't want a giant military, it got voted down. As for Japan it isn't a slave to the USA (but a blind ally for sure), and how politics work in Asia is changing. Japan doesn't need much of a military regardless, its not like China is going to attack Japan. As for North Korea it will never attack South Korea or Japan, it will just threaten or develop the capacity to. As for culture most nations are addicted and influenced by US culture, ironically even China and Russia follow this trend.

    The vote of the people can and is manipulated (how else can u explain the patriot act passing). A nation without the power to defend itself is a slave to another, there are no exceptions to this rule. As for culture japan had a warrior culture based on honor etc.. but wo a military it is reduced to a scavanger level taking the leftovers (have been and over the hill stars from america). Russia and china can be much prouder of their accomplishments because they are true powers vs the paper tiger that japan is.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X