Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenia and the information war

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 288
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 21 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 41 81 131 288 template Next
  • #301
    Re: Armenia and the information war

    Originally posted by Mukuch View Post
    It is very interesting piss of fiction...
    Very well written... but very easy to dismiss. The propaganda is based on 2 points:
    1. Azerbajan is economically strong (Oil) and prepared for a long-term conflict- Armenia is not.
    2. Armenia is depending on Russian arms supplies when Azerbaijan can (Oil) bye weapons.
    Well both if them are just PART- true. Actually it is just one point (Oil).
    1. Azerbaijan is a very corrupt and mismanaged country so no Oil reserves can help it. It is the poorest country in region and will always be one.
    2. How much weapons azures bye it will do no good, they forget to mention that if they attack Armenia today they will have to deal not just with Armenian but also with Russian army
    The last part isn't true if they attack Artsakh, because Artsakh isn't part of Armenia legally. So Russia can't do a thing but if they dare to send one soldier to Hayastan they will be screwed.

    Comment

    • #302
      Re: Armenia and the information war

      Originally posted by Federate View Post
      The last line is basically a declaration of war.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Wikipedia has new false facts about Nagorno-Karabakh



      20 July 2009 [15:28] - Today.Az
      The articles posted to Wikipedia online encyclopedia indicates false information which says Nagorno-Karabakh allegedly belongs to Armenia.

      The letter by Day.Az reader testifies to it:

      “A Wikipedia article has false information which says that Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Armenia. It says Nagorno-Karabakh is an “ancient territory” of Armenia and unrecognized independent country.”

      It is noticeable that Wikipedia posted misinformation to the page on Nagorno-Karabakh which says that large part of Nagorno-Karabakh is controlled by the unrecognized “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic” and that Azerbaijan is located within its territory.

      We want to emphasize once again that this region is located in the territory of Azerbaijan as it is an integral part of Azerbaijan. This is evidenced by the facts provided not only by Azerbaijani scholars and historians, but also by their foreign counterparts.

      For example, the American Christian scholar Samuel Weems in his book “Armenia: Secrets of Christian Terrorist State” says that Nagorno-Karabakh is a historical province of Azerbaijan.

      American scholar argued that the tiny country of Armenia appeared in 1918 after which it began to make false claims on land belonging to its neighbors - Georgia, Azerbaijan and the Ottoman Empire.

      “The so-called “Karabakh problem” is a result of false claims by Armenia. From the fourth century BC to the eighth century AD, the present territory of Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan was a province of the Caucasian Albania, an ancient state of Northern Azerbaijan. Karabakh has never been a part of Armenia until the Armenians captured it in 1992 in the most brutal way,” the American scholar said in his book.

      Is this not enough for Wikipedia and Armenia to realize and understood the fact that Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan? It is unclear why Wikipedia has borrowed this false information about the Nagorno-Karabakh from Armenian sources, thereby contributing to the spread of misinformation about the Nagorno-Karabakh. It is also noticeable that the resolution of the UN General Assembly indicates Nagorno-Karabakh is a territory of Azerbaijan. Is this not enough?

      So, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia has posted false information about Azerbaijan and there is gross misrepresentation of the country's territorial integrity. We have repeatedly written about it. We encourage all readers Day.Az visit this Web site and to correct erroneous facts relating to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

      /Day.Az/


      URL: http://www.today.az/news/politics/53954.html
      Samuel Weems is there creditable source? according to wikipedia hes a disbarred lawyer whos been convicted of arson. like usual azeris like to cite idiotic sources for there stupid claims. like azeri historians this guy has no knowledge of history.

      Comment

      • #303
        Re: Armenia and the information war

        Twas a good laugh though.

        Comment

        • #304
          Re: Armenia and the information war

          Originally posted by ninetoyadome View Post
          Samuel Weems is there creditable source? according to wikipedia hes a disbarred lawyer whos been convicted of arson. like usual azeris like to cite idiotic sources for there stupid claims. like azeri historians this guy has no knowledge of history.
          Nah, he's a joke and hardly a credible source. Only taken seriously in Turkey and Azerbaijan where they have even translated his book.
          Azerbaboon: 9.000 Google hits and counting!

          Comment

          • #305
            Re: Armenia and the information war

            Originally posted by Federate View Post
            Nah, he's a joke and hardly a credible source. Only taken seriously in Turkey and Azerbaijan where they have even translated his book.
            in the article they claim besides azeri historians there are foreign historians who agree with them. hes the only one and hes not even a historian.

            Comment

            • #306
              Re: Armenia and the information war

              The Azeri entity like Turkey has no historical legitimacy whatever and is merely the result of the usurpation and Turkification of the Caucasian Albania's territory.

              Comment

              • #307
                Re: Armenia and the information war

                Excavations to prove Armenian traces in Karabakh

                20.07.2009 17:45

                Lena Badeyan
                “Radiolur”

                While the world powers and politicians are trying to resolve the Karabakh issue, historians and archeologists are trying to prove that the territory has been originally Armenian. The Armenian specialists reached the greatest success in 2005, when they found one of the four Tigranakert cities founded by Armenian King Tigran the Great on the liberated land of Aghdam, to the southeast of Martaket region.

                “For me this is Troy, this is how I would assess it. We continue finding different items here, but it’s not the most important. What’s important is that the city once existed here,” said Vardges Safaryan, member of the Tigranakert expedition, assessing the political and historical essence of the diggings.

                “The two main walls and the towels of the Hellenic city have been discovered. The city was founded in the 80s B.C. and survived through the 15th century, about 1 500 years. That is whey here we have not only Hellenic monuments, but also Christian ones. We have discovered an Armenian church built in 5-7th centuries, where we found one of the most interesting items last year – a clay disk-like item with an engraving: “Me, Vache, the slave of God.” This inscription dates back to the 6-7th centuries and it is the most ancient Armenian inscription found on the land of Karabakh up to now,” Vardges Safaryan said.

                The authorities of Nagorno Karabakh also attach great importance to the excavations of Tigranakert and the government has been financing the works for about two years.

                404 Not Found
                http://www.armradio.am/news/?part=soc&id=15456
                Azerbaboon: 9.000 Google hits and counting!

                Comment

                • #308
                  Re: Armenia and the information war

                  Originally posted by Federate View Post
                  Excavations to prove Armenian traces in Karabakh

                  20.07.2009 17:45

                  Lena Badeyan
                  “Radiolur”

                  While the world powers and politicians are trying to resolve the Karabakh issue, historians and archeologists are trying to prove that the territory has been originally Armenian. The Armenian specialists reached the greatest success in 2005, when they found one of the four Tigranakert cities founded by Armenian King Tigran the Great on the liberated land of Aghdam, to the southeast of Martaket region.

                  “For me this is Troy, this is how I would assess it. We continue finding different items here, but it’s not the most important. What’s important is that the city once existed here,” said Vardges Safaryan, member of the Tigranakert expedition, assessing the political and historical essence of the diggings.

                  “The two main walls and the towels of the Hellenic city have been discovered. The city was founded in the 80s B.C. and survived through the 15th century, about 1 500 years. That is whey here we have not only Hellenic monuments, but also Christian ones. We have discovered an Armenian church built in 5-7th centuries, where we found one of the most interesting items last year – a clay disk-like item with an engraving: “Me, Vache, the slave of God.” This inscription dates back to the 6-7th centuries and it is the most ancient Armenian inscription found on the land of Karabakh up to now,” Vardges Safaryan said.

                  The authorities of Nagorno Karabakh also attach great importance to the excavations of Tigranakert and the government has been financing the works for about two years.

                  http://www.armradio.am/news/?part=soc&id=15456
                  actually Vache was the first leader of the historic azerbaijan, thats what the azeri "historians" will say tomorrow.

                  Comment

                  • #309
                    Re: Armenia and the information war

                    Originally posted by Federate View Post
                    Nah, he's a joke and hardly a credible source. Only taken seriously in Turkey and Azerbaijan where they have even translated his book.
                    The piece of xxxx is dead. Good riddance.

                    Comment

                    • #310
                      Re: Armenia and the information war

                      Originally posted by D3ADSY View Post
                      The piece of xxxx is dead. Good riddance.
                      And a Turkish wife.

                      The poor bastard may have been under his wife's thumb!!
                      Politics is not about the pursuit of morality nor what's right or wrong
                      Its about self interest at personal and national level often at odds with the above.
                      Great politicians pursue the National interest and small politicians personal interests

                      Comment

                      Previous 1 21 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 41 81 131 288 template Next
                      Working...
                      X