Tweet
Re: Armenia and the information war
From the wilsonforarmenia.org website I suggest everyone check this page:
...The other important international document which is often referred to is the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, Final Act adopted on August 1, 1975. It is also known as Helsinki Final Act. This document allegedly upholds territorial integrity and indivisibility of border. It does not. "They [the participating States] consider that their frontiers can be changed, in accordance with international law, by peaceful means and by agreement," holds Helsinki Final Act's Chapter 1.
It makes clear that use of force against territorial integrity and political independence is unacceptable. "The participating States will refrain in their mutual relations, as well as in their international relations in general, from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State ..." Hence, it is obvious that the Helsinki Final Act, like the Charter, condemns use of force against territorial integrity and not absolute maintenance of territorial integrity.
The “Azeri” filth think fake “Azerbaijan” is the only country that can talk about territorial integrity, what territorial integrity? Where is the internationally recognized document that confirms the existence of an “Azerbaijan” north of the Arax as a subject of international law before 1991?
The League of Nations rejected “’Azerbaijan’s” bid for recognition and the bid to join in 1920 because it did not have defined borders as a result of it’s raison d’être, a fake country that was supposed to claim as much territory from the real countries of the region to aid pan-Turkism eliminate the “wedge” that stood between them and their delirium. Effectively, fake “Azerbaijan” was never a subject of international law before 1991.
Where is the legal document that shows the borders of a state called “Azerbaijan” north of the Arax River? When has fake “Azerbaijan” ever sat down with its neighbors to delineate its borders?
I don’t know how our statesmen have let the victorious Armenia plummet into such deep shit where the “Azeri” parasites have managed to counter our victory with their nonexistent “territorial integrity”. Counterfeiting of an artificially fabricated pan-Turkist “state” to stop the expansion of Armenia eastward in 1918, with a name stolen from Iran for later claims on real Azarbaijan (Atrpatakan) as well as history, monuments, heroes, scientists, poets, etc., all stolen from others, does not bring any integrity let alone territorial.
I hope for the day when decent statesmen who care about the interests of the Armenian nation come to power in Armenia who I'd like to hear say, “without giving up the principle of self-determination, we have decided to solve the Artsakh issue according to that of territorial integrity. We bring our legal documents, you “Azeris” bring yours”.
Originally posted by ninetoyadome
View Post
...The other important international document which is often referred to is the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, Final Act adopted on August 1, 1975. It is also known as Helsinki Final Act. This document allegedly upholds territorial integrity and indivisibility of border. It does not. "They [the participating States] consider that their frontiers can be changed, in accordance with international law, by peaceful means and by agreement," holds Helsinki Final Act's Chapter 1.
It makes clear that use of force against territorial integrity and political independence is unacceptable. "The participating States will refrain in their mutual relations, as well as in their international relations in general, from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State ..." Hence, it is obvious that the Helsinki Final Act, like the Charter, condemns use of force against territorial integrity and not absolute maintenance of territorial integrity.
Originally posted by ninetoyadome
View Post
The League of Nations rejected “’Azerbaijan’s” bid for recognition and the bid to join in 1920 because it did not have defined borders as a result of it’s raison d’être, a fake country that was supposed to claim as much territory from the real countries of the region to aid pan-Turkism eliminate the “wedge” that stood between them and their delirium. Effectively, fake “Azerbaijan” was never a subject of international law before 1991.
Where is the legal document that shows the borders of a state called “Azerbaijan” north of the Arax River? When has fake “Azerbaijan” ever sat down with its neighbors to delineate its borders?
I don’t know how our statesmen have let the victorious Armenia plummet into such deep shit where the “Azeri” parasites have managed to counter our victory with their nonexistent “territorial integrity”. Counterfeiting of an artificially fabricated pan-Turkist “state” to stop the expansion of Armenia eastward in 1918, with a name stolen from Iran for later claims on real Azarbaijan (Atrpatakan) as well as history, monuments, heroes, scientists, poets, etc., all stolen from others, does not bring any integrity let alone territorial.
I hope for the day when decent statesmen who care about the interests of the Armenian nation come to power in Armenia who I'd like to hear say, “without giving up the principle of self-determination, we have decided to solve the Artsakh issue according to that of territorial integrity. We bring our legal documents, you “Azeris” bring yours”.
!
Comment