Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan
A new status in the region is needed, the current status quo does not favor Armenia but Azerbaijan and Turkey. The lifting of the blockades, and the incorporation of Artsakh legally into Armenia should be top priority. After that, we should make territorial claims to our lands to the West. I'm tired of Azerbaijanis and this war. We need to move forward. It is in the interest of the Turk to keep us wrapped up over hectares of land for the next 100 years as they colonize our former territories with more and more Muslims.
-----
Hmmm. So the current status quo favors Turks and Azeris? First time I hear this. Ingenious... So liberating our land in Artsakh is in the interest of Turks to get us wrapped up over hectares for next 100 years? I welcome that for next 100 years. But you are willing to give up that land which was won by the blood of our people and is being held by blood and wrap us with promise of other hectares in the west?
Regarding the options. Well, the phased settlement our government has been opposing for the past 20 years is the big one. That is absolute BS and unacceptable. It will lead to the death of every Armenian in the region. We must never allow this to happen.
----
I thought the phased settlement was rejected because it takes away security zones before guaranteeing artsak's status. So without phased settlement that has been favoring Azerbaijan all Armenians will be killed? I thought they tried it
Another would be the incorporation of Russian peace-keepers in the region along with phased settlement aka the Kazan Plan. Its absurd and never should happen. The Russians wouldn't be able to defend Artsakh if Armenia is cut off from it after the pull out of the buffer zone. The Azeris would overrun the region Ossetian-style.
------
Didn't Azeris try to run over Artsakh just over a month ago? Did it work?
You're joking right? What do you call these blockades? The frontline? We are being besieged by the Turks, and war is not going to solve this problem. It will only mean our eventual demise.
-----
Agh here is the siege description which we were into and never knowing.
We also have a siege-mentality and I think your posts make it obvious. This is a direct result of our genocide and should be overcome. That is the only way we can break the Turkish siege on our nation.
-------
So wiping out my genocide memory and ending my siege mentality will break Turkish "Siege".
Sorry, sounds too Turkish an idea.
What do you mean? Turk resumption of hostilites even after a peace treaty? That would prompt Russian invasion of Azerbaijan and perhaps even international intervention. The Azerbaijanis are quite literally batxxxx, but they are not THAT suicidal.
-----
Right above you do not trust Russian peacekeepers but believe Russia will "invade" if Turks break treaty.
Can you tell me on whose favor will Russia invade? Our? Really?
What I am arguing is that ceding some territory, on our terms, back to them is a much better deal than ceding the entire buffer zone back
------
Ohhh ahhh you're talking about some territory, not the entire zone.
I thought this was offered and rejected by Azeris over and over for past 22 years?
Am I a troll? �
A new status in the region is needed, the current status quo does not favor Armenia but Azerbaijan and Turkey. The lifting of the blockades, and the incorporation of Artsakh legally into Armenia should be top priority. After that, we should make territorial claims to our lands to the West. I'm tired of Azerbaijanis and this war. We need to move forward. It is in the interest of the Turk to keep us wrapped up over hectares of land for the next 100 years as they colonize our former territories with more and more Muslims.
-----
Hmmm. So the current status quo favors Turks and Azeris? First time I hear this. Ingenious... So liberating our land in Artsakh is in the interest of Turks to get us wrapped up over hectares for next 100 years? I welcome that for next 100 years. But you are willing to give up that land which was won by the blood of our people and is being held by blood and wrap us with promise of other hectares in the west?
Regarding the options. Well, the phased settlement our government has been opposing for the past 20 years is the big one. That is absolute BS and unacceptable. It will lead to the death of every Armenian in the region. We must never allow this to happen.
----
I thought the phased settlement was rejected because it takes away security zones before guaranteeing artsak's status. So without phased settlement that has been favoring Azerbaijan all Armenians will be killed? I thought they tried it
Another would be the incorporation of Russian peace-keepers in the region along with phased settlement aka the Kazan Plan. Its absurd and never should happen. The Russians wouldn't be able to defend Artsakh if Armenia is cut off from it after the pull out of the buffer zone. The Azeris would overrun the region Ossetian-style.
------
Didn't Azeris try to run over Artsakh just over a month ago? Did it work?
You're joking right? What do you call these blockades? The frontline? We are being besieged by the Turks, and war is not going to solve this problem. It will only mean our eventual demise.
-----
Agh here is the siege description which we were into and never knowing.
We also have a siege-mentality and I think your posts make it obvious. This is a direct result of our genocide and should be overcome. That is the only way we can break the Turkish siege on our nation.
-------
So wiping out my genocide memory and ending my siege mentality will break Turkish "Siege".
Sorry, sounds too Turkish an idea.
What do you mean? Turk resumption of hostilites even after a peace treaty? That would prompt Russian invasion of Azerbaijan and perhaps even international intervention. The Azerbaijanis are quite literally batxxxx, but they are not THAT suicidal.
-----
Right above you do not trust Russian peacekeepers but believe Russia will "invade" if Turks break treaty.
Can you tell me on whose favor will Russia invade? Our? Really?
What I am arguing is that ceding some territory, on our terms, back to them is a much better deal than ceding the entire buffer zone back
------
Ohhh ahhh you're talking about some territory, not the entire zone.
I thought this was offered and rejected by Azeris over and over for past 22 years?
Am I a troll? �
Comment