Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

The Sick Man of Europe -- Again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Yeah agree - nice to see this in the WSJ Op-Ed. Perhaps a bit overly concetrated on the Cyprus issue - but good to see these points raised/emphasised as a counter to the great deal of pre-Turkish propaganda one sees everywhere...

    Comment


    • #12
      Wow, the US Ambassador to Turkey resigned last week!!
      I wonder if that has anything to do with the current tensions between the former allies.
      Also found this interesting: Turkey, US relations hit new rough spot

      Comment


      • #13
        Very interesting Catwomen - yeah something is certainly up (and I think it all goes back to Turkey expressing sympathies for Palestinians...and this is Isreal's revenge/attempt to learn them the consequences - etc)

        This statement/claim (from your linked article) is quite a reach however (and makes me think that there are forces behind the scenes trying to trump up the "dispute" etc) :

        on Sunday, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that by "blocking" US efforts to get into Iraq from the north two years ago, Turkey had allowed the insurgency there to "flourish."

        The article later has more of Rumsfeld's comments expanding this line of reasoning. I'll just withhold comment...but yeah some very interesting developments. I have a good friend in Northern Iraq right now working with the Kurds. I discussed this issue of Turkish interferrence and he didn't really think it a factor (then or yet...etc) - then again might be possible to miss.

        Comment


        • #14
          Yeah, I heard about Donald Rumsfeld's statement!

          Also guess what's the best selling book in Turkey now?
          Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf"!!! lol, yeah... I guess anti-Semitism is rising in Turkey, which is weird since Jews have always supported Turkey and are a big supporter of their entrance to EU.

          Look what I found on latimes about this and it's connection to the Armenian genocide!!

          How Should We Read Sales of 'Mein Kampf' in Turkey?

          March 23, 2005

          The article about the popularity of Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" in Turkey ("Hitler Finds an Audience in Turkey," March 16) causes one to speculate about the sudden rise of anti-Semitism in Turkey.

          One reason could be that with anti-Semitism rising again in Europe, the Turks, who have desperately sought entry into the European Union, are only trying to fit in with Europeans. Another could be that Hitler's genocidal policies dovetail quite nicely with Turkish history. Let us not forget that the Turks popularized modern genocide when they killed up to 1 1/2 million Armenians during World War I. Not only won't the Turks apologize for their heinous crime, they won't even acknowledge it. The Turks also have long denied the rights of ethnic Kurds who live in Turkey. The Turks are so hateful of Kurds that they will not even allow a Kurdish state to be born outside of Turkey's borders.

          Josh Baker

          San Francisco

          latimes
          Cool, no?

          Comment


          • #15
            Yes obvioulsy the type of ideas expressed in Mein Kampf dovetail quite nicely with the standard Turkish/Pan-Turkick beliefs in the superiority of the Turk in all things and the type of jingoism that is very common over there...but perhaps Mouse (a big fan of the book) can enlighten us more why the Turks might approve of such ideas...

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by winoman
              Turkey has a formidable military that could cause havok in the region. Their elites believe in a kind of pan-Turkick manifest destiny that will once again make them some sort of world superpower...and (many/most?) Turks really buy into this idea of Turks being the most special people in the world (ahem - sound familiar anyone? lol) - and they reeally feel that the rest of the world is still in conspiracy against them (purely from jeolosy that they are not Turkish - the supreme race)...sure most Turks likely do not spout this or even believe it (who knows really) - but enough sure do - and this has been force fed them since birth (certainly throughout their schooling) along with the veneration of Ataturk's godhood...and of course that all their past enemies and those who hate them are in fact only traitors who have had no legitimate reason to ever dislike the Turks who only believe in "Peace at Home and Peace in the World"...all that being said - most Turks are pretty nice and friendly people when you get to know them who mostly like to party and have a good time...such a dichotomy...what a case study in mass mental illness they might make...
              Hohum, Wino thinks that because he's made a couple of visits to Turkey, and slept with a few Turkish women, he's now an expert on the place. Nonsense quotes like "Their elites believe in a kind of pan-Turkick manifest destiny" show that he is not. If by "elites" he means the post-WW1 Ataturk regime and its successors then actually they were almost religiously NOT pan-Turkic, but were intent on Turkey abandoning all past dreams of empire and instead accepting that Anatolia, and Anatolia alone, was now and forever the only homeland of Turks. Hence Ataturk's abandoning of Turkish claims to Northern Iraq. Not that all that helped Armenia, since it just made Republican Turkey all the more eager to make Turkey an ethnically 100% Turkish state, with borders that would never move even an inch.

              Now, as for case studies, Wino would be a good case study for individual mental illness. But that's another topic, isn't it.
              Plenipotentiary meow!

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by CatWoman
                BEAUTIFUL!!!
                Beautiful in that it shows that the Greek diaspora's cesspit is just as full of xxxxe as the Armenian and Turkish ones.
                Plenipotentiary meow!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by bell-the-cat
                  ...the post-WW1 Ataturk regime and its successors then actually they were almost religiously NOT pan-Turkic, but were intent on Turkey abandoning all past dreams of empire and instead accepting that Anatolia, and Anatolia alone, was now and forever the only homeland of Turks. Hence Ataturk's abandoning of Turkish claims to Northern Iraq. Not that all that helped Armenia, since it just made Republican Turkey all the more eager to make Turkey an ethnically 100% Turkish state, with borders that would never move even an inch.
                  I understand that this became the offical Turkish position (out of necessity) and was Ataturk's brilliant re-defintion of (as it were) "Turkism" - inward to Anatolia (what they could legitimatly think to hold onto). However, since the fall of the Soviet union this view has changed and the Turkish elite now see themselves as leading an eventual Turkish confederation of states (even if not politically - economically). To this end they have inundated the Turkick former Soviet States with Turkish media and such and suggested that they rightly are the lead - the example for all Turks of the world (witness also their involvement/advocacy with the Uighurs of China). So no - I'm not off base with this claim.

                  As for the rest - still a crybaby eh?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by bell-the-cat
                    Beautiful in that it shows that the Greek diaspora's cesspit is just as full of xxxxe as the Armenian and Turkish ones.
                    The most meaningless post of the year!!!
                    Perhaps you should know that genocide recognition is on Armenia's foreign policy agenda and isn't only a diaspora issue.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Yawn, yet more Wino misunderstandings - he never tires of producing them, does he!

                      Originally posted by winoman
                      I understand that this became the offical Turkish position (out of necessity) and was Ataturk's brilliant re-defintion of (as it were) "Turkism" - inward to Anatolia (what they could legitimatly think to hold onto). However, since the fall of the Soviet union this view has changed and the Turkish elite now see themselves as leading an eventual Turkish confederation of states (even if not politically - economically). To this end they have inundated the Turkick former Soviet States with Turkish media and such and suggested that they rightly are the lead - the example for all Turks of the world (witness also their involvement/advocacy with the Uighurs of China). So no - I'm not off base with this claim.
                      Firstly, the "Turkish elite" in the 1980s and 90s did not involve itself in grubby matters like politics.
                      Secondly, of those that did (i.e. politicians), in the early 1990s there were some who thought to increase their status within Turkey by going on foreign trips to the various newly independent Turkic states in the former Soviet Union, and making "we are your brothers" type of comments. For example, there is a particularly widespread (in Turkey) photo of the leader of Turkey's MHP party addressing a large political rally in Azerbaycan. However, nobody took these speeches seriously even at the time (remember, Turkey never did intervene to help Azerbaycan).
                      Thirdly, all real interest in establishing some sort of "Turkish commonwealth" evaporated long ago, when Turkey realised that all it was ever going to get from it would be never ending demands for more money from basket-case economies. Today, there is NOBODY in Turkey, political or otherwise, that that would ever wish for Turkey to be leading "an eventual Turkish confederation of states".
                      Plenipotentiary meow!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X