Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

[Կարմիր Բ]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

I feel in my part responsible for this mess and unpleasent internal argument, but it's you, Miss Siamanto and Կարմիր Բ who started it

There is no internal argument really, just immunity to idiocity.

So stick to the topic and tell us why is France so catastrophic for Armenia.

[Armenian]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Is it just me or have other people started not reading the psychobabble being produced by the he/she Siamanto

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

No, Miss Female man, once again you made a total fool of yourself... This is not what I meant... As usual you make imaginary interpretations and conclusions. I feel in my part responsible for this mess and unpleasent internal argument,

Please let us know how and where in the below - to use your own words - "you feel in your part responsible for this mess and unpleasent internal argument? "

This is really what I don't like... but who turned the thread which was
about Sarko into this mess?
Her obsession is just bordering on medical...

Are there "imaginary" words, in the above, that only you can see? LOL Did you, accidentally, put them "in invisible" while putting them "in bold?"

Are you naive enough to think that such a childish lie may convince the reader? How can you be dumb enough to lie so blatantly?
So much for not making a fool of yourself???

but it's you, Miss Siamanto and Կարմիր Բ who started it and apparently do not have any intention to end it...

Wow! What is your mental age? Not only you're hypocrite, unintuitive and imperceptive, you're also immature.

And as I said earlier, if you like to be respected and understood better, I strongly suggest you reassess some attitudes and manners of yours for your sake...

The following is an excerpt of a reply to you, I wrote a couple of days ago, but did not post it. Here it is:

If your posts reflect any sense of humor, then I don't want to be bored with such humor.
If your posts transpire any femininity, then I dream of a world devoid of such femininity; if you were intuitive enough you would have sensed, from how I interact with you, how feminine I perceive you. But you're not and...A bon entendeur salut!

The "moral tchador" may fit you and may reflect feminine values to narrow minded bigots like you; but, it only symbolizes masculinity to some of us and it suffocates us: the "skin" is made of a more noble fabric than your boringly rough austere "tchador."
.
As for being respected, I'd rather keep my integrity and defend certain values than seek to be "respected??" while enjoying the comfort of a cowardly attitude.
Furthermore, I would reconsider my moral values the day "trailer thrashes" and psychotic bullies like Armenian would express respect towards me. As for narrow minded and hypocrite bigots like you, though it would not matter one way or the other, I'd rather see you keep your distances.
I don't need - and do not want - the respect of your kind - i.e. narrow minded bigots and psychotic bullies; I'll worry about if it will ever matter, if your kind will ever matter.

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Hysteria?

[Lucin]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

It takes two to tango - in this case five - and we all are part of it; so why can't you face yourself? What's your excuse? Can "hypocrisy" be the word?

It was in a similar situation, the first time that I have qualified your words as hypocritical and, again, I will have to qualify the above as hypocritical.
It is your self-righteous, one sided and biased stance that makes you a hypocrite and you will continue to be so, unless you learn to see the reality from all sides.
Sorry, but I still want to call a spade a spade.

No, Miss Female man, once again you made a total fool of yourself... This is not what I meant... As usual you make imaginary interpretations and conclusions. I feel in my part responsible for this mess and unpleasent internal argument, but it's you, Miss Siamanto and Կարմիր Բ who started it and apparently do not have any intention to end it...

And as I said earlier, if you like to be respected and understood better, I strongly suggest you reassess some attitudes and manners of yours for your sake...

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

jurks are watching you. Shame on you all...

You are right...And no Turk or Jurk consideration is going to compete with the massive egos of some individuals around here.

*points to the author of the quoted post above* Like the ones who only see the problem somewhere else and lack the lucidity or the courage to assume responsibility???

jurks are watching you. Shame on you all...

This is really what I don't like... but who turned the thread which was
about Sarko into this mess?
Her obsession is just bordering on medical...

It takes two to tango - in this case five - and we all are part of it; so why can't you face yourself? What's your excuse? Can "hypocrisy" be the word?

It was in a similar situation, the first time that I have qualified your words as hypocritical and, again, I will have to qualify the above as hypocritical.
It is your self-righteous, one sided and biased stance that makes you a hypocrite and you will continue to be so, unless you learn to see the reality from all sides.
Sorry, but I still want to call a spade a spade.

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

jurks are watching you. Shame on you all...

Whatever is "shameful" and/or unfortunate in the above, it is such whether jurks are watching us or not and, I apologize to be part of what some may consider as shameful, unfortunate or unpleasant. I assure you that, when one is part of it, not only it seems as unfortunate and unpleasant, because one is consciously taking the risk to cause unpleasant feelings among others - I don't care about jurks; but, also, it consumes so much energy and time.

However, as I have told Lucin:

" I assure you that it's not a pleasant thing to do and I'd rather spend my time otherwise; unfortunately, at times, I feel it as necessary. "

I may be wrong, but I believe that ignoring issues and "looking the other way," eventually, bites back. Unfortunately, when it comes to certain sensitive issues, the situation can easily degenerate and the excesses become unfortunate and unpleasant - shameful, if you prefer.
Unfortunate, but such is life!

In any case, if anything positive comes out, I would not care much how jurks perceive it.

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Siamanto, I think you and Axel would make a good couple.
Երկուսնիդ կարող եք իրար գլուխ «արդուկել» ամեն գիշեր:

<lock>

[Armenian]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Siamanto, I think you and Axel would make a good couple.
Երկուսնիդ կարող եք իրար գլուխ «արդուկել» ամեն գիշեր:

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

One last thing...
The friend/foe distinction.
This is in line with the schmittian conception of politics, the ultimate enemy being that who threatens one's very form of existence.
It can be argued the western world order threatens armenian identity and is in contradiction with our ideals.
The criterion is thus not totally irrelevant.

If the above is a reply to my question:

By the way, did you read the title and some of the first posts? What do they inspire you?

Can you please put it into context and tell us
1. How do you think Sarkozy and France will "threaten the Armenian Identity" and will "threaten our very form of existence?" Also, will it be more and/or any differently than, let's say, Germany, Russia, China...?
2. What exactly in the conspiracy theory that is expressed through Armenian's posts on the first page inspired you such subtle concepts? I'm just curious.