Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Recognize the Armenian genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Recognize the Armenian genocide

    By Laurie Apelian
    Published: 4/24/05


    In the wake of the solemn remembrance of the 90th anniversary of the

    Armenian Genocide, Mehmet Basoglu has yet again attempted to discredit and undermine the events of the genocide with myriad skewed facts and sketchy statements regarding what occurred.

    At first, I was tempted to respond to Mr. Basoglu's article "Changing History" (The Daily Targum, April 14) by refuting each historical "fact" of his one by one. I decided not to for two reasons.

    The first reason is that I strongly urge all of you who are reading this letter to read the following: "Ambassador Morgenthau's Story," the eyewitness accounts of the American ambassador, Henry Morgenthau, who was stationed in Turkey during the latter parts of the massacres and documented exactly what he observed; "The Slaughterhouse Province: An American Diplomat's Report on the Armenian Genocide (1915 - 1917)," based on the American consul Leslie Davis' report to the State Department from Harput, Turkey; and Peter Balakian's "The Burning Tigris," a thorough compilation of many historical sources and documents regarding the massacres and an examination of America's response to the Armenians' plight. These sources are no "British Blue Book propaganda," with which Mr. Basoglu accuses Armenian Americans of being brainwashed. These sources contain the facts that no one but the Turkish government is trying to conceal.

    My second reason for not disputing his claims one by one is that the accounts of my own grandfather and great-grandfather are enough evidence to me that the genocides occurred, and that is what I'd like to share a little bit of with you.

    Mr. Basoglu makes the statement that "true progress will never be made on this issue until the Armenian Diaspora examines the roots of their own identity." I am a child of the Armenian Diaspora, and I know full well the roots of my Armenian identity. My roots reach back to my great-grandfather, Bedros Bahadourian, who passed away a few years ago. As a child, as a teenager, I would sit next to my great-grandfather and listen to his first-hand accounts of how he was orphaned during the massacres, of how he and his siblings had to march through the desert, of how he watched the bodies of those he loved perish under the sun and at the hands of the Turkish troops, and of how he was left poor, homeless and starving to the point of stealing food and licking the remains of food off of the ground. Also, my grandfather, Kevork Parseghian, was born and raised in Turkey, and he describes how he and his younger sister would be physically harassed and spit upon by the Turks while simply passing by Turkish villages on their way to school. These stories are not slanted British propaganda. They are not lies or allegations made up by extremists. They are the true experiences of my own family members.

    Amazingly enough, my great-grandfather never once exhibited hatred toward the Turks, although he and his family suffered at their hands. He never taught his children, his grandchildren or his great-grandchildren to hate the Turks or to retaliate in violence. My great-grandfather was not a revolutionary or a member of a political party - he was a man of God, who after relating all the horrors of his childhood to us, would say, "Oor eyeenk, oor yegank Park Asdoodzo," meaning, "Where were we before? And look how far we have come! Praise be to God!"

    Mr. Basoglu quotes Turkish sources - if they are not slanted sources, I don't know what is - as saying only 300,000 Armenians died during the period of the massacres. The truth of the matter is that 300,000 Armenians lost their lives in just the first period of attacks, from 1894-1896 at the hands of Sultan Abdul Hamid II. That is a fact from "The Armenian Massacres, 1894-1896 U.S. Media Testimony" by Arman J. Kirakossian. The massacres continued and only escalated during World War I until about 1916, this time led by leaders like Enver Pasha and Talaat Pahsa, among many others. By the end of 1916, the death toll had reached over one million, a fact documented in many places, but namely Merrill D. Peterson's "Starving Armenians."

    To me personally, the exact numbers of how many people died is not what matters the most. What is more crucial is that a targeted, premeditated genocide against one specific group of people was carried out for the sole reason that they were Armenian, and nothing else. The Young Turks went after the Armenians for the same basic reasons that Adolf Hitler and the Nazis went after the Jews and the Hutus in Rwanda went after the Tutsis - to exterminate an ethnic group of people who they did not see fit to live. The Jewish Holocaust and many other occurrences of ethnic cleansing have been acknowledged and dealt with on a federal level. Why must the Armenian people alone continue to suffer the disgrace and pain of having their genocide called "slanted propaganda" and mere "allegations"?

    I do not support the few and far between Armenian extremists who express their views with violence and hatred. But every time someone like Mr. Basoglu writes such infuriating, blasphemous, careless inaccuracies about the genocide that my own family members suffered through, my Armenian blood boils. It is my Christian values that keep me from retaliating in hatred, but it is my human dignity that demands recognition of the atrocities committed against my people.

    Laurie Apelian is an Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy sophomore.
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

  • #2
    An Atrocious Massacre

    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    Comment


    • #3
      Arman Kirakossian:Turkey’s State Mentality Denies Possibility

      Arman Kirakossian:
      Turkey’s State Mentality Denies Possibility of Armenian Genocide Recognition
      The more Turkey strives towards the European community the more frequently it’s reminded about the necessity of the Armenian Genocide acknowledgement. With the increasing number of European states recognizing the Armenian genocide the debates in Turkey grow hotter. PanARMENIAN.Net requested Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Arman Kirakossian to comment on some aspects of the problem.
      22.05.2006 GMT+04:00
      More and more states address the Armenian genocide recognition issue. Can this be described as the wish to pose obstacle on Turkey’s way towards the European Union?


      The process of recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide by the European states is not a novelty. It started immediately after the WWI and was resumed in the middle of 1960-ies. The fact of recognition can be proved by the joint statement of the governments of the United Kingdom, Russia and France on 24, 1915, which said that “carnage of Armenians is being perpetrated by Kurds and Turks with obvious connivance and sometimes support of the Ottoman authorities.” This statement can be reputed as the first international document condemning the Armenian Genocide (though the term “genocide” did not exist at that time), characterizing the evils committed against Armenians as Turkey’s “crime against humanity and civilization”, the responsibility for which was lying on the government and local authorities.

      By the time Armenia became independent in 1991 the only European state that has recognized the Armenian genocide was Cyprus. The interest of the European community in the problem increased in 1970-1980, when it was discussed in press and various international organizations. Thus, the Armenian Genocide was considered by the subcommittee of human rights for prevention of discrimination and defense of national minorities in Geneva. In 1985 at the sitting of the subcommittee considered the report on prevention and punishment of genocide prepared by UK representative. The report featured the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire. The 24th item characterized the “ottoman carnage in 1915-1916” as an example of genocide. A special session of the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal in Paris held in 1984, which decreed that “according to the Convention of December 9, 1948, on prevention of genocide and its punishment, the annihilation of the Armenian people by means of deportation and mass killings is a genocide.”

      At last, in 1987 the Armenian Genocide was recognized by the most important European institute – the European Union. The Item 4 of the Resolution on Political Settlement of the Armenian Issue says that “proceeding from the refusal of the modern Turkish government to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide committed in the past by the Young Turks… The absence of parliamentary democracy, violation of individual, collective and especially religious freedoms in this state appear as insurmountable obstacle for Turkey’s accession in the European Economic Community.” Thereupon, the recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Europe as well as the raising of the problem as a precondition for Turkey’s accession into the European structures in not a new phenomenon. 20 years later, in the context of the essential reforms targeted at the achievement of European criteria, this decision may be considered as a precondition for talks with Turkey.

      To date, the Armenian Genocide was recognized by the parliaments of Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Greece, Cyprus, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, France and Switzerland. The issue is being discussed the legislative bodies of a number of European states. In the resolutions on Turkey’s membership in the EU dated April 1 and December 15, 2004 and September 28, 2005, the European parliament reiterated its position on the Armenian Genocide calling upon the Commission and the Council to urge the Turkish authorities to acknowledge the historical fact of the Genocide perpetrated against Armenians in 1915 and to immediately unblock the border between Turkey and Armenia. Although the decision of the European parliament bear a recommendation nature they completely reflect the spirit of the European political parties and the public opinion in general.


      Do you agree with the opinion that Turkey will not recognize the Armenian Genocide out of the fear of territorial claims by Armenia?


      The stereotypes that have been implanted into the Turkish society and the state mentality completely deny even a slightest possibility of recognizing the Armenian Genocide by the Turkish authorities. In private conversations some Turkish diplomats or representatives of scientific intelligentsia acknowledge that the Genocide really took place, however the incumbent Turkish leadership will not dare to recognize it, since they will be thrown down just the next day. In my opinion, only with time, in a context of European reforms within the ruling echelons Turkey will be able to somehow change its position. Today official Ankara keeps on classifying the deeds of the Ottoman authorities (that is the deportation of Armenians form the front zone) as a reaction to the alleged rebellion of the Armenian population and its assistance to the Antanta member states, especially Russia. As result of the alleged civil war both Armenians and Turks died. In fact, in the course of 40 years the leadership of Ottoman Turkey applying the policy of genocide that culminated in the mass killings and deportation of Armenians during the WWI succeeded in “cleansing” almost the whole territory of the Ottoman Empire from Armenians. (By 1895 at least 3 million Armenians lived in Ottoman Turkey, by 1914 there were some 2.5 million, presently about 70 thousand Armenians live in Turkey, mostly in Istanbul). The main goal of the Genocide was to prevent the just and natural aspiration of the Armenian people for secure life and implementation of reforms provided by the European powers and calling for autonomy for Armenians living in the eastern part of the Ottoman Empire. Even if one supposes that the whole Armenian population rebelled against the Ottoman authorities (though in reality the overwhelming majority of Armenians were unarmed and only local self-defense took place in rare cases), this by no means can justify the deeds of the Ottoman leadership that are classified by the UN Convention and other appropriate international documents.


      How firm is the so-called Azeri-Turkish friendship? Can Turkey “sacrifice its fraternal state” to the EU membership and open the border?


      Presently the Armenian government does not set any preconceptions for establishment of diplomatic relations with Turkey while for the latter the final resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh problem is the principal precondition for the establishment of diplomatic relations and opening of the border with Armenia. Turkey not only infringes the common norms of the international law but also violates the acting Kars Agreement of 1921 that determines the borders. Although the Kars Agreement confirmed the principal clauses of the Moscow Agreement of 1921 that violates the vital interests of Armenia and the Armenian people, as a matter of fact, this is the only diplomatic act regulating bilateral relations not denounced by any of the parties so far.

      However, according to one of the preconditions set by the EU during the talks with Ankara, Turkey should enjoy good relations with all the neighbors including Armenia. Taking into account the constant pressure exerted by the United States, the Turkish government got into difficulties. Today it’s trying to draw a veil over the situation pleading a considerable commodity turnover available between the two states, air and overland transportation as well as the possibility of every Armenian citizen to receive visa and cross the Turkish border. It’s true, but all this happens either by air or via the territory of a third state, in complete blockade and absence of diplomatic relations. On the other hand, Turkey doesn’t wish to sacrifice relations with Azerbaijan, since the Azeri authorities consider that opening of the border with Turkey will give a boost to the Armenian economy and consequently toughen Armenia’s position on Karabakh.


      How weighty is the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues for exerting influence upon the Bush Administration?


      Presently the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues counts 149 Congressmen, democrats and republicans, representing various states. It is one of the leading, influential and numerous groups in the Congress, which supports the interests of Armenia and the Armenian community being engaged in the issues referring to the economic and military aid to Armenia, Armenian Genocide recognition, blockage imposed by Turkey and Azerbaijan, the Nagorno Karabakh settlement. The Caucus keeps in touch with the Armenian lobbying organizations and the Armenian Embassy in the U.S.
      "All truth passes through three stages:
      First, it is ridiculed;
      Second, it is violently opposed; and
      Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

      Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

      Comment

      Working...
      X