Tweet
Let say that Turkey is accepted the Genocide.What will happen what we're gonna get or what should we get??? 
-
-
Turkey must accept the Genocide because history requires justice in this regard. Turkey must wash it's hand of this crime the Ottomans committed, and the Turkish cover-up of it for 90 years and counting. This must be done. Nothing further should be a pre-condition to this. Turks and Turkey must not base the action on the result... Forget it. If they are guilty, admit guilt regardless of anything else.
When I was a child and I had done something wrong and was questioned by my mother: I didn't say "well I'll tell you wether or not I hit the baseball through the window if you'll tell me what'll happen to me after I confess"... my ass would have been kicked then and there - it either happened or it didn't either way just tell the truth, nothing can be discussed until the truth is out...NOTHING... -
Half your questions don't make sense, and the other half are answered in the link I posted AND here.
They have.Originally posted by Turanist
Comment
-
"All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)Comment
-
Nothing,Originally posted by NikosLet say that Turkey is accepted the Genocide.What will happen what we're gonna get or what should we get???
just it will go into the Turkish history books that they commited inhumane crimes!Comment
-
I'm ok with that!"All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)Comment
-
a wise man once said to me "when you have got someone in a corner a way out is for them to question you and to indirectly avoid your questions."Originally posted by KharpertHalf your questions don't make sense, and the other half are answered in the link I posted AND here.
They have.
YOu are posting a map. this map says not much though. I ask why is not Archaeological dig been done? if I was president of Syria I would not want 100,000s of dead unburied bodies in my country. in Gavur post there is a man who said he saw some bodies. Why is not Armenia trying to recover the bodies. why is not Syria or Armenia trying to establish how many bodies they are in desert. there should be teams of people excavating the bodies. these are important things and these questions make some Turks think the number of deaths is over inflated.
Also you are all avoided my information on population.**********************************
Arabic is a Language, Persian is a sweetmeat, Turkish is an Art. (Old Persian proverb)
**********************************Comment
-
A wise man once said to me, "Dude, some people just never get it."
The map CLEARLY shows that there have been numerous massacres and slaughters in Syria. If you can't find Syria on a map, check an atlas. Evidence for these massacres includes: records, witnesses, and mass graves.
These mass graves are somewhere in the middle of the desert and buried deep. It's not as if there's 100 year old Armenian bones lying around in the streets of Damascus. These graves are hard to find, and those that HAVE been found have ALREADY been excavated.Comment
-
Also you are still avoiding my post on population http://www.library.uu.nl/wesp/populs...ia/turkeyc.htm
This is quoted from the website:
Figures in italic prior to 1927 are from source "KB"; although from these figures those for the period 1911-1926 have been slightly recalculated by the compiler of this site to match certain influence of the First World War.
Guess which influence?Comment
-
Armenia not "Eastern Anatolia"
Here is a bet I make with lying fools like you:Originally posted by The Kemalist
You show me a historic map or a historic document done before the Armenian Genocide, where Armenia is called “Eastern Anatolia”. If you can produce ONE such document/map then F*CK ME, if you can come up with NONE then F*CK YOU and all the members of your species who call Armenia “Eastern Anatolia”.
Anatolia is Greek for east.
It's a meaningless term itself. East of what? Maybe east of Greek lands or east to Europe.
Anatolia = east
Eastern Anatolia = eastern east = bullxxxx
(One user Ixtanbul, calls it East Anatolia = east east = bullxxxx Big Mac (= double bullxxxx))
Click on the map for the larger image.
This map (fragment) is not from 2000 years ago. It is done in 1872 by the German cartographer H. Kiepert.
As you can see, there's a region called Anatolia (Anadoly) east of which you see Armenia (Armenien). There's a region south to the Arax River called Azarbaijan (Aderbeidjan). You will waste your time trying to find a country called "Azerbaijan" to its north or "Eastern Anatolia" to its west.
P.S. I had to re-upload this map. I know all the photos are there but since the forum update, the addresses of the images have change and they don't show in member galleries.
Can the mods please inform us how we can find these images?Four things denialist Turks do when they are confronted with facts:
I. They change the subject [SIZE="1"](e.g. they copy/paste tons of garbage to divert attention).[/SIZE]
II. They project [SIZE="1"](e.g. they replace "Turk" with "Armenian" and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history).[/SIZE]
III. They offend [SIZE="1"](e.g. they cuss, threaten and/or mock).[/SIZE]
IV. They shut up and say nothing.
[URL="http://b.imagehost.org/download/0689/azerbaijan-real-fake-absurd.pdf"][COLOR="Red"]A country named Azerbaijan north of the Arax River [B]NEVER[/B] existed before 1918[/COLOR][/URL]Comment
Comment