Cultural Genocide, the Natural Byproduct of the Unnatural Turkish Genocidal Instinct

[elendil]

and The French?

Europe and Ottomans have been arch enemies for a loong time. Though we have never waged war against France,( even helped them out a little bit at the times of Süleyman The Magnificient) the very word of "Turk" invokes an ancient fear which defines the stereotype of Turkish character that is defined by the church long time ago as people who learn to ride before walking, having the legs of a beast and so on. Besides Europe percieves Mongols as Turks too. Add Hun raids to Europe to the file. Thus I fully expect such sayings from any country of Europe.

Maybe they were mad at the Ottomans for making better bread right Elendil?

Right Gavur

[TurQ]

If Sultan Suleyman had not saved France from Germans, today we wouldnt see French nation existing.

The reason that Turk invokes the fear is actually based on Church's(Vatican's) propoganda. THose times the minds of the public was controlled by Church and they were inciting hatred towads Turks, to organize Crusades.

DO you know that they even said Turks killed Prophet Jesus so Christians should evange it. They were so liars that they did not even mention that Turks and Muslims love him as a Prophet and give his name to their sons(Isa) and his beloved mother's name Meryem to their daughters.

To compensate their failures they spread the fear of Turks so that the public wouldnt turn against them.

Europe and Ottomans have been arch enemies for a loong time. Though we have never waged war against France,( even helped them out a little bit at the times of Süleyman The Magnificient) the very word of "Turk" invokes an ancient fear which defines the stereotype of Turkish character that is defined by the church long time ago as people who learn to ride before walking, having the legs of a beast and so on. Besides Europe percieves Mongols as Turks too. Add Hun raids to Europe to the file. Thus I fully expect such sayings from any country of Europe.


Right Gavur

[TurQ]

It is the clash of newly born nationalism in both Arab and Turkish nation(not to mention Armenian and Greek).
These kind of false propoganda also spread by British to divide the alliance of Muslims in middle east to make their job easy for colonization. If you see most of those Arab nationalists were among Christian Arabs of Lobenon. And in Turkish case it was the nation state building thing, from ummet to nation transition. These are early 20th century things and do not belong(or should not) to our times.

Arabs and Turks. These are two nations that their nationalism propaganda is based on insulting, blaming the other after the 18.-19. century. Unfortunantly you will come across sayings in Turkish that insults Arabic people. For example

Ne Şam'ın şekeri, ne arabın yüzü.
Neither the candy of Damascus, nor the face of the Arab.

How relations evolve at such a short period of time.

[imported_Hellektor]

Kudos!!! ++

Maybe they were mad at the Ottomans for making better bread right Elendil?

Gavur, you made my day!

[imported_Hellektor]

Typical Turkish Reaction

There are four things Turks do when they are confronted with facts:
I. They change the subject.
e.g. They copy/paste tons of denialist crap from hate sites to divert attention.
II. They project.
e.g. They replace Turk with Armenian and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history.
III. They cuss and threaten.
IV. They shut up and say nothing.
Never an iota of shame or remorse...

Option I. Change the subject:

The reason that Turk invokes the fear is actually based on Church's(Vatican's) propoganda. THose times the minds of the public was controlled by Church and they were inciting hatred towads Turks, to organize Crusades.

The reason that Turk invokes disgust is clearly obvious when a sane person looks at the pictures in this thread.

DO you know that they even said Turks killed Prophet Jesus so Christians should evange it. They were so liars that they did not even mention that Turks and Muslims love him as a Prophet and give his name to their sons(Isa) and his beloved mother's name Meryem to their daughters.

Then they have a curious way of showing their appreciation by slaughtering, turkifying, raping, pillaging and plundering the Christians for a thousand years and destroying their Christian heritage after they’re done with them.
Hypocrisy is even more repulsive than the actual acts of barbarism.

To compensate their failures they spread the fear of Turks so that the public wouldnt turn against them.

What are you compensating for by these acts of savagery?

[imported_RUDO]

There are four things Turks do when they are confronted with facts:
I. They change the subject.
e.g. They copy/paste tons of denialist crap from hate sites to divert attention.
II. They project.
e.g. They replace Turk with Armenian and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history.
III. They cuss and threaten.
IV. They shut up and say nothing.
Never an iota of shame or remorse...

Option I. Change the subject:

The reason that Turk invokes disgust is clearly obvious when a sane person looks at the pictures in this thread.


Then they have a curious way of showing their appreciation by slaughtering, turkifying, raping, pillaging and plundering the Christians for a thousand years and destroying their Christian heritage after they’re done with them.
Hypocrisy is even more repulsive than the actual acts of barbarism.


What are you compensating for by these acts of savagery?

A good lesson about Turks

[maral_m79]

If Sultan Suleyman had not saved France from Germans, today we wouldnt see French nation existing.

The reason that Turk invokes the fear is actually based on Church's(Vatican's) propoganda. THose times the minds of the public was controlled by Church and they were inciting hatred towads Turks, to organize Crusades.

DO you know that they even said Turks killed Prophet Jesus so Christians should evange it. They were so liars that they did not even mention that Turks and Muslims love him as a Prophet and give his name to their sons(Isa) and his beloved mother's name Meryem to their daughters.

To compensate their failures they spread the fear of Turks so that the public wouldnt turn against them.

Oh come on ..... that's absurd !
I am a christian, and I was so my whole life, & I came across many many many Christians and Muslims... I have never heard such thing like "Accusing Turks for Killing Jesus" ... Who supposed to have said that ?? The Pop ??
If he did then he's an "IDIOT" !!!

The Turks DID NOT EXIST at the time of Jesus , not even until 1000 years after Jesus !

And how can you accuse the Catholic Church of spreading propaganda aginst the Turks, where the HEAD of the Catholic Church had forgiven his "Assasin [Agca] " and visited him in his jail !! Why would he do that if he wants to spread propaganda ?

[elendil]

And how can you accuse the Catholic Church of spreading propaganda aginst the Turks, where the HEAD of the Catholic Church had forgiven his "Assasin [Agca] " and visited him in his jail !! Why would he do that if he wants to spread propaganda ?

He is talking about medivial ages not modern times if I understood correctly. To form a unified response to Turkish invasion, there were false propogandas, lies about Ottomans, though I do not know if "Turks killed Jesus" issue was among them.

[maral_m79]

There are four things Turks do when they are confronted with facts:
I. They change the subject.
e.g. They copy/paste tons of denialist crap from hate sites to divert attention.
II. They project.
e.g. They replace Turk with Armenian and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history.
III. They cuss and threaten.
IV. They shut up and say nothing.
Never an iota of shame or remorse...

Interesting, and true ...

So maybe TurQ can tell us what does he think about those pictures in the thread ?
I guess he don't have enough courage to say "I can't care less !!" , who cares about Armenian centuries old monuments !!

[maral_m79]

He is talking about medivial ages not modern times if I understood correctly. To form a unified response to Turkish invasion, there were false propogandas, lies about Ottomans, though I do not know if "Turks killed Jesus" issue was among them.

mmm But I thought that TurQ believes that those were not Turks, or Mongols ARE NOT TURKS !!! as he once claimed !!

And what on earth medival ages have to do with our topic, or even with a french Quote of Victor Hugo ?? Specially when he was talking about 20th century National fudes, or even when he was talking about an Ottoman Sultan !!!!!!!!!

What does an Ottoman Sultan have to do with Medival Ages and the Catholic Church ??

Contradicting one's self , or having no idea what he's talking about ??