Taner Akçam, a Turkish historian who now lives in Germany, is in Montreal right now, and he gave a lecture/presentationofnewbook at McGill University yesterday (he will be giving another one at the Bolsahay getron today). For those who don't know him, he has collaborated a lot with Vahakn Dadrian.
Anyways, he was speaking about how recognition of genocide would take so much time in Turkey because accepting the genocide would mean accepting that so many people, which are viewed as heroes in Turkish society, were criminals. His new book, by the way, which I am now reading, is very interesting, and sees the genocide, as he says, in the oppressor's point of view, and not the victim's.
Of course, like any other genocide-related event, there was a crowd of about 15-20 Turks, which Akçam handled very well (they were being more polite than usual though, probably because Akçam is a Turk). One of them accused him of giving only the Armenian side of the story. He answered that there are no two sides of history. There can't be nationalistic views, such as the Armenian version, and the Turkish version. He said there is one side of the story, which has been proven, and it was up to Turks and Armenians to start dialogue, based on that one, true side of the story. An other one introduced himself as "not a real Turk" because he was born in Afghanistan, and he said that many Armenians today tell him "oh, your grandfather has killed my grandfather" to which Akçam replied "That is stupid, how can they tell you that if you're Afghan?"
Anyways, he was speaking about how recognition of genocide would take so much time in Turkey because accepting the genocide would mean accepting that so many people, which are viewed as heroes in Turkish society, were criminals. His new book, by the way, which I am now reading, is very interesting, and sees the genocide, as he says, in the oppressor's point of view, and not the victim's.
Of course, like any other genocide-related event, there was a crowd of about 15-20 Turks, which Akçam handled very well (they were being more polite than usual though, probably because Akçam is a Turk). One of them accused him of giving only the Armenian side of the story. He answered that there are no two sides of history. There can't be nationalistic views, such as the Armenian version, and the Turkish version. He said there is one side of the story, which has been proven, and it was up to Turks and Armenians to start dialogue, based on that one, true side of the story. An other one introduced himself as "not a real Turk" because he was born in Afghanistan, and he said that many Armenians today tell him "oh, your grandfather has killed my grandfather" to which Akçam replied "That is stupid, how can they tell you that if you're Afghan?"
Comment