Vote No

[v1ss1]

PBS released a documentary on the Armenian Genocide, and the Turks

(who are known historically to be responsible) are fighting against

this, wishing to have a revision of history that is favorable to

them, never mind that they haven't apologized for this. Please read

below. Please send this out to as many people as possible.



MSNBC has started a new survey on the PBS panel on the Armenian Genocide.



Please cut and paste the link into your browser and vote NO.



The Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) has sent e-mails

to thousands of Turks asking them vote for the panel. As of now, 55%

of the voters have voted for the panel.



Please vote NO and forward this message to everyone on your e-mail list.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12412125/

Also- Below is an additional link with more information on the

Armenian Genocide with graphic pictures of what the Armenians along

with many Greeks

http://www.armenian-genocide.org/

Black Book: The Tragedy of Pontus, 1914-1922



This is a large PDF file containing the entire book titled, Black

Book: The Tragedy of Pontus. Invaluable for its historical and

genealogical information, this brief tome was submitted to HCS by

Sophia Kostos with instructions to disseminate its contents. It

details the numbers of Pontic Greeks killed in each village by the

Turks, with some lists of actual names, and some eyewitness accounts

of massacres and genocide. Compiled in Athens in 1922, it serves as

valuable testimony to the crimes committed against our countrymen.

http://www.helleniccomserve.com/pdf/blackbookpontus.pdf

[D3ADSY]

Re: Vote No

You people have no idea what you are voting against here. I have watched the panel discussion, the deniers get absolutely destroyed, they end up looking like fools.
This is yet another case proving how Armenians ultimately cause the most harm to themselves, not Turks or anyone else.
Can you all not see how the whole issue of Turkey and it's denial works against them?

[Otto3]

Re: Vote No

can you tell us in what way it worked against us(turks)?

[TomServo]

Re: Vote No

Did you watch the panel discussion?

[jgk3]

Re: Vote No

yeah, when I heard all this vote no xxxx, I was surprised... I want people to see both sides of the discussion... How do you amplify our image if it's biased? I think we'd have a more solid position through discussion and not through closedmindedness.

Why should we condemn ourselves to being the types of Armenians ara criticizes?

[karoaper]

Re: Vote No

An Armenian has no business arguing about the Genocide in an environment where turkish point of view is given any (even initial) credence, let alone discuss it with a turk. Let others discuss it if they want.

Not wanting to discuss or argue truths with a vile madman is not a bias. It's called sanity of mind and reason. Give them a nanometer of your regard about their weave of propaganda and they will use it to advance their lies and demand more consideration and attention.

[karoaper]

Re: Vote No

You can argue about politics, economy, war, present and the future, but arguing about the simple historical fact that over million and a half of native inhabitants were either massacred of deported, no matter what the murderous dogs' excuses or reasons were, makes no sense and encourages the notion that this fact is actually debatable.

[jgk3]

Re: Vote No

well, what I'm asking is, why should we be so afraid of their lies? Is our side of the story that fragile that it will be marred by their brainwashed minds? Is their side of the story that credible? We don't need to argue with them, we can disprove their claims by showing our case to the public... If Turks don't want to listen, then that's their problem... I just think that we'd advance in this matter if we got to publicly refute their claims with our side of the story, instead of giving the old... "We were betrayed and massacred and demand recognition..."

[karoaper]

Re: Vote No

well, what I'm asking is, why should we be so afraid of their lies? Is our side of the story that fragile that it will be marred by their brainwashed minds? Is their side of the story that credible? We don't need to argue with them, we can disprove their claims by showing our case to the public... If Turks don't want to listen, then that's their problem... I just think that we'd advance in this matter if we got to publicly refute their claims with our side of the story, instead of giving the old... "We were betrayed and massacred and demand recognition..."

I honestly don't think it's a matter of being afraid of their lies. At this point in time, the truth has completely cemented in the minds of the World's foremost historians and expert on the matter. If top historical societies and experts hadn't known about it or had failed to fully understand it, then Armenians would indeed need to engage even with Turks in breaking down this historical event and bringing out the facts. And guess what, they did. Ingenious Armenians did exactly that with the help of just and noble people from around the world who didn't rest untill the plight of Armenians was heard and mourned in ever corner of the world.

Today, the only reason why 100% of the world leaders don't declare in unison that the Armenian Genocide is an undeniable truth is the politics, and politics is the den of prostitutes. Turkish intellectual attempts at lies are so incredibly feeble and pathetic, however from their geopolitical podium they still manage to xxxx on reason and justice. That's why, to engage with them in any discussion is to give credence to their xxxx.

What we need to do is use our superior intellectual ingenuity to fight turkish money and xxxxx-status to banish such travesty as debate on the Armenian Genocide.

[jgk3]

Re: Vote No

alright... I really liked that post, you win. lol