Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Robert Fisk & Simon Usborne: The Forgotten Holocaust

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Robert Fisk & Simon Usborne: The Forgotten Holocaust

    1 of 2






    Robert Fisk: The forgotten holocaust

    The killing of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks during the First
    World War remains one of the bloodiest and most contentious episodes of the
    20th century. Robert Fisk visits Yerevan, and unearths hitherto unpublished
    images of the first modern genocide

    Published: 28 August 2007

    The photographs, never before published, capture the horrors of the first
    Holocaust of the 20th century. They show a frightened people on the move -
    men, women and children, some with animals, others on foot, walking over
    open ground outside the city of Erzerum in 1915, at the beginning of their
    death march. We know that none of the Armenians sent from Erzerum - in what
    is today north-eastern Turkey - survived. Most of the men were shot, the
    children - including, no doubt, the young boy or girl with a headscarf in
    the close-up photograph - died of starvation or disease. The young women
    were almost all raped, the older women beaten to death, the sick and babies
    left by the road to die.

    The unique photographs are a stunning witness to one of the most terrible
    events of our times. Their poor quality - the failure of the camera to cope
    with the swirl and movement of the Armenian deportees in the close-up
    picture, the fingerprint on the top of the second - lend them an undeniable
    authenticity. They come from the archives of the German Deutsche Bank, which
    was in 1915 providing finance for the maintenance and extension of the
    Turkish railway system. One incredible photograph - so far published in only
    two specialist magazines, in Germany and in modern-day Armenia - actually
    shows dozens of doomed Armenians, including children, crammed into cattle
    trucks for their deportation. The Turks stuffed 90 Armenians into each of
    these wagons - the same average the Nazis achieved in their transports to
    the death camps of Eastern Europe during the xxxish Holocaust.

    Hayk Demoyan, director of the grey-stone Museum of the Armenian Genocide in
    the foothills just outside Yerevan, the capital of present-day Armenia,
    stares at the photographs on his computer screen in bleak silence. A
    university lecturer in modern Turkish history, he is one of the most dynamic
    Armenian genocide researchers inside the remains of Armenia, which is all
    that was left after the Turkish slaughter; it suffered a further 70 years of
    terror as part of the Soviet Union. "Yes, you can have these pictures, he
    says. "We are still discovering more. The Germans took photographs and these
    pictures even survived the Second World War. Today, we want our museum to be
    a place of collective memory, a memorisation of trauma. Our museum is for
    Turks as well as Armenians. This is also [the Turks'] history."

    The story of the last century's first Holocaust - Winston Churchill used
    this very word about the Armenian genocide years before the Nazi murder of
    six million xxxs - is well known, despite the refusal of modern-day Turkey
    to acknowledge the facts. Nor are the parallels with Nazi Germany's
    persecution of the xxxs idle ones. Turkey's reign of terror against the
    Armenian people was an attempt to destroy the Armenian race. While the Turks
    spoke publicly of the need to "resettle" their Armenian population - as the
    Germans were to speak later of the xxxs of Europe - the true intentions of
    Enver Pasha's Committee of Union and Progress in Constantinople were quite
    clear. On 15 September 1915, for example (and a carbon of this document
    exists) Talaat Pasha, the Turkish Interior minister, cabled an instruction
    to his prefect in Aleppo about what he should do with the tens of thousands
    of Armenians in his city. "You have already been informed that the
    government... has decided to destroy completely all the indicated persons
    living in Turkey... Their existence must be terminated, however tragic the
    measures taken may be, and no regard must be paid to either age or sex, or
    to any scruples of conscience." These words are almost identical to those
    used by Himmler to his SS killers in 1941.

    Taner Akcam, a prominent - and extremely brave - Turkish scholar who has
    visited the Yerevan museum, has used original Ottoman Turkish documents to
    authenticate the act of genocide. Now under fierce attack for doing so from
    his own government, he discovered in Turkish archives that individual
    Turkish officers often wrote "doubles" of their mass death-sentence orders,
    telegrams sent at precisely the same time that asked their subordinates to
    ensure there was sufficient protection and food for the Armenians during
    their "resettlement". This weirdly parallels the bureaucracy of Nazi
    Germany, where officials were dispatching hundreds of thousands of xxxs to
    the gas chambers while assuring International Red Cross officials in Geneva
    that they were being well cared for and well fed.

    Ottoman Turkey's attempt to exterminate an entire Christian race in the
    Middle East - the Armenians, descended from the residents of ancient Urartu,
    became the first Christian nation when their king Drtad converted from
    paganism in AD301 - is a history of almost unrelieved horror at the hands of
    Turkish policemen and soldiers, and Kurdish tribesmen.

    In 1915, Turkey claimed that its Armenian population was supporting Turkey's
    Christian enemies in Britain, France and Russia. Several historians -
    including Churchill, who was responsible for the doomed venture at
    Gallipoli - have asked whether the Turkish victory there did not give them
    the excuse to turn against the Christian Armenians of Asia Minor, a people
    of mixed Persian, Roman and Byzantine blood, with what Churchill called
    "merciless fury". Armenian scholars have compiled a map of their people's
    persecution and deportation, a document that is as detailed as the maps of
    Europe that show the railway lines to Auschwitz and Treblinka; the Armenians
    of Erzerum, for example, were sent on their death march to Terjan and then
    to Erzinjan and on to Sivas province. The men would be executed by firing
    squad or hacked to death with axes outside villages, the women and children
    then driven on into the desert to die of thirst or disease or exhaustion or
    gang-rape. In one mass grave I myself discovered on a hillside at Hurgada in
    present-day Syria, there were thousands of skeletons, mostly of young
    people - their teeth were perfect. I even found a 100-year-old Armenian
    woman who had escaped the slaughter there and identified the hillside for
    me.

    Hayk Demoyan sits in his air-conditioned museum office, his computer purring
    softly on the desk, and talks of the need to memorialise this huge
    suffering. "You can see it in the writing of each survivor," he says. "When
    visitors come here from the diaspora - from America and Europe, Lebanon and
    Syria, people whose parents or grandparents died in our genocide - our staff
    feel with these people. They see these people become very upset, there are
    tears and some get a bit crazy after seeing the exhibition. This can be very
    difficult for us, psychologically. The stance of the current Turkish
    government [in denying the genocide] is proving they are proud of what their
    ancestors did. They are saying they are pleased with what the Ottomans did.
    Yet today, we are hearing that a lot of places in the world are like
    goldmines of archive materials to continue our work - even here in Yerevan.
    Every day, we are coming across new photographs or documents."

    The pictures Demoyan gives to The Independent were taken by employees of
    Deutsche Bank in 1915 to send to their head office in Berlin as proof of
    their claims that the Turks were massacring their Armenian population. They
    can be found in the Deutsche Bank Historical Institute - Oriental Section
    (the photograph of the Armenian deportees across the desert published in The
    Independent today, for example, is registered photo number 1704 and the 1915
    caption reads: "Deportation Camp near Erzerum.")

    A German engineer in Kharput sent back a now-famous photogaph of Armenian
    men being led to their execution by armed Turkish police officers. The
    banking officials were appalled that the Ottoman Turks were using - in
    effect - German money to send Armenians to their death by rail. The new
    transportation system was supposed to be used for military purposes, not for
    genocide.

    German soldiers sent to Turkey to reorganise the Ottoman army also witnessed
    these atrocities. Armin Wegner, an especially courageous German second
    lieutenant in the retinue of Field Marshal von der Goltz, took a series of
    photographs of dead and dying Armenian women and children. Other German
    officers regarded the genocide with more sinister interest. Some of these
    men, as Armenian scholar Vahakn Dadrian discovered, turn up 26 years later
    as more senior officers conducting the mass killing of xxxs in
    German-occupied Russia.

    Computers have transformed the research of institutions like the Yerevan
    museum. Poorly funded scholarship has been replaced by a treasure-house of
    information that Demoyan is going to publish in scholarly magazines. "We
    have information that some Germans who were in Armenia in 1915 started
    selling genocide pictures for personal collections when they returned
    home... In Russia, a man from St Petersburg also informed us that he had
    seen handwritten memoirs from 1940 in which the writer spoke of Russian
    photographs of Armenian bodies in Van and Marash in 1915 and 1916." Russian
    Tsarist troops marched into the eastern Turkish city of Van and briefly
    liberated its doomed Armenian inhabitants. Then the Russians retreated after
    apparently taking these pictures of dead Armenians in outlying villages.

    Stalin also did his bit to erase the memory of the massacres. The Armenian
    Tashnag party, so prominent in Armenian politics in the Ottoman empire, was
    banned by the Soviets. "In the 1930s," Demoyan says, "everyone destroyed
    handwritten memoirs of the genocide, photographs, land deeds - otherwise
    they could have been associated by the Soviet secret police with Tashnag
    material." He shakes his head at this immeasurable loss. "But now we are
    finding new material in France and new pictures taken by humanitarian
    workers of the time. We know there were two or three documentary films from
    1915, one shot approvingly by a Kurdish leader to show how the Turks "dealt"
    with Armenians. There is huge new material in Norway of the deportations in
    Mush from a Norwegian missionary who was there in 1915."

    There is, too, a need to archive memoirs and books that were published in
    the aftermath of the genocide but discarded or forgotten in the decades that
    followed. In 1929, for example, a small-circulation book was published in
    Boston entitled From Dardanelles to Palestine by Captain Sarkis Torossian.
    The author was a highly decorated officer in the Turkish army who fought
    with distinction and was wounded at Gallipoli. He went on to fight the
    Allies in Palestine but was appalled to find thousands of dying Armenian
    refugees in the deserts of northern Syria. In passages of great pain, he
    discovers his sister living in rags and tells how his fiancée Jemileh died
    in his arms. "I raised Jemileh in my arms, the pain and terror in her eyes
    melted until they were bright as stars again, stars in an oriental night...
    and so she died, as a dream passing." Torossian changed sides, fought with
    the Arabs, and even briefly met Lawrence of Arabia - who did not impress
    him.

    "The day following my entry into Damascus, the remainder of the Arab army
    entered along with their loads and behind them on a camel came one they
    called... the paymaster. This camel rider I learned was Captain Lawrence...
    Captain Lawrence to my knowledge did nothing to foment the Arab revolution,
    nor did he play any part in the Arab military tactics. When first I heard of
    him he was a paymaster, nothing more. And so he was to Prince Emir Abdulah
    (sic), brother of King Feisal, whom I knew. I do not write in disparagement.
    I write as a fighting man. Some must fight and others pay." Bitterness, it
    seems, runs deep. Torossian eventually re-entered Ottoman Turkey as an
    Armenian officer with the French army of occupation in the Cilicia region.
    But Kemalist guerrillas attacked the French, who then, Torossian suspects,
    gave weapons and ammunition to the Turks to allow the French army safe
    passage out of Cilicia. Betrayed, Torossian fled to relatives in America.
    What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

  • #2
    Re: Robert Fisk & Simon Usborne: The Forgotten Holocaust

    2 of 2


    There is debate in Yerevan today as to why the diaspora Armenians appear to
    care more about the genocide than the citizens of modern-day Armenia.
    Indeed, the Foreign minister of Armenia, Vardan Oskanian, actually told me
    that "days, weeks, even months go by" when he does not think of the
    genocide. One powerful argument put to me by an Armenian friend is that 70
    years of Stalinism and official Soviet silence on the genocide deleted the
    historical memory in eastern Armenia - the present-day state of Armenia.
    Another argument suggests that the survivors of western Armenia - in what is
    now Turkey - lost their families and lands and still seek acknowledgement
    and maybe even restitution, while eastern Armenians did not lose their
    lands. Demoyan disputes all this.

    "The fundamental problem, I think, is that in the diaspora many don't want
    to recognise our statehood," he says. "We are surrounded by two countries -
    Turkey and Azerbaijan - and we have to take our security into account; but
    not to the extent of damaging memory. Here we must be accurate. I have
    changed things in this museum. There were inappropriate things, comments
    about 'hot-bloodied'people, all the old clichés about Turks - they have now
    gone. The diaspora want to be the holders of our memories - but 60 per cent
    of the citizens of the Armenian state are "repatriates" - Armenians
    originally from the diaspora, people whose grandparents originally came from
    western Armenia. And remember that Turkish forces swept though part of
    Armenia after the 1915 genocide - right through Yerevan on their way to
    Baku. According to Soviet documentation in 1920, 200,000 Armenians died in
    this part of Armenia, 180,000 of them between 1918 and 1920." Indeed, there
    were further mass executions by the Turks in what is now the Armenian state.
    At Ghumri - near the centre of the devastating earthquake that preceded
    final liberation from the Soviet Union - there is a place known as the
    "Gorge of Slaughter", where in 1918 a whole village was massacred.

    But I sensed some political problems up at the Yerevan museum -
    international as well as internal. While many Armenians acknowledge that
    their countrymen did commit individual revenge atrocities - around Van, for
    example - at the time of the genocide, a heavy burden of more modern
    responsibility lies with those who fought for Armenia against the Azeris in
    Nagorno-Karabakh in the early 1990s. This mountainous region east of the
    Armenian state saw fierce and sometimes cruel fighting in which Armenians
    massacred Turkish Azeri villagers. The Independent was one of the newspapers
    that exposed this.

    Yet when I arrive at the massive genocide memorial next to the museum, I
    find the graves of five "heroes" of the Karabakh war. Here lies, for
    instance, Musher "Vosht" Mikhoyan, who was killed in 1991, and the remains
    of Samuel "Samo" Kevorkian, who died in action in 1992. However upright
    these warriors may have been, should those involved in the ghastly war in
    Kharabakh be associated with the integrity and truth of 1915? Do they not
    demean the history of Armenia's greatest suffering? Or were they - as I
    suspect - intended to suggest that the Karabakh war, which Armenia won, was
    revenge for the 1915 genocide? It's as if the Israelis placed the graves of
    the 1948 Irgun fighters - responsible for the massacres of Palestinians at
    Deir Yassin and other Arab villages - outside the xxxish Holocaust memorial
    at Yad Vashem near Jerusalem.

    Officials later explain to me that these Kharabakh grave-sites were
    established at a moment of great emotion after the war and that today -
    while they might be inappropriate - it is difficult to ask the families of
    "Vosht" and "Samo" and the others to remove them to a more suitable
    location. Once buried, it is difficult to dig up the dead. Similarly, among
    the memorials left in a small park by visiting statesmen and politicians,
    there is a distinct difference in tone. Arab leaders have placed plaques in
    memory of the "genocide". Less courageous American congressman - who do not
    want to offend their Turkish allies - have placed plaques stating merely
    that they "planted this tree". The pro-American Lebanese Prime Minister
    Rafiq Hariri left his own memorial less than a year before he was
    assassinated in 2005. "Tree of Peace," it says. Which rather misses the
    point.

    And yet it is the work of archivists that will continue to establish the
    truth. In Yerevan you can now buy excellent witness testimonies of the
    genocide by Westerners who were present during the Armenian Holocaust. One
    of them is by Tacy Atkinson, an American missionary who witnessed the
    deportation of her Armenian friends from the town of Kharput. On 16 July
    1915, she recorded in her secret diary how "a boy has arrived in Mezreh in a
    bad state nervously. As I understand it he was with a crowd of women and
    children from some village... who joined our prisoners who went out June
    23... The boy says that in the gorge this side of Bakir Maden the men and
    women were all shot and the leading men had their heads cut off
    afterwards... He escaped... and came here. His own mother was stripped and
    robbed and then shot... He says the valley smells so awful that one can
    hardly pass by now."

    For fear the Turkish authorities might discover her diaries, Atkinson
    sometimes omitted events. In 1924 - when her diary, enclosed in a sealed
    trunk, at last returned to the United States, she wrote about a trip made to
    Kharput by her fellow missionaries. "The story of this trip I did not dare
    write," she scribbled in the margin. "They saw about 10,000 bodies."



    Anatomy of a massacre: How the genocide unfolded

    By Simon Usborne

    An estimated 1.5 million Armenians died between 1915 and 1917, either at the
    hands of Turkish forces or of starvation. Exact figures are unknown, but
    each larger blob - at the site of a concentration camp or massacre -
    potentially represents the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.

    The trail of extermination, and dispute about exactly what happened,
    stretches back more than 90 years to the opening months of the First World
    War, when some of the Armenian minority in the east of the beleaguered
    Ottoman Empire enraged the ruling Young Turks coalition by siding with
    Russia.

    On 24 April 1915, Turkish troops rounded up and killed hundreds of Armenian
    intellectuals. Weeks later, three million Armenians were marched from their
    homes - the majority towards Syria and modern-day Iraq - via an estimated 25
    concentration camps.

    In 1915, The New York Times reported that "the roads and the Euphrates are
    strewn with corpses of exiles... It is a plan to exterminate the whole
    Armenian people." Winston Churchill would later call the forced exodus an
    "administrative holocaust".

    Yet Turkey, while acknowledging that many Armenians died, disputes the 1.5
    million toll and insists that the acts of 1915-17 did not constitute what is
    now termed genocide - defined by the UN as a state-sponsored attempt to
    "destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious
    group". Instead, Ankara claims the deaths were part of the wider war, and
    that massacres were committed by both sides.

    Several countries have formally recognised genocide against the Armenians
    (and, in the case of France, outlawed its denial), but it remains illegal in
    Turkey to call for recognition. As recently as last year, the Turkish
    foreign ministry dismissed genocide allegations as "unfounded".

    One authority on extermination who did recognise the Armenian genocide was
    Adolf Hitler. In a 1939 speech, in which he ordered the killing,
    "mercilessly and without compassion", of Polish men, women and children, he
    concluded: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the
    Armenians?"
    What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Robert Fisk & Simon Usborne: The Forgotten Holocaust

      A CLASH OF OPINIONS ON ARMENIANS: TWO BRITISH ABOUT KARABAKH

      Noyan Tapan
      Sept 10 2007

      We present a unique example of discussion on Armenian issues in a
      foreign newspaper. The British Independent newspaper has placed
      two materials touching upon the Karabakh issue. Both authors,
      the newspaper's famous Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk, and
      Baroness Caroline Cox, are known as friends of Armenia. However,
      they differ in their viewing of the Nagorno Karabakh issue. And this
      difference provides a serious ground for us, the Armenians, to assess
      how correct and efficient our activity is.


      Originally posted by Siamanto View Post
      Robert Fisk: The forgotten holocaust

      The killing of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks.....


      And Caroline Cox's reaction...

      The Editor, The Independent August 30 2007 Dear Sir, I have always
      appreciated the integrity of Robert Fisk's analysis of the genocide
      of the Armenians by Turkey in 1915: his well-informed argumentation
      has been incontrovert- ible and important - for every geno- cide which
      is not acknowledged not only prevents healing for the sur- vivors but
      is also an encouragement to potential perpetrators of other genocides.

      However, I must challenge the grossly inaccurate analogy between the
      Armenian genocide and the recent war in the predominantly Armenian
      enclave of Nagorno Karabakh. The Armenians were not the aggressors:
      Azerbaijan initiated a self-avowed policy, 'Operation Ring', of ethnic
      cleansing of the Armenians who live in this histori- cally Armenian
      enclave, given by Stalin to Azerbaijan.

      I have visited the region 63 times since Azerbaijan carried out
      mas- sacres of Armenians in Baku and Sumgait in the late 1980s
      and then unleashed full-scale war against the 150,000 civilians
      in the enclave. In July 1991, I visited Azerbaijan, with an inter-
      national group of inde- pendent human rights experts, to ascertain
      the Azeri viewpoint. We were left in no doubt of their policy of
      intended ethnic cleansing of all Armenians from Karabakh - a policy
      sub- sequently publicly affirmed by successive Azeri Presidents and
      senior politicians. I was in Karabakh virtually every month during the
      height of the war; I counted 400 'Grad' missiles a day fired by Azeris
      on the capital city, Stepanakert; I witnessed aerial bom- bardment
      and the use of cluster bombs on civilian targets and mas- sacres of
      indescribable brutality - documented irrefutably in our publi- cation
      'Ethnic Cleansing in Progress: The War in Nagorno Karabakh'.

      It would be a great pity if Robert Fisk were to lose credibility of
      his main thesis by such an inappropriate comparison.




      What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

      Comment

      Working...
      X