The barracuda

[gevo]

This vehicle is heavier than a corvette stingray below. And in its pure stock configuration the cuda is faster of the line and through the quarter mile. Ofcourse these vehicles are decades apart, but i wanted to say. the stingray got NOTHING on cuda .. lol..

[gevo]

Oh and on a seperate note.. the Cuda looks better.. right? lol..

[dusken]

Actually, no. The Stingray looks better than the Baracuda. The older Stingrays were beautiful; the Baracuda was never a beautiful car. Sorry.

[Crimson Glow]

I swear, Dusken, while I've agreed with a lot of your posts throughout this forum, you seem to suffer from some sort of vision impairment when it comes to cars. Either that, or you have a fetish for hunched back looking cars.

The Cuda is BEAUTIFUL, and the Sting Ray is...well....yeah. The Cuda is definitely one of my favorite all time muscle cars. I have to drool any time I'm skipping channels, and I see that flammer, Don Knots (sp), driving the yellow one (much like the one in the photo) on Nash Bridges.


*Oh, speaking of cars! Autozone just called to inform me my K&N filter is in. I'll have to continue this later...

[dusken]

I am not saying I do not like the Baracuda, but the Stingray is more visually interesting. It has a lot of charisma when you are standing next to it. And what is this "hunchback" nonsense? It seems every car that has a hard top is somehow hunchbacked to you.

[gevo]

This vehicle came out one week after the barracuda in April of 1964, it was deemed to have made the cuda look like a child.. the cuda stood up to this expectation with its stock 3.2 liter single ocer head cam and belt driven camshaft.. it was a car.. nothign more. 1967 i beleive the cuda braught out what is known as "the plymouth signature car" becuase now the mustang fell in performance and quality.. this riveled for a little more than a decade until the cuda became a best item to have on a car collectors list.. now cudas in mint condition are very very rare.. and worht pretty good money if everythign is stock.. so.. anyways.. i just thaught of tht.. lol.. as far as that UGLY stingray goes.. it sucks.. the 1973 corvettes have some ground and look much better. but still i rather have a cuda.. even though the corvette puts out about 450 bhp as apposed to the cuda's 320-375 bhp.. the cuda is more honorable of a vehicle.. the corvette is too expensive. even though its not s rare as it is wanted to be

[dusken]

I love 1964 1/2 and 1965 Mustangs.

And Baracudas, FuryIII's, and Road Runners are cool too.

But I would prefer a 1966 - 1972 Charger over all of these.

[dstyle]

71 Camaro. Hooweeee.

A 442 wow.

[Crimson Glow]

I am not saying I do not like the Baracuda, but the Stingray is more visually interesting. It has a lot of charisma when you are standing next to it. And what is this "hunchback" nonsense? It seems every car that has a hard top is somehow hunchbacked to you.

Not at all, sir. Just hunchbacked ones look hunchbacked. Visually interesting and good looking are 2 different things. I just don't find the Stingers appealing at all. Meanwhile, the 'Cuda has a look that says "hello. Please don't scream as I eat you alive, spit out your bones, and leave the remainders of your roting carcass to be picked apart and violated slowly by maggots?"

[MeesterFly]

holy sh!t, where have i been ? i go away and come back, and there is a thread dedicated to my most favorite muscle car in ziii world !

got hemi ?


yummy


shwing!