Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

[Anoush]

I don't know if you guys know this; but there was absolutely no mention of our Nagorno-Karabagh Artsakh in their maps.

We should bring it to Googles' attention and have them put it in there.

[Anoush]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Live Search Maps however does. But I am very unhappy with Google not having Artsax in their maps.

[Sako]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Some part of me thinks it's good that Artsakh isn't there because the Azeri's might make it look like it's THEIR land. Then we'll have to go around convincing everyone that it's ours. Just look at what the Turks did. They placed Ataturk's statue on our AG memorial in the map. It's not good that Artsakh isn't on the map, don't get me wrong, but maybe that's better then we think.

[hipeter924]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Live Search Maps however does. But I am very unhappy with Google not having Artsax in their maps.

They have to be 'politically neutral' even if that means insulting Armenia to make the Azeri's and Turks feel better about themselves.

[Anoush]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Some part of me thinks it's good that Artsakh isn't there because the Azeri's might make it look like it's THEIR land. Then we'll have to go around convincing everyone that it's ours. Just look at what the Turks did. They placed Ataturk's statue on our AG memorial in the map. It's not good that Artsakh isn't on the map, don't get me wrong, but maybe that's better then we think.

You know what Saco jan, the thing is that Live Search Maps has it as disputed. They don't have it as final borders. So Google can do the same and neither them or us have to be attacked by the tatars "Azeris".

[Anoush]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

They have to be 'politically neutral' even if that means insulting Armenia to make the Azeri's and Turks feel better about themselves.

As I have mentioned above hipeter, the Live Search Maps has it as disputed country, and Google can do the same and they don't or we don't have to be attacked. There is absolutely nothing wrong in mentioning the facts (the truth as it stands) you see?

[Sako]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Perhaps your right but I think there is a reason why Google HASN'T taken that step yet. Or maybe they just don't know about Artsakh. I can try and remind them if you like.

[Anoush]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

Perhaps your right but I think there is a reason why Google HASN'T taken that step yet. Or maybe they just don't know about Artsakh. I can try and remind them if you like.

Yes please do Saco, that's exactly why I have created this thread. I wanted someone to let them know please.

You see, in Live Search Maps they wrote the Artsakh's borders as dot dot dot, like this (---). Google can do the same thing and write it as disputed in paragraphs. Check the Live Search Maps for yourself and see how.

Thank you.

[Anoush]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

In Live Search Maps when you write as such, it comes up on their map right away:

Nagorno-Karapakh
(disputed)

It even comes up on their map when you ask for Yerevan, Armenia. Nagorno-Karapakh (disputed) with dots comes right up.

[Sako]

Re: Google Maps Doesn't Have Artsakh

I'll try right now Anoush jan.