Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Another War Inc.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Another War Inc.

    Long but realistic article about the coming war.
    Hayastan or Bust.

  • #2
    Re: Another War Inc.

    Here is a interesting development which exposes some of the truth burried under piles of lies by NATO.
    Pentagon scrambles to assess Wikileaks damage
    Updated 5h 58m ago | Comments 981 | Recommend 6 E-mail | Save | Print |


    Enlarge By Leon Neal, AFP/Getty Images

    Julian Assange, Australian founder of whistleblowing website Wikileaks, holds up a copy of Monday's Guardian newspaper during a press conference in London.


    Share
    Yahoo! Buzz Add to Mixx Facebook TwitterMore
    Fark Digg Reddit MySpace StumbleUpon Propeller LinkedInSubscribe
    myYahoo iGoogleMore
    Netvibes myAOL
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon said Monday that it was trying to assess the damage caused by the Internet leak of some 91,000 classified documents on the Afghanistan war.
    The documents are described as battlefield reports compiled by various military units that provide an unvarnished look at combat in the past five years, including U.S. frustration over reports Pakistan secretly aided insurgents and civilian casualties at the hand of U.S. troops.

    Wikileaks.org, a self-described whistle-blower organization, posted the reports to its website Sunday night.

    Col. Dave Lapan, a Defense Department spokesman, said the military would probably need "days, if not weeks" to review all the documents and determine "the potential damage to the lives of our service members and coalition partners."

    The Pentagon declined to respond to specifics detailed in the documents, including reports of the Taliban's use of heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles.

    "Just because they are posted on the Internet, doesn't make them unclassified," Lapan said.


    THE OVAL: Obama's White House blasts release of papers

    The Pentagon says it is still investigating the source of the documents. The military has detained Bradley Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst in Baghdad, for allegedly transmitting classified information. But the latest documents could have come from anyone with a secret-level clearance, Lapan said.

    Wikileaks founder Julian Assange promised Monday that the release of documents —one of the largest unauthorized disclosures in military history — was just the beginning.

    Assange told reporters in London that some 15,000 more files on Afghanistan were still being vetted by his organization.

    He said he believed that "thousands" of U.S. attacks in Afghanistan could be investigated for evidence of war crimes, although he acknowledged that such claims would have to be tested in court.

    "It is up to a court to decide really if something in the end is a crime," he said.

    Assange pointed in particular to a deadly missile strike ordered by Taskforce 373, a unit allegedly charged with hunting down and killing senior Taliban targets. He said there was also evidence of cover-ups when civilians were killed, including what he called a suspiciously high number of casualties that U.S. forces attributed to ricochet wounds.


    THE OVAL: NY Times: Documents provide 'real-time history' of Afghanistan War

    The Defense Department declined to respond to specifics contained in the documents, citing security reasons.

    But Lapan said that coalition forces have made great strides in reducing the number of civilian deaths in Afghanistan.

    White House national security adviser Gen. Jim Jones said the release of the documents "put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk," while Pakistan dismissed the documents as malicious and unsubstantiated.

    Pakistan Ambassador Husain Haqqani said the documents "do not reflect the current on-ground realities," in which his country and Washington are "jointly endeavoring to defeat al-Qaeda and its Taliban allies."

    NATO refused to comment on the leak, but individual nations said they hoped it wouldn't harm current operations in Afghanistan.

    British Foreign Secretary William Hague said there has been significant progress recently in building up the Afghan state "so I hope any such leaks will not poison that atmosphere." German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle warned about possible "backlashes" and urged all sides in Afghanistan to work toward national reconciliation.

    Rep. Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said the documents reflect his view that U.S. war strategy was adrift last year, before President Obama's decision to retool the war plan and add tens of thousands of U.S. forces.

    Skelton, D-Mo., warned Monday that the documents are outdated and "should not be used as a measure of success or a determining factor in our continued mission there."

    U.S. government agencies have been bracing for the deluge of classified documents since the leak of helicopter xxxxpit video of a 2007 fire fight in Baghdad. That was blamed on a U.S. Army intelligence analyst, Spc. Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Md., who was charged with releasing classified information earlier this month.


    DATABASE: A look at U.S. lives lost in Iraq, Afghanistan

    Manning had bragged online that he downloaded 260,000 classified U.S. cables and transmitted them to Wikileaks.org.

    Assange on Monday compared the impact of the released material to the opening of East Germany's secret police files. "This is the equivalent of opening the Stasi archives," he said.

    He also said his group had many more documents on other subjects, including files on countries from across the globe.

    "We have built up an enormous backlog of whistle-blower disclosures," he said.

    Assange said he believed more whistle-blowing material will flood in after the publicity about the Afghan files.

    "It is our experience that courage is contagious," he said.
    Hayastan or Bust.

    Comment

    Working...
    X