Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

[Iranianazeri]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

I never said they were not. However, the last Shah was a liability for the Iranian nation, for he was a murderer and a pathetic stooge for Western powers.

Maybe ... but the mullahs are much worse. You can't even compare.

The mere fact that you foolishly blurted out "islamofascist" is quite revealing of your true intentions.

True intentions? I have no hidden agenda. I'm liberal.

The only characters that say such stupid terms are deranged Evangelicals in America, bloodthirsty Zionist J-e-w-s - or idiots who are brainwashed by them. The bottom line is, the Iranian people have to decide themselves what they want to be 'without' outside pressure.

I consider myself, "within".

Nonetheless, had western powers not exploited Iran during the twentieth century, had the ZOG controlled US administrations not been aggressive towards Tehran - there would not have been an Islamic problem in Iran today.

Maybe, but that doesn't make the islamist regime aaceptable for the iranian people.

Change in Iran cannot come from the outside, it simply has to be a natural gradual evolution from within.

I want change, fast. But no american invasion if you think so.

Change in Iran cannot come especially via the Mossad/CIA sponsored "Iranian" community of southern California. The ones waiting to jump into the thrones of government in Tehran once the mullahs are overthrown are those who are diametrically - politically, economically and militarily - opposed to Armenians and Russians. There are grand plans for the region in question. As a result, we can't risk a regime change in Iran for the foreseeable future.

And the iranians that are suffering, being tortured, hanged and so on??? Armenians get killed too.

Read what I wrote again and realize that religion does 'not' play a role in real politics.

Unfortunately it does for the mullah regime.

Religion only plays a role in controlling the ignorant masses.

The mullahs are a part of the ignorant masses

Religion only lives in sociological formulations. Geostrategic formulations has a life of its own. Without Armenia in the Caucasus, the region can potentially fall into Turkish/American control thereby severing Iran from an important route to Russia and beyond.

Iran can be independent without the theocracy.

And never trust Iranians living in southern California, never trust western politicians, never trust Turks, never trust J-e-w-s. As for me. I'll trust an Iranian mullah much before I can trust a career diplomat in the US State Department.

I'm am none of those so you can trust me then I guess

I thought the ZOG theory died in 1945

Long live the Islamic Republic of Iran.

That's just weird man.

[Sip]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Iranian Mullahs are GREAT ... for me to poop on.

[skhara]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

I want change, fast. But no american invasion if you think so.

How about a CIA/MI-6 instigated and sponsored coup?

[Armenian]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

How about a CIA/MI-6 instigated and sponsored coup?

Comrade Skhara, these people have an agenda whether or not they realize it. They also can't see past their vanity and personal egos. These "patriots" are simply concerned about seeing Iranian chicks in Tehran wearing miniskirts, the rest of the unessential issues that concern individuals like you and I, like international diplomacy, geostrategy, global economy, politics, history, etc, mean nothing to them. These fools claim that they are against an "invasion" of Iran yet they enthusiastically support "revolution" in Iran. And they don't have the ethical foresight nor the common sense to see what an imposed revolution or regime change can do to a nation - case in point, Iraq.

Long live the Islamic Republic of Iran.

[Sip]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Long live the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Oh yes the great Republic. A Republic in which my mother wasn't allowed to practice medicine on males. A revolution after which she would be beaten physically even if she showed a strand of hair in public. Yes it was a great revolution indeed. I don't think my mother was asking to be allowed to wear mini skirts. Just being treated as a human being would have been enough for her.

I am very glad we left that dump. They can take their Islam and stick it up their own rears.

[Shahanshah]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Comrade Skhara, these people have an agenda whether or not they realize it. They also can't see past their vanity and personal egos. These "patriots" are simply concerned about seeing Iranian chicks in Tehran wearing miniskirts, the rest of the unessential issues that concern individuals like you and I, like international diplomacy, geostrategy, global economy, politics, history, etc, mean nothing to them. These fools claim that they are against an "invasion" of Iran yet they enthusiastically support "revolution" in Iran. And they don't have the ethical foresight nor the common sense to see what an imposed revolution or regime change can do to a nation - case in point, Iraq.

Long live the Islamic Republic of Iran.

What a hypocrite...I know your true intentions.

The only reason you say this garbage is because you know that the Iranian Mullahs support Armenia, and your afraid that if the government changes, Armenia will lose one of its biggest supporters.

Shame on you for being so selfish, Iranians are humans to, and just like Armenians living in secular Armenia, there are Iranians who want to have the freedom to wear what they want and do what they want too.

[Shahanshah]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Oh yes the great Republic. A Republic in which my mother wasn't allowed to practice medicine on males. A revolution after which she would be beaten physically even if she showed a strand of hair in public. Yes it was a great revolution indeed. I don't think my mother was asking to be allowed to wear mini skirts. Just being treated as a human being would have been enough for her.

I dont know where you get your information from, or when your parents were last living in Iran, but things have changed since the 1980's. Iranian women today have more opportunities than the average women in the Muslim world.

[Armenian]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

What a hypocrite...

Shhhh... He may be watching you...

[skhara]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Shame on you for being so selfish, Iranians are humans to, and just like Armenians living in secular Armenia, there are Iranians who want to have the freedom to wear what they want and do what they want too.

I have no interest in making this hostile. But some of you guys are so shallow.
You lack the comprehension that causing upheaval in Iran in the vary explosive geopolitical environment of today would go to turn Iran into easy pray to the PNAC-xxxs and the "globalists".

Sure it would be better for Iran to be secular nationalist and this has to come while keeping the intelligence angencies, the army, and the institutions in place. It would have to be up to you to slowly change it to a more desirable social entity over time.

[Sip]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Iranian women today have more opportunities than the average women in the Muslim world.

Yes and the average monkeys in zoos have more freedom than the average monkeys in cages. So what's the point?

Before I ask you complicated questions like how much does a woman's testimony really count in a court of Law in Iran, I will ask you this: Can women in Iran go to a stadium to simply watch a soccer game?

But for whatever it's worth, we left there in 1989 (after the war ended). We still have some family there and I have Iranian friends that go back and forth visiting their own families and such.