Real Men

[felizitation]

Originally posted by Arvestaked You missed the point. I am not talking about this forum. And labels are important because it shows how people feel. They are not completely meaningless.

1- I was talking about this only forum
2- For my part (and mine only), i'm really not keen on labels. It shows the lack of self confidence you have on your own identity and the fact that you are unique. It's exterior to you, and thus you don't need it to define you. Moreover, it depends on trends and change in time.

[loseyourname]

Originally posted by frenchie Moreover, it depends on trends and change in time.

So does your self image.

[Arvestaked]

Originally posted by felizitation 1- I was talking about this only forum
2- For my part (and mine only), i'm really not keen on labels. It shows the lack of self confidence you have on your own identity and the fact that you are unique. It's exterior to you, and thus you don't need it to define you. Moreover, it depends on trends and change in time.

I do not agree. I am sorry. I am sick and tired of people making me feel guilty for being offended. xxxx you for being stupid.

[felizitation]

Originally posted by ;So does your self image.

I'm sorry, I speak too fast for you. So, I was saying, it depends on trends, which means:

You take individual A, and you put it on time X1 and X2. The function F, giving the label of A, is a function of A obviously, but also of time.

So : not [ F(A, X1) equals F(A, X2) ]

even if A is the SAME at X1 and X2.

Do you understand ; ?

[felizitation]

Originally posted by Arvestaked I do not agree. I am sorry. I am sick and tired of people making me feel guilty for being offended. xxxx you for being stupid.

I've never said you're stupid ...

[Arvestaked]

Originally posted by felizitation I'm sorry, I speak too fast for you. So, I was saying, it depends on trends, which means:

You take individual A, and you put it on time X1 and X2. The function F, giving the label of A, is a function of A obviously, but also of time.

So : not [ F(A, X1) equals F(A, X2) ]

even if A is the SAME at X1 and X2.

Do you understand ; ?

I understand your point. That does not mean I cannot be offended by a person who subscribes to a "trend." If you are different than good for you. But I do not want to hear anymore of this unfounded, elitist crap.

[loseyourname]

Originally posted by frenchie I'm sorry, I speak too fast for you. So, I was saying, it depends on trends, which means:

You take individual A, and you put it on time X1 and X2. The function F, giving the label of A, is a function of A obviously, but also of time.

So : not [ F(A, X1) equals F(A, X2) ]

even if A is the SAME at X1 and X2.

Do you understand ; ?

What did I say that contradicted any of this mathematical brilliance?

[felizitation]

Originally posted by Arvestaked I understand your point. That does not mean I cannot be offended by a person who subscribes to a "trend." If you are different than good for you. But I do not want to hear anymore of this unfounded, elitist crap.

What elitist ???
I don't know if i'm different, actually i don't care. My thoughts exists in the only bounds of my life.
Now, i was talking about me (do you remember ?), because my opinions concern only me. Now if you see a lack of respect or any kind of hurtings, I'll respect you and
- Either never try to "label" you (even as armenian, american armenian ...)
- Or call you exactly as what you want, ie. ameriga-hay (as far i've understood)

PS.: i'm making too much mistakes in your language, hope you would excuse me...

[felizitation]

Originally posted by ; What did I say that contradicted any of this mathematical brilliance?

You were talking about the function M being the miror of A, which was out of purpose. M is also a function of time
Not [ M(A) equals A]
Not [ M(A, X1) equals M(A, X2) ]

You should be keen on mirrors ...

;

[loseyourname]

Your purpose is not a mathematical function. I was not wrong to say that M mirrors A. Nor was I saying something tangential to your discussion. My whole point was that everything changes with time, except the laws of physics. It does no service to your argument to say that labels change with time. That statement is completely superfluous to the discussion.