If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
lets test your criteria for these phenotypes. First of all, how is Sumerian speakable in the same breadth as Cro-Magnoid and Nordic? It is in a lexical category that pertains to another field of inquiry, identification if you will. There is no Sumerian phenotype in any field of anthropological inquiry I've ever read, so I'm curious as to what kind of pictures you would post to support this idea of "Sumerian" as a lexical item for a study of phenotypes.
Also, I've seen you post pictures of Persian "Nordics" before who had no Nordic features, and Cro-Magnoids are typical of the remnant appearance from first wave Europeans, and not really people in Asia, especially not in the Middle East, so I'm equally interested in seeing the pictures of these supposed Cro-Magnoids you're talking about. (In the past year I've gone through the online material on phenotype categorization and even though I'm not for it's application at such a technical level to categories human beings that we encounter in our day to day lives, I do see it's logic now. I'm just curious as to whether you follow any of the traditional and conventional criterion for this sort of analysis, so far the signs point to no...
lets test your criteria for these phenotypes. First of all, how is Sumerian speakable in the same breadth as Cro-Magnoid and Nordic? It is in a lexical category that pertains to another field of inquiry, identification if you will. There is no Sumerian phenotype in any field of anthropological inquiry I've ever read, so I'm curious as to what kind of pictures you would post to support this idea of "Sumerian" as a lexical item for a study of phenotypes.
Also, I've seen you post pictures of Persian "Nordics" before who had no Nordic features, and Cro-Magnoids are typical of the remnant appearance from first wave Europeans, and not really people in Asia, especially not in the Middle East, so I'm equally interested in seeing the pictures of these supposed Cro-Magnoids you're talking about. (In the past year I've gone through the online material on phenotype categorization and even though I'm not for it's application at such a technical level to categories human beings that we encounter in our day to day lives, I do see it's logic now. I'm just curious as to whether you follow any of the traditional and conventional criterion for this sort of analysis, so far the signs point to no...
Can you tell us why you care so much about defending this "integrity of the Persian people as Nordics?" Are you that insecure about what other people think of your wife?
Sorry that is not my Stormfront. I was banned from Stormfront many years ago. Stormfront considers Azeri Turks as the "pure Aryans". I heard they banned Armenians too.
Persian is not a race and is not a homogenous group either unlike Azeri Turks who are very homogenous. Persians can range from Sumerian to Cro-Magnoid to Nordic. But they are a cultural-historical entity apart from Azeri Turks.
Azeri Turks misuse the identity of Persians and present themselves as Persians. We are just warning people not to fall into the trap of believing them. Historically Persians have very good names and are famous for honesty. Now some criminal turks are trying to destroy it.
Leave a comment: