Re: elegy
June 15, 2010
************************************************** *
DEAD END
*********************************************
When one side says one thing and the other the exact opposite for one hundred years, we have no choice but to conclude either one side or both are obstinate, dogmatic, self-righteous, and intolerant of dissent.
Has anyone ever said we are open-minded, tolerant, willing to engage in dialogue, and eager to develop a consensus by means of compromise?
Has anyone ever said diplomacy is our strong suit?
If Armenian cannot agree with Armenian, can he ever agree with the Turk?
I am not casting aspersions, just asking questions.
*
ARMENIAN ETIQUETTE
*******************************
When you don't understand what you read, call the writer an idiot.
When you disagree with what he writes, call him a traitor.
*
KHRUSHCHEV ON DE GAULLE
**************************************
“Was he smart or stupid? For a while he was considered an idiot and a fascist. But in fact he was a very smart fellow.”
*
KHRUSHCHEV ON MALRAUX
*****************************************
“De Gaulle's Minister of Culture was a well-known writer. I think he had the same last name as that other famous French writer, Moliere.”
Which reminds me of the story that when Malraux was named the winner of the Nobel Prize, Mailer received several congratulatory calls from American friends.
*
REFLECTIONS
*********************************
Some day even the most absurd occurrence may make perfect sense, but by then the perceiver and the occurrence may well be one and the same.
*
About Armenians and Turks: There is probably something true in the saying that if you hate somebody too much it may be because you see yourself in him.
*
When I was young I was unteachable. Hence my intolerance of phony pundits.
There is an old Spanish saying: “Women and horses: let someone else tame them.”
And I say: “Horse’s asses: let a shrew tame them.”
#
June 15, 2010
************************************************** *
DEAD END
*********************************************
When one side says one thing and the other the exact opposite for one hundred years, we have no choice but to conclude either one side or both are obstinate, dogmatic, self-righteous, and intolerant of dissent.
Has anyone ever said we are open-minded, tolerant, willing to engage in dialogue, and eager to develop a consensus by means of compromise?
Has anyone ever said diplomacy is our strong suit?
If Armenian cannot agree with Armenian, can he ever agree with the Turk?
I am not casting aspersions, just asking questions.
*
ARMENIAN ETIQUETTE
*******************************
When you don't understand what you read, call the writer an idiot.
When you disagree with what he writes, call him a traitor.
*
KHRUSHCHEV ON DE GAULLE
**************************************
“Was he smart or stupid? For a while he was considered an idiot and a fascist. But in fact he was a very smart fellow.”
*
KHRUSHCHEV ON MALRAUX
*****************************************
“De Gaulle's Minister of Culture was a well-known writer. I think he had the same last name as that other famous French writer, Moliere.”
Which reminds me of the story that when Malraux was named the winner of the Nobel Prize, Mailer received several congratulatory calls from American friends.
*
REFLECTIONS
*********************************
Some day even the most absurd occurrence may make perfect sense, but by then the perceiver and the occurrence may well be one and the same.
*
About Armenians and Turks: There is probably something true in the saying that if you hate somebody too much it may be because you see yourself in him.
*
When I was young I was unteachable. Hence my intolerance of phony pundits.
There is an old Spanish saying: “Women and horses: let someone else tame them.”
And I say: “Horse’s asses: let a shrew tame them.”
#
Comment