Sometimes hard to back up minorities?

[Yedtarts]

Re: Sometimes hard to back up minorities?

I don't know why you have to add superfluous and (seemingly) sarcastic remarks to everything you post. It's hard enough understanding you with strange grammar and way of constructing sentences. Don't prolong the torture of reading your posts with extra, unnecessary text.

Anyway, I'm a bit surprised I actually have to 'educate' you on this, since I thought it was pretty common knowledge that people who identify themselves as xxxs can also be secular or atheistic. It isn't terribly complex to be ethnically xxxish, it comes out a shared heritage with other xxxs and a strong sense of preserving particular types of food, music, art, language and values associated with the xxxish people. Just from my personal life experience, I would say most xxxs I know are ethnically xxxish and far fewer are actually people of faith or followers of Judaism as a religion.

I'm really not sure how this thread became so xxx-centric. I guess it's to be expected on a forum where apparently antisemitism is so rampant that the very word xxx needs to be censored as if it were a cuss word.

I wasn’t talking to you when I did my comment about "joowishness being religion", yet you took it on yourself to answer back. The grand philosopher you!

I am writing sarcastically because in the other thread you called me “hallucinating or schizophrenic” when I said I have my proof I don’t need a proof, you gave yourself permission to do so because you have read few philosophy books?

If I do grammar mistakes or I don’t construct my sentences correctly it’s because I wasn’t educated in Canada or US, I never claimed my English was perfect nor I was going after your typo mistakes that you also do them often. But it seemed to me that you were understanding my English very well till you had problem answering me back in the other thread.

[Jinx]

Re: Sometimes hard to back up minorities?

I wasn’t talking to you when I did my comment about "joowishness being religion", yet you took it on yourself to answer back. The grand philosopher you!

I am writing sarcastically because in the other thread you called me “hallucinating or schizophrenic” when I said I have my proof I don’t need a proof, you gave yourself permission to do so because you have read few philosophy books?

If I do grammar mistakes or I don’t construct my sentences correctly it’s because I wasn’t educated in Canada or US, I never claimed my English was perfect nor I was going after your typo mistakes that you also do them often. But it seemed to me that you were understanding my English very well till you had problem answering me back in the other thread.

Um, no. I never said me reading philosophy gives me any kind of special privilege. You constantly attribute things to people they never said. I see this trend. And I am not in the minority of believing that hearing voices in your head or seeing the appearance of a magical person constitutes as hallucination of schizophrenia. But all that aside, I hope I educated you in what being culturally xxxish is, since that's what you asked.