Historicity of the Jewish Holocaust

[Darorinag]

Check your PM in a bit, Seapahn.

[Fadix]

Originally posted by Darorinag That is irrelevant. You are trying to evade the discussion by finding excuses for it. Now "be a man" and take the challenge and stop these games. This has no place in this thread. I have already accepted certain views with regards to other issues, including the ever famous one, communism. Now quit the excuses. Or let me know if you won't, and I will put you on ignore. Nothing better than putting a pest on ignore.

Jerk, between you and me YOU are the one having made excuses after excuses to evade EVERYTHING

First it was Hilberg which you claimed having read, even when I showed you that it could be impossible that you have read it, YOU STILL MAINTAIN having read it. Dan, how can one even expect having a discussion with you when you lie in every few sentences, lies that are SO OBVIOUS, and later on refuse to admit it. How one can expect that you will take documents or subjects at their face values?

Jerk, I showed you that you did even not knew that Hilbergs work was three books in the first place, you had no idea of what was in... you invaded and invaded...

You claimed that the Judge statment you took it from a book, which is IMPOSSIBLE, the accolades added by Flaurisson were there, there is no work of the translation of the trial which will contain it... there is even no work that contain the judges translation, you DON'T even know how to access the US public records, you don't even know how to use the interloaning system Dan.

Dan, you lie, lie, lie, lie, lie... you lie like you breathe, and you tell me that I am evasive, look Dan, I am not you, when I make a mistake I just admit it, I do not twist it again and again and again and hide it with lie lies and deny them being lies... this is not how it works.

Just an example here Dan, it is the Barbarrossa issue, I just admitted even if my sentence was not clear and it was abvious that it was full of typing mistakes attributed to me not having reread it... I could have twisted it, and it would have been easier in my cases because I have posts dating back four years ago that proves that I know and even knew four years back what I am talking about. BUT STILL... I just admitted it was a mistake, without lying, without hidding without twisting.

You are here, having shown to have read nothing, absolutly nothing... you claimed having read Irving, which you still claim, when you had obviously no idea that he was a revisionist of the same line as Zundel...

Dear pathological liar, I will call you with the name you yourself has forced people to call you, you digged the hole yourself...

Now, I want you to explain me how could it be possible to have a discussion with someone that claims to know all those things, and before I even bring it expose his ignorance and when I bring it claims he knew it... dear liar, you still maintain having read Hilbergs book when all the evidences I provided shows that it was impossible for you to have read the book... you claimed having taken the judge statment from a book, and claimed having read the entire sentence, when the judge statment does not come from a book, and could not have been come from a translation of the trial, since it even contained the accolades added by Flaurisson himself... the work is a translation Jerk, Flaurisson in that article says that that would sound terrible to hear for the French... don't force me to requote that part, where he exposes writting the article in French... and you jerk have maintained that part regarding French, because it is the only way you could have hidden your big lie.

Look Jerk, no matter you lie or tell the truth you shall have the answer for the rest of your trash... I am not the one that is evasif here, you are, but I will still ask again the same question, and this time answer.

Dan dear, how do you expect that anyone be interested to discuss with you, when you lie in his own face like that, when both you and him, and everyone else know(including your "friends") you are lying? How do you expect that anyone will accept to have a discussion with a pathological liar?

Answer to that question Dan. Now do you see how the Den affair is related to this one Jerk? You lie, lie, lie,lie,lie,lie,lie,lie,lie... you twist and lie, ...

Now, quit lying Dan the pathological liar.

[Darorinag]

As I stated, you are now on my ignore list.

[anileve]

Please lets stay on topic, I understand it's a bit hard after 100th page but at least try. As far as topic is concerned, did anyone prove that earth is flat yet? By the way interestingly enough, one can easily come to a certain conclusion when the IP in another forum matches the IP in this one. Making mistakes can be an easy give away.

[Darorinag]

By the way interestingly enough, one can easily come to a certain conclusion when the IP in another forum matches the IP in this one. Making mistakes can be an easy give away.

On can easily come to the conclusion that you could be sued for sharing anyone's IP. I am sure Admin will not be pleased with this if I tell him that one of his moderators is admitting she shared an IP across boards.

At any rate, I am done discussing this with Fadi. If loseyourname or anyone else would like to butt in and post some stuff, I'd be more than glad to reply. Otherwise, I'm done with this thread.

Btw, I am surprised moderators have been so lenient on Mr. Fadi with regards to his personal attacks. I thought there was a new warning system...

Anyway, good thread, until, I'm afraid, someone couldn't control his temper.

[Fadix]

Originally posted by anileve Please lets stay on topic, I understand it's a bit hard after 100th page but at least try. As far as topic is concerned, did anyone prove that earth is flat yet? By the way interestingly enough, one can easily come to a certain conclusion when the IP in another forum matches the IP in this one. Making mistakes can be an easy give away.

It is easy to say to someone to stay on topic, when the person with whom you are discussing with lie in every few sentences and still continue to lie when both him and the person with whom he exchange knows he is lying.

Actually it is impossible to have a discussion with a pathological liar and a jerk. I am not attacking him here, I told him countless numbvers of times to stop lying and the person still continue to lie.

Anileve, what do you think? Is it possible for someone to have read a work when he has no idea what is in the work? Is it possible for someone to have read the work when he has no idea that the work in question is three books and not one?

Is it possible for someone to have read a material only available in US National archives public record, when he does even not know how to use the interloaning program to have a print of archival material? Is it possible for that same person whom say having copied a translation from a book, when the said translation even contain the accolade of an author of an article?

This person lie and lie and lie and lie etc... I can present here a countdown of all his lies... how do you expect an individual such as this to agree with you when you present him an evidence, when this same person deny lying when the evidence is clear cut for everyone else?



Unlike what people believe, sharing IP addresses is not illegal, there is no laws that forbidden someone to share IP addresses... Dan, don't forget that you have abused a private forum(the other board), sharing IP addresses here concerns an abuser(you)...

And both of us know Dan that you can not ignore me, you have claimed that I was in your ignore list countless numbers of times... this is another lie from your part Danny boy.

[anileve]

Oh stop whining Dan and go back to drawing swastikas. And I don't think you want the volcano to erupt. Your schizophrenic tendencies are whispering wrong sweet little nothings, no one admitted to anything, the statement is general and apparently right on target. No one except for Fadix has the golden patience to argue with you by the way.

[anileve]

Originally posted by Fadix
Actually it is impossible to have a discussion with a pathological liar and a jerk. I am not attacking him here, I told him countless numbvers of times to stop lying and the person still continue to lie.

Anileve, what do you think? Is it possible for someone to have read a work when he has no idea what is in the work? Is it possible for someone to have read the work when he has no idea that the work in question is three books and not one?

Well Fadix let's just say that my ability of arguing with walls doesn't extend to your steel patience. A debate only works if the participants are actually considering other points of views and paying attention to the posts of other members. It's called selective interpretation. Now if they have a clear agenda and keep pounding the same irrelevant points over and over again it becomes equivalent to the pointless keystrokes and wasted time, unless one enjoys having a conversation with himself. One of the reasons I stopped responding.

[Darorinag]

Originally posted by anileve Oh stop whining Dan and go back to drawing swastikas. And I don't think you want the volcano to erupt. Your schizophrenic tendencies are whispering wrong sweet little nothings, no one admitted to anything, the statement is general and apparently right on target. No one except for Fadix has the golden patience to argue with you by the way.

Drawing swastikas? Mmmhmmm...

I'm sure Fadi is grateful that you're around to vindicate him.

[Darorinag]

Originally posted by anileve Well Fadix let's just say that my ability of arguing with walls doesn't extend to your steel patience. A debate only works if the participants are actually considering other points of views and paying attention to the posts of other members. It's called selective interpretation. Now if they have a clear agenda and keep pounding the same irrelevant points over and over again it becomes equivalent to the pointless keystrokes and wasted time, unless one enjoys having a conversation with himself. One of the reasons I stopped responding.

"Irrelevant points"? Yet you never took the time to prove me wrong, did you? Yet you seem to know it's irrelevant.. Hmmm!!

Anyway, glad to have you at least a bit neutral this time around. We don't see that happening usually.

It's fine and dandy not to want to participate in a discussion for no reason - it is only when you claim that you're not going to discuss it because my points are irrelevant that I have my doubts about your reasons.

Anyway... nice debate we had going there. at least the thread wasn't deleted. that's a start.

peace,

dan