Western Armenia (animation)

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

You don't know what you're talking about go and study some hsitroians that are not turks and come back maybe you'll have something good to say

[Selpak]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

I have no plan for studying history to discuss with you about some topics like "urartus was armenians", "kakatürk was gay"...etc.

I posted 2 animations which were created by a single person. And I liked them, especially first one. I've shared them with you.

I added "western armenia" part to title for taking your attention. I see you are history expert but what about rest of the forumers. I said (here comes history): Lydians, Meds, Lykians and -I can add more names- were local Anatolians. And I said Urartus were not talking Armenian... You can discuss it with PKK sympathizer Kurds and Greeks. They have also some desperate claims which are opposite to yours.

[Sip]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

This is even Gayer than the Turkish hop hop thread. What's the point? It's not funny, it's not entertaining, it's not humorous, and it's not even understandable since it's in Turkish. So who cares, really?

I added "western armenia" part to title for taking your attention.

Are you that desparate for attention? Ok here's some: Yay look it's Selpak, yay hooray, let's all pay attention to Selpak. WHee heee horay yay omg jajaja

By the way, taking a history lesson from a Turk is like getting a crash course in Astronomy from Aristotle or Ptolemy (they both thought they were at the center of the universe and everything revolved around them)

[Selpak]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

QUESTION l. WAS EASTERN ANATOLIA THE ORIGINAL HOMELAND OF THE ARMENIANS?

Even Armenian historians disagree on this question. Let us examine some of their contradictory theories while looking into Anatolian history.



1. The Biblical Noah Theory. According to this idea, the Armenians descended from Hayk, great-great grandson of the Biblical patriarch Noah. Since Noah's Arc is supposed to have come to rest on Mount Ararat, the advocates of this idea conclude that eastern Anatolia must have been the original Armenian homeland, adding that Hayk lived some four hundred years and expanded his dominion as far as Babylon. This claim is based entirely on fables, not on any scientific evidence, and is not worthy of further consideration. The historian Auguste Carrière summarily dismisses it stating that "it depends entirely on information provided by some Armenian historians, most of which was made up." (1)
2. The Urartu Theory. Some Armenians claim that they were the people of Urartu, which existed in eastern Anatolia starting about 3000 B.C. until it was defeated and destroyed by the Medes, with its territory being contested for some time by Lydia and the Medes until it finally fell under the influence of the latter. This claim has no basis in fact. No form of the name Armenian is found in any inscription in Anatolia dating from that period, nor was there any similarity at all between the Armenian language and that of Urartu, the former being a member of the Satem group of Indo European languages, while the latter was similar to the Ural-Altaic languages. Nor were there any similarities between their cultures. The most recent archaeological finds in the area of Erzurum support these conclusions very clearly. There is, therefore, absolutely no evidence at all to support the claim that the people of Urartu were Armenian.
3. The Thracian-Phrygian Theory. The theory most favored by Armenian historians claims that they descended from a Thracian-Phrygian group, that originated in the Balkan Peninsula and by the pressure of Illyrians migrated to eastern Anatolia in the sixth century B.C. This theory is based on the fact that the name Armenian was mentioned for the first time in the Behistan inscription of the Mede (Persian) Emperor Darius from the year 521 B.C., "I defeated the Armenians." If accepted, of course, this view effectively contradicts and disproves the Noah and Urartu theories.
4. The Southern Caucasus Theory. This idea claims that the Armenians are related racially and culturally to the peoples of the Southern Caucasus and that, therefore, they originated there. It is, however, supported only by the fact that Darius defeated the Armenians in the Caucasus. The Armenians are in no way related to any of the Caucasian races.
5. The Turanian Theory. Some Armenians have adduced similarities of certain elements of the Armenian language and culture with those of some Turkish and Azeri tribes of the Caucasus to document a relationship, but this remains to be proved.

Whichever, if any, of these theories is correct, it is very certain that the Armenians did not originate in Anatolia, nor did they live there for three to four thousand years, as claimed. They have put forward these ideas merely to support their claims that the Turks drove them out of a homeland in which they have lived for thousands of years, but they can not stand up to the facts.

[Sip]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

Here's a theory Selpak: You're still an idiot.

[skhara]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

5. The Turanian Theory. Some Armenians have adduced similarities of certain elements of the Armenian language and culture with those of some Turkish and Azeri tribes of the Caucasus to document a relationship, but this remains to be proved.

This is most absurd.

Whichever, if any, of these theories is correct, it is very certain that the Armenians did not originate in Anatolia, nor did they live there for three to four thousand years, as claimed.

Armenian's originated in Armenia. Historic Armenia and this is the only place that Armenians originated.

They have put forward these ideas merely to support their claims that the Turks drove them out of a homeland in which they have lived for thousands of years, but they can not stand up to the facts.

You sure about that turd. You better be real sure of the tripe you vomit here. You have well overstayed your welcome.

[Lucin]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

QUESTION l. WAS EASTERN ANATOLIA THE ORIGINAL HOMELAND OF THE ARMENIANS?

5. The Turanian Theory. Some Armenians have adduced similarities of certain elements of the Armenian language and culture with those of some Turkish and Azeri tribes of the Caucasus to document a relationship, but this remains to be proved.

Whichever, if any, of these theories is correct, it is very certain that the Armenians did not originate in Anatolia, nor did they live there for three to four thousand years, as claimed. They have put forward these ideas merely to support their claims that the Turks drove them out of a homeland in which they have lived for thousands of years, but they can not stand up to the facts.

Question: What is a Turk? Where does it originate from?

1. The Scientific theory: Turks originated from the Jurassic Park.
2. The Universal Theory: Turks originated from Hell!

Whichever, if any, of these theories is correct, it is very certain that the Turks have not evolved from the early primates of evolution charts. They have put forward these ideas merely to support their claims that the Armenians drove them out of the ‘Park’ in which they have lived for thousands of years, but they cannot stand up to the facts.

[Selpak]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

Thanks for the jokes. Unfortunately, all of them were bad!

[Sip]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

Selpak = teh owned.

[Selpak]

Re: Western Armenia (animation)

what does "teh" mean?