2009 NBA Playoffs

[One-Way]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

This year wasn't the Spurs year.
Without Ginobili who averages 20 points, of course there going to be in trouble. Well as of now I can careless who win as long as Lakers lose I'm a happy man.

Your problem is you were so confident with the Spurs and thought they would win without Manu. Now, here they are, long gone and you are bringing Manu into the conversation saying they fell into trouble because of him.

I told you they wouldn't win. I wasn't speaking as a Spurs hater, I was strictly speaking practically, yet you didn't care. I don't like people who are ignorant to facts; they close their eyes to what's laid in front of them and continue to root for their team, regardless.

Last year, I was rooting for Lakers but knew it wasn't going to pull through. This year, I'm confident they will win. I never wanted Spurs to lose, I even mentioned I'd like them to play Lakers. Either way, take your hate elsewhere. I wish Lakers did play Spurs so we'd sweep them, unfortunately, they're not even good enough to meet us in the Western Finals.

[MrHyeSev]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

Your problem is you were so confident with the Spurs and thought they would win without Manu. Now, here they are, long gone and you are bringing Manu into the conversation saying they fell into trouble because of him.

I told you they wouldn't win. I wasn't speaking as a Spurs hater, I was strictly speaking practically, yet you didn't care. I don't like people who are ignorant to facts; they close their eyes to what's laid in front of them and continue to root for their team, regardless.

Last year, I was rooting for Lakers but knew it wasn't going to pull through. This year, I'm confident they will win. I never wanted Spurs to lose, I even mentioned I'd like them to play Lakers. Either way, take your hate elsewhere. I wish Lakers did play Spurs so we'd sweep them, unfortunately, they're not even good enough to meet us in the Western Finals.

If Lakers lose I want to hear your excuse, I mentioned Ginobili only based on true facts. Let's see what Lakers are going to do, I hope they play Portland, this year Lakers split the season series with them.

[One-Way]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

Lakers will not lose, therefore I won't need an excuse.

[MrHyeSev]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

Ok like I said let's wait & see.
Some teams Lakers should worry about

Blazers,Boston, & Cavs.

[One-Way]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

Ok like I said let's wait & see.
Some teams Lakers should worry about

Blazers,Boston, & Cavs.

Were you born yesterday?

Blazers are currently losing the series 3-2 to Houston. The next game between the two is tomorrow in Houston. It's almost certain Lakers will be playing Houston next, which is no problem because Lakers took care of them during the season.

Boston basically embarrassed themselves during the first round. They are barely hanging on in a 3-2 series; two of the games they won were decided by two or three points, and they had only one big game. I wish Lakers played Boston but they will not.

Cavs is the only team worthy of recongition, even though Lakers will handle them. It won't be as tough as last year but it will be done; I'm thinking 4-1 win for Lakers.

I can't wait to quote myself and prove how right I was in June.

[mikek]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

Blazers are currently losing the series 3-2 to Houston. The next game between the two is tomorrow in Houston. It's almost certain Lakers will be playing Houston next, which is no problem because Lakers took care of them during the season.

Post season is entirely different from the regular season. Didn't the 04 Lakers sweep the Pistons, but lose to them in the Finals? Portland will be an easy out, but the Rockets will not. They have two damn good wing defenders to throw at Kobe and the best center in the game. Rick Adelman is also one of the most underrated coaches in the history of the NBA. Regardless, Nuggets will be the toughest team due to Billups being a beast and Melo being who he is. Not to mention, they have physical bigs, and Pau hates those matchups.

Boston basically embarrassed themselves during the first round. They are barely hanging on in a 3-2 series; two of the games they won were decided by two or three points, and they had only one big game. I wish Lakers played Boston but they will not.

Yes, let's ignore the fact Boston took 7 games to beat the Hawks, and I believe, the Cavaliers last season. On top of that, they are playing without last years DPOY and also lost Powe in the series. They will be just fine.

Cavs is the only team worthy of recongition, even though Lakers will handle them. It won't be as tough as last year but it will be done; I'm thinking 4-1 win for Lakers.

You think the Lakers will beat the Cavs in 5? That is a clear cut sign of being a homer. Cavs are a defensive minded squad with physical big men (Wallace & Andy). Like I already noted, Pau hates physical play and he always shys away from contact. Basically, if you go position by position, Cavs have the advantage at everything but the 2 and the 4.

[MrHyeSev]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

The most exciting series so far has been
Boston vs Chicago

3OT what a game.

[One-Way]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

I think we've had enough drifting off, let's say on topic.

[MrHyeSev]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

I'm staying on the topic.

[MrHyeSev]

Re: 2009 NBA Playoffs

I hope the Bulls win.
Go Brad Miller LOL.