Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Hrant Dink murdered

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Hrant Dink murdered

    Originally posted by Aurathen
    Let me explain what I meant by my last sentence:
    What i was trying to express was that my relations with the armenian people living here are very good, in most cases better than my relations with most of the Turks I know. We call eachother brothers. Yet I sense that most of the Armenians here hate us and don't want to talk about our common problems. I never deny something that is true. So after the historians complete their researches about this matter and conclude that there has been a genocie to Armenians starting from 24 April 1915, then I will accept it with great grief and regret and be ashamed of my acestors. But to destroy the freedom of expression and thought as French example is something that is beyond the line. I hope you understand me thanx.
    just because your gov't has had its own propoganda of denying historical facts does not mean that this has not already been studied by historians. all that remains is for that open and honest study to be conducted in Turkey. and most Armenians do not hate Turks only the denialism that comes from the gov't and the brain washed masses.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Hrant Dink murdered

      ABC On-line
      Sydney Armenians protest journalist's murder
      Sydney's Armenian community has held a noisy rally outside the Turkish consulate to protest against the recent murder of prominent journalist Hrant Dink in Istanbul.

      Hundreds of people waving Armenian flags called on the Turkish Government to punish the man who shot Mr Dink outside his newspaper's office on Friday.

      Mr Dink was an outspoken critic of the Turkish Government's refusal to recognise the Armenian genocide at the end of World War I.

      Dr Tro Kortian from the Armenian National Committee of Australia says the protesters were also calling for the Turkish Government to acknowledge the issue.

      "It is a two-sided, double-edged protest," he said.

      "One to express our horror, one to express our solidarity but also to express our indignation at the policy of denial which the Turkish Government has persistently pursued."



      and Can I just add, that I was there at this protest today. Armenian community had a letter to hand over to the General of the consulat and they didn't want to receive it, we then asked a police officer to hand it over and he was denied as well.

      well, Our speaker started reading the letter in front of all the news cameras etc. What a shame, whole of Australia will now see them for who they are. They eventually took the letter but not until it was read out to the media.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Hrant Dink murdered

        After many times i still find mysef repeating what i expressed. When we say we feel sorry for the loss of Hrant Dink we really mean it. Is it impossible for us o be human and mourn for our fellow citizen? You will keep on accusing us with everything that comes to yor mind so i dont think it makes any difference if i try to explain how we feel about Hrant s death. ypu have already made up your mind

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Hrant Dink murdered

          This is a sad and shameful event for Turkey,my country.
          I'm an Agos reader and Dink was an idol writer for me and a lot of Turkish/Armenian young people here in Turkey. I was shocked when I heard the news that he shot from his back:/

          It's a break-point for the rising-nationalism in Turkey,this is their dark face...

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Hrant Dink murdered

            as he made comments objectively, both diaspora and some nationalist turks didn't like him. However, turkish public showed its sadness in his funeral.

            Last edited by lan ?; 12-10-2007, 07:24 AM.
            "the question is: has anything that you've done made your life better?"

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Hrant Dink murdered

              Originally posted by lan ? View Post
              as he made comments objectively, both diaspora and some nationalist turks didn't like him. However, turkish public showed its sadness in his funeral.

              It is tragic what happend to Hrant Dink and his political struggle, it got hijacked by the popular movement in Turkey that wanted more freedoms of speech. Every one of those protestors opposed Agos newspaper and Hrant Dink's true message for the Turkish people that he was gunned down for. I think it was all window dressing to make themselves look good prior to the important European Union negotiations that occured post Dink assasination.

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Hrant Dink murdered

                Originally posted by Virgil View Post
                It is tragic what happend to Hrant Dink and his political struggle, it got hijacked by the popular movement in Turkey that wanted more freedoms of speech. Every one of those protestors opposed Agos newspaper and Hrant Dink's true message for the Turkish people that he was gunned down for. I think it was all window dressing to make themselves look good prior to the important European Union negotiations that occured post Dink assasination.
                ...also it comes as no surprise that NOTHING has changed in Turkey since Dink's murder. It is business as usual there.
                In my opinion, the Turkish sheeple in the picture above are just useless human garbage. These hordes are cynicaly used to promote a civilized image of Turkey that does not exist in reality.

                F them and their crockadile tears.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Hrant Dink murdered

                  We have lived to see this day
                  By Christopher H. Zakian



                  * A reminiscence, after a year

                  At first hearing, the news seemed like the build-up to a joke. Dink’s been shot? The name itself never failed to amuse me, no matter the context. And pictures of the man had always showed a pleasant, expressive Armenian face, slightly ironic, and confidently composed even amid the Keystone-Coppish antics of Turkey’s legal system. Besides, he was only a writer. Dink’s been shot? What an improbable idea. Go on -- what’s the punchline? It turned out there was more than one punchline – and quite different from what I had expected. Dink’s been shot – and he’s dead. Dink was shot -- in broad daylight, on an open street. He was shot in the back of the head. He was shot coming out of his office. He was shot, and the punk who did it cursed him in Turkish as he ran away. The details trickled into the Reporter’s offices throughout that day, but there was hardly time to greet them with the reverence they deserved. Energy could be spared for a periodic sad shake of the head, an angry grinding of teeth. But what took possession of me and my colleagues in our scattered offices was the emerging news story -- already developing in astonishing ways on the streets of Istanbul, and rippling outward to Armenian communities across the world. How would we cover it? How would we do justice, not simply to the immediate event, but also to the accelerating pace of reactions and counter-developments? How would we convey it all in a timely way, with an original perspective? In some ways the reaction was coldly forensic; but there was a touch of poignancy in the realization that the victim himself, in decidedly different circumstances, would likely have been approaching things in a similar way. It was not until two days later, in church, that the full weight of Hrant Dink’s fate fell on me. Already by that time, the Internet was alive with headlines and slogans seeking to encapsulate the greater meaning of Dink’s death. Dink was said to have died in 1915. He was designated Victim Number one-and-a-half-million-plus-one of the Armenian Genocide. He was the hero-martyr killed for speaking the truth. All of these were thoughtful, helpful, even true in their own ways. And yet not the whole truth. Even in the Republic of Turkey, there are others willing to speak and write about the Genocide; some have been roughed up, threatened, sued, forced into exile. But none of them was selected for an execution-style murder. That distinction was reserved for Hrant Dink, and what recommended him for that fate, in the eyes of his killers, was not the kind of man he was or wasn’t, or even what he said or did, but rather the very fact that he was an Armenian.


                  That thought weighed on me as I stood in our church sanctuary, among fellow countrymen, but also by myself. The sharagans came from me raspingly, haltingly. Surely there was comfort to be found in those immortal sounds, which have outlived every Armenian who ever existed, and link us with those who were, and those who are yet to come. But on that day there was also a sense of defiance in the mere utterance of those Armenian words, and more than once, when I felt I couldn’t continue a given phrase, I found myself forcing the words out, through clenched teeth, and at the expense of tunefulness, just to assure the invisible powers listening that our words would never easily be silenced. It was just after the singing of Der voghormia that I felt my son at my side, up from Sunday School to receive Communion. Earlier that morning, I had tried to explain something of what had occurred in the previous days, and in his wise little way he stood close by me now, without any words, as if to console the troubled heart of his father. Every child, I think, represents a parent’s desire to redeem the wrongs of the past, and to cast a vote for a better future -- certainly that’s the perspective of many Armenians I know. And my own firstborn son, named for the departed grandfathers he never knew, is no exception. But in the midst of that mostly happy thought, it came hard upon me that this same boy, freshly turned six the week before, would be no different from Dink in the eyes of the killers: equally expendable, equally worthy of extinction. Equally guilty of the sin of being an Armenian. So are we all. Looking back from the vantage of a year, it is still astonishing to me that I have lived to see a day on which such a realization could occur. For reasons of politics, which are not unworthy in themselves, we pretend that what happened in 1915 was the act of a now-defunct regime. Even the attempt to link Dink’s death directly to the Genocide seems, to me, to be an attempt to isolate it, historicize it, emphasize its anomalous, retrograde quality – as if in the passage of 90-odd years the world has outgrown such things. But the thing that most impresses itself upon me a year after the day Hrant Dink was shot is that the passions of hatred and contempt which made something like the Genocide possible, even plausible, a century ago, are still alive, still easily accessible, still there waiting to be unleashed today. I fear that this hatred will always follow our people. Certainly, I cannot see how all the easy talk about reconciliation (whatever that entails) will ever overcome it. Dink’s killers, an amalgam of the faceless state, and the otherwise nameless lowlifes for whom a moment of violence is the only path to notoriety, are in their typology as old as man himself. They are the images of enforced order and mindless chaos which have allied themselves throughout history, whenever the conceit of human freedom, human distinctiveness, human dignity, arise, and need to be put down -- violently, carelessly, with only a token of remorse. Certainly, there was reason for unexpected hope in the immediate aftermath of Dink’s murder. Perhaps one day it will amount to something. There was likewise reason for disappointment in the political developments (or non-developments) of the past 12 months. But the fluctuating highs and lows are, I fear, in the scheme of history, ephemeral. What persists is a hatred directed at our people -- as it has been directed at other people, elsewhere. It will always be with us. By all accounts, Hrant Dink was a decent man in life; certainly a brave one. We should remember that whenever we memorialize him -- and we should be grateful that we can remember him as such a man. But good or bad, none of that mattered to his killers. Dink was shot – because he was an Armenian. That’s the terrible “punchline” that has stayed with me these past months. To be honest, the thought does not keep me awake at night, or pollute the joy I find in life’s many beautiful and noble aspects. But I am also all too aware that I have accepted the responsibility for bringing four new Armenians into this world, to carry on our family tradition, and to add their voices to the chorus of our ancestors. Someday, somehow, I will have to find a way to tell them that, despite their breathtaking purity and innocence, the weapon that targeted Hrant Dink is aimed at them, too.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Hrant Dink murdered

                    Many Turks felt great sadness at the passing of Hrant Dink. I know cause I am one of them.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Hrant Dink murdered

                      Originally posted by Timetells View Post
                      Many Turks felt great sadness at the passing of Hrant Dink. I know cause I am one of them.
                      Please do not resort to Turkish euphemisms to mask dispicible Turkish crimes. Hrant Dink was murdered - he did not "pass" (as if he died of old age).

                      I bet you refer to the Armenian Genocide as a "tragedy" too.
                      Last edited by crusader1492; 04-17-2008, 12:27 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X