Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan
I understand cooperation which can contribute to some trust of intentions aswell as allow input for our forces to evolve for the better.
Management and welfare of the squaddies would also be part of that. I think these are good things.
At a higher level there are agreements and treaties which do not allow the US to help Armenia at the expense of Azerbaijan and vice versa.
There are also constraints which would not allow the US to supply equipment to either side not to increase tension and fuel the conflict.
Also constraints of supply of equipment to a country that belongs to a different military block / alliance.
Therefore the the ceiling is well defined.
To me the statement has more than a military description of the processes but has political overtones.
Why not say "improves its army", simple and sweet.
Armenia is part of CSTO and never declared an ambition to be a western style army.
May be there is some truth in the statement that there can be no free lunch.
.
Originally posted by Eddo211
View Post
Management and welfare of the squaddies would also be part of that. I think these are good things.
At a higher level there are agreements and treaties which do not allow the US to help Armenia at the expense of Azerbaijan and vice versa.
There are also constraints which would not allow the US to supply equipment to either side not to increase tension and fuel the conflict.
Also constraints of supply of equipment to a country that belongs to a different military block / alliance.
Therefore the the ceiling is well defined.
To me the statement has more than a military description of the processes but has political overtones.
Why not say "improves its army", simple and sweet.
Armenia is part of CSTO and never declared an ambition to be a western style army.
May be there is some truth in the statement that there can be no free lunch.
.
Comment