Tweet
YEREVAN (RFE/RL)–Armenia has officially responded to international mediators’ recently modified plan to end the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, an aide to President Serzh Sarkisian said on Thursday.
The American, French and Russian co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group announced in January that they have developed an “updated version” of the basic principles of a Karabakh settlement. They have still not disclosed changes made in a document that was formally submitted the conflicting parties in Madrid late 2007.
The Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents are understood to have discussed the updated Madrid document at their January 25 talks in Russia hosted by President Dmitry Medvedev. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov Serzh Sarkisian and Ilham Aliyev agreed to “prepare their own concrete ideas and formulations” on their remaining disagreements.
According to Garnik Isagulian, Sarkisian’s representative to the Armenian parliament and former national security adviser, the Armenian side has already sent relevant proposals to the mediators. But he said he is unaware of their content.
“Armenia has submitted its concrete proposals, whereas the president of Azerbaijan, according to our information, has still not made any proposals,” Isagulian told a news conference.
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov said on Wednesday that Baku has already accepted the Minsk Group’s modified peace proposals “with some exceptions.” “We want to find out the Armenian side’s opinion about the amended document, and for that purpose I will meet the Minsk Group co-chairs [in Paris] on March 5,” he said, according to Azerbaijani media.
In a recent interview with the Euronews TV channel, Aliyev again claimed that the mediators’ peace proposals are “based on restoration of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.” “Azerbaijan will never agree to independence of Nagorno-Karabakh, or to any kind of mechanisms or procedures which will eventually lead to secession,” he said.
Armenian leaders insist that the proposed agreement does include such a mechanism. They say one of the basic principles upholds the Karabakh Armenians’ right to formalize the disputed region’s secession from Azerbaijan in a future referendum.
The American, French and Russian co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group announced in January that they have developed an “updated version” of the basic principles of a Karabakh settlement. They have still not disclosed changes made in a document that was formally submitted the conflicting parties in Madrid late 2007.
The Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents are understood to have discussed the updated Madrid document at their January 25 talks in Russia hosted by President Dmitry Medvedev. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov Serzh Sarkisian and Ilham Aliyev agreed to “prepare their own concrete ideas and formulations” on their remaining disagreements.
According to Garnik Isagulian, Sarkisian’s representative to the Armenian parliament and former national security adviser, the Armenian side has already sent relevant proposals to the mediators. But he said he is unaware of their content.
“Armenia has submitted its concrete proposals, whereas the president of Azerbaijan, according to our information, has still not made any proposals,” Isagulian told a news conference.
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov said on Wednesday that Baku has already accepted the Minsk Group’s modified peace proposals “with some exceptions.” “We want to find out the Armenian side’s opinion about the amended document, and for that purpose I will meet the Minsk Group co-chairs [in Paris] on March 5,” he said, according to Azerbaijani media.
In a recent interview with the Euronews TV channel, Aliyev again claimed that the mediators’ peace proposals are “based on restoration of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.” “Azerbaijan will never agree to independence of Nagorno-Karabakh, or to any kind of mechanisms or procedures which will eventually lead to secession,” he said.
Armenian leaders insist that the proposed agreement does include such a mechanism. They say one of the basic principles upholds the Karabakh Armenians’ right to formalize the disputed region’s secession from Azerbaijan in a future referendum.
Is it not dangerous to play this game, accepting such proposals which vaguely state that Artsakh can vote for independence somewhere in the ''future'', when all the Azeris have returned? We should not fail in diplomacy.
Armenia should only accept a proposal which states that Nagorno-Karabakh is already an independent state. Only some regions around Karabakh should get the chance to ''vote for independence'' in the future.
Doesn't Armenia have the diplomatic means to involve the Nakhichevan issue in these protocols? This could give us more leverage.
Comment