Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

    US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran
    Wednesday, 24 December 2008, 21:58
    S E C R E T STATE 134490
    SIPDIS
    EO 12958 DECL: 12/23/2018
    TAGS ETTC, MASS, OPDC">OPDC, PARM, PREL, AM,
    SUBJECT: (S) LETTER FROM DEPUTY SECRETARY NEGROPONTE
    REGARDING 2003 ARMENIAN ARMS PROCUREMENT FOR IRAN
    REFS: A. YEREVAN 657, B. State 97802
    Classified By: EUR/FO DAS Garber, Reasons 1.4 (b), (c), and (d).

    1. (U) Please deliver the following letter from Deputy Secretary Negroponte. There will be no signed original. Embassy should also propose discussions with the Government of Armenia in coming weeks. Suggested dates and team composition will be provided septel. Embassy Yerevan is requested to report response.

    2. (Secret/Rel Armenia) Begin Letter:

    Dear Mr. President:

    We value our positive relationship with your government, as we explore a range of shared interests, especially an agreement on Nagorno Karabakh and normalization of Armenia's relations with Turkey. At the same time, we are dismayed by a serious and, indeed, deadly - arms re-export case.

    Secretary Rice, Assistant Secretary Fried, Deputy Assistant Secretary Bryza, and Ambassador Yovanovitch have raised with you our deep concerns about Armenia's transfer of arms to Iran which resulted in the death and injury of U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Notwithstanding the close relationship between our countries, neither the Administration nor the U.S. Congress can overlook this case.
    By law, the transfer of these weapons requires us to consider whether there is a basis for the imposition of U.S. sanctions. If sanctions are imposed, penalties could include the cutoff of U.S. assistance and certain export restrictions.

    To avoid such sanctions, it is essential that you present compelling evidence that your government is now in partnership with us to ensure such transfers do not occur in the future.

    To convince the United States that this will not happen again, we seek a written agreement from Armenia, memorializing its intent to implement measures that will prevent Armenia from becoming a source of weapons for Iran or other states or groups involved with terrorism and/or weapons proliferation. Such measures include:

    -- Reform the Armenian Export Control Commission so its members are full time employees who exclusively work on export controls;

    -- Establish, at each point of entry into Armenia, Armenian teams dedicated to detecting and interdicting dual-use commodities and other contraband;

    -- Periodically accept unannounced visits by U.S. experts to assess the work of the teams;

    -- Harmonize Armenia's export control legislation with that of the EU;

    -- Update and make public Armenian export control lists, incorporating the control lists of the Wassenaar Arrangement, Missile Technology Control Regime, and other international control regimes;

    -- Ensure that Armenian-based brokers do not facilitate arms related transfers; and

    -- Consult with the United States on transfers to countries that are not member states of NATO or the EU, or participating states of the Wassenaar Arrangement.

    We are prepared to send a team as early as possible in the New Year to discuss this proposal further. It is my hope that we can work together to forge a positive outcome which provides your government the opportunity to strengthen Armenia's export controls and for my government to assist you in this effort.

    Sincerely, John D. Negroponte

    End text of letter.

    3. (S) Background: In 2003, Armenia facilitated Iran's purchase of rockets and machine guns. In 2007, some of these weapons were recovered from two Shia militant attacks in which a United States soldier was killed and six others were injured in Iraq. The Secretary discussed our concerns with President Sargsian on the margins of the UN General Assembly, but he denied any transfer occurred. The direct role of high-level Armenian officials and the link of the weapons to an attack on U.S. forces make this case unique and highly troubling. These transfers may provide a basis for sanctions pursuant to U.S. legal authorities. We propose a series of steps that Armenia will need to take to prevent future transfers, which will be weighed in the consideration of sanctions. We hope to use the threat of sanctions as a tool to generate Armenian responsiveness so that we will not be forced to impose sanctions measures.

    4. (S) The Deputy Secretary is writing to President Sargsian and indicating that a team will be sent to Armenia to seek written agreement that Armenia will take steps to ensure that it does not become a source of weapons for Iran or other states or groups of concern. The team will also present additional information that will make clear why the United States is convinced that the transfers happened and make it unreasonable for Sargsian to continue his denials. We anticipate that the team will travel to Yerevan in the coming weeks, to provide sufficient time for the incoming Administration to be briefed on the situation.

    5. (S) Objective: Our objective is to prevent Armenia from becoming a source of weapons for Iran or other states or groups of concern, without derailing a possible Nagorno-Karabakh settlement. Embassy Yerevan should seek to convey the seriousness with which the United States views this issue and emphasize that the transfer of arms to Iran and subsequently to terrorists in Iraq, in particular transfers that resulted in the death of an American serviceman, cannot be overlooked by the United States.

    6. (U) Please contact EUR/PRA Matt Hardiman and ISN/CATR Margaret Mitchell with any questions or follow-up issues related to this case and slug any reporting on this issue for ISN and EUR. RICE

  • #2
    Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

    Pretty embarrassing I must say, and something Armenian government should quickly distance itself from. Armenia needs US aid, economic relations, and business with them. Supplying arms to Ahmadinejad's government is reckless.
    Մեկ Ազգ, Մեկ Մշակույթ
    ---
    "Western Assimilation is the greatest threat to the Armenian nation since the Armenian Genocide."

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

      Its only speculations they have no proofs,only attempts to control armenia,they send a team in 2008 what is the report?
      we are in 2010 now its all fabricated...if they are to be fury about something then they have to check there NATO allies that are making deals worth of billions with Iran like Turkey or the Pakis the very source of the Talibs.....

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

        Well true, probably some idiot government official that sold some weapons to some Iranian, which got in the wrong hands. US supplied mujahadeen and some of those weapons are being used against US. Plus Turkey supporting al-Qaeda is another much bigger allegation. But still gives no excuse for our government if this is true...
        Մեկ Ազգ, Մեկ Մշակույթ
        ---
        "Western Assimilation is the greatest threat to the Armenian nation since the Armenian Genocide."

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

          Mos is one thing to sell pistols and another thing weapons of mass destruction or more importantly financial help to achieve that...

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

            I posted in the other thread how it turned out to be BS since Sargsian denied it and nothing else became of the issue. The title that these people wrote is misleading, there was no 'fury', the U.S just inquired, probably over some retarded hunch.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

              Do you really trust Serzh's denial? I mean all politicians lie, he may very well just be blatantly lying. I mean do you imagine Serzh saying straight in the face of Condolezza Rice "yes we sold heavy weapons to Iran which was used to kill US soldiers"
              Մեկ Ազգ, Մեկ Մշակույթ
              ---
              "Western Assimilation is the greatest threat to the Armenian nation since the Armenian Genocide."

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

                My point is, if there was any evidence to anything like that, it would have gone beyond a simple inquiry. They probably just had some hunch or tip so they looked into it. It could have easily been Turkey, Azerbaijan engaging in petty diplomatic warfare by throwing out false information about Armenia amongst U.S circles.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

                  I replied to another post with the same: Most likely it is true. Sounds like Armenia was being used to transfer Russian made weapons to Iran. The US picked up on this, warned Armenia and it stopped. From some of the other links, it appears that the US wanted to train Azeri units to create problems in Northern Iran.
                  General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: US embassy cables: US fury at Armenia over arms transfers to Iran

                    Originally posted by Joseph View Post
                    I replied to another post with the same: Most likely it is true. Sounds like Armenia was being used to transfer Russian made weapons to Iran. The US picked up on this, warned Armenia and it stopped. From some of the other links, it appears that the US wanted to train Azeri units to create problems in Northern Iran.
                    And after that they have the moral to demand samthing like that from armenia ??? we all know that the trained troops would be used against Artsax just like what they did with Georgia

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X