Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Interesting !

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Re: Interesting !

    Originally posted by Armanen View Post
    turks and turkics in general could not belong to the jepethic race because at the time of Jepeth (assuming he did exist), they were all mongoloid, Jepeth is the "ancestor" of the Cacausian peoples.

    Anything taught in turkey is most likely not true.
    Have you got scientific evidence about that Turks are Mongolid ?

    Comment


    • #12
      Re: Interesting !

      Originally posted by Anonymouse View Post
      You do know that the Bible is just a bunch of metaphors, stories and myths, right?
      Anonymouse what parts?
      Positive vibes, positive taught

      Comment


      • #13
        Re: Interesting !

        Originally posted by KarotheGreat View Post
        I thought history teachers were supoused to teach History not xxxish myths lol. But it's turkey they still are saying there wasn't a genocide. So what can you expect.
        Turks (55%) accept genocide. But East Ottoman soldiers were not Turkish (mostly Kurd)

        Comment


        • #14
          Re: Interesting !

          Originally posted by Kanki View Post
          Have you got scientific evidence about that Turks are Mongolid ?


          I shouldn't be the one to tell you that turkish is part of altaic family of languages which also includes the other turkic/mongolic and tungusic languages. Plus, it is a well known historical fact that turks first moved into Asia Minor and the Armenian Highlands from Central Asia and what is now the western parts of modern Mongolia. The oghuz, the seljuks and the ottomans being the primary turkic tribes that invaded Asia Minor were all mongolid, not cacausian.
          For the first time in more than 600 years, Armenia is free and independent, and we are therefore obligated
          to place our national interests ahead of our personal gains or aspirations.



          http://www.armenianhighland.com/main.html

          Comment


          • #15
            Re: Interesting !

            Originally posted by Armanen View Post
            I shouldn't be the one to tell you that turkish is part of altaic family of languages which also includes the other turkic/mongolic and tungusic languages. Plus, it is a well known historical fact that turks first moved into Asia Minor and the Armenian Highlands from Central Asia and what is now the western parts of modern Mongolia. The oghuz, the seljuks and the ottomans being the primary turkic tribes that invaded Asia Minor were all mongolid, not cacausian.
            No Turks

            Comment


            • #16
              Re: Interesting !

              Originally posted by Kanki View Post
              No Turks
              Ok, Mongol.

              "The first historical text to mention the Turks was from the standpoint of the Chinese, who mentioned trade of Turk tribes with the Sogdians along the Silk Road. The Xiongnu mentioned in Han Dynasty records may have been Proto-Turkic speakers, followed by the Hun hordes of Attila that tried to conquer Europe. On the other hand, recent genetics research dated 2003 confirms the studies indicating that the Turkic people originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related with the Xiongnu."

              Comment


              • #17
                Re: Interesting !

                modern turks are quite caucasoid actually, having absorbed the ethnicities of the land they came to dominate at a faster rate than Turkic nomads from Central Asia came to join their ranks.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Re: Interesting !

                  I think it's been pretty much determined today that human life started in Africa, and while there was a great flood when the barrier between the Mediterranean broke causing, a lake to become the black sea, the world has never been completely flooded all at once, and there have been people in all corners of the world including the Americas before 10,000 years ago. The story of Noah is more a parable based on a regional event to teach people to obey God, and nothing more. Jesus taught in parables so why wouldn't the old testament be taught in the same way? Also those traditional views only became so engrained and accepted b/c people wanted a reason to justify things, (ham was cursed to be a slave to his brothers), so it was ok that the xxxs took land from all those -ites peoples b/c they were his descendants, or it was ok to enslave africans b/c they were descended from ham.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Re: Interesting !

                    Originally posted by ara87 View Post
                    I think it's been pretty much determined today that human life started in Africa,
                    What? I must have missed something. Last I heard, scientists had merely a theory. When was this "determined"? Determination involves certainty and knowledge, not theorizing and approximation, which is what scientists claim so far. It is based on the assumption of evolution being true. It is accepted as fact that all women are descended from the African "Eve". This conclusion was based upon mtDNA studies which assume that its only inherited only from mothers. This assumption has been repeated so much now that it has become an infallible "fact". Other recent studies would suggest that some paternal mtDNA actually does get into eggs and recombines with maternal mtDNA. Moreover, the "African Eve" theory has been challenged so much that it is believed that it is only the mother of sub-Saharan black Africans.

                    J. Hey and E. Harris, have presented data suggesting that the famous African Eve was the mother of only modern sub-Saharan Africans and everyone else descended from an entirely different Eves.

                    Source: Pennisi, Elizabeth; "Genetic Study Shakes Up Out of Africa Theory," Science, 283:1828, 1999. Bower, B.; "DNA Data Yield New Human-Origins View," Science News, 155:181, 1999.)
                    Last edited by Anonymouse; 08-24-2008, 07:51 PM.
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Re: Interesting !

                      Originally posted by yerazhishda View Post
                      Ok, Mongol.

                      "The first historical text to mention the Turks was from the standpoint of the Chinese, who mentioned trade of Turk tribes with the Sogdians along the Silk Road. The Xiongnu mentioned in Han Dynasty records may have been Proto-Turkic speakers, followed by the Hun hordes of Attila that tried to conquer Europe. On the other hand, recent genetics research dated 2003 confirms the studies indicating that the Turkic people originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related with the Xiongnu."

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_...s#Turkic_roots
                      Stop the insults please. I don't care what the Turk says. Turk or no Turk, baseless name calling is discouraged.
                      Achkerov kute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X