Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • levon
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    ....
    ....
    Last edited by levon; 02-26-2011, 12:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by levon View Post
    ....
    took you 4 pages to understand.

    Հաճա՞խ ես մարդկանց ներվերը ուտում:

    Leave a comment:


  • levon
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    So why...
    ....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    ...and vagrant lies (last 3 pages)
    It's more just basic misunderstanding on how AIDS works and ignorance of the different variants of the English language.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by levon View Post
    Mos, I really don't give a sh&t what you have to say. This is a useless discussion.
    So why the hell have you been whining about my spelling for the last few pages if you think it's a useless discussion and denying what you clear said regarding getting aids?? You should have just stopped talking early on, instead you went on to attack ridiculous things and trying to cover your mistakes rather pathetically wasting everybody's time and derailing this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • levon
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    It's not ...
    Mos, I really don't give a sh&t what you have to say. This is a useless discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by levon View Post
    Implying is your interpretation, not mine. You can dance around the issue, but there is no explicit mention, and that closes this issue.
    It's not even implying. You say "people who get aids" - that alone is outright incorrect. For the hundredth time, you can't get aids!!! Aids can develop but you don't "get" aids. There's no implication here I'm directly referring to what you said.


    Sorry, saying "If an idiot wants to sound credible" is not explicit, it's called implicit. That's the distinction. It would have been explicit only if I had said something like "he is an idiot, or mos is an idiot," but I didn't, you made the connection, hence, your interpretation.
    How about you refer to it in context and stop playing games. You can take anything out of context and make it sound like it was about something else.

    I will post again so you remember:

    Secondly, I only brought up his spelling, because he arrogantly declared that my entire argument is invalid because one cannot get AIDS, but has to get HIV first.I think an idiot who wants to appear credible should at least use correct grammar, especially if he boasts about "being in academia."
    The "he" obviously refers to me - and in the second part of that second sentence you make it more clear that you are referring to me. One doesn't have to be a brain surgeon to know that you were calling me an idiot in that quote. Stop playing games.

    Learn to spell, then no one will criticize you.
    Oh, look who's talking. The person who doesn't know difference between British and American spelling and tries to cover his a*s when he is humiliated. So now British spelling is the incorrect spelling? Are you going to go on and prove this for all of us?

    Stop digging yourself in a deeper hole with your BS statements. You won't accomplish anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • levon
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by gegev View Post
    Isn’t this called MJORITY harassment?

    Thus in fact they want someone out of the MJORITY to harass; when they are talking about their “rights”.

    Talking about "democracy" & “rights” serves as a tool; that makes MAJORITY HARASSMENT legal for them.
    I agree. Why the hell should we, normal people, have to care about the perverse problems of a small group of people who suddenly feel empowered just because western liberals want to do away with traditional family values in general. Yes, it is majority harassment when a f@ggot can't shut the f*ck up about his "imaginary rights", as if somehow, someone has oppressed him, when all he wants is special treatment. Then has the audacity to suggest that somehow, not supporting gay rights is the greatest moral mistake one can make, as if gayness is some kind of holly mental state that affords one the moral authority to suggest what's right and wrong?
    Yeah, f*ck that. A mental perversion should be discouraged as much as possible. Homos deserve no rights that straight people don't have. This means no gay marriage. Furthermore, if homos don't want to be persecuted they can move to a place where society is more accepting of them. No society should bend over backwards for a small minority of population suffering from mental problems. So, if gays in Armenia want more freedoms they can move to San-Francisco, because they will never find peace in Armenia.

    I remember an incident some years back. Two homos in Armenia decided they wanted to get married. Of course no priest would even entertain the idea so they decided to sneak into a church and get married. Needless to say, no one in Armenia will accept such disrespect to the church. The next day these guys disappeared for good. I think one of them was eventually found the forest, but that's just rumors. In short, this situation will never change. Our culture does not need perversions that keep our population from growing.

    Leave a comment:


  • levon
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    You said, "most people who get aids, get it from the back door" That's implying that from the back door your get aids, and thus aids is the initial infection. You officially "get" aids after your T-Cell count drops below 200. But even "get" is not the proper term. It's more correct to say aids develops.
    Implying is your interpretation, not mine. You can dance around the issue, but there is no explicit mention, and that closes this issue.

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    That was pretty explicit as you were clearly referring to me in that quote. Jgk3 was referring to me in his post and you were thus quoting him and referring to me. It's not brain surgery, your were referring to me as an idiot and it's clear from your quote. Stop trying to deny the obvious.
    Sorry, saying "If an idiot wants to sound credible" is not explicit, it's called implicit. That's the distinction. It would have been explicit only if I had said something like "he is an idiot, or mos is an idiot," but I didn't, you made the connection, hence, your interpretation.

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    So if you don't care why were you whining about my spelling of that one word? Was that really so crucial to the argument at hand, or you just had to find a distraction?
    Learn to spell, then no one will criticize you.

    Leave a comment:


  • gegev
    replied
    Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?

    Originally posted by Doctor View Post
    Armenian population consider gay as sick, abnormal people and usually ovoid having any contact with them, otherwise you will be treated the same way.

    I think these cases should remain under doctors jurisdiction, politicians have nothing to do with it. Manifesting that gays/sick should have “democratic” right to remain sick is nonsense.
    This is the attitude of Armenians living in Armenia towards the gay and alike, whether you like it or not. Majority opinion.

    Originally posted by Odar View Post
    Majority isn't always right. In the past centuries, the majority of Europeans blamed the plague epidemics on people called "untori" - often xxxs, Gypsies and the local weirdos - does that mean that it was the truth?
    The gay and alike, are eager, in need, to discuss this subject with the MAJORITY; because they need to talk about it to hundreds/thousands of them; to find out someone who agrees having sex with them. And the Internet is a very convenient place for that.

    Regardless the fact that the discussion is disgustful for majority of the MAJORITY, they keep talking about the subject, ... their “rights” until ... convincing someone to ...

    Isn’t this called MJORITY harassment?

    Thus in fact they want someone out of the MJORITY to harass; when they are talking about their “rights”.

    Talking about "democracy" & “rights” serves as a tool; that makes MAJORITY HARASSMENT legal for them.

    Levon any comment on this?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X