Originally posted by Mos
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
...and vagrant lies (last 3 pages)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Originally posted by levon View PostMos, I really don't give a sh&t what you have to say. This is a useless discussion.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Originally posted by levon View PostImplying is your interpretation, not mine. You can dance around the issue, but there is no explicit mention, and that closes this issue.
Sorry, saying "If an idiot wants to sound credible" is not explicit, it's called implicit. That's the distinction. It would have been explicit only if I had said something like "he is an idiot, or mos is an idiot," but I didn't, you made the connection, hence, your interpretation.
I will post again so you remember:
Secondly, I only brought up his spelling, because he arrogantly declared that my entire argument is invalid because one cannot get AIDS, but has to get HIV first.I think an idiot who wants to appear credible should at least use correct grammar, especially if he boasts about "being in academia."
Learn to spell, then no one will criticize you.
Stop digging yourself in a deeper hole with your BS statements. You won't accomplish anything.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Originally posted by gegev View PostIsn’t this called MJORITY harassment?
Thus in fact they want someone out of the MJORITY to harass; when they are talking about their “rights”.
Talking about "democracy" & “rights” serves as a tool; that makes MAJORITY HARASSMENT legal for them.
Yeah, f*ck that. A mental perversion should be discouraged as much as possible. Homos deserve no rights that straight people don't have. This means no gay marriage. Furthermore, if homos don't want to be persecuted they can move to a place where society is more accepting of them. No society should bend over backwards for a small minority of population suffering from mental problems. So, if gays in Armenia want more freedoms they can move to San-Francisco, because they will never find peace in Armenia.
I remember an incident some years back. Two homos in Armenia decided they wanted to get married. Of course no priest would even entertain the idea so they decided to sneak into a church and get married. Needless to say, no one in Armenia will accept such disrespect to the church. The next day these guys disappeared for good. I think one of them was eventually found the forest, but that's just rumors. In short, this situation will never change. Our culture does not need perversions that keep our population from growing.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Originally posted by Mos View PostYou said, "most people who get aids, get it from the back door" That's implying that from the back door your get aids, and thus aids is the initial infection. You officially "get" aids after your T-Cell count drops below 200. But even "get" is not the proper term. It's more correct to say aids develops.
Originally posted by Mos View PostThat was pretty explicit as you were clearly referring to me in that quote. Jgk3 was referring to me in his post and you were thus quoting him and referring to me. It's not brain surgery, your were referring to me as an idiot and it's clear from your quote. Stop trying to deny the obvious.
Originally posted by Mos View PostSo if you don't care why were you whining about my spelling of that one word? Was that really so crucial to the argument at hand, or you just had to find a distraction?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Are you okay with Gay Armenians?
Originally posted by Doctor View PostArmenian population consider gay as sick, abnormal people and usually ovoid having any contact with them, otherwise you will be treated the same way.
I think these cases should remain under doctors jurisdiction, politicians have nothing to do with it. Manifesting that gays/sick should have “democratic” right to remain sick is nonsense.
Originally posted by Odar View PostMajority isn't always right. In the past centuries, the majority of Europeans blamed the plague epidemics on people called "untori" - often xxxs, Gypsies and the local weirdos - does that mean that it was the truth?
Regardless the fact that the discussion is disgustful for majority of the MAJORITY, they keep talking about the subject, ... their “rights” until ... convincing someone to ...
Isn’t this called MJORITY harassment?
Thus in fact they want someone out of the MJORITY to harass; when they are talking about their “rights”.
Talking about "democracy" & “rights” serves as a tool; that makes MAJORITY HARASSMENT legal for them.
Levon any comment on this?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: