Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenians And Breeding.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I'm not sure what the argument here is, but here's an intersting fact. Women literally control 100% of evolution. I think I've said this before, but women, especially human women, choose who they reproduce.

    "The human female determines in culture, just as in females often do in biology, the direction of evolution. Sociobiology suggests that the forces of biological evolution are identical to the forces of cultural change. Shift theory agrees, but places the leverage of these changes in the body of the female arbitrated by her choice in mates and the changes in her body during pregnancy. Sexual selection, heterochrony (including neoteny and acceleration), and zygote and uterine selection join the sociobiological focus on natural selection as the forces that guide cultural change."

    I read that a long time ago and saved it in a wordpad folder I have on my desktop called Facts, (it just has a lot of random stuff I've kept.). I don't really know what most of it means, but pretty much, instead of Natural Selection, where the women reproduces the "best" choice, such as the man who can swing the biggest hammer. To her own choice, that for example could be the man who has the most creative architectural ideas.

    So my point is, women need to get their act together. No more Gangster babies. no more Abusive husband babies, no more "he's too lazy to get a job but i still love him" babies. We need more doctors, and scientists, we need more mechanics and engineers. I dont' know what else to add, but thanx.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by ArmoBarbi
      I would only have two or three. I have no intention to boost the world Armenian population with my own body, despite of what my family believes lol.
      hahaha...
      Same here, no more than 3
      And If my husband wants more, he can have them himself

      Comment


      • #23
        I'd like to see that. ( Especially with an Armenian man. ) lol

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Thai-Samurai
          I'm not sure what the argument here is, but here's an intersting fact. Women literally control 100% of evolution. I think I've said this before, but women, especially human women, choose who they reproduce.

          "The human female determines in culture, just as in females often do in biology, the direction of evolution. Sociobiology suggests that the forces of biological evolution are identical to the forces of cultural change. Shift theory agrees, but places the leverage of these changes in the body of the female arbitrated by her choice in mates and the changes in her body during pregnancy. Sexual selection, heterochrony (including neoteny and acceleration), and zygote and uterine selection join the sociobiological focus on natural selection as the forces that guide cultural change."

          I read that a long time ago and saved it in a wordpad folder I have on my desktop called Facts, (it just has a lot of random stuff I've kept.). I don't really know what most of it means, but pretty much, instead of Natural Selection, where the women reproduces the "best" choice, such as the man who can swing the biggest hammer. To her own choice, that for example could be the man who has the most creative architectural ideas.

          So my point is, women need to get their act together. No more Gangster babies. no more Abusive husband babies, no more "he's too lazy to get a job but i still love him" babies. We need more doctors, and scientists, we need more mechanics and engineers. I dont' know what else to add, but thanx.
          It is always the women that determine the quality and race of the future generations. That is why Jews require ones Jewishness be based on the mother, and the Law of Return is based on this.
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Anonymouse
            It is always the women that determine the quality and race of the future generations. That is why Jews require ones Jewishness be based on the mother, and the Law of Return is based on this.
            I thought that was created as a strategy to keep the Jewish nation from dying out because of rape.

            Its true that the mother (typically) has more to do with the way a child turns out. It is seen in studies, and one could take it as common sense.

            It has been shown through studies, however, that a baby who regularly spends time with the father, as well as the mother, scores higher on IQ tests later in life. Just a side note, if anyone cares.

            Comment


            • #26
              Armenian inbreeding.....for centuries and centuries we continue.... the end result, the majority of Armenian people retaining physical qualities similar to our neanderthal ancestors. Haha, I'm for Armenians continuing inbreeding, but I dont think we should be breeding just to put more Armenians out in the world. Look at the mexicans, they have like 10 kids..... I think quality before quantity. If families choose to have more children let it be "natural" any concept of quotas for the # of children a family should have is pretty artificial and just doesnt seem right for any reason.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by IamLegend
                Armenian inbreeding.....for centuries and centuries we continue.... the end result, the majority of Armenian people retaining physical qualities similar to our neanderthal ancestors. Haha, I'm for Armenians continuing inbreeding, but I dont think we should be breeding just to put more Armenians out in the world. Look at the mexicans, they have like 10 kids..... I think quality before quantity. If families choose to have more children let it be "natural" any concept of quotas for the # of children a family should have is pretty artificial and just doesnt seem right for any reason.
                I think we are all for quality here.
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Sure quality first...
                  But as I said before, the only thing that scares me is the fact that if things don't change, in fifty years two of Armenia's Muslim neighbors will double their population while ours will decrease by 1/3! But then again, diaspora breeding won't really change that.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Quality, definitely before quantity! I think 2 is good since I'm an only child (always hated that, but there was war in Iran and baby materials were hard to come by believe it or not, so my parents weren't sure if it was a good idea to have another one, plus we were lagging on getting out of there for years so I never got to have any brother(s) or sister(s) ) and more than two, you're just asking for it!

                    And always remember, it's better if you can provide better quality life for 2 children than an average life for 5 of them, plus with the way the world and the people in this world are, sometimes it feels like a sin to have children in this day and age. (no offense to all you good people out there reading this)

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      2 makes the population stay the same. 3 gives it growth.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X