Are you happy now Armenia!!!

[ahıskalı]

Turanist please leave your empty words. Of course we have an ideal for our nation and should defend it. But please never forget our proverb: "Even you know thousands, consult with a man who knows one." And avoid from that behaviours which humiliates you and because of you we turkish youth

[kerkuk_kurdista]

Hilarious. Iraq is carbombed and suicide bombed every day, and their government is less stable than nitroglycerin. How does the U.S. plan to build an embassy when civil workers are kidnapped and slaughtered on a daily basis?

That's gone,

Baghdad will have the biggest US embassy and Hewler will get US consulate!

[elendil]

We must understand it United States of America is there for one reason. Oil. As you know there is a Kurdish Regional Goverment in northeren Iraq now, an authority which gives direct support and open protection, shelter to American troops there. Using this as a jump-point it would be pretty easy to build bases, embassy or any kind of diplomatic, military complex in northeren Iraq which will be the future money-reserve of America in future. I am sorry but America can and will build embassy in Iraq and more...

[Kharpert]

That's gone,

Check the Iraqi body count and say that again. Exactly one hour ago from this post, an American helicopter crashed and 12 are presumed dead. Yesterday, a Texan soldier was killed by an Iraqi improvised bomb. That's right: these casualties are going through the roof and they are showing no signs of stopping. If you remember Vietnam, Americans don't like it when their soldiers are marching to their death in a country that no one really gives a flying xxxx about.

elendil, this is not just about oil. If the only reason for this war was oil, America would have bribed Saddam Huissen for a few million dollars and then bought all the Iraqi oil for dirt cheap prices. It would have been much, much cheaper than this 20 billion dollar escapade. Now this has turned from oil mining to setting up a democratic government, and its doomed to fail. Even if democracy prevails, radical Islam in Iraq cannot be quelled.

[Gavur]

True Capitalism=
Live for Money,Die for Oil

[Kharpert]

Ummm....no

[Gavur]

Ummm....no

Ummm,,,Yes

Capitalist theory
Some emphasize the private ownership of capital as being the essence of capitalism, or emphasize the importance of a free market as a mechanism for the movement and accumulation of capital. Others measure capitalism through class analysis, including the class structure of society and relations between labor and the capitalist class. Some note the growth of a global market system.

Others focus on the application of the market to (or commoditisation of) human labour. Still others, such as Hayek, note the self-organizing character of economies which are not centrally-planned by government. Many, such as Adam Smith, point to what is believed to be the value of individuals pursuing their self-interest as opposed to altruistically working to serve the "common good."
Many of these theories call attention to various economic practices that became institutionalized in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries, especially involving the right of individuals and groups of individuals acting as "legal persons" (or corporations) to buy and sell capital goods, as well as land, labor, and money (see finance and credit), in a free market (see trade), and relying on the state for the enforcement of private property rights rather than on a system of feudal protection and obligations.

Due to the vagueness of the term, debates and controversies have emerged. In particular, there is contention on whether capitalism is an actual system, or an ideal, i.e. on whether it has actually been implemented in particular economies, or if not, then to what degree capitalism exists in them (see mixed economy). From a historic point of view, there is an argument on whether capitalism is specific to a particular era or geographic region or if it is a universally valid system that may exist throughout various times and spaces. Some interpret capitalism as a purely economic system; others however contend that capitalism is a political, social, and cultural system as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

[Turanist]

I agree with Gavur. everyone knows capitalism is about money And keeping people poor. Control of resources is capitalism. If the people control resources that is communism.

[Hovik]

how do you know are you everyone???? maybe there are people that do like it.

Its callled Qarabax. It is not in the past it is in the present. Azeris are still homeless because of Armenian invasion. Qarabax is an integral part of west Azerbaycan you have stolen Azerbaycans heart.

Were you worried about the homelessness of Armenians who were exiled from Nachichevan?

You do realize how Azerbaijan became an occupier of Artsakh and Nachichevan right?


The Autonomous Region of Mountainous Karabagh (also known in America as Nagorno-Karabagh) recently declared independence from Azerbaijan because of continued persecution, oppression, and human and civil rights violations by the Azeri Turks. It was attached to Azerbaijan as an Autonomous Region by Joseph Stalin in 1921 and has suffered under Azeri rule from that time onward.

The Soviet Union isn't around anymore, nor is Stalin, so what makes you think you can continue occupying land that was a gift to you only 85 years ago, but was someones ancestral homeland for thousands of years? Get over it. You started a war and you lost... move on - quit acting like little girls...

[Kharpert]

I agree with Gavur. everyone knows capitalism is about money And keeping people poor. Control of resources is capitalism. If the people control resources that is communism.

Have you explored why communism died a horrible death? Because it's not viable. It's impossible to run a nation without some for of incentive for people to work. Under the communist system, since everyone had the same wages (no matter who you were), everybody opted to get easy jobs and then work very little. After all, if it's the same pay, why should anyone work hard?

Pure socialism is total government ownership of all business and economy. Pure socialism leads to either totalitarianism or communism.

Capitalism, on the other hand, allows for people to strive for their own success. Rather than depend on the state to hand them money, people have to go out, work, and earn it on their own terms. In theory, it's the most reasonable system, but it is impossible for a nation to run on a system of poor capitalism.

Many nations of the modern world now depend on a mixture of socialism and capitalism, where people are allowed to fight in a free market, but the government is also allowed to step in and correct severe injustices inflicted upon the poor. The United States, for example, enjoys a capitalist and free markey economy, but it also has had a lot of socialist programs such as : The Social Security act, the Securities Exchange Commision, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Congress of Labor Unions, the National Industry Recovery act, etc.