Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do you expect people to trust you ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    NickyMartin, I'd love to help you but I have no idea what you're talking about.

    I also don't know any of the background on this "birthing snakes" idea.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Kharpert
      NickyMartin, I'd love to help you but I have no idea what you're talking about.

      I also don't know any of the background on this "birthing snakes" idea.
      Me too.

      Comment


      • #13
        it is obvious this clown is a Turk, the name sounds so fake, "NickyMartin" lol

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by RUDO
          Me too.
          Grigor of Akner, a 13th-14th century historian describes your grandpaws this way when he heard of them for the first time:

          "Let us say some more about what these first Tatars resembled. The first who came against our country were not like people. They were awful to see and impossible to describe. They had large heads, like a buffalo, narrow eyes like a chick, short noses like a cat, protruding chins like a dog, narrow waists like an ant, and short legs like a pig. They are completely beardless, possessing the strength of a lion and a screeching voice like an eagle. They appear unexpectedly. Their women have attractive hats covered with a brocade shawl on top and broad faces smeared with a deadly pine medicine. They give birth like snakes, and eat like wolves. Death does not appear among them, and so they can live for three hundred years. Such were the folk who came first to the upper land. They never eat bread."

          Comment


          • #15
            Are you calling Armenians liars because of one ambiguous sentence found in a historian's translated works?

            Comment


            • #16
              What about the poll,
              Is this a truth or a lie , Turkey's paying money to histiorians for denying AG?
              What is your evidence?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Kharpert
                Are you calling Armenians liars because of one ambiguous sentence found in a historian's translated works?
                Have you said one sentence?
                Are you sure?
                You should say "totally nonsense"

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by NickyMartin
                  What about the poll,
                  Is this a truth or a lie , Turkey's paying money to histiorians for denying AG?
                  What is your evidence?
                  Just look into the Heath Lowry affair, and you'll have a taste of the answer. McCarthy, as well, is a paid mouthpiece of the Turkish govt.

                  And there's no point even discussing the Turkish historians who deny it.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Touchy brutes!

                    Originally posted by NickyMartin
                    Grigor of Akner, a 13th-14th century historian describes your grandpaws this way when he heard of them for the first time:

                    "Let us say some more about what these first Tatars resembled. The first who came against our country were not like people. They were awful to see and impossible to describe. They had large heads, like a buffalo, narrow eyes like a chick, short noses like a cat, protruding chins like a dog, narrow waists like an ant, and short legs like a pig. They are completely beardless, possessing the strength of a lion and a screeching voice like an eagle. They appear unexpectedly. Their women have attractive hats covered with a brocade shawl on top and broad faces smeared with a deadly pine medicine. They give birth like snakes, and eat like wolves. Death does not appear among them, and so they can live for three hundred years. Such were the folk who came first to the upper land. They never eat bread."
                    Judging from the posts of the majority of the Turks and also their general behavior these last thousand years, one can not help but to conclude that there is something fundamentally different between the Turks and the rest of humanity.

                    I usually say that the Turks have missed the train of evolution somewhere down the line between six million years ago, when it's supposed that the humans were separated from the apes and now.
                    In those six million years and especially during the last 12000, when civilization is believed to have started to develop, human beings acquired additional attributes that made societies and human coexistence possible.

                    It is clear as daylight, of these attributes the majority have not yet been acquired by the Turks. This is not to offend. All their posts prove this.
                    Some of these human traits are shame, guilt, remorse, sympathy, compassion, honesty, modesty, sincerity, truthfulness, conscience, objectivity, self-criticism, understanding for the suffering of others, the ability to share others' pain, the ability to value achievements of civilization such as works of art, places of worship, manuscripts, cities, etc.

                    It's astonishing while they do not show any sign of the crudest forms of these characteristics, touchiness has been evolved to an exaggerated, uncontrollable trait of the Turks.

                    Proof: The slightest act of rightful self-defense by their "subjects" is wrathfully dismissed as an act of treachery:
                    "The Armenians betrayed “their” nation, therefore, we gave them hell."
                    Or all the resistance in the Balkans is described as "genocide" of Muslims.

                    Note that the use of the term "Muslims" is intentional and aims at attracting Muslim sympathy in these days of "clash of civilizations".
                    What Muslims? Were there any Arabs, Persians, Moroccans, Algerians, Egyptians, Indian Muslims, Indonesians, etc. in the Balkans in those days?

                    They were Turks. The resistance, the anger, the rejection was directed at invading, uninvited Turkish plunderers not because they happened to be Muslims.
                    The problem is in the "cide" part of the word.
                    These people "confuse" pesticide with genocide.

                    P.S. How many times do I have to tell you?
                    When, about 700 years ago, Grigor Aknertsi heard of the savageries of your grandpaws and accounts of their unusual appearance, he could not have painted a more favorable portrait of your ancestors.

                    Now that you seem interested enough to read history, do take your time and read these excerpts of the tale of the "migration" of your earliest ancestors about a thousand years ago, recorded by Aristakes Lastivertsi, who was there and saw it with his own eyes.
                    Four things denialist Turks do when they are confronted with facts:

                    I. They change the subject [SIZE="1"](e.g. they copy/paste tons of garbage to divert attention).[/SIZE]
                    II. They project [SIZE="1"](e.g. they replace "Turk" with "Armenian" and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history).[/SIZE]
                    III. They offend [SIZE="1"](e.g. they cuss, threaten and/or mock).[/SIZE]
                    IV. They shut up and say nothing.

                    [URL="http://b.imagehost.org/download/0689/azerbaijan-real-fake-absurd.pdf"][COLOR="Red"]A country named Azerbaijan north of the Arax River [B]NEVER[/B] existed before 1918[/COLOR][/URL]

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X