If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Grigor of Akner, a 13th-14th century historian describes your grandpaws this way when he heard of them for the first time:
"Let us say some more about what these first Tatars resembled. The first who came against our country were not like people. They were awful to see and impossible to describe. They had large heads, like a buffalo, narrow eyes like a chick, short noses like a cat, protruding chins like a dog, narrow waists like an ant, and short legs like a pig. They are completely beardless, possessing the strength of a lion and a screeching voice like an eagle. They appear unexpectedly. Their women have attractive hats covered with a brocade shawl on top and broad faces smeared with a deadly pine medicine. They give birth like snakes, and eat like wolves. Death does not appear among them, and so they can live for three hundred years. Such were the folk who came first to the upper land. They never eat bread."
Grigor of Akner, a 13th-14th century historian describes your grandpaws this way when he heard of them for the first time:
"Let us say some more about what these first Tatars resembled. The first who came against our country were not like people. They were awful to see and impossible to describe. They had large heads, like a buffalo, narrow eyes like a chick, short noses like a cat, protruding chins like a dog, narrow waists like an ant, and short legs like a pig. They are completely beardless, possessing the strength of a lion and a screeching voice like an eagle. They appear unexpectedly. Their women have attractive hats covered with a brocade shawl on top and broad faces smeared with a deadly pine medicine. They give birth like snakes, and eat like wolves. Death does not appear among them, and so they can live for three hundred years. Such were the folk who came first to the upper land. They never eat bread."
Judging from the posts of the majority of the Turks and also their general behavior these last thousand years, one can not help but to conclude that there is something fundamentally different between the Turks and the rest of humanity.
I usually say that the Turks have missed the train of evolution somewhere down the line between six million years ago, when it's supposed that the humans were separated from the apes and now.
In those six million years and especially during the last 12000, when civilization is believed to have started to develop, human beings acquired additional attributes that made societies and human coexistence possible.
It is clear as daylight, of these attributes the majority have not yet been acquired by the Turks. This is not to offend. All their posts prove this.
Some of these human traits are shame, guilt, remorse, sympathy, compassion, honesty, modesty, sincerity, truthfulness, conscience, objectivity, self-criticism, understanding for the suffering of others, the ability to share others' pain, the ability to value achievements of civilization such as works of art, places of worship, manuscripts, cities, etc.
It's astonishing while they do not show any sign of the crudest forms of these characteristics, touchiness has been evolved to an exaggerated, uncontrollable trait of the Turks.
Proof: The slightest act of rightful self-defense by their "subjects" is wrathfully dismissed as an act of treachery:
"The Armenians betrayed “their” nation, therefore, we gave them hell."
Or all the resistance in the Balkans is described as "genocide" of Muslims.
Note that the use of the term "Muslims" is intentional and aims at attracting Muslim sympathy in these days of "clash of civilizations".
What Muslims? Were there any Arabs, Persians, Moroccans, Algerians, Egyptians, Indian Muslims, Indonesians, etc. in the Balkans in those days?
They were Turks. The resistance, the anger, the rejection was directed at invading, uninvited Turkish plunderers not because they happened to be Muslims.
The problem is in the "cide" part of the word.
These people "confuse" pesticide with genocide.
P.S. How many times do I have to tell you?
When, about 700 years ago, Grigor Aknertsi heard of the savageries of your grandpaws and accounts of their unusual appearance, he could not have painted a more favorable portrait of your ancestors.
Four things denialist Turks do when they are confronted with facts:
I. They change the subject [SIZE="1"](e.g. they copy/paste tons of garbage to divert attention).[/SIZE]
II. They project [SIZE="1"](e.g. they replace "Turk" with "Armenian" and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history).[/SIZE]
III. They offend [SIZE="1"](e.g. they cuss, threaten and/or mock).[/SIZE]
IV. They shut up and say nothing.
[URL="http://b.imagehost.org/download/0689/azerbaijan-real-fake-absurd.pdf"][COLOR="Red"]A country named Azerbaijan north of the Arax River [B]NEVER[/B] existed before 1918[/COLOR][/URL]
Comment