I don't have enough information to conclude that Nogales was guilty of anything except perhaps being overzealous in his duty in regards to the tactics at Van.
While it is true that he was an odd one it is my impression that he is essentially telling the truth and is a man of honor. Both of you fail to understand the profesional military mind and that of an adventurer-mercenary as existed in his day and prior. Again sure he was a bit of a strange one - but there is no proof that I am aware of of his being a psychopath (though I have not read other then 4 years beneath the crescent). Anyway he seems to me to have been a very upright person - someone to be admired - and his accounts - while certainly self serving - are I think a fairly accurate depiction of what he saw and went through. Sure he has digested the biases and claims against the Armenians without truly understandign the political background and situation - but it is his direct observations - not this speculation - which is meaningful/relevant IMO.
While it is true that he was an odd one it is my impression that he is essentially telling the truth and is a man of honor. Both of you fail to understand the profesional military mind and that of an adventurer-mercenary as existed in his day and prior. Again sure he was a bit of a strange one - but there is no proof that I am aware of of his being a psychopath (though I have not read other then 4 years beneath the crescent). Anyway he seems to me to have been a very upright person - someone to be admired - and his accounts - while certainly self serving - are I think a fairly accurate depiction of what he saw and went through. Sure he has digested the biases and claims against the Armenians without truly understandign the political background and situation - but it is his direct observations - not this speculation - which is meaningful/relevant IMO.
Comment