Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenia, Azerbaijan `Close To Karabakh Deal'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Joseph View Post
    TURKISH MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO AZERBAIJAN AND THE FOREIGN MERCENERIES DURING THE KARABAGH WAR



    Intriguing facts in the book of Hayk DEMOYAN

    The book by the Armenian historian Hayk Demoyan titled “Karabakh drama - hidden Acts” (Yerevan, Caucasian Center for Iranian Studies, 2003) presents and analyzes documents and evidence concerning Turkish military assistance to Azerbaijan, as well as revealing the recruitment of Chechen and Afghan mercenaries by Azerbaijan during the 1991-1994 Karabagh war. Based on Armenian, Russian, Turkish, French, Azeri and American sources, as well as the archives of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic’s State Department of National Security, Demoyan’s book reveals certain intriguing facts.

    By 1991-92, Turkey had organized a number of secret air operations in order to transfer military equipment and ammunition to Azerbaijan. Meanwhile, Turkey embarked on a program of training for Azerbaijani officers and soldiers in military schools located in the territories of both Turkey and Azerbaijan. However, Ankara showed a certain degree of caution regarding the issue of directly supplying the Azerbaijani forces with military hardware and logistics, caution bred from the fear that Turkey’s clandestine action, namely, supplying the Azerbaijani armed forces with armaments, produced in Turkey or via NATO depots, could be exposed. Thus, Ankara provided the Azeri’s mainly with Soviet made weapons captured from the Iraqi Army after the Gulf War, as well as weapons imported from the former German Democratic Republic's army stores.

    Concurrently, the Turkish National Intelligence Organization (MIT), in close cooperation with the Azerbaijani branch of the ultra-nationalistic Turkish organization “Grey Wolves” -which numbered over 15 thousand members-, began to implement meticulously planned activities. The Turkish branch of the organization started to recruit and post volunteers to special military bases of the Third Turkish field army, and then complete their further transfer to Azerbaijan.

    In the summer of 1992, when the situation along the Nakhichevan section of the Armenian-Azeri border became strained again, the Commander-in-Chief of the Turkish ground forces Muhittin Fisunogli declared that, “all necessary preparations are made and the army is waiting for the order to proceed to action.” As a response to that declaration the Commander-in-Chief of the United Armed Forces of the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States), Marshal Shaposhnikov, warned that the intervention of a third party in the conflict would lead to the outbreak of the Third World War.

    1993 was a very decisive year for the Karabagh conflict. Turkey did its best to exert some influence on the resolution of the conflict in favor of Azerbaijan. Besides the fact that Turkey officially closed its border with Armenia on April 3, 1993, it also signed an agreement with Azerbaijan on the supply of light weaponry and the training of Azeri military specialists, blatantly violating the OSCE decision (February 1993) which prohibited any military supply to the zone of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

    Thanks to the revelations of former Ambassador of Greece to Armenia, Leonidas Chrisantopoulos, it became known that in October 1993 Turkey tried to use the parliamentary crisis in Russia in order to make incursions into Armenia. According to information from French intelligence sources, corroborated by the US Ambassador to Armenia, there was an agreement reached between the then speaker of the Russian parliament Ruslan Khasbulatov and Turkish PM Tansu Ciller that, in the case of an anti-Yeltsin fraction success, Khasbulatov would allow Turkey to execute a small-scale incursion into Armenia.

    Curiously, the territory of the non-recognized Turkish republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) was also used for the recruitment of foreign mercenaries and military instructors. Through the initiative of English Lord Erskin and Turkish businessman Mustafa Mutlu, foreign and Turkish mercenaries were transferred to Azerbaijan. According to the Turkish and European press, in return for this service, the Azeris were obliged to deliver oil to Great Britain for 150 thousands US dollars per year. The territory of the TRNC was not chosen coincidentally, in so far as the jurisdictional scope of resolutions of international organizations does not extend to the territory of the non-recognized republic. Also, Demoyan re-established the hidden links between the Azerbaijani government, Chechen and Afghan authorities, as well as revealing the agreements concluded between them concerning the supply of mercenaries to the Azeri armed forces.

    In early June 1992 the number of Chechen mercenaries in Karabakh totaled approximately 300. They had been recruited on the basis of a military agreement signed between Azeri and Chechen authorities regarding the supply of human resources from Chechnya in exchange for military supply from Azerbaijan. After heavy losses Chechen fighters left Karabakh battlefields, partially in connection with Inter-Chechen and Chechen-Russian problems. A Chechen representative from Grozny arrived in Stepanakert, the capital of NKR, and reached an agreement on the repatriation of Chechen prisoners of war. The Chechens amongst the bodyguards of the then Azeri President were also recalled. By a strange coincidence, this occurred precisely on the eve of Colonel Huseynov’s armed mutiny and attempted march on Baku in June 1993.

    Following the defeats suffered by the Azerbaijani army at the Karabakh frontline in mid 1993, Baku turned to the Afghan authorities for the supply of Mujaheddins to fight against the Armenian self-defence force of Nagorno-Karabakh. Demoyan refers to a report by American journalist Thomas Golz, while describing how US citizens, who were involved in the Iran-Contra affair whilst serving in the US Special Forces, brought mujaheddins to Azerbaijan while also training Azeri pilots in Texas for this mission. Nevertheless, the enthusiasm of the Americans faded away when a possible Azerbaijani connection was discovered in the attacks on the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania far before September 11. After those attacks the FBI traced about 60 phone calls made from the satellite phone used by bin Laden to his Islamic Jihad associates in Baku, and from there to partners in Africa.

    Source: http://www.panarmenian.net/library/eng/?nid=42&cid=10
    __________________

    Thanks to the revelations of former Ambassador of Greece to Armenia, Leonidas Chrisantopoulos, it became known that in October 1993 Turkey tried to use the parliamentary crisis in Russia in order to make incursions into Armenia. According to information from French intelligence sources, corroborated by the US Ambassador to Armenia, there was an agreement reached between the then speaker of the Russian parliament Ruslan Khasbulatov and Turkish PM Tansu Ciller that, in the case of an anti-Yeltsin fraction success, Khasbulatov would allow Turkey to execute a small-scale incursion into Armenia.
    Very interesting Joseph.Thanks for posting.

    Comment


    • Caroline Cox: I can personally testify to ridiculous nature of claims that ‘Karabakh is a black hole’
      13.06.2008 17:24 GMT+04:00
      /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Baroness Caroline Cox, member of UK House of Lords, has addressed a letter to the editor of The Guardian over Alexandros Petersen’s article published in the newspaper on June 7.

      The letter says,

      “Your article on ‘the Black Hole’ of Nagorno Karabakh by Alexandros Petersen (June 7) contains so many false allegations and untruths that it would be laughable if the implications were not so serious.

      I was in Nagorno Karabakh last week and I can personally testify to the ridiculous nature of the claims that ‘Karabakh is a black hole that attracts arms, drug and human trafficking, money laundering and organized crime. Chances are that heroin on London’s streets, illegal weapons in the Paris banlieue, and the underage prostitutes in Berlin either came through a conflict zone such as Karabakh , or were trafficked by a network that uses the area to facilitate its operations.’

      These allegations are outrageous. The Armenians in Karabakh had to defend their land against well-documented attempted ethnic cleansing by Azerbaijan in a bitter war from 1991-1994, During that war, Islamist terrorists fought on the side of Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Karabakh, who are now rebuilding their shattered lives and land with laudable commitment to democratic principles (their elections have been declared free and fair by independent respected international observers).

      My charitable organization supports a Rehabilitation Centre for people with disabilities which has become recognized by many professional visitors as a Centre of Excellence, disseminating innovative good practice throughout the South Caucasus. Over the years, I have encouraged as many as a thousand people to visit this historic land; we have traveled widely throughout the small region and every visitor has been inspired by the graciousness, openness and warm hospitality of the people. All would join me in signing this letter of rebuttal of the outrageously absurd and misleading allegations in your article.”
      General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Joseph View Post
        Caroline Cox: I can personally testify to ridiculous nature of claims that ‘Karabakh is a black hole’
        13.06.2008 17:24 GMT+04:00
        /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Baroness Caroline Cox, member of UK House of Lords, has addressed a letter to the editor of The Guardian over Alexandros Petersen’s article published in the newspaper on June 7.

        The letter says,

        “Your article on ‘the Black Hole’ of Nagorno Karabakh by Alexandros Petersen (June 7) contains so many false allegations and untruths that it would be laughable if the implications were not so serious.

        I was in Nagorno Karabakh last week and I can personally testify to the ridiculous nature of the claims that ‘Karabakh is a black hole that attracts arms, drug and human trafficking, money laundering and organized crime. Chances are that heroin on London’s streets, illegal weapons in the Paris banlieue, and the underage prostitutes in Berlin either came through a conflict zone such as Karabakh , or were trafficked by a network that uses the area to facilitate its operations.’"

        These allegations are outrageous. The Armenians in Karabakh had to defend their land against well-documented attempted ethnic cleansing by Azerbaijan in a bitter war from 1991-1994, During that war, Islamist terrorists fought on the side of Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Karabakh, who are now rebuilding their shattered lives and land with laudable commitment to democratic principles (their elections have been declared free and fair by independent respected international observers).

        My charitable organization supports a Rehabilitation Centre for people with disabilities which has become recognized by many professional visitors as a Centre of Excellence, disseminating innovative good practice throughout the South Caucasus. Over the years, I have encouraged as many as a thousand people to visit this historic land; we have traveled widely throughout the small region and every visitor has been inspired by the graciousness, openness and warm hospitality of the people. All would join me in signing this letter of rebuttal of the outrageously absurd and misleading allegations in your article.”
        What a fine example of how not to write a reply letter! You do not reproduce verbatim the very text you are disagreeing the most with, especially if every subsequent word you write does nothing to specifically disprove that text.
        Plenipotentiary meow!

        Comment


        • Here is a much better response:


          Vahe Gabrielyan: Alexandros Peterson is wrong: the South Caucasus country is a well-functioning democratic entity



          Misrepresenting the issues in Nagorno-Karabakh
          Alexandros Peterson is wrong: this South Caucases country is a well-functioning democratic entity deserving EU recognition

          Vahe Gabrielyan
          guardian.co.uk, Monday June 16 2008
          Article history
          The article Negotiating a black hole by Alexandros Petersen on Cif on June 7, was regretfully unbecoming for such a reputable newspaper. The author refers to a conflict of which he either has little understanding, or knowingly distorts the truth. He fails to mention how the conflict evolved and grossly misjudges its character.

          The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not an "ethno-religious conflict" and not one over a disputed territory where "Armenian Christians [are] against Azerbaijani Muslims". It is about the fundamental human rights issue of self-determination, one of being able to peacefully live on the land of your ancestors and be the master of your own destiny. The current situation is a result of decades-long systematic abuse of the human rights and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Armenian population by the Soviet Azeri authorities since the unlawful annexation of the ancient Armenian province (Artsakh) to Azerbaijan and later, of pogroms and outright military aggression against the peaceful population.

          The military phase of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh ended with the victory of the latter's hastily-formed defence forces and enabled their people to start re-building their lives and homes. Since its independence (impeccably proclaimed according to same laws and procedures by which Azerbaijan gained independence from the USSR), in the political and socio-economic turmoil following the break-up of the Soviet Union and even under military aggression, Nagorno-Karabakh has been a surprising case of rule of law and well-functioning state machine. Starting with the independence referendum in 1991, all manifestations of its people's will, which included four presidential elections and several parliamentary and local ones, have been orderly, dignified and democratic exercises, as witnessed by numerous independent international observers, including, incidentally, members of the UK parliament and the US Congress.

          Indeed, Nagorno-Karabakh is not "a governance black hole", but a well-functioning democratic entity with strengthening civil society and full economic and cultural life, possessing all attributes of an independent state, save for international recognition. Its elected authorities have announced on several occasions that they would be happy to receive international inspection missions who can study the situation in situ and refute any groundless allegations. There have been no volunteers to chase ghosts. The allegations of all earthly sins in the mentioned article, happily picked en masse from the Azeri propaganda machine of libellous campaign of hatred and misinformation against Karabakh and enriched by references to all possible evils of our times to scare the modern security-conscious citizen are so bizarre that they are at best ignored or frowned upon in any more or less informed circles.

          However, the author is right in saying that the conflict should concern Europe. It should, because although the people of Karabakh have been able to stop the regular bombings of their homes by resorting to self-defence, peace has not been made final yet and threats of war are heard from the other side of the border regularly. It should, because although we keep fingers cross for the renewed negotiations between the presidents and foreign ministers to succeed – the last, June 6 round was constructive and it was decided to continue them – the continuing military rhetoric and the fierce anti-Armenian hate campaign on all levels of society, combined with the mentioned ever-growing military budget, are an ominous sign. It is much worrying that today, fed on this campaign; more than one-third of Azeris are for a military solution while international mediators (the Minsk Group co-chair countries) are widely lambasted for their impartiality. The oil money paid by the European companies should not facilitate the unleashing of another war, the consequences of which will indeed be dire. With a fragile ceasefire being maintained simply because of the balance of power, it is easy to instigate another war that will hugely increase the toll on human life and create new refugees. On top of the already existing one million, about 400,000 of which by the way are the Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan and from Nagorno-Karabakh, this will result in a large-scale humanitarian disaster affecting whole of Europe and beyond. This cannot be allowed to happen. This is why both past and present Armenian authorities have readily engaged in negotiations in good faith and have strived to find lasting peace, despite and because of the fact that one party of the conflict, Azerbaijan, refuses to talk to Nagorno-Karabakh, the other party.

          Security in the modern world is certainly a global problem and in order to ensure global peace and security, frozen conflicts should be resolved in a way so that the vital interests of all parties are taken into account. That will take concessions on both sides and it is a hard thing to do. In order to help, the international community, as well as its individual members, should adopt an attitude based on values and principles that apply universally. Acknowledging that the people of NK have the right to be in charge of their own destiny would have helped. It has in other cases. On the other hand, giving in to dirty propaganda and trying to discredit one side, be it with either explicit or implied allegations does not help and raises questions.

          guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
          General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

          Comment





          • Azeri soldier in Armenian captivity doesn’t want to return


            19.12.2008 17:28 GMT+04:00

            /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azeri draftee Rafik Rahman ogly Hasanov who yielded himself prisoner to the Armenian side said he doesn’t want to return to the homeland.

            He told Armenian TV channels that he suffered humiliation when serving in the Azeri army. He said that he is treated well in Armenia and that he is not going to return to Azerbaijan.

            Link

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Alexandros View Post



              Azeri soldier in Armenian captivity doesn’t want to return


              19.12.2008 17:28 GMT+04:00

              /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azeri draftee Rafik Rahman ogly Hasanov who yielded himself prisoner to the Armenian side said he doesn’t want to return to the homeland.

              He told Armenian TV channels that he suffered humiliation when serving in the Azeri army. He said that he is treated well in Armenia and that he is not going to return to Azerbaijan.

              Link
              Not the first one either.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by steph View Post
                Not the first one either.
                I know.It won`t be the last one either.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Alexandros View Post
                  I know.It won`t be the last one either.
                  True, true, Kala Christouyenna, true, true.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by steph View Post
                    True, true, Kala Christouyenna, true, true.
                    Nase kala.Efxaristo poli.Kala Christouyenna ke se sena.

                    P.S Who will Inter face in the next Champion league match?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Alexandros View Post
                      Nase kala.Efxaristo poli.Kala Christouyenna ke se sena.

                      P.S Who will Inter face in the next Champion league match?
                      Manchester United !!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X