The "OLIVE BRANCH"???
Something that the self-proclaimed 'human' Representative Burton said and some of his brainless colleagues regurgitated that WAS NOT REFUTED by any of those comittee members who supported the bill was the "OLIVE BRANCH" that Turkey had purportedly extended to President Kocharyan and Armenia earlier this year. But some very important facts were not pointed out by supporters of this bill.
The garbage this imbecile was referring to was Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's proposal to have a joint (Armenian-Turkish) commission look into the events of 1915-1923.
Naturally the beasts who ignored and protested against the bill attempted to make the Armenian authority appear to cast aside the "OLIVE BRANCH". Nobody noted that Armenia has extended such an "OLIVE BRANCH" over and over again throughout the years without any cooperation.
However, opponents and supporters alike failed to point out the fact that Turkey had ATTACHED PRECONDITIONS to their little "OLIVE BRANCH". We know that Turkey demanded the withdrawl of Armenian Troops from Karabagh and the elimination of any Armenian claims of "Genocide". And how can a nation "Extend an OVLIVE BRANCH" while at the same time blockading it's neighbor from two different directions? Does this assertion hold water?
There are two main points here:
1. Armenia has offered such a commisssion TIME AND TIME AGAIN and it has NEVER BEEN ACCEPTED BY TURKEY.
2. NO SINCERE "OLIVE BRANCH" has impossible or unreasonable preconditions attached to it, unless it is for the purpose of SHOW ONLY.
While I feel that the supporters of this legislation did a phenominal job in presenting their views, I wish they had struck this very important blow to the opponents "OLIVE BRANCH" hoax that they successfully spoon-fed to all who listened to this event.
Hovik
AG.com Moderator
Something that the self-proclaimed 'human' Representative Burton said and some of his brainless colleagues regurgitated that WAS NOT REFUTED by any of those comittee members who supported the bill was the "OLIVE BRANCH" that Turkey had purportedly extended to President Kocharyan and Armenia earlier this year. But some very important facts were not pointed out by supporters of this bill.
The garbage this imbecile was referring to was Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's proposal to have a joint (Armenian-Turkish) commission look into the events of 1915-1923.
Naturally the beasts who ignored and protested against the bill attempted to make the Armenian authority appear to cast aside the "OLIVE BRANCH". Nobody noted that Armenia has extended such an "OLIVE BRANCH" over and over again throughout the years without any cooperation.
However, opponents and supporters alike failed to point out the fact that Turkey had ATTACHED PRECONDITIONS to their little "OLIVE BRANCH". We know that Turkey demanded the withdrawl of Armenian Troops from Karabagh and the elimination of any Armenian claims of "Genocide". And how can a nation "Extend an OVLIVE BRANCH" while at the same time blockading it's neighbor from two different directions? Does this assertion hold water?
There are two main points here:
1. Armenia has offered such a commisssion TIME AND TIME AGAIN and it has NEVER BEEN ACCEPTED BY TURKEY.
2. NO SINCERE "OLIVE BRANCH" has impossible or unreasonable preconditions attached to it, unless it is for the purpose of SHOW ONLY.
While I feel that the supporters of this legislation did a phenominal job in presenting their views, I wish they had struck this very important blow to the opponents "OLIVE BRANCH" hoax that they successfully spoon-fed to all who listened to this event.
Hovik
AG.com Moderator
Comment