Axa-oyak Partnership Issue Still Hot
AXA-OYAK PARTNERSHIP ISSUE STILL HOT
By Erkan Acar
Zaman, Turkey
Dec. 1, 2005
The Turkish Armed Forces Pension Fund (OYAK) recently became the focal
point of heated discussion. OYAK General Manager Coskun Ulusoy drew
the attention with his statement "We will certainly purchase one of;
Telekom, TUPRAS, or ERDEMIR". He previously said before the tender
for bloc sale of the state-run Turkish petroleum refineries (TUPRAS),
that they intended to leave Sabanci and Koc holdings behind in the
race on profit, despite OYAK's smaller size.
A Koc Holding top level director Bulend Ozaydinli, at a news conference
following the company's highest bid in the TUPRAS privatization
tender, responded to OYAK: "It is important to make comparisons in
international standards; besides, apples and oranges should not be
mixed, and that is important in terms of educating public opinion
correctly. In order to make comparisons of institutions that are in
different leagues and have different legal status, all available data
should be laid down transparently."
Moreover around the same time the media criticized OYAK. Turkish
daily newspaper Hurriyet's writer Ege Cansen suggested OYAK be
closed down in his September 17th article. Cansen termed OYAK's
participation in privatization tenders as an active entrepreneur
"extremely objectionable". According to Cansen, since OYAK is not
a private enterprise this kind of participation contradicts with a
free market economy. The most important news then followed from the
US regarding OYAK. The institution's French partner AXA had approved
to pay $17 million in compensation to the heirs of Armenians who
were forced to leave the Ottoman State in 1915. Following ZAMAN's
headline announcement of the reports, public opinion reacted harshly
against AXA's decision. The public thought the AXA decision would
aid the recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide. Economic
and political circles wanted OYAK to separate their ways with
AXA. An OYAK statement a week later read that an investigation was
launched into the "genocide compensation". Memoirs written by the
first General Manager of OYAK, Selahattin Ozmen, shed some light
on the happenings during the foundation of the fund. In the book,
socialist intellectuals provided a great deal of support to OYAK,
it said, since the institution introduced the sale of goods on
"Military Markets" for convenient prices in the 1960s.
In his book, Ozmen emphasizes that widely read press writers may be
strengthened via OYPA (an OYAK marketing affiliate). Another issue
touched among the pages of Ozmen's memoir is that the master of
Turkish industry, the late Vehbi Koc, founder of Koc Holding, was
excluded from OYAK since he was regarded as a rival. On the other
side of the situation OYAKBANK's, television commercials emphasize
"the good absolutely wins".
AXA-OYAK PARTNERSHIP ISSUE STILL HOT
By Erkan Acar
Zaman, Turkey
Dec. 1, 2005
The Turkish Armed Forces Pension Fund (OYAK) recently became the focal
point of heated discussion. OYAK General Manager Coskun Ulusoy drew
the attention with his statement "We will certainly purchase one of;
Telekom, TUPRAS, or ERDEMIR". He previously said before the tender
for bloc sale of the state-run Turkish petroleum refineries (TUPRAS),
that they intended to leave Sabanci and Koc holdings behind in the
race on profit, despite OYAK's smaller size.
A Koc Holding top level director Bulend Ozaydinli, at a news conference
following the company's highest bid in the TUPRAS privatization
tender, responded to OYAK: "It is important to make comparisons in
international standards; besides, apples and oranges should not be
mixed, and that is important in terms of educating public opinion
correctly. In order to make comparisons of institutions that are in
different leagues and have different legal status, all available data
should be laid down transparently."
Moreover around the same time the media criticized OYAK. Turkish
daily newspaper Hurriyet's writer Ege Cansen suggested OYAK be
closed down in his September 17th article. Cansen termed OYAK's
participation in privatization tenders as an active entrepreneur
"extremely objectionable". According to Cansen, since OYAK is not
a private enterprise this kind of participation contradicts with a
free market economy. The most important news then followed from the
US regarding OYAK. The institution's French partner AXA had approved
to pay $17 million in compensation to the heirs of Armenians who
were forced to leave the Ottoman State in 1915. Following ZAMAN's
headline announcement of the reports, public opinion reacted harshly
against AXA's decision. The public thought the AXA decision would
aid the recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide. Economic
and political circles wanted OYAK to separate their ways with
AXA. An OYAK statement a week later read that an investigation was
launched into the "genocide compensation". Memoirs written by the
first General Manager of OYAK, Selahattin Ozmen, shed some light
on the happenings during the foundation of the fund. In the book,
socialist intellectuals provided a great deal of support to OYAK,
it said, since the institution introduced the sale of goods on
"Military Markets" for convenient prices in the 1960s.
In his book, Ozmen emphasizes that widely read press writers may be
strengthened via OYPA (an OYAK marketing affiliate). Another issue
touched among the pages of Ozmen's memoir is that the master of
Turkish industry, the late Vehbi Koc, founder of Koc Holding, was
excluded from OYAK since he was regarded as a rival. On the other
side of the situation OYAKBANK's, television commercials emphasize
"the good absolutely wins".
Comment