Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

US rejects Iraq pullout reports

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US rejects Iraq pullout reports

    Sunday 05 March 2006, 14:18 Makka Time, 11:18 GMT

    Reports that Britain and the US are planning to withdraw all their forces from Iraq by the spring of 2007 are completely false, the US military in Iraq has said, reiterating that there is no timetable for withdrawal.

    Two British newspapers reported in their Sunday editions that the pullout plan followed an acceptance by the two governments that the presence of foreign troops in Iraq was now a large obstacle to securing peace.

    But a spokesman for the US military in Iraq reiterated previous statements by US and Iraqi officials that foreign troops would be gradually withdrawn once Iraqi security forces were capable of guaranteeing security.

    Lieutenant-Colonel Barry Johnson said of the reports in the Sunday Telegraph and Sunday Mirror: "This news report on a withdrawal of forces within a set time frame is completely false.

    "As we've said over and over again, any withdrawal will be linked to the ability of the Iraqi security forces to maintain domestic order on behalf of a representative Iraqi government that respects the rights of all its citizens. This is an ongoing assessment and not linked to any time frame."

    Volatile

    "This news report on a withdrawal of forces within a set time frame is completely false"

    Lieutenant-Colonel Barry Johnson, US military spokesman in Iraq


    The newspaper reports quoted unnamed senior British Army sources confirming the pullout, saying London and Washington realised that staying in Iraq will inflame an increasingly volatile situation.

    The only situation in which troops would stay would be if violence escalated into full-blown civil war, they said.

    A Ministry of Defence spokesman in London rejected the reports, telling AFP that the British government had not altered its position set out by John Reid, the defence secretary, on 7 February.

    Britain has about 8000 troops based mainly in Iraq's four southern provinces. The United States has about 136,000 military personnel posted around the country.

    South Korean pullout


    South Korea will begin pulling out
    a third of its troops

    Meanwhile, South Korea's defence ministry announced on Sunday that it would begin bringing its troops home from Iraq next month under a plan to reduce its presence there by a third.

    South Korea plans to withdraw about 1000 of its 3200-member contingent stationed in northern Iraq this year.

    The troop reduction will begin in April, said Major General Chung Seung-jo, chief of the Korean troops stationed in the Kurdish region of Irbil in northern Iraq, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency.

    South Korea's troop contribution has made the country the second-largest US coalition partner after Britain and Italy, which has the fourth-largest contingent in Iraq, has said it plans to pull out this year.

    Unpopular

    "The British government is understood to be the driving force behind the withdrawal plan but all 24 coalition members are likely to welcome the move, given the growing international unpopularity of the war"

    Sunday Telegraph report

    The Sunday Telegraph wrote: "The British government is understood to be the driving force behind the withdrawal plan, but all 24 coalition members are likely to welcome the move, given the growing international unpopularity of the war."

    The Bush administration and Pentagon have stated repeatedly there is no timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq, and a US military spokesman repeated that on Saturday. "We've made no such plans," Major Paul Swiergosz, a Pentagon spokesman, said.

    US and Iraqi officials have said frequently in the past that foreign troops will be gradually withdrawn from Iraq once Iraqi security forces are capable of guaranteeing security for the 27 million population.

    US and British troops have trained 230,000 Iraqis to take on roles in the police force and a slowly expanding Iraqi army, although both are still incapable of securing the country on their own.

    Denial


    The growing sectarian violence is
    leading to more instability in Iraq

    According to the Sunday Mirror, the source told them: "We are rapidly approaching the time when there is simply nothing else for our boys and girls to do. We have trained 230,000 members of the Iraqi security forces. Remaining much longer will serve no purpose whatsoever.

    "In many cases, the appearance of British and US soldiers on the ground can inflame a situation. With the major training tasks completed all we represent are targets for the insurgents - inevitably leading to coalition deaths."

    But an unnamed MoD official responded to the Sunday Mirror claims saying: "There is no question of us 'cutting and running'. If we get out it will be because all our conditions for withdrawal have been met."

  • #2
    US Rejects US and British Forces Withdrawal in a Year

    US Rejects US and British Forces Withdrawal in a Year
    By Anadolu News Agency (aa), Bagdat (Baghdad)
    Published: Sunday, March 05, 2006
    zaman.com


    The US army rejected the news claiming the British and US forces in Iraq will withdraw from the country.

    The Sunday Telegraph newspaper, based on British Defense Ministry sources, had written the United States and Britain agreed that the presence of foreign troops in Iraq was an obstacle in securing peace in the country, and thereupon constructed a withdrawal plan.



    Sunday Mirror paper had claimed the withdrawal would be completed within 12 months.


    After the December elections in Iraq, the US army withdrew 15,000 soldiers.

    Comment


    • #3
      'US and British Forces Withdraw from Iraq Within a Year'

      'US and British Forces Withdraw from Iraq Within a Year'

      Published: Sunday, March 05, 2006
      zaman.com


      According to British Defense Ministry sources, the British and US forces in Iraq will withdraw from the country within a year.

      The Sunday Telegraph news, based on British Defense Ministry sources, read the United States and Britain agreed that the presence of foreign troops in Iraq was an obstacle in securing peace in the country. ”


      As the US and Britain have decided to withdraw troops from Iraq, the Sunday Mirror paper claimed the withdrawal would be realized within a year

      Comment


      • #4
        Fisk Paints a Middle East in crisis= LISTEN

        "All truth passes through three stages:
        First, it is ridiculed;
        Second, it is violently opposed; and
        Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

        Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

        Comment


        • #5
          UK troops in Iraq to be reduced

          UK troops in Iraq to be reduced

          British forces could withdraw from some areas
          Defence Secretary John Reid is to announce a reduction in the level of UK forces in Iraq, the BBC has learnt.
          The reduction will be "several hundred and probably around 800", said BBC defence correspondent Paul Wood.

          The minister will also reveal to the House of Commons plans to relocate forces from certain parts of the country over the next few months.

          Downing Street has always insisted there is no strict timetable for British troops to quit Iraq.

          Prime Minister Tony Blair's spokesman said withdrawal would depend on the "quality and quantity" of Iraqi troops.

          Lt Gen Nick Houghton, the UK's senior commander in Iraq, had told a newspaper they could withdraw by 2008.

          The BBC correspondent said the forces to be withdrawn could comprise Army trainers of the Iraq security forces, which could be interpreted either as a sign of confidence in their capability or as simply a matter of urgency to withdraw.

          The UK has 8,000 personnel taking part in Operation Telic in the south of the country.

          Mr Reid's announcement is one he makes every six months to the Commons about troop deployment.

          bbcworld

          Comment

          Working...
          X