Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Row over US Ambassador's Armenian Genocide remark

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Row over US Ambassador's Armenian Genocide remark

    By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
    Published: 23 March 2006


    Protests are growing over the possible recall of the US ambassador in Armenia after he described the 1915 massacres of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. If he is recalled, it would be seen as giving in to Turkish pressure.

    Officially, John Marshall Evans remains - for the time being at least - Washington's man in Erevan. "Ambassador Evans is our ambassador, and he continues ... to exercise that honour and privilege," a State Department official said last week.

    But that assurance has satisfied neither the ethnic Armenian community in the US, nor members of Congress from southern California where the community is centred. Their suspicion is that a successor for Mr Evans has already been lined up, and he will be ordered home. Adam Schiff and Grace Napolitano, representing districts in the Los Angeles area, have taken up the matter with the State Department. "I expressed my opposition to any disciplinary action being taken against the ambassador for speaking the truth," Mr Schiff said.

    Mr Evans caused a diplomatic sensation in February 2005 when he flatly called the massacres a genocide, during an appearance at the University of California at Berkeley. It was "unbecoming of us as Americans to play word games here," he declared. "I will today call it the Armenian genocide."

    By doing so, he became the first US official to use the loaded word in an Armenian context. Like the Clinton administration before it, the Bush administration has always referred to the slaughter as a massacre or a tragedy, but not as a genocide. The circumspection is widely seen as an effort not to upset Turkey, an important US ally in the Middle East that shares borders with Iraq and Iran.

    The stand-off follows successive efforts by Mr Schiff to introduce a bill specifically recognising the events of 1915 as an act of genocide - efforts that have been blocked at the White House's behest.

    Protests are growing over the possible recall of the US ambassador in Armenia after he described the 1915 massacres of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. If he is recalled, it would be seen as giving in to Turkish pressure.

    Officially, John Marshall Evans remains - for the time being at least - Washington's man in Erevan. "Ambassador Evans is our ambassador, and he continues ... to exercise that honour and privilege," a State Department official said last week.

    But that assurance has satisfied neither the ethnic Armenian community in the US, nor members of Congress from southern California where the community is centred. Their suspicion is that a successor for Mr Evans has already been lined up, and he will be ordered home. Adam Schiff and Grace Napolitano, representing districts in the Los Angeles area, have taken up the matter with the State Department. "I expressed my opposition to any disciplinary action being taken against the ambassador for speaking the truth," Mr Schiff said.
    Mr Evans caused a diplomatic sensation in February 2005 when he flatly called the massacres a genocide, during an appearance at the University of California at Berkeley. It was "unbecoming of us as Americans to play word games here," he declared. "I will today call it the Armenian genocide."

    By doing so, he became the first US official to use the loaded word in an Armenian context. Like the Clinton administration before it, the Bush administration has always referred to the slaughter as a massacre or a tragedy, but not as a genocide. The circumspection is widely seen as an effort not to upset Turkey, an important US ally in the Middle East that shares borders with Iraq and Iran.

    The stand-off follows successive efforts by Mr Schiff to introduce a bill specifically recognising the events of 1915 as an act of genocide - efforts that have been blocked at the White House's behest.


  • #2
    Originally posted by Tongue
    By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
    Published: 23 March 2006


    Protests are growing over the possible recall of the US ambassador in Armenia after he described the 1915 massacres of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. If he is recalled, it would be seen as giving in to Turkish pressure.

    Officially, John Marshall Evans remains - for the time being at least - Washington's man in Erevan. "Ambassador Evans is our ambassador, and he continues ... to exercise that honour and privilege," a State Department official said last week.

    But that assurance has satisfied neither the ethnic Armenian community in the US, nor members of Congress from southern California where the community is centred. Their suspicion is that a successor for Mr Evans has already been lined up, and he will be ordered home. Adam Schiff and Grace Napolitano, representing districts in the Los Angeles area, have taken up the matter with the State Department. "I expressed my opposition to any disciplinary action being taken against the ambassador for speaking the truth," Mr Schiff said.

    Mr Evans caused a diplomatic sensation in February 2005 when he flatly called the massacres a genocide, during an appearance at the University of California at Berkeley. It was "unbecoming of us as Americans to play word games here," he declared. "I will today call it the Armenian genocide."

    By doing so, he became the first US official to use the loaded word in an Armenian context. Like the Clinton administration before it, the Bush administration has always referred to the slaughter as a massacre or a tragedy, but not as a genocide. The circumspection is widely seen as an effort not to upset Turkey, an important US ally in the Middle East that shares borders with Iraq and Iran.

    The stand-off follows successive efforts by Mr Schiff to introduce a bill specifically recognising the events of 1915 as an act of genocide - efforts that have been blocked at the White House's behest.

    Protests are growing over the possible recall of the US ambassador in Armenia after he described the 1915 massacres of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. If he is recalled, it would be seen as giving in to Turkish pressure.

    Officially, John Marshall Evans remains - for the time being at least - Washington's man in Erevan. "Ambassador Evans is our ambassador, and he continues ... to exercise that honour and privilege," a State Department official said last week.

    But that assurance has satisfied neither the ethnic Armenian community in the US, nor members of Congress from southern California where the community is centred. Their suspicion is that a successor for Mr Evans has already been lined up, and he will be ordered home. Adam Schiff and Grace Napolitano, representing districts in the Los Angeles area, have taken up the matter with the State Department. "I expressed my opposition to any disciplinary action being taken against the ambassador for speaking the truth," Mr Schiff said.
    Mr Evans caused a diplomatic sensation in February 2005 when he flatly called the massacres a genocide, during an appearance at the University of California at Berkeley. It was "unbecoming of us as Americans to play word games here," he declared. "I will today call it the Armenian genocide."

    By doing so, he became the first US official to use the loaded word in an Armenian context. Like the Clinton administration before it, the Bush administration has always referred to the slaughter as a massacre or a tragedy, but not as a genocide. The circumspection is widely seen as an effort not to upset Turkey, an important US ally in the Middle East that shares borders with Iraq and Iran.

    The stand-off follows successive efforts by Mr Schiff to introduce a bill specifically recognising the events of 1915 as an act of genocide - efforts that have been blocked at the White House's behest.

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...icle352977.ece

    I hope Evans remains at his post. It's very unusual to see an ambassador with balls. It look like he may indeed finish hi term because enough of a rucus has been made. If nobody did anything to support him, he'd be gone.
    General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

    Comment


    • #3
      The US Constitution expressly protects Freedom Of Speech.

      Comment


      • #4
        Genocide comment could cost ambassador to Armenia his job

        By MICHAEL DOYLE
        McClatchy Newspapers
        28-MAR-06

        WASHINGTON -- Ambassador John Evans is unfailingly diplomatic about his fate as the plain-speaking U.S. envoy to Armenia.

        Others, including California lawmakers and Armenian-American activists, are more blunt.

        Unhappy lawmakers and activists contend Evans is being forced from his post because he conceded last year that the term "Armenian genocide" appropriately described the slaughter of Armenians between 1915 and 1923. His potential career problem is that the State Department and the government of Turkey do not accept the term.

        On Tuesday, sounding as if he were reciting carefully prepared talking points, Evans spoke delicately about his current status.

        "I am still the ambassador," Evans said in a brief interview during a Washington visit. "I have not submitted my retirement papers."

        At the same time, the career foreign service officer underscored the temporary nature of any diplomatic posting. In June, he will have served in Armenia for two years _ and he also will have reached the 35-year mark in the State Department.

        "No ambassador stays forever," Evans said, twice.

        A Yale graduate who speaks four foreign languages, and is currently studying Eastern Armenian, Evans is now the subject of considerable speculation by politically active Armenian Americans and their congressional champions. Ever since rumors began running rampant several weeks ago that Evans was to be recalled or otherwise disciplined, interest groups and lawmakers with large Armenian-American constituencies have been weighing in.

        Most recently, Rep. George Radanovich, R-Calif., has called the State Department to request a meeting. It has not yet been scheduled.

        Other lawmakers, too, have been increasing the pressure. At least three members of Congress, including California Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Grace Napolitano, have leveled written blasts at the State Department.

        "I do not believe it is possible for any ambassador to Armenia to function with any credibility if he does not recognize the genocide," Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., wrote Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on March 10. "It is simply wrong for the State Department to punish Ambassador Evans for statements he made that are factually correct."

        Schiff, a member of the House International Relations Committee, followed up with written questions presented to Rice. Schiff, who in the past has co-sponsored Armenian genocide resolutions with Radanovich, also met privately with State Department officials. So far, though, the State Department has not responded save for a routine official statement.

        "U.S. ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president," the State Department declared. "Ambassador Evans and his capable team have the full confidence of the administration."

        The State Department, under both Democratic and Republican presidents, has consistently opposed congressional measures that commemorate or even use the term "Armenian genocide." The State Department contends historians disagree over whether the legal term "genocide" applies; more fundamentally, officials worry about antagonizing Turkey, a strategically located NATO ally.

        Evans, who helped coordinate the U.S. response to the devastating 1988 Armenian earthquake, later began studying Ottoman history before going on to other diplomatic assignments.

        "I informed myself in depth about it," Evans told an Armenian-American audience in Berkeley, Calif., according to an account provided by Pallone's office. "I think we, the U.S. government, owe you, our fellow citizens, a more frank and honest way of discussing this problem. I think it is unbecoming of us, as Americans, to play word games here. I believe in calling things by their name."

        Armenian officials agree. About Evans, though, they, too, are circumspect.

        "The U.S. ambassador is the U.S. ambassador," Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said in response to a question Tuesday. "Until he leaves the country, we will treat him as such."



        Comment


        • #5
          'We Will Remember not the Words of our Enemies, but the Silence of our Friends'

          'We Will Remember not the Words of our
          Enemies, but the Silence of our Friends'
          By Harut Sassounian
          Publisher, The California Courier
          As Armenians are commemorating the anniversary of the Armenian Genocide
          this week, they should keep in mind that 91 years after the fact, a
          distinguished U.S. diplomat has become its latest victim!
          John Evans, the U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, fortunately has not lost his
          life, but has sacrificed his diplomatic career for speaking out on the
          Armenian Genocide. He is being recalled by the State Department for
          publicly acknowledging the facts of the Genocide during his tour of the
          United States last year.
          As Martin Luther King said: "At the end, we will remember not the words of
          our enemies, but the silence of our friends." This famous statement aptly
          describes the regrettable situation Amb. Evans and Armenians find
          themselves in. The U.S. Ambassador is a true friend of Armenia and
          Armenians. But, more importantly, he is a defender of the truth. His
          friends should not remain silent about his predicament.
          By speaking out, Armenians would be defending not so much the Ambassador --
          who deserves their full support -- but their own cause. They cannot remain
          silent when the State Department is indirectly trying to bury the truth
          about the Armenian Genocide. A noble messenger is being eliminated in order
          to silence his message!
          The upcoming commemorative events of the Armenian Genocide are the perfect
          opportunity for Armenians to raise their voices in defense of the
          acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide, in solidarity with Amb. Evans. As
          Armenians gather in various cities throughout the world during the week of
          April 24, the keynote speakers at commemorative events in every city should
          condemn the shameful action of the State Department against one of its
          finest diplomats! They should urge their audiences to write to the State
          Department expressing their outrage about its inexcusable treatment of Amb.
          Evans.
          A group of Armenian Americans and their friends in Yerevan are launching
          this week a "Yellow Ribbon" campaign in order to shatter the wall of
          silence surrounding this affair. As more than a million Armenians will be
          marching in a solemn procession to the Genocide Memorial Monument in
          Yerevan on April 24, volunteers will be asking each individual to tie a
          yellow ribbon on a rope along the path leading toward the Monument. The
          organizers have chosen the "Yellow Ribbon" campaign as a mode of silent and
          respectful protest that is so familiar to Americans. This activity will be
          publicized throughout Armenia as well as the Diaspora.
          These actions and the ensuing publicity would add to the extensive media
          coverage in recent weeks of the State Department's shocking recall of Amb.
          Evans. As the Los Angeles Times wrote in an editorial published on March
          22: "Punishing an ambassador for speaking honestly about a 90-year-old
          crime befits a cynical, double-dealing monarchy, not the leader of the free
          world." In a similar harshly worded editorial published on March 24, the
          Fresno Bee wrote: "Shame on the State Department" for recalling Amb. Evans.
          Prominent British journalist Robert Fisk wrote a scathing article in The
          Independent on April 8. He castigated the State Department for recalling
          Amb. Evans and took Pres. Bush to task for reneging on his campaign promise
          of acknowledging the Armenian Genocide. Fisk said that after getting
          elected, Pres. Bush "caved in, gutlessly calling it [the Armenian Genocide]
          a 'tragedy' so that he wouldn't get his fingers burned by that wonderful
          democratic NATO ally - and would-be EU member - called Turkey."
          Despite extensive critical media attention and several letters of inquiry
          by members of Congress to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the State
          Department continues to stonewall and remain officially silent on the Evans
          affair.
          If Armenians worldwide react strongly on this occasion, maybe in the
          future the State Department and the White House would carefully weigh the
          repercussions of their actions, before contemplating important decisions on
          Armenian issues. Silence and inaction are not valuable commodities in the
          pursuit of any cause, let alone a noble one!
          "All truth passes through three stages:
          First, it is ridiculed;
          Second, it is violently opposed; and
          Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

          Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

          Comment

          Working...
          X