Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

"America's next ambassador to Armenia is a verbal gymnast.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "America's next ambassador to Armenia is a verbal gymnast.

    "America's next ambassador to Armenia is a verbal gymnast. He has
    to be, to keep his job."






    Armenian National Committee of America
    1711 N Street NW
    Washington, DC 20036
    Tel: (202) 775-1918
    Fax: (202) 775-5648
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Internet: www.anca.org

    PRESS RELEASE
    June 28, 2006
    Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
    Tel: (202) 775-1918

    SENATE PANEL PRESSES PROPOSED U.S. ENVOY FOR CLEAR
    EXPLANATION OF U.S POLICY ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    -- "I am not sure how we can continue to have Ambassadors
    to Armenia who can be effective unless they give
    recognition to the Genocide." - Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN)

    -- Sen. Biden Against Senate Approval of New Ambassador until
    State Department Responds to Questions on Amb. Evans Recall

    WASHINGTON, DC - Senate Foreign Relations Committee members George
    Allen (R-VA) and Norm Coleman (R-MN) bombarded U.S. Ambassador to
    Armenia Designate Richard Hoagland with questions about official
    U.S. complicity in Turkey's campaign of Genocide denial,
    questioning him, during his confirmation hearing, regarding his
    ability to effectively represent the United States in Armenia
    without properly recognizing the Armenian Genocide, reported the
    Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

    In the days leading up to today's hearing, the Committee's Ranking
    Democrat, Joseph Biden (D-DE), in a strongly worded letter,
    demanded that the Secretary of State answers questions concerning
    the recall of the current U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans,
    before he could support the confirmation of his replacement.

    At the hearing, Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD), joined with Senators
    Coleman and Allen in sharply criticizing the Administration's
    refusal to speak truthfully on the Armenian Genocide. Senator
    Boxer, who was unable to attend the hearing, submitted written
    questions to Amb. Hoagland.

    The hearing was marked by repeated calls upon Amb. Hoagland to
    clarify the State Department's policy on the Armenian Genocide. If
    approved, he will replace the current U.S. Ambassador to Armenia,
    John Marshall Evans, who - amid great controversy - has been
    recalled over his truthful description of the Armenian Genocide in
    February of 2005.

    "We appreciate the leadership of Senators Allen, Coleman and
    Sarbanes in pressing hard for a detailed explanation of the U.S.
    policy on the Armenian Genocide - and commend Senator Biden for his
    principled demand that the Senate receive clear answers on this
    issue from the State Department before moving ahead with the
    nomination of a new envoy to Yerevan," said ANCA Chairman Ken
    Hachikian. "We were deeply disappointed that, in response to these
    legitimate inquiries, Ambassador-designate Hoagland - apparently at
    the direction of his superiors in the State Department - limited
    his responses to a series of unresponsive evasions and euphemisms
    intended to obscure - not explain - the U.S. policy on the Armenian
    Genocide."

    "We have said from the start - and believe even more firmly today -
    that the U.S. Senate cannot, in good conscience, approve the
    nomination of a new ambassador to Armenia until the circumstances
    of the current envoy's controversial firing - including a thorough
    description of the U.S. policy on the Armenian Genocide - are
    fully, officially and openly explained to Congress and the American
    people," said Hachikian.

    -------------------------------
    Dodging the Armenian Genocide
    -------------------------------

    In his opening remarks, Senator Allen, who chaired the confirmation
    hearing, made specific reference to the Bush Administration's
    decision to recall U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans
    for referring to the deportation and death of 1.5 million Armenians
    in 1915 as a clear instance of "genocide." "Some have expressed
    concern that Ambassador Evans has been relieved of his duties as a
    result of references to the Armenian Genocide," stated Sen. Allen.
    "I do not know this to be true, but will say that many of my
    colleagues and I refer to the tragic events of 1915 as genocide and
    have strongly encouraged the President to do so as well. I hope
    that in the future the Administration will recognize this terrible
    event for what it was - genocide."

    The Virginia Senator - and potential 2008 Presidential candidate -
    then went on to question Amb. Hoagland about the instructions he
    has received about discussing the Armenian Genocide, as well as the
    instructions he intends to issue to his Embassy staff on this
    matter. In response, Amb. Hoagland stated that, "the President has
    said, this is a tragedy for all humanity and one that the world
    must never forget." He went on to note that he had not received
    "any kind of written instruction about this. I simply studied the
    policy, I studied the background papers on the policy, I know the
    policy and my responsibility is to support the president."

    Amb. Hoagland noted on a number of occasions during the hearing
    that, as a Foreign Service officer who has dealt with the Caucasus,
    he has visited the memorial to victims in Armenia in Yerevan, and
    would do so again, should he be confirmed. He added, however, that
    he was against "getting stuck in the past" and wanted to focus on
    "living in the future."

    Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman noted that, "you can't look to the
    future if you deny your past." Sen. Coleman was relentless but
    respectful in his questioning, stating that, "the State Department
    has put you in a difficult position. It is almost absurd for you
    to sit here and you can't utter the word 'genocide.' The
    President's statement that he utters every year is a description of
    genocide. One of the things I was proud about the State Department
    is when we talk about the Genocide in Sudan - it's genocide what's
    happening in Darfur."

    Senator Coleman raised the 2000 statement by then Governor George
    Bush that, "Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that
    defies comprehension," asking Amb. Hoagland, "do you agree or
    disagree with that statement." Amb. Hoagland avoided directly
    answering the question, noting instead: "I fully agree that events
    occurred in 1915 and following were of historic proportion. As I
    said, they were documented, they were horrifying. As we heard from
    Senator Sarbanes earlier on - 'hundreds of valleys devastated,' 'no
    family untouched'. It was historic, it was a tragedy."

    When asked by Senator Coleman why he thought the State Department
    barred the use of the term "Armenian Genocide," Amb. Hoagland
    dodged the question, stating: "I am very much encouraged by the
    fact that there are senior officials in Yerevan and Ankara and
    elsewhere who do like to bring closure to that period of history.
    They are looking for new ways of doing it. There are talks of
    commissions - the truth and reconciliation commission concept is
    being explored in quiet conversations. If we could I would very
    much like to meet with senior officials in Ankara and Baku because
    I think that could be helpful - it would help me understand better
    how to play a role of reconciliatory and a peacemaking role."

    In his comments, Senator Coleman stressed the theme that a U.S.
    Ambassador to Armenia who does not recognize the Armenian Genocide
    lacks credibility. He noted that, "I am of the Jewish faith. I
    cannot imagine an Ambassador to Israel being effective without
    talking about the Holocaust. I am not sure how we can continue to
    have Ambassadors to Armenia who can be effective, unless they give
    recognition to the Genocide."

    Senator Sarbanes, in his opening remarks, expressed "regret that we
    were called to hold this hearing today, in part to replace a career
    Ambassador prior to the completion of a three year tour of duty.
    We would not be in this situation, if the Administration would
    simply acknowledge a plain historical truth that 91 years ago, the
    world witnessed the first Genocide of the 21st century - the
    Armenian Genocide." Sen. Sarbanes spoke eloquently about the U.S.
    Foreign service officers who witnessed the Armenian Genocide in
    1915, and whose observations remain a permanent part of the U.S.
    archives.

    Senator Barbara Boxer, who was not able to attend the hearing,
    submitted remarks and detailed written questions to Amb. Hoagland.
    Noting Amb. Evans' statement in February 2005, properly
    characterizing the Armenian Genocide as "genocide," Sen. Boxer
    stated, "I agree with Ambassador Evans' statement. Not only should
    we not play word games with a matter as serious as genocide, we
    should also not play political games with issues of genocide." The
    Senator went on to express concern "that the controversy
    surrounding Ambassador Evans will needlessly harm U.S.-Armenian
    relations. I understand that there are protests in front of the
    U.S. Embassy in Yerevan today over the recall of Ambassador of
    Evans. How would you respond to this concern?"

    Sen. Boxer's reference was to a candle-light vigil held today in
    Yerevan by hundreds of human rights activists during the Senate
    confirmation hearing, as part of the "Yellow Ribbon Campaign"
    protesting the firing the Amb. Evans. On April 24th, tens of
    thousands had tied yellow ribbons in solidarity with the U.S.
    Ambassador, who had stood with the Armenian people in honoring the
    victims and survivors of the Armenian Genocide.

    ---------------------------------------------
    Regional Integration and Military Aid Parity
    ---------------------------------------------

    In response to questions on the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades
    of Armenia and the proposed Kars, Tbilisi, Baku railroad, Amb.
    Hoagland was adamant about the Administration's decision not to
    fund any project that would hinder regional integration and
    cooperation. When asked about efforts to maintain military aid
    parity to Armenia and Azerbaijan, Amb. Hoagland would not commit to
    equal allocations of military aid to both countries. Sen. Allen
    reminded the nominee that the Senate plays a central role in
    ensuring military aid parity and that he would continue to work
    hard to ensure the aid balance is maintained.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Sen. Biden Asks Secretary Rice for Answers on Amb. Evans Recall
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Just days before the Senate confirmation hearing, Foreign Relations
    Committee Ranking Democrat Joe Biden (D-DE) expressed concern to
    Secretary Condoleezza Rice regarding the circumstances surrounding
    the recall of Amb. Evans, noting that he is "not prepared to move
    forward on Senate action" on his replacement, until several key
    questions are answered.

    In his June 23rd letter to Secretary Rice, Sen. Biden noted that
    "to punish an American official for correctly describing any
    historical event raise serious questions about the United States'
    commitment to the values of transparency and honesty." The letter
    went on to note that, "in this instance, the allegation that the
    Department would retaliate against an official whose only apparent
    offense was discussing an act of genocide with American citizens
    also damages our country's reputation for upholding human rights
    and democratic values." Senator Biden posed four questions to the
    State Department, including one which asks: "If it is in fact the
    policy of the United States not to characterize the systematic
    killing of 1.5 million Armenians as genocide, please explain why
    these events do not meet any of the five definitions in the
    Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
    Genocide." The State Department response, written by Assistant
    Secretary of Legislative Affairs Jeffrey Bergner, effectively
    avoided providing a meaningful response to Senator Biden's
    questions.

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Sen. Allen Calls on Ambassador-Designate to Respect Armenians
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    In his closing comments, Senator Allen urged Ambassador-designate
    Hoagland "to be respectful to Armenian Americans and also to
    Armenians, recognizing their heritage, their history, their
    sensitivities."

    The Scripps-Howard News Service, today, ran a story, "Ambassador-
    to-be dodges Armenian genocide question," about Amb. Hoagland's
    confirmation hearing. The first line of the story reads:
    "America's next ambassador to Armenia is a verbal gymnast. He has
    to be, to keep his job."
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

  • #2
    Senate Holds up Confirmation of New Ambassador to Armenia

    By Harut Sassounian
    Publisher, The California Courier

    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week postponed the
    confirmation of Richard Hoagland, the Ambassador to Armenia
    Designate, in response to sharp criticism by the Armenian-American
    community, members of U.S. Congress and the media.
    By holding up the confirmation of Amb. Hoagland, the Senate panel
    clearly wanted to indicate its displeasure with the White House and
    State Department for the dismissal of the current Ambassador to
    Armenia, John Evans, who used the term "Armenian Genocide" last year
    during remarks at an Armenian-American gathering in California.
    On June 28, three nominees for U.S. ambassadorships to Ireland,
    Switzerland and Armenia appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations
    Committee. With scant attention being paid to the Ambassadors
    Designate for Ireland and Switzerland, the Senators spent the entire
    hour-long hearing to pepper Amb. Hoagland with numerous questions
    regarding the Bush Administration's refusal to characterize the mass
    killings of Armenians in 1915 as genocide.
    Later that day, the nominations of Ambassadors Designate for Ireland
    and Switzerland were approved by the Foreign Relations Committee and
    the full Senate on the following day. The nomination of Amb.
    Hoagland, however, languished in committee for an undetermined length
    of time, thus placing an informal hold on his nomination.
    After ignoring for months all inquiries from Members of Congress and
    the American public, the State Dept. was finally given an ultimatum
    by Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Ranking Democrat on the Foreign
    Relations Committee, just days before the Senate confirmation
    hearing. In a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Sen.
    Biden asked a series of very tough questions and warned that unless
    he received appropriate answers, he would "not be prepared to move
    forward with any Senate action that would prematurely end" the tenure
    of Amb. Evans. Even though the State Dept. was alarmed enough to
    respond immediately to Sen. Biden, the reply of Jeffrey T. Bergner,
    Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs, was largely
    non-responsive. In addition, Bergner's letter contained several
    misrepresentations, such as alleging that Amb. Evans had in fact
    resigned from his post (after being fired!) and that the Turkish
    government had no contact with the Bush Administration on this issue
    (contradicting Turkish press reports).
    Pushing for dialogue between Armenians and Turks, Bergner touted as a
    positive accomplishment the legal analysis of the Armenian Genocide
    conducted by the International Center for Transitional Justice, under
    the auspices of the Turkish Armenian Reconciliation Commission. Since
    the State Dept. seems to be so proud of the study it had funded, why
    does it not then adopt its verdict that qualified the systematic
    killings of Armenians as genocide?
    Lastly, after quoting Pres. Bush's words that described what took
    place in 1915 as "the forced exile and mass killing of as many as 1.5
    million Armenians by Ottoman troops," which in fact is an
    acknowledgment of genocide without actually using that term, Bergner
    suggested that the characterization of this "tragedy" should be
    "determined through heartfelt dialogue, not through diplomatic or
    political proclamation." Did Mr. Bergner realize that by saying so,
    he was in fact qualifying as useless Pres. Bush's annual April 24
    statements, and slighting Pres. Reagan's Presidential Proclamation of
    1981 that referred to the Armenian Genocide as well as the two
    resolutions adopted by the House of Representatives on this issue in
    1975 and 1984?
    In addition to Sen. Biden, eight other Senators -- six of whom are
    members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee -- took issue with
    the Bush Administration's evasiveness on the Armenian Genocide.
    Senators John Kerry (D-MA), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Christopher Dodd
    (D-CT), Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Paul
    Sarbanes (D-MD) wrote strongly worded letters to the State Dept. or
    submitted written questions to Amb. Hoagland regarding the Bush
    Administration's policy on the Armenian Genocide. Sen. Sarbanes also
    delivered lengthy and highly critical remarks during the Foreign
    Relations Committee hearing.
    Particularly noteworthy was the interrogation of Amb. Hoagland by
    Republican Senators George Allen of Virginia and Norm Coleman of
    Minnesota. Sen. Allen, who chaired the Foreign Relations Committee's
    confirmation hearing, and Sen. Coleman, a member of that panel, did
    not shy away from sharply criticizing their own Republican
    Administration's unacceptable position on the Armenian Genocide and
    its refusal to provide a clear explanation for the dismissal of Amb.
    Evans.
    In his opening remarks, Sen. Allen said: "Many of my colleagues refer
    to the tragic events of 1915 as a genocide and have strongly
    encouraged the President to do so as well. I hope that in the future
    our Administration will recognize this terrible event for what it was
    -- genocide."
    Sen. Coleman added: "I am of the Jewish faith. I cannot imagine an
    Ambassador to Israel being effective without talking about the
    Holocaust. I am not sure how we can continue to have Ambassadors to
    Armenia who can be effective, unless they give recognition to the
    Genocide."
    Mr. Hoagland, who is currently the U.S. Ambassador to Tajikistan, was
    caught in the horns of a dilemma. Realizing full well that his
    predecessor, Amb. Evans, had lost his job for saying "Armenian
    Genocide," he carefully sidestepped using that term during the
    hearing. On the other hand, he was cognizant of the fact that unless
    he and the Bush Administration appease the disgruntled Senators and
    incensed Armenian Americans, he runs the risk of not getting
    confirmed! Pressed by Sen. Coleman, Amb. Hoagland finally pledged
    that, if confirmed, he would use proper internal channels to raise
    with State Dept. officials the issue of the acknowledgment of the
    Armenian Genocide.
    The hour-long confirmation hearing of Amb. Hoagland turned into a
    comprehensive and critical review of the Bush Administration's
    unacceptable position on the Armenian Genocide. It now remains to be
    seen whether the State Dept. and the White House would be more
    forthcoming on this issue and provide an honest explanation for the
    dismissal of Amb. Evans. Until then, Amb. Hoagland's confirmation may
    languish in the Senate.
    Clearly, the Senate and the Administration have taken seriously the
    concerns expressed by the Armenian American community. Given this
    initial success, it is now incumbent on everyone to thank the
    Senators - particularly Sen. Allen and Sen. Coleman - who supported
    the Armenian demands and ask them to continue pressing the State
    Dept. and the White House on this issue.
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    Comment


    • #3
      Senate Delays Hoagland Confirmation

      WASHINGTONIn the wake of this past Wednesday's contentious Senate Foreign
      Relations Committee nomination hearing for Ambassador to Armenia Designate
      Richard Hoagland, panel members John Kerry (D-Mass.), Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.),
      Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) have each submitted a
      series of detailed written questions asking the nominee to explain the
      guidance
      he has received from the State Department concerning its policy on the
      Armenian
      Genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee.
      Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) also sent a letter of inquiry this week
      concerning the recall of the current US Ambassador to Armenia John Evans
      following his statements affirming the Armenian Genocide.
      During the June 28th nomination hearing, Sen. George Allen (R-Va.), Sen. Norm
      Coleman (R-Minn.), and Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.) pressed the nominee for an
      explanation of the State Department's guidance regarding the use of the word
      "genocide" to properly characterize this crime against humanity. Senators
      Allen
      and Coleman peppered the nominee with numerous questions and expressed
      frustration as the Ambassador-Designate avoided giving direct answers to
      any of
      the questions, resorting to the use of euphemisms.
      Ambassador-Designate Hoagland's June 28th appearance before the Foreign
      Relations Committee was alongside nominees for the US ambassadorships to
      Ireland and Switzerland, who were subsequently approved by the Committee and
      then the full Senate on June 29th. In contrast, the Committee deferred action
      on confirming the proposed new ambassador to Armenia.
      "Seven of the eighteen members of the Foreign Relations Committeeover one
      third of this influential panelare already on record raising serious concerns
      about confirming a new ambassador to Yerevan before receiving a full, open,
      and
      official explanation of the circumstances surrounding the recall of our
      current
      ambassador, the instructions given to our prospective ambassador, andmore
      broadlythe exact nature of our government's policy on the Armenian Genocide,"
      said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. "In light of the seriousness of these
      issuesand the lack of responsiveness from the Administrationwe were gratified
      that the Committee has wisely delayed action on the new ambassador to Yerevan
      until these fundamental questions have been answered."
      In the days leading up to the confirmation hearing, Senate Foreign Relations
      Committee Ranking Democrat Joseph Biden (D-Del.) asked Secretary Condoleezza
      Rice for a thorough explanation of the circumstances of the premature
      recall of
      US Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans over his public comments
      affirming
      the Armenian Genocide. In his June 23rd letter to Secretary Rice, Sen.
      Biden, a
      potential 2008 Presidential candidate, stated that he would "not be
      prepared to
      move forward with any Senate action that would prematurely end his [Amb.
      Evans'] tenure in Yerevan" until a series of questions concerning Evans'
      dismissal and the State Department's failure to properly recognize the
      Armenian
      Genocide had been answered. Sen. Biden wrote further to Secretary Rice,
      "Recalling an accomplished American diplomat for speaking truthfully about
      genocide could feed widespread cynicism about United States' foreign policy. I
      hope that you will carefully reconsider the long-term implications of this
      decision on the United States' ability to promote freedom and respect for
      human
      life."
      Senator Kerry submitted a three-page set of detailed questions to the
      Ambassador-Designate. Among his inquiries was the following:
      "During your June 28, 2006 confirmation hearing, you stated the following
      when
      responding to a question on the State Department's policy on the Armenian
      Genocide: "I simply studied the policy, I studied the background papers on the
      policy, I know the policy and my responsibility is to support the president."
      1. Please describe, in detail, the source, purpose, content, and
      conclusions of
      all "policy" documents, "background papers," and other materials concerning
      the
      Armenian Genocide that you reviewed and provide copies of these materials to
      the Committee for its review. Turkey has consistently denied that it committed
      genocide against Armenians and in fact has jailed several journalists for
      stating otherwise, as in the case of Hrant Dink, a Turkish publisher who was
      convicted for simply writing about the Armenian Genocide. And the criminal law
      penalizing speech on the Armenian Genocide remains on the books in Turkey.
      2. What is the Administration's position on these imprisonments?
      3. Do you believe the policy of non-recognition encourages the repressive
      actions taken by Turkey?
      Senator Sarbanes, who spoke at Wednesday's confirmation hearing, followed up
      today with a set of seven additional questions:
      1. How many people died, and during what period, in the Armenian Genocide?
      2. What were the causes of these deaths?
      3. What actions were taken by US diplomats in Turkey at that time to warn and
      report on the events?
      4. What steps were taken to punish perpetrators of the Armenian genocide?
      5. How does the US define "genocide"?
      6. Does the United Nations consider the atrocities against Armenians to be a
      "genocide"?
      7. Since the Ottoman Empire is long gone, why does Turkey view discussion of
      the genocide as a reflection on its own government and people?
      Among the questions asked by Senator Chafee was a request that
      Ambassador-Designate Hoagland explain "the State Department's policy regarding
      statements by official US government representatives, such as yourself, about
      the Armenian Genocide." The Rhode Island legislator also asked if the nominee
      had "ever been counseled to not refer to the events of 1915 as the Armenian
      Genocide."
      Sen. Dodd outlined his concerns in a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza
      Rice, stating that he is "interested to learn more about the circumstances
      that
      lead to his [Evans] departure," noting that "an effort, intended to destroy in
      whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, clearly
      constitutes an act of genocide."
      Last week, House Armenian Genocide Resolution lead sponsors George Radanovich
      (R-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) joined with Congressional Armenian
      Caucus
      Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-Mich.) in urging
      Secretary Rice to reconsider replacing Amb. Evans, noting that "allowing John
      Evans to continue as Ambassador to Armenia sends a strong message on the
      necessity of Turkish recognition, and will be an important step in
      establishing
      the US position on the Armenian Genocide."
      Over the past several months, scores of Senate and House Members have
      directed
      questions to State Department officials, calling for answers surrounding the
      controversial firing of Amb. Evans, including 60 Representatives who joined
      Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) in a letter to Secretary Rice, Rep. Grace
      Napolitano (D-Calif.) who submitted questions to Assistant Secretary of State
      Dan Fried, and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) who submitted questions to
      Secretary
      Rice. Massachusetts Senators Ted Kennedy and John Kerry also asked Secretary
      Rice for clarification on the Amb. Evans dismissal. The Administration has
      either failed to provide responses or provided responses, which have been
      largely perfunctory, citing that Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the
      President, but giving no clear insight into the State Department's decision to
      dismiss the career diplomat after 35 years of distinguished service.
      The State Department, with the blessing of the White House, fired Amb. Evans
      in response to his February 2005 statements at Armenian American community
      functions, during which he properly characterized the Armenian Genocide as
      "genocide." Following his statements, Amb. Evans was forced to issue a
      statement clarifying that his references to the Armenian Genocide were his
      personal views and did not represent a change in US policy. He subsequently
      issued a correction to this statement, replacing a reference to the genocide
      with the word "tragedy." The American Foreign Service Association, which had
      decided to honor Amb. Evans with the "Christian A. Herter Award," recognizing
      creative thinking and intellectual courage within the Foreign Service,
      reportedly rescinded the award following pressure from the State Department in
      the days leading up to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's visit to
      Washington, DC to meet with President Bush.
      Armenian American response to Amb. Evans' dismissal has been widespread with
      thousands calling on their legislators to take action and demand answers. In a
      March 8th letter to Secretary Rice, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian noted that
      "if,
      in fact, punitive measures are being taken against Ambassador Evans, this
      would
      represent a tragic retreat from our nation's core values. It would also
      represent a new low in our government's shameful complicity in the Turkish
      government's campaign of denial. Not only does the State Department
      continue to
      be publicly silent as Turkey criminally prosecutes its writers and citizens
      for
      speaking about the Armenian Genocide, it appears the State Department is
      following Turkey's lead by muzzling and punishing an American diplomat for his
      speech and his acknowledgment of a genocide that is extensively documented in
      the State Department's own archives."
      In Yerevan, a candle-light vigil was held by hundreds of human rights
      activists during the June 28th Senate confirmation hearing, as part of the
      "Yellow Ribbon Campaign" protesting the firing the Amb. Evans. On April 24th,
      tens of thousands had tied yellow ribbons in solidarity with the US
      Ambassador,
      who had stood with the Armenian people in honoring the victims and
      survivors of
      the Armenian Genocide.

      (c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
      "All truth passes through three stages:
      First, it is ridiculed;
      Second, it is violently opposed; and
      Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

      Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

      Comment


      • #4
        US Armenians seek to delay new Yerevan envoy's confirmation

        Monday, July 10, 2006
        Armenian protests reinvigorated over firing of predecessor, who used g-word for Armenian killings




        ÜMİT ENGİNSOY

        WASHINGTON - Turkish Daily News


        U.S. Armenians have launched a fresh campaign to delay congressional confirmation for the United States' new ambassador to Armenia in protest of the firing of the previous envoy, who last year classified the Armenian killings of World War I as genocide.

        The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), an umbrella organization of radical Armenian groups, urged the Senate to delay the confirmation process for Richard Hoagland until the Washington administration formally clarifies the reasons for his predecessor's firing.

        An ANCA statement on Friday encouraged U.S. Armenians to ask senators “to delay the confirmation of ambassador designate Hoagland until the State Department honestly and completely addresses Senate and House concerns regarding the dismissal of John Evans and the U.S. policy regarding the Armenian genocide.”

        During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee confirmation hearing in late June, Republican Senators George Allen of Virginia and Norm Coleman of Minnesota grilled Hoagland with questions about what Armenians call “official U.S. complicity in Turkey's campaign of genocide denial,” questioning him regarding “his ability to effectively represent the United States in Armenia without properly recognizing the Armenian genocide.”

        ANCA said that so far nearly half of the Senate committee's 18 members and scores of lawmakers at the House of Representatives had submitted questions and sent letters to the State Department, “all of which have been either ignored or provided perfunctory answers, noting that ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president.”

        Presently Hoagland's case is awaiting confirmation at the committee. To assume his new post, he needs confirmation by both the committee and the full Senate. Normally, the confirmation of ambassadors is a routine process, but in Hoagland's case Armenian groups and their congressional backers have raised a controversy over Evans' firing.

        Addressing an Armenian audience in the United States in February 2005, Evans said that the World War I killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire amounted to genocide.

        Warned by his superiors at the State Department, he then issued a “clarification” in which he said his remarks reflected his own views. Still pressed by the State Department, Evans later issued a further “correction,” admitting that his statement misrepresented U.S. policy.

        But President George W. Bush fired Evans in May after the latter continued to deviate from the official U.S. policy, according to analysts.

        Evans' dismissal has led to an uproar in the Armenian-American community and among pro-Armenian lawmakers in Congress.

        “Ambassadors serve the president, and they are obliged to follow his policy. President Bush's policy as it regards the mass killings of Armenians is precise, and he mentions it in his annual statement,” Matt Bryza, U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, recently was quoted as telling an Armenian newspaper.

        “Certainly if somebody doesn't agree with the president's policy, he can take his own decisions; however, they should not be announced publicly. We all serve the president, and our job is to contribute to his policy. We should also give him advice, but when the matter concerns public statements we should support the president's policy,” the Armenian news agency Asbarez July 6 quoted Bryza as telling Haykakan Zhamanak.

        During the June 28 confirmation hearing at the Senate committee, Allen, Coleman and Senator Paul Sarbanes of Maryland, the committee's ranking Democratic member, all said the Armenian killings clearly were the first genocide of the 20th century and urged Bush's administration and Congress to recognize the violence as genocide.

        Hoagland tried to eschew insistent questions by the senators over how he would qualify the Armenian killings during his planned tenure in Yerevan.

        Recalling that in his last April 24 statement Bush referred to the Armenian killings as “a tragedy the world must not forget,” Hoagland said, “I represent the president.”

        He also said, “Instead of getting stuck in the past, and vocabulary, I would like to move forward.”

        Analysts said that in a year of critical congressional elections in November, the Armenian groups have considerable leverage over the legislative body and that Hoagland's confirmation probably would not be completed before Congress' August recess.
        "All truth passes through three stages:
        First, it is ridiculed;
        Second, it is violently opposed; and
        Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

        Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

        Comment


        • #5
          Armenian National Committee of America
          1711 N Street NW
          Washington, DC 20036
          Tel: (202) 775-1918
          Fax: (202) 775-5648
          E-mail: [email protected]
          Internet: www.anca.org

          PRESS RELEASE

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          July 24, 2006
          Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
          Tel: (202) 775-1918

          STATE DEPARTMENT MISLED SENATE ON
          TURKISH COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT AMB. EVANS

          -- Signed Statements Contradict State Department's
          Official Denial

          -- Justice Department Records Reveal Repeated Contacts
          by Turkey's Foreign Agent with the State Department
          Concerning Remarks by the Ambassador to Armenia

          WASHINGTON, DC - In yet another troubling development concerning
          the controversial nomination of Richard Hoagland to serve as U.S.
          Ambassador to Armenia, Department of Justice records have revealed
          that the State Department has misled the U.S. Senate regarding its
          communications with the Turkish government concerning the February
          2005 public affirmation of the Armenian Genocide by U.S. Ambassador
          to Armenia John Marshall Evans, reported the Armenian National
          Committee of America (ANCA).

          In a letter, dated June 28, 2005 written on behalf of Secretary of
          State Condoleezza Rice to Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), the Ranking
          Democrat of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the State
          Department denied that the Turkish government had even approached
          the Administration on this issue. However, official Foreign Agent
          Registration filings by the Turkish government's registered foreign
          agent, the Livingston Group, document that, in the days following
          Ambassador Evans' February 19, 2005 remarks, one of Turkey's agents
          communicated on at least four different occasions with State
          Department officials concerning the envoy's statement and his
          subsequent retraction.

          "With each new revelation, we see more clearly the corrosive impact
          that the Administration's complicity in Turkey's denial is having
          on our own core values as Americans," said ANCA Chairman Ken
          Hachikian. "This latest failed attempt by the State Department to
          mislead the Senate adds to the many compelling reasons to block the
          confirmation of a new Ambassador to Armenia."

          Consistent with the pattern of unresponsiveness that has come to
          characterize the Administration's actions on the Hoagland
          nomination, the only answer the State Department chose to provide
          in response to Senator Biden's four questions was a misleading one.
          His other inquiries - including an official request for an
          explanation of why Ambassador Evans was being replaced prematurely
          - remain unanswered.

          On June 23rd, as part of Ambassador Richard Hoagland's confirmation
          process to replace Amb. Evans in Yerevan, Senator Biden wrote a
          letter asking Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a series of
          questions including the following: "Has the State Department
          received any communication - written, electronic, or spoken - from
          the Turkish Government concerning Ambassador Evans?"

          Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs Jeffrey T.
          Bergner responded on behalf of Secretary Rice with the following
          assertion: "Please be assured that allegations that the U.S. is
          removing Ambassador Evans under pressure from the Government of
          Turkey are simply untrue. The Government of Turkey has not
          approached the Administration on this issue, and the United States
          and Turkey engaged in no diplomatic exchanges related to this
          matter."

          However, Justice Department filings by the Livingston Group reveal
          that a day after Amb. Evans' statements on the Armenian Genocide
          were publicized in an ANCA-San Francisco press release dated
          February 24, 2005, a Turkish agent communicated with the State
          Department concerning his statements. On February 28, 2005, one
          business day after the agent's first phone call, Ambassador Evans
          issued his first public retraction - noting that his mention of the
          Armenian Genocide was made in a private capacity. Later that same
          day, the Livingston Group reported three additional calls between
          one of Turkey's agents and State Department officials including the
          Deputy Chief of Mission-designate at the U.S. Embassy in Ankara to
          discuss Ambassador Evans' retraction. The very next day on March
          1, 2005, Ambassador Evans issued a public correction of his
          retraction - removing entirely any mention of the Armenian
          Genocide.

          In addition to the Justice Department filings, several Turkish
          press accounts reported that officials of the Government of Turkey
          communicated their concerns to the State Department regarding
          statements made by Ambassador Evans:

          1) Turkish Press

          On March 3, 2005, Turkish Press reported that, "Turkey's Ambassador
          in Washington Faruk Logoglu reacted to this. Ambassador Logoglu
          reminded his interlocutors in the State Department that the United
          States did not recognize 'Armenian genocide' noting the expression
          in Evans' apology was unacceptable. Justifying Turkey's warning,
          US State Department made Evans to issue a 'correction' for the
          apology." ("Evans Had to Correct His Statement Again After Using
          'Genocide' in His Apology," Turkish Press, March 3, 2005)

          2) Anadolu News Agency

          On March 4, 2005, the Anadolu News Agency reported that, "The
          Turkish ambassador to Washington Faruk Logoglu reacted to this
          message and the Washington administration approved Turkey's demand
          and made Evans correct the message of apology. Logoglu reminded the
          US State Department that the US does not recognize the Armenian
          genocide, but the term was used in the message of apology of the US
          Yerevan Ambassador. Logoglu noted that a term that is not accepted
          by USA could not be used in a statement of policy." ("Double
          Genocide Correction from US Yerevan Ambassador," Anadolu News
          Agency, March 04, 2005)

          3) Turkish Daily News

          On May 27, 2006, Turkish Daily News reported that, "'After his
          remarks last year that caused reaction at the State Department and
          by Turkey, Evans was given a second chance, but he continued to
          deviate from the official U.S. policy, working almost as a part of
          Armenian groups that have a specific agenda,' one U.S. analyst
          familiar with the matter said on Thursday. 'As a result he was
          recalled.'" ("US Envoy Fired Over 'Genocide' Claims," Turkish Daily
          News, May 27, 2006)

          The ANCA has circulated relevant sections of the Justice Department
          FARA filings to Congressional offices.

          #####
          General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

          Comment


          • #6
            ommentary

            Amb. Evans Speaks for the First Time

            About His Genocide Acknowledgment



            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier


            The USC Institute of Armenian Studies honored former U.S. ambassador to
            Armenia John Marshall Evans during a gala banquet celebrating its second
            anniversary on March 4, at the Beverly Hilton Hotel, in Beverly Hills. Morethan 900
            guests attended the event during which over $1 million was raised for the
            Institute.

            I was asked to introduce Amb. Evans at the banquet. Below is the text of my
            introductory remarks followed by the text of the keynote address of Amb. Evans:


            Harut Sassounian's introduction of Amb. Evans:

            We just watched together, for the first time, the recently discovered video
            of the profoundly moving remarks that Ambassador John Evans made two years ago
            in Fresno. He delivered similarly candid remarks during the rest of his
            February 2005 tour of Boston, Los Angeles and Berkeley.

            As the video showed, Ambassador Evans spoke about the Armenian Genocide in an
            "honest, forthright and sensitive" manner. He did not make a slip of the
            tongue. He did not play word games. He called a spade a spade by referring to the
            Armenian Genocide simply as=80¦GENOCIDE!



            He knew that his honesty could cost him his job. And it did.



            Before going to Fresno, on his first morning in Los Angeles, he invited me to
            have breakfast with him, during which he freely discussed the Armenian
            Genocide in the presence of three other State Department and U.S. Embassy officials.
            He said he had studied the Armenian Genocide extensively and asked for
            specific documents on this issue.



            For those not familiar with the political gamesmanship involving this serious
            matter, I must explain that no federal official has dared to use the term
            "Armenian Genocide," since Pres. Reagan's proclamation 1981. Successive U.S.
            administrations, both Republican and Democrat, have avoided the term "Armenian
            Genocide," in order to placate the Turkish government, in disgraceful complicity
            with its denialist policy.



            At our breakfast meeting, I was intrigued by Amb. Evans' intense interest in
            the Armenian Genocide. I was surprised at his forthright manner of speaking
            about this issue. I was even more surprised, when in the following days, during
            his public remarks at various venues, he openly spoke about the Armenian
            Genocide. While his Armenian audiences were stunned by his frank remarks, they were
            concerned about any possible damage his words may cause to his career.



            Ambassador Evans is a highly educated and experienced diplomat. He had
            studied Russian History at Yale and Columbia. He served in various diplomatic posts
            in Tehran, Prague, Moscow, St. Petersburg, the U.S. Mission to NATO, and as
            Deputy Director of the Soviet Desk, among others.



            Regrettably, the prophetic words you heard him say in the video, about the
            risk of losing his job for talking about the Armenian Genocide, came true.



            Immediately upon returning to Washington, D.C. from California, he
            courageously told his superiors at the State Department that he had acknowledged the
            Armenian Genocide, during his visits with the Armenian-American community.



            After receiving complaints from Turkish officials and their lobbyists, the
            State Department forced Amb. Evans to issue a retraction as well as a
            correction, stating that he was expressing his personal opinion and not government
            policy, and that he should not have used the word genocide.



            Several months later, when the American Foreign Service Association granted
            him the "Constructive Dissent" Award for his outspoken views on the Armenian
            Genocide, the State Department made him give up that prestigious honor.



            Unfortunately, after all that, this distinguished career diplomat was forced
            into "early retirement" from the US Foreign Service. This very honest and
            highly competent civil servant's career was terminated for courageously speaking
            the truth.



            Under the rules of ethics and morality, honesty should be rewarded, not
            punished! And justice demands that those who lie get fired -- not those whotell
            the truth!



            Ambassador Evans, the good and humble man that he is, cannot understand why
            he's being honored today for simply speaking the truth. He cannot understand
            why Armenians worldwide are calling him a national hero and a "modern day Henry
            Morgenthau" -- another righteous U.S. Ambassador who did everything in his
            power to save the perishing Armenians during the genocide of 1915 in Turkey.



            In closing, I must say that Ambassador Evans did not just dwell on the
            genocide issue during his two-year tenure in Armenia.



            He and his wife Donna were deeply engaged in every aspect of Armenian life.
            To the last day of his service in Yerevan, Amb. Evans was initiating projects,
            funding new programs, and helping to strengthen the rule of law and democracy
            in Armenia.



            He even learned to speak some Armenian and gave brief talks in the Armenian
            language. He loved Armenia and its people.



            John and Donna Evans went beyond the call of duty to assist the fledgling
            Republic of Armenia for which Ambassador Evans was decorated by President
            Kocharian with one of the highest medals of the Republic.



            Ambassador Evans deserves the undying gratitude of the Armenian nation for
            his distinguished service to the United States of America, the Republic of
            Armenia and his sacrifices for the Armenian Cause!



            Ambassador John Evans remarks:



            I do find it unusual that anyone, even a former government official, should
            be honored simply for telling the truth. It should not be that way. Perhaps
            this is a sad commentary on our times.



            In any case, no one should imagine that they owe me any thanks for telling
            the truth.

            When I called the Events of 1915 by their historically correct name - which
            is "genocide" - I used a word the U.S. Government does not currently employ. As
            you have just witnessed in this short film, I knew what I was doing and knew
            it might have consequences for my career. The decision was wholly mine. No one
            put me up to it. I stand by it. I have taken responsibility for it, paid a
            price for it. As a consequence, I am free to be with you this evening in support
            of the USC Institute of Armenian Studies.

            None of us in this room is so naĂŻve as to imagine that the official foreign
            policy of great states - even of the United States - is ever based solely on
            "the truth." As educated people, we also are aware that even arriving at and
            defining the truth can be difficult. But in the real world, when an official
            policy diverges wildly from what the broad public believes is self-evident,that
            policy ceases to command respect.

            Let me give you an example: You may remember the Iraqi Minister of
            Information, who, as Coalition Forces were closing in on Baghdad, asked histelevision
            viewers, "whom do you believe, your eyes or my words?" Not surprisingly, we
            all believed our own eyes.

            Of course, when it comes to events that occurred over ninety years ago, we
            must rely not on our own eyes, but on eyewitness like Ambassador Henry
            Morgenthau, Consul Leslie Davis, on historians, diplomatic archives - and on the
            survivors themselves.

            The overwhelming consensus of these sources is that the tragic events of
            1915, despite all the complicating factors of war, rebellion and Great Power
            politics, constituted genocide.

            Above the entrance to the State Department Library, there stands a quotation
            from Thomas Jefferson, some of whose books are in that library. It proclaims:
            "We are not afraid to follow Truth wherever it may lead, nor [are we afraid]
            to tolerate any error, so long as Reason is free to combat it."

            Unfortunately Reason - which tells us that there was a genocide in 1915 -is
            not everywhere free today to combat false assertions that the deaths of as many
            as one and one half million Armenians came about as the result of mere
            "relocations," "some excesses," "a few mishaps," "disease and famine." One country's
            official policy of denying the Armenian Genocide interferes with the process
            of seeking the truth; other countries' policies of going along with this
            denial do not serve the truth. Instead what we have seen is the horrific murder of
            Hrant Dink forty days ago.

            Over the last twenty years or so, American politicians and diplomats have
            been urging authorities in other parts of the world to listen to civil society
            and to take into account what civil society -- that is, the realm of opinion
            outside official circles -- thinks. A resolution of the Congress of the United
            States calling on the Administration to take into account the fact of the
            Armenian Genocide would be fully in harmony with this principle.

            The Armenian Genocide should be recognized as such by this Congress.

            Many people have asked me why, two years ago, I decided to speak out on the
            Armenian Genocide. I am not Armenian. I have no Armenian relatives, even by
            marriage, and in a diplomatic career of thirty-five years, I had never before
            encountered a U.S. Government policy that I did not like and could not support,
            certainly not in my own area of responsibility -- until, as the new U.S.
            Ambassador to Armenia, I ran up hard against the issue of the Armenian Genocide. I
            believe I owe people an explanation.

            I have, therefore, started writing a book to explain the intellectual journey
            that took me from knowing next to nothing about Armenia, Armenians, and the
            Genocide, to the point where I felt I had to break publicly with U.S.
            Government on this issue. I hope the story of my own intellectual journey may help
            others, particularly those whose names, like my own, do not end in "-ian", to
            reach a similar understanding.

            In my book I intend not only to explain my own actions, but also to look at
            some of the things that could and should be done to deal with the great wound
            and the resulting problem posed by the Genocide. This is a difficult subject on
            which honest people can disagree, and do, but I already have several ideas
            that I hope to develop. I do not plan to work in a vacuum, but rather to talk to
            people on all sides of the issue, many of whom are in this room. I dare to
            hope that some of my readers will be Turkish-Americans and even Turks.

            In the meantime, there is much work to be done. First and foremost, the
            Republic of Armenia needs our help. I am personally proud to have been involved
            in implementing the U.S. Government's official assistance programs, which now
            include the hugely important Millennium Challenge Account. Taken together, the
            official assistance programs of all the donor countries and institutions have
            made a measurable difference in Armenia. The California Trade Office is now
            open for business in Yerevan, and investment is taking place, if more slowly
            than one would like. I know that many of you personally and through your work
            have also made generous contributions and investment in Armenia. Thank you for
            all you have done and, no doubt, will continue to do for Armenia. Armenia is
            facing elections over the next twelve months. The United States is attempting to
            help Armenia to stage the best possible free and fair elections, in the
            belief that strengthening democracy will strengthen
            Armenia itself.

            Obviously not all Armenians live in the Republic, and it is also important
            that the needs of Diasporans, especially young people, be met. For that reason,
            I want especially to salute the USC Institute of Armenian Studies, which,
            despite its relative youth, is doing a great job of ensuring that Armenian
            history, arts, science and letters receive the serious academic attention they
            deserve. The Institute should become even more capable, after this evening's
            fund-raising event, of providing a vibrant center for the growing communityof
            scholars it serves.

            In any family there will always be divisions and differences of opinion, even
            bitter quarrels. As an "odar" and friend of your particular family, I thinkI
            can safely say that the Armenian-American community is at its best when it
            joins forces for a common cause, as happened most notably in 1988 at the time of
            the earthquake. To the extent that unnecessary divisions can be overcome,
            without sacrificing democracy, the community will become stronger and more
            capable of achieving its goals. Unity does not always need to occur as a result of
            tragedy and disaster. Supporting the USC Institute of Armenian Studies ought to
            be one of those unifying issues that merits your unified and continuing
            support.

            Although we have spent some time tonight thinking about the past, I
            personally am looking forward to what we can achieve in the future, workingclosely
            together as we have done in the past. Pari yerego yev shnorhagalutiun!
            General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

            Comment


            • #7
              An interview with former U.S. ambassador to Armenia John Evans, who lost his job after referring to the Armenian genocide as genocide.


              LA Times

              Opinion Daily

              The diplomat who cracked

              An interview with former U.S. ambassador to Armenia John Evans, who lost his job after referring to the Armenian genocide as “genocide.”

              By Matt Welch

              April 24, 2007


              John Marshall Evans, a career U.S. diplomat with extensive experience in Central and Eastern Europe, was sworn in as ambassador to Armenia in August 2004. In February 2005, Evans made a trip to California, the capital state of the Armenian diaspora. At three different meetings with Armenian-American groups, when asked about Washington's lack of official recognition of the 1915-23 Armenian genocide as a "genocide," Evans said some variation of the following: "I will today call it the Armenian Genocide."

              Since this deviated from State Department guidelines, Evans was eventually asked to resign. Now the mild-mannered foreign service veteran is preparing a book about his "intellectual journey" that led him "rock the boat" of U.S. policy.

              I caught up with Evans this March, a few days after he gave the keynote speech explaining his dissent to the second annual banquet for USC's Institute of Armenian Studies. The following is an edited transcript of our conversation.

              To start with, when did it become unusual, your preparation for this job? When you said that basically you wanted to read up on this controversial historical thing before assuming the ambassadorship, one does that before one goes to a foreign posting, anyway; at what point did that process become different than your usual diplomatic posting, in terms of fact-gathering, and conclusions that you might come up with? [...]

              [M]y nomination for Yerevan was announced in the first half of May 2004. I was confirmed in late June, I can give you the exact dates. And then I had a window of a couple weeks in which I went into a kind of monastic retreat and read everything I possibly could about Armenia.

              Now, I had the advantage that [...] [in] 1989, that year I had received a Cox Fellowship, and was spending a year reading Ottoman history at the Wilson Center in Washington, at the Kennan Institute. And so I read a lot of history. So I wasn't coming to the issue of Armenian history with a totally blank slate; I'd read mostly mainstream books -- Lord Kinross and various others who have written about Ottoman history. [...]

              I read as much as I could before I went out to Yerevan. I read [former U.S. ambassador Henry] Morgenthau's story, which had a profound impact on me, and [...] I proceeded [to Yerevan], but not before having a discussion with my immediate boss about the issue of the genocide, and how it was treated in State Department materials. I felt that it was not being adequately addressed, but at that point I had no sense that we couldn't do a better job basically in the same lines that we were already using. I had not abandoned the policy, but I felt we could do a much better job with that policy, and in particular using the things that had been said by President Bush and President Clinton.

              So I went out there and I became increasingly frustrated when I returned to that subject, at the fact that it was considered taboo. And it was; I couldn't really get it onto the agenda for at least a discussion. [...]

              Let me also just say that I never departed from the U.S. policy line in Armenia. The question, if you look at public opinion polls in Armenia, what you see is that although the question of recognition of the genocide is on the minds of people, it's sort of the ninth or tenth issue behind social stability, having a job, worrying about their retirement, you know, worrying about Nagorno-Karabakh. And then you get down to the single digits, the people who put the recognition of the genocide at the top of their lists. Single digits.

              So in a way it's much bigger for the diaspora?

              That's right. That's correct. And I did not ever -- I rarely got a question about it when serving as U.S. ambassador to Armenia, and I never used the word 'genocide' in answering any question there. Almost never; I can't remember a time when a local journalist asked me about it.

              By the time of my trip out here in February in 2005 I'd been in place for about six months, and I'd done more reading. I was more upset than ever about both the issue and the policy, and about the prospect that this is just going to be a situation that was going to continue ad infinitum. I mean, Turkish interests, and U.S. interests in Turkey; a country with 72 million, a member of NATO of long standing, with valuable strategic property in the Middle East, secular, Muslim, in a time when we're contending with forces in the Muslim world that have produced this fundamentalist ideology and terrorism. Turkey is a hugely important ally, and little landlocked Armenia, population 3 million at best, is never going weigh in those scales in such a way as to even make a showing.

              And yet, the facts of the matter, the facts of the historical matter, and the legal definition of genocide as basically codified in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, which we ratified, does count for something in my view. I felt that something had to be done to rock the boat, and to open up some space around this taboo subject, which in the State Department was routinely referred to as "the G-word." Which to me is sort of reminiscent of potty training. [...]

              I never in 35 years had encountered a U.S. policy that I could not at least live with. Certainly not one in my own area of responsibility.

              I wonder how much of that is the fact that you had the good fortune, mind you, to spend most of your life basically working in what in retrospect can seem like the most virtuous of American endeavors, which is --

              Winning the Cold War

              Winning the Cold War in Central Europe in particular. You know, it's a lot different having done that than if you had to deal with Saudi Arabia, ever, you know, or other parts of the world where we have a much more realpolitik type of appraoch.

              Well you bring to mind another point that I made Sunday night, and that is since 1989, American diplomats have spent a lot of their time encouraging the growth of civil society. [...] Civil society does matter, and when civil society, taken together -- that is, historians, journalists, public people who've thought about issues -- when the vast majority of them perceive that there was a genocide of Armenians in 1915, and we are withholding that in our declared policy, it sets up a very difficult situation: You can't call it cognitive dissonance, exactly, but as I expressed it the other night, when a policy is perceived as not conforming to the broadly accepted truth, the policy becomes less supportable, and may not be supportable.

              I came to the point where I felt this strongly, that it couldn't be -- it was not -- sustainable. That this flew in the face of the facts as we know them from people I hugely respect, starting with Henry Morgenthau, and our past diplomatic colleagues. [...] The truth as we know it from very good sources had diverged to an unsustainable degree. [...]

              But was it reasonable for you to imagine that your rocking the boat wouldn't get you fired? [...]

              Clearly when I was here in February 2005, I knew that by mentioning this word, I could get myself in trouble. I didn't know precisely what the degree of that trouble would be, but I knew that it could range from a slap on the wrist to being immediately canned. And as it turned out it was something between those extremes: I got more than a mere slap on the wrist, I wasn't immediately canned. I basically was eased out after about 18 months, although I had more time on my clock. [...] I was basically asked to go ahead and retire. [...]

              How would you characterize the reaction of your superiors or even just your colleagues when you said "Hey, this is a policy that I'm beginning to believe is untenable, we need to shift it this way"? And when I ask you how would you characterize it, is it your impression that they, too believed that this is a historically settled issue, it's just one that is inconvenient to talk about?

              Nobody ever used those terms, and I never had that kind of a conversation. [...]

              The problem for me was not that we were having an argument about it, the problem for me was we couldn't talk about it. I couldn't even get it on the agenda. And I couldn't take the policy positions that had been devised for dealing with this, I couldn't get them properly deployed, because nobody wanted to even touch it. I kept running into this sort of impossible Maginot Line, or just obstacle to even getting the issue onto the table, and that's where I decided to do an end run.

              So it was less that people were saying, you know, "Stop knocking on this door"; it was more of just like, "Oh, I gotta go fill up my water glass now"?

              Well, it was sort of "Now's not the time." But there never -- given the realities -- there never would be a good time to face this issue, if one does the traditional calculations of well, Turkey is 72 million, Armenia is 3 million, it was 92 years and counting, and so on and so forth. This is a formula for it to go on for 500 years.
              General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

              Comment


              • #8
                Richard Hoagland not to be appointed as US Ambassador to Armenia?
                17.07.2007 14:22 GMT+04:00

                /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Richard Hoagland, US Ambassador Designate to Armenia, is about to be reassigned to another country, according to several confidential but highly reliable sources. This decision was made after his candidacy was twice blocked the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Both times Sen. Robert Menendez from New Jersey placed hold on Hoagland’s nomination, The California Courier reports.

                “The US administration must have realized that Richard Hoagland’s nomination as Ambassador to Armenia is despairing. After languishing for a whole year at an empty desk in the State Department, Ambassador Hoagland deserves to have an assignment at a diplomatic post in a country other than Armenia. His superiors’ mismanagement of this issue should no longer keep his career in limbo. Only time will tell if the Bush administration has properly understood from this episode the deeply-felt sentiments of the Armenian-American community. In view of the embarrassment suffered by the State Department on this occasion, it is hoped that, henceforth, the administration would think long and hard before showing any more disrespect towards the Armenian-American community on the core issue of the Armenian Genocide of 1915,” The California Courier writes.

                On September 7, 2006 thanks to Senator Robert Menendez’s efforts Hoagland’s candidacy was blocked in the Senate. On December 1 the New Jersey legislator joined with Majority Leader Harry Reid in calling on the Administration to offer a new candidacy for this post. The negative attitude towards Richard Hoagland’s nomination is connected with his outright denial of the Armenian Genocide in response to questions posed during and after his June 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Former US Ambassador to Yerevan John Evans was forced into early retirement last year, after he used the words “Armenian Genocide” to describe the mass murder of Armenians in Turkey.

                Comment


                • #9
                  MRS. EVANS REVEALS INTRIGUING DETAILS OF HER HUSBAND'S RECALL
                  By Harut Sassounian, Publisher, The California Courier

                  AZG Armenian Daily
                  29/11/2007

                  More than two years after her husband became the first U.S. diplomat
                  to publicly acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, Donna Evans revealed
                  some of the behind-the-scene details of Ambassador John Evans' tenure
                  in Armenia and his dramatic forced retirement from the U.S. Foreign
                  Service. She spoke at the Armenian Assembly's Annual Capital Region
                  Holiday Reception held at the Armenian Embassy in Washington, D.C.,
                  on November 18.

                  Mrs. Evans began her talk by describing the phone call she received
                  from her husband, telling her, "Assistant Secretary of State Beth
                  Jones had just informed him that he was the State Department's choice
                  to be assigned as Ambassador to Armenia in the summer of 2004. She
                  told him that it was a small country but growing in importance and
                  had a significant assistance program and a new Embassy was being
                  built. She encouraged him to accept it and he did, without hesitation."

                  After Senate confirmation, Amb. Evans and his wife moved to Armenia
                  in fall 2004. Mrs. Evans described the constant "tension" because the
                  "unwritten policy of the State Department was that the word 'genocide'
                  had to be in quotation marks and, if spoken, it would be referred to
                  as the 'g' word." She said Foreign Service officers "knew, for certain,
                  that the word 'genocide' was a strict taboo."

                  She went on to state, "The Armenian genocide was a very sensitive
                  subject and therefore avoided in diplomatic circles in Yerevan. The
                  wives of other ambassadors did not talk about it even in private. The
                  first time we drove by the Genocide Memorial my husband whispered to me
                  'there's the Genocide Memorial.' I looked over and caught a fleeting
                  glance of the spire. As I turned back, our driver's eyes caught mine
                  in the rear view mirror. I was so uncomfortable. My husband told me
                  that we were allowed to go there once a year, on April 24th."

                  Amb. Evans' problems began during his speaking tour of the Armenian
                  communities in the United States in early 2005. Upon the couple's
                  arrival in California, Mrs. Evans said her husband informed her that
                  "he was going to use the word 'genocide' and that it might cost him
                  his job." She said she was "stunned at first but then very proud of
                  him. I hoped that telling the truth would result in no more than a
                  reprimand and that he would be marginalized for a while. I thought
                  that losing his job was the very worst-case scenario."

                  Once her husband used the term "genocide" in public, Donna Evans was
                  amazed that the Armenian American media did not rush to publicize it
                  immediately - "It was as if they were protecting the Ambassador."

                  Eventually, after a press release from ANC revealed that Amb. Evans
                  had actually used the words "Armenian Genocide" during his talk
                  at Berkeley, she said her "husband went on to Washington to brief
                  the State Department on what had transpired. The reaction was not
                  pretty to say the least" which made her "sick at heart." Meanwhile,
                  the Ambassador did not know "whether his recall orders would be on
                  his desk when he returned to Yerevan. I did not know whether I would
                  be returning to Yerevan myself."

                  Mrs. Evans had harsh words for the State Department for buckling under
                  Turkish pressure. "It was unthinkable that the Turkish ambassador and
                  the Government of Turkey had enough clout to get a knee-jerk reaction
                  from the State Department and cause the recall of an ambassador,"
                  she said.

                  Leaving his ambassadorial post voluntarily was out of question,
                  Mrs. Evans said. "Not resigning was the right thing to do. My husband
                  had not committed a crime, he only acknowledged a crime," she said.

                  Upon returning to Yerevan, Mrs. Evans said her husband went on
                  carrying out his diplomatic duties and "acted as if it was business
                  as usual.... However, each morning he arrived at the office wondering
                  if the morning e-mail and telegram traffic would include his official
                  recall. Then, on July 2, 2005, the dreaded telephone call came." Dan
                  Fried, the Assistant Secretary of State, called to inform that her
                  husband's position was "about to be posted as open for the summer of
                  2006 and that we could be removed at any time," she said.

                  Mrs. Evans said she was "furious" particularly since this call had come
                  "just before July the 4th, Independence Day and axed a professional
                  diplomat with 35 years of faithful service to his government --
                  and a 12th generation American -- just because he said 'genocide'
                  in an academic setting in the United States."

                  Mrs. Evans further revealed that she wrote a personal letter to First
                  Lady Laura Bush because she said she believed "in spouse power." She
                  never received a reply.

                  When the word got out -- this writer was the first to report that
                  Amb. Evans was about to be recalled for his statement on the Armenian
                  Genocide -- Mrs. Evans reported that "the pressure was on...[there was]
                  wild speculation in the Armenian papers, some calling my husband a
                  hero and others not so flattering and some downright ridiculous. Again
                  the press had a field day.

                  My husband's answer had to be 'I serve at the pleasure of the
                  President.' I died a little every time I heard him say it."

                  Notably, Mrs. Evans revealed that during those tumultuous days, "the
                  diplomatic community" supported her husband "privately." She then
                  described April 24, 2006 as "an unforgettable day" in her life when
                  thousands of Armenians from all walks of life tied yellow ribbons to
                  a fence at the Genocide Memorial Monument in Yerevan, in support of
                  her husband. "How this was pulled together and who supported it is a
                  remarkable story. I wish I could give them all a hug individually. This
                  event inspired us to stay strong during a very trying time," she said.

                  As they say, the rest is history. The White House cut Amb. Evans'
                  service short and announced the nomination of his successor, Richard
                  Hoagland, who never made it to Armenia.

                  Showing her continued support for the reaffirmation of the Armenian
                  Genocide, Mrs. Evans said that when the House Foreign Affairs Committee
                  adopted the Armenian Genocide resolution, it was one of the happiest
                  days of her life.

                  However, she was "stunned and outraged" when her husband showed
                  her the letter that was signed by eight former Secretaries of State
                  opposing the congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide. "How
                  could Secretaries of State so blindly sign such a document?

                  What I would say to the former Secretaries of State is 'shame on
                  you' for being used by the Turkish lobby. By your actions, you have
                  set back any progress that has been made to normalize diplomatic
                  relations between Armenia and Turkey. It would have been better to
                  remain silent. A special shame on Secretary [of State Alexander]
                  Haig because he served under President Reagan, who acknowledged the
                  genocide," she said.

                  Donna Evans described her dismay at some of the negative reactions to
                  the genocide resolution. "What followed was the worst turn of events
                  that I had witnessed in all my time in Washington. The supporters of
                  the recognition of the genocide were in shock and awe at the cruel
                  commentaries, articles, and Internet buzz. What we were witnessing
                  was a hyper-overkill of a human rights issue."

                  She concluded her remarks with heart-warming words: "The Armenian
                  experience has woven itself into my soul like the intricate carvings
                  in the Khachkars. It is beautiful, it is sad and it is hopeful. So
                  what do we do now? We don't give up. We bide our time and return
                  to the fight, more experienced, better informed and therefore better
                  armed. Most important of all we continue to educate. Grassroots support
                  is vital. You are vital. This issue needs to be resolved. You and your
                  ancestors deserve an apology and recognition of the first genocide
                  of the 20th century...the Armenian Genocide."
                  General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X