Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Excellent Dutch Article on the "debate"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Excellent Dutch Article on the "debate"




    Armenian genocide debate

    by Johan Huizinga

    24-04-2007



    "Let's unearth the truth about what happened in 1915 together". That was the headline of a page-wide advertisement from the Turkish government in some international newspapers. Ankara hopes to win public support over the issue of the Armenian genocide in 1915.
    The proposal to let Armenian and Turkish historians investigate the matter together, however, is not new and neither is the support from Washington for this idea. But the timing of the adverstisment, just before the annual commemoration of the Armenian Genocide, was very clever.

    In the advertisement, Ankara invites Armenia to establish a joint commission of historians to investigate the 1915 killings of thousands of Armenians in the Turkish Ottoman Empire. Estimates range from 800,000 to 1.2 million Armenians who have died between 1915 and 1917 in the mass killings and deportation of Armenians. However, for mainly nationalistic reasons, Ankara still refuses to acknowledge that what happened was genocide, the planned extermination of an ethnic group.

    Thorny issue
    The genocide denial remains a thorny issue in Turkish relations not only with Armenia, but with the US, the EU and several European countries as well. That explains the advertisement, which also quotes US President George W Bush and his Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice who are backing the proposal. But according to Professor Eric Jan Zurcher, Turkey expert at Leiden University, neither the proposal, nor the American support is new.

    The proposal is a few years old and has been categorically rejected by the Armenian government. The Armenians claim no extra research is needed to establish the historical facts. The Americans support the Turkish proposal since they are bound by the need to maintain good relations with Turkey and the demands from Armenian pressure groups. So in the end, the advertisement very much looks like a publicity stunt to win time for Turkey.


    Fruitless debates
    And the chances of any joint commission of historians reaching the same conclusions are still very small, fears Mr Zurcher. Historians appointed by the Armenian and Turkish governments will first of all be selected for their loyalty to the national points of view on this issue. So the attempt to find a common conclusion will most likely end up in some fruitless debates.

    Then there remains another possible pitfall, warns Professor Zurcher. In the initial stages, Ankara hinted that such a joint commission of historians would get exclusive rights on the issue.

    That could bar independent historians from using Turkish archives, for instance and it would possibly silence the debate on the Armenian Genocide for the time being which might be exactly what the Turks are after.

    This leaves the Armenians, demonstrating at the Turkish embassy in The Hague, with their clear demands: a penalty on denial of the Armenian Genocide and no Turkish EU-membership without acknowledging the genocide by Ankara. Whether the Armenians will have it their way remains very doubtful however. Although more than 90 years have passed since the atrocities took place, the discussion is a long way from reaching a conclusion
    General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

  • #2
    If you open the url, you can listen to what Zurcher has to say about the "debate".
    General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Joseph View Post
      Estimates range from 800,000 to 1.2 million Armenians who have died between 1915 and 1917 in the mass killings and deportation of Armenians.
      Ummm, where did this idiot get the "range" of dead from? And who said the genocide only took place between 1915 and 1917?

      Someone needs to do a little homework before writing their article...

      Comment


      • #4
        Indeed an excellent article. He made some very strong points.

        Another thing that really bothers me is how they are going to choose the 'winner' of the debate. Who will judge these historians and the points they make? Americans? Europeans? who?

        And if Turkey looses the debate, what's gonna happen next? Are they going to accept the fact of the Armenian Genocide or are they going to continue the denial by refusing to accept the debate's results? I am more than sure that if they loose the debate and, it is the most likely outcome given that the debate will be fair, I am more than sure they will start attacking people (or whoever it might be) who made the decision regarding the debate's winner. The whole situation around this debate seems to be absurd.
        I agree, that Turkey is just trying to win more time and Americans are doing their best to support their ally.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Hovik View Post
          Ummm, where did this idiot get the "range" of dead from? And who said the genocide only took place between 1915 and 1917?

          Someone needs to do a little homework before writing their article...
          I absolutely agree with you. I really don't understand why people only talk about the period starting from 1915. It is a fact that mass killings of Armenians started from the second half of the 19th century and, according to the literature i read, I can only conclude that the death poll should be around 2 million people, if not more.

          Though, as I said, I agree with some of his points regarding the debate issue.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hovik View Post
            Ummm, where did this idiot get the "range" of dead from? And who said the genocide only took place between 1915 and 1917?

            Someone needs to do a little homework before writing their article...
            The details are incorrect but his basic synopsis, that the debate is futile and the Genocide occured is spot on.

            I have read Erik Zurcher and he's one of the few Turcophiles to admit the Genocide and it has effected his career and accesibility to the Ottoman archives ever since he did so.
            General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by asalafedayiwar View Post
              I agree, that Turkey is just trying to win more time and Americans are doing their best to support their ally.
              The American and Turkish alliance is nearly dead.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Turkish Pride View Post
                The American and Turkish alliance is nearly dead.
                I agree that the alliance is nearly dead, but at the same time I doubt that it will die. America needs Turkey and Turkey needs America. When Congressman Adam Schiff was questioning Condoleezza Rice regarding the State Department's efforts to defeat legislation
                recognizing the Armenian Genocide , it was obvious that the US doesn't want to spoil their relations with Turkey, despite the disagreements they may have. Still, you never know.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Turkish Pride View Post
                  The American and Turkish alliance is nearly dead.

                  Good riddance!
                  General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hovik View Post
                    Ummm, where did this idiot get the "range" of dead from? And who said the genocide only took place between 1915 and 1917?

                    Someone needs to do a little homework before writing their article...
                    He is a journalist - so what do you expect. Journalists don't do "homework", they can't handle anything beyond sound-bite simplifications, and they think they are clever by automatically assuming no-one ever says the whole truth. A journalist will write "some mathematicians have alleged that two plus two is equal to between three and five".
                    Plenipotentiary meow!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X