Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenian genocide dispute erupts at LAT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Community Expects Swift Action, Times' Executives Told at Meeting

    BY HARUT SASSOUNIAN

    A select group of Armenian-Americans held an hour-long meeting with Publisher David Hiller and Editor Jim O'Shea, at the headquarters of the Los Angeles Times last Thursday.


    ANCA Western Region Board member Zanku Armenian, USC Political Science Professor and Director of Institute of Armenian Studies Hrair Dekmejian, Armenia Fund of Western U.S. Chairwoman Maria Mehranian, California Courier Publisher Harut Sassounian, and former Glendale Mayor Larry Zarian told the top two executives of The Times that they must act swiftly to resolve the hostile environment created within the newsroom by Managing Editor Douglas Frantz.

    Last month, Frantz blocked an article on the Armenian Genocide written by Armenian American reporter Mark Arax. Frantz accused Arax of a personal bias because of signing a "petition" in 2005 with five other reporters, and not having followed "normal" internal channels in submitting his article for publication.

    During last week's meeting, The Times executives admitted that both charges against Arax were unfounded. They attributed the controversy to a miscommunication. An internal investigation established that Arax and his five colleagues had not signed a "petition," but a letter with the intent of bringing to the attention of the editors the newspaper's repeated violations of its own policy of referring to the Armenian Genocide as genocide. The Armenian community group that met with the newspaper's executives reminded them that The Times own Code of Ethics requires that "a staff member who receives a complaint about the accuracy of a story should inform an editor." The Code further state: "Readers and staff members who bring mistakes to our attention deserve our gratitude."

    Even though Arax was fully exonerated, the editors went ahead and assigned his completed article to another reporter who ended up writing a much weaker piece, using mostly Turkish sources. An attempt by the editors to pressure Arax into allowing his name to appear jointly on the byline of the rewritten article was rejected by Arax because it had little resemblance to the article that he had originally prepared.

    The Armenian group told Hiller and O'Shea that since both of Frantz's accusations against Arax were proven baseless, the only conclusion that one can draw from this episode is that Frantz was looking for a pretext to block Arax's article on the Armenian Genocide.

    Hiller and O'Shea responded by saying that they had not found any bias on the part of Frantz on this issue. They acknowledged, however, that their investigation had failed to uncover some basic facts about Frantz's past articles. For instance, when he was the Istanbul Bureau Chief for the New York Times, he had written an article that described the Armenian Genocide simply as "the killings of tens of thousands of Armenians." The N.Y. Times had to publish a correction on January 18, 2001 to rectify this erroneous reference. In an article published one month later, on February 15, 2001, Frantz referred to the Armenian Genocide as "Armenians say 1.5 million people were killed by Turkey in 1915…." Hiller and O'Shea said they were not aware of these facts and promised to look into Frantz's earlier misrepresentations on the Armenian Genocide.

    While the Armenian group said it appreciated Hiller's personal attempts in recent months to reach out to the local Armenian community, it expressed its clear concern over the newspaper's inaction in the Frantz controversy. The group emphasized that the community expects The Times to do the right thing by taking swift and decisive action in this matter.

    The Armenian group objected strongly to Frantz's plans to moderate a panel at a conference in Istanbul on May 13, presenting Turkey's "democratic experience" as a role model for other countries! One of the panel members is Andrew Mango, a notorious denialist of the Armenian Genocide. To make matters worse, The Times is paying Frantz's travel expenses to Istanbul which makes the newspaper an accomplice to his chairing a panel with a revisionist participant!

    Last week, the ANCA issued a strongly-worded Action Alert demanding the resignation of Douglas Frantz. As a result, more than 4,000 e-mails were sent to Hiller, O'Shea and Managing Editor Leo Wolinsky. During the meeting, the Publisher and the Editor said they were not happy that they were receiving thousands of e-mail messages, mostly through the ANCA Action Alert. They also expressed their displeasure at the two columns written by this writer.

    The Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of North America sent an urgent e-mail to its entire membership, which included a copy of this writer's column as well as a link to the above Action Alert. Appo Jabarian, the Executive Publisher of USA Armenian Life Magazine forwarded his own as well as this writer's column along with the link to the ANCA Action Alert to thousands of e-mail addresses, asking everyone to send e-mail messages to Publisher Hiller and Editor O'Shea.

    The Jewish Journal, the Fresno Bee and the L.A. Weekly published lengthy articles on the L.A. Times controversy. Articles and editorials on this subject were published by several Armenian newspapers in this country and overseas. The press in Turkey and Azerbaijan also covered this issue. Furthermore, dozens of non-Armenian websites reported this controversy or posted this writer's columns on this topic.

    Please continue sending e-mails to Publisher David Hiller: [email protected]; and Editor Jim O'Shea: [email protected].

    Hopefully, the executives at the Los Angeles Times will realize the seriousness of the problem created by Managing Editor Douglas Frantz and act to eliminate as soon as possible the hostility that he created in the newsroom. It would be a shame if The Times would end up paying a heavy price for the indiscretion of one of its executives, as a result of widespread community outrage and possible legal action.



    ASBAREZ, 5/12/2007
    General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

    Comment


    • #12
      Denialists Frantz and Mango

      Denialists Frantz and Mango Participate in a Deceptive
      Conference on "Turkish Democracy"
      1) Divesting Denialist Turkey and Genocidal Sudan; 2) Denialists Frantz and Mango Participate in a Deceptive Conference on "Turkish De...




      The widely criticized denialist Managing Editor of the
      Los Angeles Times, Douglas Frantz just delivered
      another deceptive act: On may 12-15, he moderated a
      panel at a deceptive conference held in Istanbul. Of
      all the names, that conference was called, "Turkey:
      Sharing the Democratic Experience."

      Are certain readers not fully familiar with Frantz?
      Harut Sassounian, the Publisher of The California
      Courier wrote an update in his recent column: "Based
      on copies of the e-mails received by this writer, the
      Los Angeles Times is continuing to receive a steady
      stream of complaints from Armenians worldwide. They
      are calling for the dismissal of Managing Editor
      Douglas Frantz because of his discrimination against
      Armenian-American reporter Mark Arax whose article on
      the Armenian Genocide was blocked by Frantz.
      Meanwhile, several Turkish websites and lobbying
      groups have started an e-mail campaign in defense of
      Frantz. By sending such e-mails, the Turks are
      inadvertently helping to keep the Frantz fiasco alive.
      It is clearly counter-productive for Turks to be
      rushing to the aid of Frantz. The Turkish support of
      Frantz only serves to confirm the accusations that he
      is a Turkophile and not an independent journalist."

      How can one label Turkey's decades-long undemocratic
      behavior as a "model democracy" that "deserves to be
      emulated?"

      Early this year, in broad daylight, innocent and
      defenseless citizens like Armenian journalist Hrant
      Dink and three non-Armenian Christians have been
      murdered by the same "democratic" Turkish society.

      This is only the tip of the iceberg. Barely forty days
      after Dink's murder, was a pipe bomb thrown on an
      Armenian church in Constantinople in a show of
      commonplace criminality of certain circles within
      Turkey's government and civil sectors.

      Just a few days ago, Turkish nationalists sent a
      message to "Levon Vardukhian" Armenian school in
      Constantinople, shamelessly threatening the
      defenseless Armenians of Turkey: "The Last Warning and
      Ultimatum . .exclamations 'We are all Armenians, we
      are all Hrant Dink' are examples of extreme chauvinism
      and summons for revolution. Do not forget that except
      Armenian citizens of Turkey, there are also Armenians
      from Armenia on our land, and they count over 100
      thousand. Both their addresses and their workplaces
      are well known. Henceforth we hope to see our Armenian
      citizens as advocates of truth [sic], concerning the
      Armenian Genocide or any other matter, and as
      defenders of the Turkish statehood. We shall keep an
      eye on how the Armenians are playing this role.
      Otherwise the Armenians shall be those to lie in the
      grave and count how many Armenians and how many Turks
      there were in the `ages long past'. This land has
      never pardoned treachery and shall not. Who does not
      stand for our paradise-homeland is against us and
      shall be vanquished."

      One shouldn't discount the possibility that the
      so-called "pro-West" secularists did commit the
      heinous Malatya Massacre of three non-Armenian
      Christians in order to make the ruling Islamists of
      Turkey look bad in the eyes of the International
      Community.

      Currently, the Turkish "nationalists" are still in
      control of the government bureaucracy in Turkey. One
      shouldn't be surprised that in order to perpetuate
      their strangle-hold on Turkey's power infrastructure,
      they are willing to undermine Turkey's fledgling
      democracy by staging many more criminal acts or by
      issuing threats against the minorities - Christian
      Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians or Muslim Kurds, Alevi
      Arabs and non-Turks. They might even carry out a coup
      d'état.

      In a May 6 article in Washington Post, Claire
      Berlinski wrote: "In recent weeks, demonstrators have
      taken to the streets in massive numbers in support of
      Kemalist secularism. Westerners watching the footage
      may be tempted to sigh with approval, imagining this
      as an outpouring of sympathy with liberal
      Enlightenment values. They would be mistaken. The
      (Justice and Development Party) AKP's opponents say
      they don't want Turkey turned into another Iran. But
      it is not clear that the AKP has any intention of
      doing that. What is clear is that it poses a threat to
      the power, bureaucratic privileges and economic
      interests of the secular ruling class, of which a
      dismaying number are authoritarian
      ultra-nationalists."

      Berlinski added: "A casual observer might also expect
      that because the Turkish protesters are enemies of
      Islamic extremism, they are friends of the United
      States. Not so. The secularists here are if anything
      more hostile to the West than the AKP. (They are often
      just as anti-Semitic, too.) Many secularist
      legislators voted in 2003 to deny U.S. forces the
      right to pass through Turkey on their way to invade
      Iraq. At the recent rallies in Ankara and Istanbul,
      protesters held up signs denouncing 'ABD-ullah Gul.'
      This is an anti-American pun: The letters 'ABD' stand
      for 'USA' in Turkish. U.S. camera crews were abused
      with chants of 'Go home, CIA spies.' One particularly
      lunatic nationalist, Ergun Poyraz, has just published
      a book claiming that Erdogan is really an undercover
      Jew who is collaborating with the Mossad to destroy
      Turkish secularism."

      It is against this anti-democratic backdrop that
      Frantz moderated the Istanbul conference on the
      so-called "Turkish Democracy."

      Individuals like Frantz and Mango should stop
      insulting the intelligence of the community through
      their misguided efforts to mischaracterize Turkey as a
      "model democracy."

      What a sham!
      "All truth passes through three stages:
      First, it is ridiculed;
      Second, it is violently opposed; and
      Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

      Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

      Comment


      • #13


        The LA Times and Other Censors
        By David B. Boyajian

        Frantz and Turkey
        Frantz, reportedly a genocide denier, defended his actions. Arax was
        biased, claimed Frantz, because he and other Times journalists had
        sent management a letter in 2005. The letter pointed out that the
        paper's reports from Turkey violated the Time's formal policy of using
        the word `genocide,' rather than milder terms, when referring to the
        1915 exterminations.

        Times editors had actually agreed with the letter and had run
        corrections. Significantly, Frantz was the paper's Istanbul bureau
        chief in 2005 and thus ultimately responsible for mischaracterizations
        of the genocide. Previously, he headed the NY Times office in Turkey.

        That Frantz is a Turkophile is perhaps not surprising. Fellow
        correspondents Hugh Pope of the Wall Street Journal and Stephen Kinzer
        of the NY Times, both of whom have done stints in Istanbul, are also
        outspokenly pro-Turkish.

        In a memo to Times colleagues that found its way onto the Internet,
        Arax has said he believes his article was axed because Frantz is
        biased in favor of Turkey and against Armenians. California Courier
        publisher Harut Sassounian, who broke the scandal, agrees.

        Might Frantz also be holding a grudge against Arax because of the 2005
        letter? And what role has the reportedly close relationship between
        Frantz and the local Turkish Consul General played?

        It is apparent that, particularly in detailing how the Lobby has
        worked arm in arm with Turkey to kill Armenian resolutions, Arax's
        investigative reporting was simply too good and too on-target. That
        and pro-Turkish bias help explain why the newspaper killed the Arax
        piece.

        The Times will argue that it had no qualms about investigating the
        Lobby's denialist machinations. Were that so, however, the paper
        would itself have been reporting on the Lobby's genocide hypocrisy,
        one of the most outrageous double standards in American politics
        today.

        Let's be clear: we are critiquing only mainstream media and the
        denialists within the Jewish lobby. Indeed, Armenians value, and
        perhaps insufficiently, the many principled Jews and
        Israelis'scholars, public officials, writers, clergy, lawyers, and
        organizations'who support affirmation of the Armenian genocide.
        Moreover, we recognize that the U.S. State Department and various
        other parties also support genocide denial.

        Foxman Fibs
        The Times apparently didn't dare discard all of Arax's research.
        Simon's article quotes Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation
        League (ADL), as acknowledging that his group opposes Armenian
        genocide resolutions.

        However, in answering a question of mine at a taped presentation at
        Clark University's Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies three
        years ago, Foxman'with scholars Deborah Dwork and Simon Payaslian
        sitting right behind him'sang a different tune. The ADL, he crooned,
        `did not oppose' Armenian genocide resolutions.

        Was Foxman telling the truth? That seems unlikely. A prominent
        Jewish-American leader in Washington, D.C., had, just days before,
        confided in me that the ADL had indeed worked against Armenian
        resolutions.

        The spineless mainstream media seem to think Foxman is some kind of
        demigod. He reportedly pressured Fox TV into removing from its web
        site an investigative report on another largely taboo story: Israeli
        intelligence agents in the US, posing as `art students,' may have been
        tailing the 9/11 hijackers.

        Cover-ups
        Then there's Sibel Edmonds, the courageous FBI whistleblower
        (Justacitizen.org). She translated wiretaps that she says revealed,
        among other illegalities, that Turks and highly placed Jewish American
        neo-conservatives were involved in such activities as illicit
        international weapons transfers. Mainstream media, not surprisingly,
        consider the Edmonds case too hot to handle.

        Similarly, most media have vastly underreported the story of Steve
        Rosen and Keith Weissman, former officers of the Lobby's American
        Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), who will be tried for
        espionage: passing classified documents to Israel.
        For over a year, the Boston Globe has reported on, and opposed, plans
        to break ground for an Armenian Heritage Park on the city's Rose
        Kennedy Greenway. I have repeatedly informed the Globe that Greenway
        Conservancy chairman Peter Meade, the park's main opponent and an
        outspokenly pro-Israeli Catholic, has a serious conflict of interest:
        he sits on the New England board of the genocide-denying ADL. The
        Globe has concealed that fact and, incredibly, continues to tell me
        that Meade's ADL background is not relevant.

        Yet even non-mainstream media are capable of suppressing unwelcome
        facts.

        Non-Mainstream Media
        Antiwar.com, whose chief political analyst is Justin Raimondo, may be
        the Lobby's most relentless and intelligent critic.

        Imagine my surprise, therefore, when an Antiwar editor recently
        rejected my tactful, well-documented letter on the Lobby's opposition
        to genocide affirmation. He repeatedly castigated me for using the
        term `Jewish lobby' rather than `Israel lobby.'

        Yet even leading Lobby member Yolanda Habif Johnston, whom my letter
        quoted, used that term: `The Jewish lobby has prevented the Armenian
        genocide resolution from passing.'

        Though I offered to revise my letter, the editor, who happens to be
        half Jewish, informed me that Antiwar.com `is run by Jews.' Though he
        quickly apologized for his `rant,' it's clear that even critics of the
        Lobby may balk at scrutinizing its genocide hypocrisy. Finally, we
        would be remiss if we did not also criticize those Christian
        organizations'including the so-called fundamentalists who have aligned
        themselves with the Lobby'that ignore the past and present fate of
        Christians on their ancestral lands in Turkey. But that's a subject
        for another time.

        The author is a freelance writer based in Massachusetts.
        General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

        Comment


        • #14
          Arax and Times part ways

          Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.
          "All truth passes through three stages:
          First, it is ridiculed;
          Second, it is violently opposed; and
          Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

          Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

          Comment


          • #15
            UPDATE 1. FROM EDITOR & PUBLISHER



            NEW YORK Los Angeles Times Managing Editor Doug Frantz has quit the paper, the newspaper announced today. In a short Web story, the paper revealed that Frantz, a former New York Times staffer, would leave July 6 after 20 months on the job.

            “I felt like I had done as much as I could in this job,” Frantz said in the story, which noted that he did not have another position lined up, “but he would like to return to being a reporter.”

            “My true love is reporting and writing,” he added in the report, which offered no explanation for his sudden departure. “This is a great newspaper filled with great people … I’m sure it will continue to pursue excellence in journalism. I’m sorry I won’t be around.”

            In the Times’ report, Editor James O’Shea described Frantz as “a solid leader, guiding the editorial department through some troubled and rugged days. He is an extraordinary journalist and a dedicated editor who cares deeply about the newspaper and the staff.”

            Frantz gained notice in recent months for a public dispute with former Times staffer Mark Arax over Frantz’s decision not to publish a story by Arax on Armenian genocide. Frantz, according to The Fresno (Calif.) Bee, reportedly had withheld the story after determining Arax had taken a position on the issue. Arax claimed discrimination and left the paper earlier this month after reaching an undisclosed settlement with the Times.
            General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

            Comment


            • #16
              Should we take bets on how soon before he accepts a lobbying position with the Livingston group?

              Comment


              • #17
                I'll say 6 weeks!
                "All truth passes through three stages:
                First, it is ridiculed;
                Second, it is violently opposed; and
                Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                Comment


                • #18
                  Genocide Controversy Leads L.A. Times Managing Editor To Resign

                  For Immediate Release ~ 2007-06-29
                  Contact: Haig Hovsepian ~ Tel: (818) 500-1918


                  Genocide Controversy Leads L.A. Times Managing Editor To Resign





                  Los Angeles, CA – After escalating criticism from the Armenian American community for his role in obstructing an article on the Armenian Genocide this April and his discriminatory behavior against Armenian American reporters, Los Angeles Times Managing Editor Douglas Frantz has resigned effective July 6th and will be returning to Istanbul, reported the Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region (ANCA-WR).

                  This past April Frantz “killed” a story on the Armenian Genocide that was written by Armenian American Los Angeles Times reporter Mark Arax. Frantz had erroneously accused Arax (who recently left the paper) of having a “conflict of interest” regarding reporting on the Armenian Genocide and had also circumvented the standard editorial process for reviewing articles. A subsequent internal investigation by the Times deemed Frantz’s accusations to be completely baseless.

                  This past April, the ANCA led a grassroots campaign to raise awareness regarding Frantz’s actions. Over 5,000 activists responded to an ANCA action alert and sent emails and letters calling for Frantz’s resignation. In addition, the ANCA-WR, California Courier Publisher Harut Sassounian and other community representatives met with the publisher and senior Los Angeles Times management on multiple occasions during the last several months to convey the community’s outrage regarding Frantz’s discriminatory actions.

                  “Doug Frantz’s resignation from the Los Angeles Times is an appropriate answer to his unprofessional behavior and anti-Armenian posture in the newsroom,” remarked ANCA-WR Board member Zanku Armenian. “The Los Angeles Times is a fine newspaper and deserves better than to have a genocide denier as a member of its senior staff. The fact that Frantz is returning to Istanbul tells the full story of where he stands.” he added.

                  Frantz’s activities and pro-Turkish positions have been monitored over the course of his many assignments at different newspapers and most recently in May when he moderated a panel in Istanbul that featured a well-known genocide denier. The Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region (ANCA-WR) worked with a coalition of individuals to bring to light the situation that had developed at the Los Angeles Times after Frantz more overtly revealed his anti-Armenian position with his actions against Mark Arax. Sassounian had highlighted the Frantz controversy in several columns that appeared in the California Courier and a host of other news websites. Sassounian was also instrumental in bringing to light Frantz’s involvement in the May conference held in Istanbul.

                  The Armenian National Committee of America is the largest and most influential Armenian American grassroots political organization. Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters throughout the United States and affiliated organizations around the world, the ANCA actively advances the concerns of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.


                  ###


                  Photo Caption: Former L.A. Times Managing Editor Douglas Frantz.
                  Attached Files
                  "All truth passes through three stages:
                  First, it is ridiculed;
                  Second, it is violently opposed; and
                  Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                  Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Gavur View Post
                    I'll say 6 weeks!
                    Sounds about right.
                    General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Looks like Franz is now at the Wall St. Journal...which in a way is very similar to working for the Turkish Gov't, JINSA, AIPAC, etc


                      L.A. Times managing editor is out following genocide denial scandal

                      * Douglas Frantz is heading to Istanbul

                      by Jenny Kiljian

                      LOS ANGELES -- The Los Angeles Times on Thursday announced that
                      Managing Editor Douglas Frantz had resigned his post effective July 6.
                      Mr. Frantz' resignation comes amidst intense scrutiny of his decision
                      in April to block a news story about the Armenian Genocide resolutions
                      in Congress by star reporter Mark Arax and replace it with a
                      different, controversial story.

                      "I felt like I had done as much as I could in this job," Mr. Frantz
                      told the Los Angeles Times. His next job will take him to Istanbul as
                      the Wall Street Journal's Middle East Bureau chief. He was Istanbul
                      Bureau chief for the New York Times and later an Istanbul-based
                      investigative reporter for the Los Angeles Times before taking on his
                      senior post in Los Angeles. "This is a great newspaper filled with
                      great people. I'm sure it will continue to pursue excellence in
                      journalism. I'm sorry I won't be around."

                      The publisher and editor of the Los Angeles Times did not
                      immediately return calls asking for comment.

                      * Mark Arax receives settlement

                      The Fresno Bee on June 19 reported that Mark Arax had left the Los
                      Angeles Times on June 16. Mr. Arax's attorney Warren Paboojian told
                      the Bee that Mr. Arax and the Times "reached a settlement to forestall
                      a lawsuit alleging defamation and discrimination." Mr. Arax has not
                      commented on the terms because of a confidentiality agreement.

                      The controversy started with a story Mr. Arax wrote in April about
                      the Armenian Genocide resolutions in Congress.

                      In memos leaked to the online political journal LAObserved.com, Mr.
                      Frantz said Mr. Arax, an Armenian-American, could no longer write
                      about the Armenian Genocide because he had taken a position on the
                      issue.

                      Mr. Arax and five other Los Angeles Times reporters -- Greg
                      Krikorian, Robin Abcarian, Ralph Vartabedian, Henry Weinstein, and
                      Chuck Philips -- had signed an internal memo reminding editors that
                      Times policy was to refer to the Armenian massacres in Turkey as
                      genocide, without qualifying it as "alleged."

                      Mr. Frantz claimed that he put a hold on the story "because of
                      concerns that the reporter had expressed personal views about the
                      topic in a public manner and therefore was not a disinterested party,
                      which is required by our ethics guidelines, and because the reporter
                      and an editor had gone outside the normal procedures for compiling and
                      editing articles. My actions were based solely on the journalistic
                      ethics and standards that we follow to ensure that readers of Times
                      news coverage are not affected by the personal views of our reporters
                      and editors," according to an email he sent to LAObserved.com.

                      In response, Mr. Arax sent an email to his colleagues at the Los
                      Angeles Times, which was also published on LAObserved.com, in which he
                      maintained, "What the six of us did wasn't a public display. We didn't
                      grab a bullhorn in one hand and a petition in the other and take to
                      the corner of First and Spring. What we did we did inside the paper as
                      loyal employees who care deeply about the Times. In no way should the
                      carrying out of this duty preclude us from writing about the Armenian
                      genocide now or in the future."

                      Mr. Arax further demanded a public apology from Mr. Frantz. No
                      apology was forthcoming.

                      Instead of Mr. Arax's article, the Times on April 21 published a
                      story by Rich Simon under the headline, "Armenian Genocide Resolution
                      Far from Certain." According to an editorial in the April 28 edition
                      of this newspaper, "the article simply provides a forum for opponents
                      of the resolution to explain why they believe it should not be
                      adopted."

                      Mr. Frantz's actions came as a surprise to the Armenian-American
                      community, since the Times has been a strong supporter and advocate of
                      the recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

                      Harut Sassounian, publisher of the Los Angeles-based California
                      Courier, broke the story in his syndicated column and called for the
                      managing editor's dismissal. Mr. Sassounian and Armenian community
                      leaders met with Los Angeles Times executives to work toward a
                      solution.

                      Mr. Sassounian told the Armenian Reporter he was "very pleased" that
                      Mr. Frantz had left the Times, "because he had made a serious error
                      and all the excuses he used for justifying his reasons for blocking
                      Mark Arax's article were proven to be baseless by an internal
                      investigation.

                      "The only excuse was that Douglas Frantz was a Turcophile and a
                      genocide denialist, and people like that should not be working in the
                      field of journalism -- let alone at the highest echelons of the Los
                      Angeles Times," Mr. Sassounian continued.

                      "I'm pleased that the story, which started with my column in the
                      California Courier, ended up with the broad support of the community
                      and various organizations, including the Armenian National Committee
                      of America and the Western Diocese of the United States, as well as
                      the thousands of people in the United States and abroad who sent
                      letters to the Los Angeles Times executives. This all came to the
                      positive result that we had demanded -- the dismissal of Douglas
                      Frantz.

                      "The Wall Street Journal announced today that Douglas Frantz would
                      be its bureau chief in Istanbul. This is the proper place for Douglas
                      Frantz -- both at the Wall Street Journal and Istanbul. First, because
                      the Wall Street Journal is, as I have said, more pro-Turkish than the
                      Turkish Daily News and, second, because Douglas Frantz is probably
                      more comfortable in Istanbul, where his heart and mind have always
                      been. I'm sure he feels more comfortable working in Istanbul than he
                      did in Los Angeles," Mr. Sassounian concluded.
                      General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X